In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

May 30, 2008 -

The lawyer for a 25-year-old New Zealand man who pleaded guilty to beating a police officer and stealing a patrol car has blamed his client's crime in part on playing Grand Theft Auto - and the judge apparently agreed.

As reported by the Dominion Post, attorney Cris Nicholls argued at the sentencing hearing for Tim Reid that his client's behavior was influenced by the game.

From the news account:

[Reid] committed violent offences and compulsively played Grand Theft Auto. Mr Nicholls said a video game that showed violence toward police was a public safety concern, with the game promoting the behaviour...

 

Wellington District Court judge Denys Barry jailed Reid for five years... He said Reid was hardwired for violence and anti-social behaviour and programmed by his recreational pursuits.

GP: Reid, according to the report, began smoking pot at age five. He had been physically and sexually abused while growing up, and continues to abuse drugs and alcohol. He has priors for assault and robbery. Moreover, he is a 25-year-old man, not an impressionable adolescent.

Yet a video game is to blame?


Comments

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

umm the defence has a tailor made claim of mental instability (as well i imagine as one hell of a sob story) and this is his defense are we sure jacky boy hasnt left the country?

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

it would be hard for Thompson to implicate GTA IV in this.  But if he does implicate it I will laugh so hard.

The Judge seems to be a fairly insane person to implicate GTA even though this guy has been smoking pot since five and getting abused often too.

 

 

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

No no Dennis his vast history of mistakes cannot have any value or fault.   That would imply that society is to blame and would require whoever sat in judgement of his mistakes to take responsibility.  Nope much much easier to blame it on games.

Hmmm for punishment I would suggest breaking his fingers so he is not capable of holding a gamepad.  That or lock him in a room with JBT for a weekend. 

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

I, for one, am having trouble seeing how this follows from the judge's perspective as a cause.  I could see it being an inspiration if say, the judge really believes this guy can't tell fantasy from reality, but if that's the case, the problem is that the guy is a PSYCHOTIC, not that he saw this in a game.  In that case, he needs to be locked away for the good of society and treated.  Of course, since we don't have the judge's reasoning here, that gets pretty speculative.

 

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

I just don't trust any country that doesn't have the decency to have the water swirl the correct way down the drain.


 

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

Send him back to Old Zealand.

That'll learn 'im.

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

I smell an agenda.  Hardwired?  Hardly.

 

GTA is a game about choice.  Real life is about making choices.

 

This assclown made some bad choices... at least they didn't let him off the hook entirely.

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

Yeah, GTA is about choice. Without (real) consequence. I think of GTA as a mirror to one's inner personality; people do what they do in GTA because they like it.

If the defendant played GTA and obssessivly beat up cops, then he was predisposed in that direction. But I can't help but think GTA DID reinforce his violent tendency. Of course, this doesn't mean he can blame his crime solely on GTA...

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

Seems kind of ironic that people say that "in GTA you can kill cops with no consequences".

It looks like thanks to the videogames-made-me-do-it defence, you can do it in real life now too.

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

@GP what does smoking pot at age 5 have to do with anything?

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

what does smoking pot at age 5 have to do with anything?

Just like how alcohol and cigarettes are no good for children, pot at too early an age, and in sufficient quantities, can muck with your mental development. As others have mentioned, pot in non-moderate quantities can heighten pre-existing susceptibility to schizophrenia and the like.

My question is, how do you teach a 5 year old to smoke, let alone smoke pot?

-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

I was in a bus station in London a year or so back, sat next to me was a typical chav family (teenage parents, fake gold coming out of there back side) with a two year old child. The mother was showing off the "clever little boy, init" by giving him a lighted cigarette and the kid taking a drag from it.

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

I imagine they mostly learn by watching.  Both my step-brothers started with cigarettes when they were about five years old.  They learned it by watching virtually every adult they'd ever known.  Well, that and a small amount of experimentation.

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

Well for one thing pot is a drug that exacerbating the effects of depression, psychosis, schizophrenia combinded with the fact that this person had terrible up bringing makes for a good argument that it actualy help creat this life for the man. So I do think that him smokeing pot at age 5 help and lead to many problems and is relivent.

