"Voice of God" Use in Madden Promo Headed to Trial

"Voice of God" Use in Madden Promo Headed to Trial

June 9, 2008

If you're a football fan, you've surely heard the voice of the late John Facenda.

Facenda, a beloved Philadelphia newscaster from 1948-1973, gained national recognition for his voice-over work with NFL Films in the latter part of his career.

However, a lawsuit filed by Facenda's son alleges that the NFL allowed Electronic Arts to use the announcer's voice to promote Madden 2006 in violation of a contract Facenda signed before his death..

The case, which has been working its way through the federal court system since GamePolitics originally reported on it in 2006, now appears headed for trial. As detailed by the Associated Press on Friday:

A federal appeals court heard arguments Friday and strongly hinted that a jury should decide whether the 22-minute film was a commercial or a documentary , or perhaps, as one judge suggested, "a documercial."

 

Facenda's son is challenging the use of 13 seconds of his father's baritone voice on an NFL Network program about the making of the 2006 Madden game... The NFL, hoping to have the suit thrown out before trial, is appealing a lower-court ruling that allowed the suit to go forward.

 

The program aired on the NFL Network nine times in the days leading up to the August 2006 release of the popular Madden game. The game was not directly offered for sale during the program.

 From the complaint:

In or around August 2005, the NFL caused to be broadcast on its NFL Network a program devoted to publicizing and promoting the Madden 2006 football game... The broadcast of “The Making of Madden 2006” was coordinated with the marketing of the Madden 2006 videogame. The program was a blatant commercial for the product; in fact, the broadcast was coordinated to coincide with the release of the game...

GP: We should note that EA is not a defendant in the suit.

Comments

Re: "Voice of God" Use in Madden Promo Headed to Trial

Thats pretty damned shady, kind of reminds me of those movies & ads using dead celebrities to sell useless crap

Re: "Voice of God" Use in Madden Promo Headed to Trial

Not all use of dead celebritiesis shady.

http://www.giveafewbob.org/

Re: "Voice of God" Use in Madden Promo Headed to Trial

While it is good for the man to be remembered, well, I'm pretty sure I'd turn over in my grave if EA were usign words of mine long after I passed. EA already has a goddamn NFL game monopoly, they don't need anymore leeway

Re: "Voice of God" Use in Madden Promo Headed to Trial

2005... this is 2008... why wouldnt he file the lawsuit in 2005... when the commercial actually aired?  Sounds like just another guy who needs money and tries to sue the big companies for anything to get it.

Re: "Voice of God" Use in Madden Promo Headed to Trial

For the record, i dont agree with using the guy's voice, i'm just saying what the guy's true motive for suing probably is.

Re: "Voice of God" Use in Madden Promo Headed to Trial

I vote legal red tape.

GamePolitics originally reported on it in 2006...

Re: "Voice of God" Use in Madden Promo Headed to Trial

Ummm...  if you read the article you may notice that he did infact initiate this lawsuit in 2006...

-- mostly harmless

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 07/04/09 at 03:48am
Michael Chandra: I missed out on Jack? =(
Posted 07/04/09 at 01:52am
Escanor94: hmm, looks like when someone gets banned all their comments are automaticly deleted
Posted 07/03/09 at 11:46pm
Arcanagos: aww, did i miss the JT party? :(
Posted 07/03/09 at 11:00pm
Leet Gamer Jargon: Where's the recent JT bullcrap? Which comments section has he vomited on? EDIT: Nevermind; it's in the "Radio" thread.
Posted 07/03/09 at 09:17pm
BearDogg-X: I wonder what the Metropolitian Moron of Miami said in response to my comment saying that he got a dose of his medicine on the SGC09 Debate thread?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:51pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: He gets offended with a bunch of flowers.
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:49pm
GoodRobotUs: LOL He takes offence at the fact he might have *chosen* to be crazy?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:47pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: He warned me to get a lawyer after I called him "crazy by his own choice"... that´s libel for him
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:45pm
HilaryDuffGta: "libel" what did he threaten now?
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:44pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Was fun to be threatened for "libel" again.
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:26pm
HilaryDuffGta: hey so what did i miss??? the usual spam of "crap"
Posted 07/03/09 at 06:15pm
FlakAttack: Jack ruined his chance to have civil debates with us here. Glad you banned him (again).
Posted 07/03/09 at 04:04pm
Krono: Unexpected is probably the best word to describe it. Particularly as no decent reason is given.
Posted 07/03/09 at 03:59pm
GoodRobotUs: Just heard about that myself... kinda unexpected
Posted 07/03/09 at 03:58pm
Krono: Huh, apparently Sarah Palin is resigning.
Posted 07/03/09 at 03:34pm
GoodRobotUs: Sounds like he's been mainlining the Angel Dust again
Posted 07/03/09 at 01:50pm
ezbiker555: I'm back. Just in time too, my Jack Thompson sense were going wild
Posted 07/03/09 at 01:47pm
DarkSaber: You mean "playing with himself"? :-P
Posted 07/03/09 at 01:16pm
Matthew: Oh, Jack's back? I guess he got bored of playing single-player.
Posted 07/03/09 at 01:05pm
Andrew Eisen: I'm leaving most of his comments up but he'll be banned again shortly.
Login or register to post shouts