Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm Bombs

July 20, 2008 -

U.S. and British military forces are increasingly utilizing video game technology, according to Wired's Danger Room blog.

By way of example, arms manufacturer Raytheon displayed its Universal Control System for drone aircraft at an air show last week. Company exec Mark Bigham commented on the system, which employs video game-like controls:

Gaming companies have spent millions to develop user-friendly graphic interfaces, so why not put them to work on UAVs [unmanned aerial vehicles]? The video-game industry always will outspend the military on improving human-computer interaction.

In another application, the Wiimote is being used in place of traditional joypads to control the robots used to disarm roadside bombs in Iraq. Paul Marks writes in New Scientist:

The problem with the joypad is that it takes a lot of concentration and can monopolize the attention of the soldier using it… The Wiimote is far more intuitive because movements of the hand directly translate into movements of the robot.

Meanwhile, UK blogger Paul Mander noticed that a modified Xbox controller is being used to fly a drone in the British Army recruiting video at left.

Via: Hard OCP


Comments

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm ...

It makes perfect sense to try to employ a control interfacre that's easier to use than those complicated briefcases.

maxiview

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

I'm all for freedom of ttnet vitamin speech and allowing rent a car game makers to put whatever they want in games, but there's one thing about this app that has me scratching my head.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but from araç kiralama the previous article araba kiralama on this I gathered that players can use Google maps in-game to find the other (real-life?) dealers in their area.  If this is the case, has travesti anyone considered what's stopping someone from using this app to actually move drugs between hands for reals?

But majority araba kiralama of their outrage araç kiralama stems from what it could DO TO children, not the content itself.  Talk to one of these people and you'll find they don't think any books kiralık araba should be banned from children.  Mention American Psycho and they talk about kiralık araç the redeeming value of using imagination to construct a story.  Reading, no matter what the content, is largely viewed as a consequenceless activity for people of any age.  The reason why I mention American Psycho is because of the content itself.  Gaming never has and likely never will have any scenes where someone has sex with a severed head.  Not gonna happen.  Yet despite this, they'll fight tooth and nail to protect their children from two boys kissing in Bully but whatever they read is harmless... yeah.

The entire arguement is kiralık oto based upon a social normality inflicted by luddites who can't figure out the controls for Halo so it's frightening and terrifying and obviously the cause of youth violence on the rise even though, in reality, it's in decline (which is actually a HUGE suprise given minibüs kiralama the economies status).  In  a perfect world, we would have parents that actually parent.  The idea of sales restrictions on media on oto kiralama any form to accomidate parental unwillingness to get involved with their child's life is the real problem to me.  Here I am, 32 years old, and being held up at a self-scan rent a car needing to show ID before I can buy a $10 M rated game all because Soccer Momthra can't be bothered to look at the crap Billy Genericallystupidson does in his free time.  It's too hard for her, so I have to suffer?

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

I like this idea.

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

Using game controllers to pilot flying drones?

>.>

<.<

"Do a barrel roll Fox!"

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

PC gamers got that beat. Official secrets and military information is entered onto systems around the world every day using standard unmodified WASD controllers.

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

Well, you know, all the IMPORTANT people know that those little plastic button are leik TEH BEZT SIM-U-L8RZ EVAR!!!!

...meh, i got nothin'

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

"The problem with the joypad is that it takes a lot of concentration and can monopolize the attention of the soldier using it…"

Unless the solider is a gamer, which lets him use the control, eat, talk on the phone, sing and shout slurs at people all at the same time and still go 35-5 on CoD

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

I would prefer a keyboard and mouse

 

just saying...

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

now imagine if those drones had sensors that can send haptic feedback or motion sense to the controller

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

That would bring unmanned airiel dogfights straight to reality.

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

see, videogames do kill people

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

bombs are not people; disarming them actually does the opposite of killing people

岩「…Ace beats Jack」

岩「…I can see why Hasselbeck's worried about fake guns killing fake people. afterall, she's a fake journalist on a fake news channel」

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

yes but they may on the odd occasion use the drones to take out enemy soldiers. Some drones are equiped with a couple helfire missles to use in some occasions.

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

The hope is to use those as little as possible with as little collateral damage as possible.

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

Except that SWORDS and other projects are years of if they ever amount to anything.

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

I was more wondering why the militaries weren't already using game controllers in some capicity. Apparrently I was correct in thinking they should lol.

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

Well actually this makes sense.

The gaming industry spends millions upon millions on user-to-technology interfaces (controllers, keyboards, mice, wiimotes), so it doesn't come as a surprise when military organisations lends from the gaming industry in order to literally get more usable remote-control hardware for less taxpayer money.

As for the posters above mentioning the LaRouche guys and Thompson.. I doubt those douchebags can pull anything actually worthwhile out of this segment instead of the usual "games train to kill" jibberish that has been put down by REAL SCIENTIFIC WORK a couple billion times so far.

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

It makes perfect sense to try to employ a control interfacre that's easier to use than those complicated briefcases.

Now we jus wait for Thompson and the LaRouche-ites to descend upon here and the articel will be compelte [/sarcasm]

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

The cartoon eyes were good as well as the RRoD.

On a more serious note, it's not surprising. The Predator' control setup is effecively taken from MS Flight simulator.

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

I loved the above video "sarge, take a look at this!" *360 RRoD's*

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

Is this just a honeypot to trap jack thompson, possibly for scientific experiements into the connection between megalomania and paranoia?

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

Oh god... I have to work really hard to avoid making or even referencing a joke about... ah! Almost got me there.

Almost said waggle.

****.

 

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Craig R.Btw, the guy who swatted security expert Brian Krebs? He got picked up recently. It can be done.09/20/2014 - 8:55pm
Craig R.Such things are not done in a vacuum... hence why the 4chan and other logs show what fools you've all been, tricked into doing the trolls' work09/20/2014 - 8:49pm
Sleaker@Technogeek - How do you call someone out that anonymously calls in a SWAT team, or sends threats to people?09/20/2014 - 7:04pm
Technogeek"It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so." I'd say you're certainly obligated to call them out when you see it happening.09/20/2014 - 5:17pm
SleakerNow if you disagree with anything in my last 2 posts then we obviously have a difference in world view, and wont come to any sort of agreement. I'm fine with that, maybe some people aren't?09/20/2014 - 5:09pm
SleakerIt also doesn't mean that just because a news outlet says that Gamers are the problem and you self-identify as a Gamer, you're immediately the problem. It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so.09/20/2014 - 4:59pm
SleakerJust to re-iterate: People getting harassed is wrong. Just because someone is harassed by so called 'gamers' doesn't mean that all gamers are bad. nor does it mean that you need to pass laws or judgement on all gamers.09/20/2014 - 4:56pm
SleakerAnd furthermore just because someone doesn't 'crusade against the evil' that doesn't make them the problem. You can have discussion with those around you. There's a thing called sphere of influence.09/20/2014 - 4:54pm
Sleaker@Conster - one person getting harassed is a 'problem' only so far as the harassee's are doing it. Just because a select few people choose to act like this doesn't make it widespread. Nor does it immediately make everyone responsible to put an end to it.09/20/2014 - 4:54pm
james_fudgeno worries09/20/2014 - 4:15pm
TechnogeekI misread james' comment as "we can't have a debate without threatening" there at first. Actually wound up posting a shout about death threats and "kill yourself" not technically being the same thing before I realized.09/20/2014 - 3:59pm
james_fudgeDon't hit me *cowers behind Andrew*09/20/2014 - 3:20pm
ConsterYou take that back right now, james, or else. *shakes fist menacingly*09/20/2014 - 3:00pm
james_fudgeOur community is awesome. We can have a debate without threatening to kill each other.09/20/2014 - 2:50pm
Andrew EisenNo one's crossed a line but I just want to remind you all to keep discussions civil.09/20/2014 - 1:54pm
Craig R.tldr: I'm a gamer, and imo those who support GamerGate should feel free to take a flying leap off a cliff.09/20/2014 - 1:27pm
Craig R.Not only that, I'm pretty sure that if actual studies were done, you'd still deny them, Sleaker. After all, it's not what you'd want to hear to support your rose-colored view of GamerGate.09/20/2014 - 1:18pm
Craig R.There IS an issue. Nor do we need a study to show that if you deny it then you're part of the problem.09/20/2014 - 1:17pm
Sleakersimply oust people that do harass others.09/20/2014 - 11:34am
Sleaker@Conster - I can say the same thing if you think there's been more than a handful. Until there's an actual study on rates no one can claim to know how widespread the incidence of harassment is. Thus the best we can do is 'there might be an issue' and...09/20/2014 - 11:33am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician