Paper Mario Lawsuit Not Worth the Paper It's Written On

Paper Mario Lawsuit Not Worth the Paper It's Written On

June 26, 2008

On Tuesday GamePolitics broke the news that Morgan Creek Productions had filed suit against Nintendo on June 12th over the use of the Hans Zimmer song You're So Cool in a 2004 commercial for GameCube hit Paper Mario: The Thousand Year Door. The tune was part of the soundtrack of Morgan Creek's 1993 film True Romance.

As we also reported, the suit was voluntarily dismissed just six days later.

Now we know why: inept lawyering on the plaintiff's part.

Charlie Scibetta, Nintendo of America Corporate Affairs spokesperson, forwarded this statement to GamePolitics:

A lawsuit filed by Morgan Creek Productions, Inc. against Nintendo of America was recently dismissed.  The lawsuit alleged copyright infringement by Nintendo for its use of the song "You're So Cool" in a Nintendo GameCube television commercial produced by advertising agency Leo Burnett USA, Inc.  In response to the lawsuit, Leo Burnett provided Morgan Creek Productions with a copy of a music license entered into between Leo Burnett USA, on behalf of Nintendo of America and Morgan Creek, for licensing of the song.  The lawsuit was dismissed by Morgan Creek Productions the following day.
 

 

Posted in

Comments

Re: Paper Mario Lawsuit Not Worth the Paper It's Written On
Submitted by PHOENIXZERO - June 26, 2008 at 8:24 am -0500

I guess I should have went ahead and made the comment that this was an issue that should've been taken up with the ad agency that Nintendo used but I didn't bother. Inept indeed....

Re: Paper Mario Lawsuit Not Worth the Paper It's Written On
Submitted by Anonymous - June 26, 2008 at 8:30 am -0500

Maybe it's just my time here, but I have an abiding dislike for lawyers who sue first and check facts later....

Re: Paper Mario Lawsuit Not Worth the Paper It's Written On
Submitted by Austin_Lewis - June 26, 2008 at 8:44 am -0500

You're not referring to Jacko, are you?  He doesn't check facts later; he blatantly ignores and misrepresents them.

Re: Paper Mario Lawsuit Not Worth the Paper It's Written On
Submitted by Anonymous - June 26, 2008 at 8:46 am -0500

True, but he does check facts eventually, purely to see if there's any possible way of getting out of the hole he's dug himself into.

Fortunately, there usually isn't ;)

Re: Paper Mario Lawsuit Not Worth the Paper It's Written On
Submitted by Azhrarn - June 26, 2008 at 9:06 am -0500

So let me get this strait, they sued Nintendo for copyright infringement for a song used in a commercial, but didn't bother to check whether or not the song in question had been licensed to for instance an advertising company for use in a commercial?

That's not inept, that's downright stupid, especially considering the plaintifs themselves licensed the game to the ad company nintendo used for the commercial. They had it in their own records aswell, didn't they simply check to whom the song in question had been licensed and what it was going to be used for?

 

Re: Paper Mario Lawsuit Not Worth the Paper It's Written On
Submitted by Black Patriot - June 26, 2008 at 9:51 am -0500

Apparently not...

Re: Paper Mario Lawsuit Not Worth the Paper It's Written On
Submitted by Riff Raff 1138 - June 26, 2008 at 11:28 am -0500

This is kinda like when Universal sued Nintendo over Donkey Kong, claiming it infringed upon their copyright to King Kong... and lost, because it turned out King Kong was public domain.

And here's the great part, which I only just found out, after looking it up in Wikipedia: Universal themselves had previously won a suit against RKO Pictures for the rights to King Kong... by arguing that King Kong was public domain.

Re: Paper Mario Lawsuit Not Worth the Paper It's Written On
Submitted by Keith K - June 26, 2008 at 9:40 am -0500

I would have loved to see the look on both parties faces when this fact came to light. Oh that would be so classic.

Re: Paper Mario Lawsuit Not Worth the Paper It's Written On
Submitted by Mark - June 26, 2008 at 9:44 am -0500

That lawyer fails.

At everything.

 

Re: Paper Mario Lawsuit Not Worth the Paper It's Written On
Submitted by gameman9 - June 26, 2008 at 10:28 am -0500

EPIC FAIL

Re: Paper Mario Lawsuit Not Worth the Paper It's Written On
Submitted by Chadius - June 26, 2008 at 10:47 am -0500

It's amazing how eager people are to sue Nintendo these days. Sometimes justified, sometimes not. LOL

Re: Paper Mario Lawsuit Not Worth the Paper It's Written On
Submitted by Loudspeaker - June 26, 2008 at 10:49 am -0500

Wow this lawyer is destined to work for the RIAA.  "What do you mean they licensed the song?  BLASPHEMY!  Everyone is guilty of copyright infringement except the RIAA! *does another coke line*"

-Loudspeaker
"Volume helps to get a point across but sharp teeth are better."

Re: Paper Mario Lawsuit Not Worth the Paper It's Written On
Submitted by nighstalker160 - June 26, 2008 at 11:33 am -0500

This is right up there when Miramax (I think) tried to sue Nintendo for the creation of Donkey Kong.  Basically Nintendo argued that Donkey Kong was a direct representation of King Kong and that Miramax owned the rights to King Kong.

Nintendo was just a little start up in the U.S. at this point, basically 11 guys in an office.  Well one of them did some digging and they walking into court with a trial transcript from the 70s where Miramax had successfully argued that King Kong was, in fact, PUBLIC domain.

Re: Paper Mario Lawsuit Not Worth the Paper It's Written On
Submitted by Keith K - June 26, 2008 at 12:06 pm -0500

And no one ever heard of Miramax ever again until Kevin Smith gave them some Dick and Fart jokes.

Re: Paper Mario Lawsuit Not Worth the Paper It's Written On
Submitted by Grombar - June 26, 2008 at 1:11 pm -0500

"You used our song without permission."

"No, you gave us permission."

"...Oh. I'm...gonna go over here now..."

Re: Paper Mario Lawsuit Not Worth the Paper It's Written On
Submitted by Shih Tzu - June 26, 2008 at 1:38 pm -0500

You can still do it, Morgan Creek!  Don't let the haters get you down!  Don't let them confuse you with their fancy contracts and legalese!  Never give up!!!

Re: Paper Mario Lawsuit Not Worth the Paper It's Written On
Submitted by Anonymous - June 26, 2008 at 2:46 pm -0500

LOL, lawyers sure seem to have a habit of "sue first, ask important questions like 'before we go though all of this, should we check to see if they really did get & have the rights to this?' later."

Re: Paper Mario Lawsuit Not Worth the Paper It's Written On
Submitted by David D. - June 26, 2008 at 10:43 pm -0500

Maybe Grand Theft Auto made him do it?

Re: Paper Mario Lawsuit Not Worth the Paper It's Written On
Submitted by RobertHMayfire - June 27, 2008 at 2:13 am -0500

I remember a Sucide Girl getting sued by Nintendo for mentioning Nintendo on her site. The google watching lawyer on the Nintendo legal team leaped before he looked at the site. Nintendo quickly withdrew its suit and gave the girl a free Gamecube.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/22/09 at 09:45am
ZippyDSMlee: JD:I think doc phill is still sout about the break up with his wife he dose not fill holes as much as make them bigger these day
Posted 11/22/09 at 12:06am
JDKJ: You should get Phil McCraken to help you spackle those banisters.
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:57pm
ZippyDSMlee: Oh in the pirate hunter article I need my song ieda heckled DS,JD,Beemon sic im !!!
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:56pm
ZippyDSMlee: JD:no I am tried from prepping the banisters for painting , worked on them from 12 to 4 and 6 to 8...after I got back from the store...got up early got ready...blah...been up all day..I need a nap...
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:42pm
JDKJ: No. You gonna stay up late tonight soldering?
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:41pm
ZippyDSMlee: JDKJ:Don't you mean Mctite?
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:33pm
JDKJ: @Zip: Neil, Bob, and Lik McTaint. The McTaint brothers. LOL!!!
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:44pm
Flamespeak: I still think military personell, killing other military personell, on a military complex should be handled by military courts.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:43pm
Flamespeak: I could see this a mixture of the two charges rather than just one or the other.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:43pm
Flamespeak: I think this was mainly a person who snapped, but evidence is showing he definitely had strong inlinations to islamic-extremism.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:41pm
Flamespeak: People are trying to claim that Hasan's actions were not terrorism. I don't jump on the 'terror train' like others, however
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:38pm
mentor07825: Britain certainly does deserve it! And the French! God damn it, it was a hand ball!!!
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:34pm
ZippyDSMlee: mentor07825:Well Brittan dose deserve it....
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:33pm
ZippyDSMlee: Alyric:I don;t hasliburton having to pay back billoins... don;t you love it when the rich roll over the goverment without a care?
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:32pm
mentor07825: I say we nuke the whales, for the benefit of both mankind and the environment.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:28pm
Austin_Lewis: I say we try Al Gore too. I always said he was in on the racket.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:16pm
Alyric: The leaked information proves these organizations knowingly defrauded governments (i.e., taxpayers) out of billions of dollars. Yet there will probably never be a trial.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:15pm
Flamespeak: working on other things makes me angry. I might have had a jet pack by now. :p
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:14pm
Flamespeak: Just thinking of all the time and manpower wasted to try and make things emit less CO2 emmision that could have been spent
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:07pm
Alyric: @Zip: FYI, the construction of solar panels puts out more pollution than any form of energy production. To say nothing of the toxic components of the panels that cannot be recycled.
Login or register to post shouts