Aussie Game Developers & Publishers Unite to Demand Govt Tax Breaks

Aussie Game Developers & Publishers Unite to Demand Govt Tax Breaks

June 13, 2008

According to a report on Kotaku, the Game Developers Association of Australia (GDAA) and the Interactive Entertainment Association of Australia (IEAA) have banded together in an effort to lobby for government tax breaks.

Of the fight for incentives, GDAA president Tom Crago said:

Australian game developers cannot be expected to be internationally competitive when global market conditions are 'not level'. We owe it to the companies themselves to offer these incentives and we also need to make an investment into Australia's 'smart economy'.

IEAA CEO Ron Curry added:

Interactive entertainment is a huge, mainstream business and like our home grown film and television industry, it's vital that our local games developers are given the best chance to be competitive on the world stage.

 

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Re: Aussie Game Developers & Publishers Unite to Demand Govt

One can only hope that this leads to something other than another stonewalling.

Re: Aussie Game Developers & Publishers Unite to Demand Govt

They should just leave and go setup shop in Canada or something...  that'll learn 'em  ;)

-- mostly harmless

Re: Aussie Game Developers & Publishers Unite to Demand Govt

It's about time. Australia has been trying to position itself as a hub for movie making, games are a logical extension of that same desire. If they manage to get things together & actually get a bit of political weight, maybe they can also lobby for the OFLC to add the 18+ certification we really need. If nothing else they could whack the south australian attorney general in the head with a fish & explain that his objection to an 18+ rating is making the entire country look like immature morons.

Re: Aussie Game Developers & Publishers Unite to Demand Govt

Not going to be easy while the current Australian governmental attitude that adults never play computer games exists.

Re: Aussie Game Developers & Publishers Unite to Demand Govt

Well I'm actually related to the prime minister (very distantly, something like 6 generations), maybe I can have a word with him...

ECA IconA PUBLICATION OF THE ECA RSS IconSUBSCRIBE User LoginLOGIN / REGISTER

Crispy Gamer




       

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 03/19/10 at 01:50am
hayabusa75: Flamespeak: Shhh, the Dems might hear you ;)
Posted 03/18/10 at 09:41pm
ZippyDSMlee: And not taxing the 30-500K bracket so much, sure you make 500K at the end of the year add in life thats minus 200K add in the company you made there's another 200K.
Posted 03/18/10 at 09:39pm
ZippyDSMlee: Flamespeak: we should be taxing the ultra rich alot more(those that have more than 10 million in wealth),.
Posted 03/18/10 at 08:04pm
Flamespeak: I never understood why someone should work hard to get a lot of money, just to be punished with more taxes for doing so.
Posted 03/18/10 at 06:44pm
hayabusa75: Isn't the upper class supposed to be footing most of this bill?
Posted 03/18/10 at 06:05pm
Austin_Lewis: Of course, that ignores the fact that for the next 4 years, the people will be taxed without 'benefit' from the bill.
Posted 03/18/10 at 06:04pm
Austin_Lewis: If we go by the CBO's past estimation failures, they're about 300% short on the actual cost.
Posted 03/18/10 at 05:21pm
ZippyDSMlee: *punt*Roll call, whos on and how are you doing?
Posted 03/18/10 at 12:07pm
JDKJ: No, I did you the favor and said it for you.
Posted 03/18/10 at 12:06pm
Valdearg: What I said was while I may have implied long term accuraccy, and that might have been incorrect, my greater point that the CBO report calculated reduced deficits, expanded coverage, and lower costs is still 100% accurate. :D
Posted 03/18/10 at 12:06pm
Valdearg: Like any good politician, I don't believe I said "I was incorrect." :P
Posted 03/18/10 at 12:02pm
JDKJ: If you'd said "I was incorrect" 10 shouts ago, I'd have quit twisting your arm to get you see the obvious 10 shouts ago.
Posted 03/18/10 at 12:00pm
JDKJ: You were they one assuming 100% accuracy. In all caps, no less.
Posted 03/18/10 at 11:59am
Valdearg: Yes, my implication that the long term estimates were facts was incorrect, but the short term calculations are absolutely facts, and even the long term estimates are still useful in attempting to determine exactly what will happen with the bill.
Posted 03/18/10 at 11:58am
Valdearg: I do. The Short term costs are actually calculated facts. The long term estimates aren't necessarily 100% accurate, but to assume that they can't possibly be accurate because someone said they might not be 100% accurate is also wrong.
Posted 03/18/10 at 11:57am
JDKJ: When someone says, "I could be wrong but, as best as I can tell, X," X ain't a fact.
Posted 03/18/10 at 11:53am
JDKJ: It's too early in the morning for you to be deaf, blind, and dumb drunk. A "my best guestimate" can't be a fact. Don't you understand the difference between the two?
Posted 03/18/10 at 11:41am
Valdearg: By how much depends on variables that can't necessarily be predicted at this point in time. And yes, those Facts are accurate only so far into the future, but those estimates can certainly be used to support this measure.
Posted 03/18/10 at 11:40am
Valdearg: And I'm saying, as far as the CBO report goes, the facts that it does put forward are deficit reduction, reducing costs, and expanding costs. Those ARE facts.
Posted 03/18/10 at 11:30am
JDKJ: You were the one championing a qualified estimate as an indisputable fact. I'm merely pointing out that it's far from indisputable. So says the estimator.
Login or register to post shouts