 

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

Pot doesn't increase the effects of depression or schizophrenia, this is a common misconception, and honestly if my parents had smoked me up when i was 5 it might have made less nuts, I think my objection is that next to sexual and physical abuse the effects of marijuana become essentially nil. Sig figs, and whatnot.

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

Well, it doesn't really mean much by itself, but depending on the circumstances, it's a fairly good indication that things weren't going well for him even at that age.  It depends on where and how he was getting it really.  If, at five years old, he was nicking jewelry to trade to his dealer for pot, that's pretty messed up.  Even if he was just getting it from his parents because they thought it was fine for a five year-old to light up, that's a little dodgy.  But I reckon the sexual and physical abuse are far better signs of the sort of parents he had.

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

Smoking pot at an early age (5) is an indication fo a lack of parental supervision.  Chances are, this kid was either a latch-key baby, or he came from an unusually dysfunctional family.  Yes, if your parents give you pot at five, your family is dysfunctional. 

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

There are a lot of people who think smoking pot will destroy your life automatically despite the fact that a lot of successful intelligent people have done it/still do it. Doing at the age of 5 could really screw you up though, if you're not metnally prepared for it you can really freak yourself out, especially if you're alone when you're doing it.

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

Everyone knows that being physically and sexually abused, decades of drug and alcohol usage, and a history of violent crime have nothing to do with whether a 25-year-old man beats a policeman and steals his patrol car. It could *only* be that he was "programmed" as a result of GTAIV.

Are you sure it wasn't the judge who started smoking pot at age 5?

 

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

[sarcasm]Must have been the video games, I don't see any other traumatic experience that could have lead to this individuals criminal behavior.  [/sarcasm]

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

. But really.. this is kinda messed up.

EZK: I have declared war on the phrase "First Comment" all all variations of it. All will be replaced with a thumbs down. ;)

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

[sarcasm]Sweet, first reply![/sarcasm] Seriously, EZK, WTF? Did Dennis approve this?

I AM A LOST SOUL, CONDEMNED TO HAUNT THE DREAMS OF JOHN BRUCE "JACK" THOMPSON UNTIL HIS CRUSADE AGAINST VIDEO GAMES ENDS. SOMEONE, PLEASE! END MY SUFFERING!



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I AM DOOMED TO HAUNT JACK THOMPSON'S DREAMS UNTIL HIS CRUSADE AGAINST VIDEO GAMES ENDS.

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

I have taken the matter into my own hands. I just find the use of "First Comment" etc, to be very annoying. It is pointless. I will however leave any that are not the actual first comment in as they have punished themselves.

Other than replacing the "First Comment" I will be leaving the rest of the comment intact so that person will still be able to voice their opinion.

It has not been approved by Dennis, but he has not objected either. If he does object, I will stop.

E. Zachary Knight
www.editorialgames.com

 

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

Either way, consult Dennis before you do that again. Me gut says it could lead to a lot of trouble. And not jsut for you, but possibly Dennis. I don't honestly know, but better safe than sorry.

I AM A LOST SOUL, CONDEMNED TO HAUNT THE DREAMS OF JOHN BRUCE "JACK" THOMPSON UNTIL HIS CRUSADE AGAINST VIDEO GAMES ENDS. SOMEONE, PLEASE! END MY SUFFERING!



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I AM DOOMED TO HAUNT JACK THOMPSON'S DREAMS UNTIL HIS CRUSADE AGAINST VIDEO GAMES ENDS.

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

EZK: I have declared war on the phrase "First Comment" all all variations of it. All will be replaced with a thumbs down. ;)

Thank you.

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

"First comment lol."

Really!?!? We couldn't tell considering your comment was the first one under the article.  Did you get a prize? A button? A blue ribbon? A cookie...oh, you got nothing for claming to be first...sad face...

*On Topic*

Could the defendent have received clemency solely on the "video games made me do it" defense? The other trauma had to have played a part in the ruling...

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

If I were this guy i'd be so pissed that my lawyer couldn't think up something better than: vidjaygames made heem doos iet

Seriously....only 5 years with the videogame defense imagine how scotfree he could have been if he argued the whole"GP: Reid, according to the report, began smoking pot at age five. He had been physically and sexually abused while growing up" aspect of things

---Reno to Thompson "I'm only interested in virile men. That’s why I'm not attracted to you." This kids, is what we call a grammatical smack down

----Apparently our plan to just sit around and wait for all the stupid people to die isn't going so well

Re: In New Zealand: Another "GTA Made Me Do It" Case

Obviously our society is doomed. Think about it. We are now officially the GTA generation. Our youth? Yikes. GTA influenced society is scary only if we believe in the unreal. C'mon. Video games made me do it? Classic. I mean how many times has GTA been thrown under the bus but keeps on selling millions of copies. I think that my friends, sums it all up.

Buy Eee Buy Eee PC Buy A Netbook Buy Netbook Online

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MattsworknameWilson: how? Im still waiting for my upgrade notice07/29/2015 - 3:44am
Matthew WilsonI updated to a clean instill of windows 10.07/29/2015 - 2:36am
Mattsworknameargue that it's wrong, but then please admit it's wrong on ALL Fronts07/29/2015 - 2:06am
MattsworknameTechnoGeek: It's actually NOT, but it is a method used all across the specturm. See Rush limbaugh, MSNBC, Shawn hannity, etc etc, how many compagns have been brought up to try and shut them down by going after there advertisers. It's fine if you wanna07/29/2015 - 2:05am
Mattsworknamediscussed, while not what I liked and not the methods I wanted to see used, were , in a sense, the effort of thsoe game consuming masses to hold what they felt was supposed to be there press accountable for what many of them felt was Betrayal07/29/2015 - 2:03am
MattsworknameAs we say, the gamers are dead article set of a firestorm among the game consuming populace, who, ideally, were the intended audiance for sites like Kotaku, Polygon, Et all. As such, the turn about on them and the attacking of them, via the metods07/29/2015 - 2:03am
MattsworknameAndrew: Thats kind fo the issue at hand, Accountable is a matter of context. For a media group, it means accountable to its reader. to a goverment, to it's voters and tax payer, to a company, to it's share holders.07/29/2015 - 2:02am
Andrew EisenAnd again, you keep saying "accountable." What exactly does that mean? How is Gamasutra not accounting for the editorial it published?07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - I disagree with your 9:12 and 9:16 comment. There are myriad ways to address content you don't like. And they're far easier to execute in the online space.07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - Banning in the legal sense? Not that I'm aware but there have certainly been groups of gamers who have worked towards getting content they don't like removed.07/28/2015 - 11:45pm
DanJAlexander's editorial was and continues to be grossly misrepresented by her opponents. And if you don't like a site, you stop reading it - same as not watching a tv show. They get your first click, but not your second.07/28/2015 - 11:40pm
TechnogeekYes, because actively trying to convince advertisers to influence the editorial content of media is a perfectly acceptable thing to do, especially for a movement that's ostensibly about journalistic ethics.07/28/2015 - 11:02pm
Mattsworknameanother07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
Mattsworknameyou HAVE TO click on it. So they get the click revenue weather you like what it says or not. as such, the targeting of advertisers most likely seemed like a good course of action to those who wanted to hold those media groups accountable for one reason07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
MattsworknameBut, when you look at online media, it's completely different, with far more options, but far few ways to address issues that the consumers may have. In tv, you don't like what they show, you don't watch. But in order to see if you like something online07/28/2015 - 9:12pm
MattsworknameIn tv, and radio, ratings are how it works. your ratings determine how well you do and how much money you an charge.07/28/2015 - 9:02pm
Mattsworknameexpect to do so without someone wanting to hold you to task for it07/28/2015 - 9:00pm
MattsworknameMecha: I don't think anyone was asking for Editoral changes, what they wanted was to show those media groups that if they were gonna bash there own audiance, the audiance was not gonna take it sitting down. you can write what you want, but you can't07/28/2015 - 8:56pm
MattsworknameAndrew, Im asking as a practical question, Have gamers, as a group, ever asked for a game, or other item, to be banned. Im trying to see if theres any cases anyone else remembers cause I cant find or remember any.07/28/2015 - 8:55pm
Andrew EisenAs mentioned, Gamasutra isn't a gaming site, it's a game industry site. I don't feel it's changed its focus at all. Also, I don't get the sense that the majority of the people who took issue with that one opinion piece were regular readers anyway.07/28/2015 - 8:43pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician