Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm Bombs

July 20, 2008 -

U.S. and British military forces are increasingly utilizing video game technology, according to Wired's Danger Room blog.

By way of example, arms manufacturer Raytheon displayed its Universal Control System for drone aircraft at an air show last week. Company exec Mark Bigham commented on the system, which employs video game-like controls:

Gaming companies have spent millions to develop user-friendly graphic interfaces, so why not put them to work on UAVs [unmanned aerial vehicles]? The video-game industry always will outspend the military on improving human-computer interaction.

In another application, the Wiimote is being used in place of traditional joypads to control the robots used to disarm roadside bombs in Iraq. Paul Marks writes in New Scientist:

The problem with the joypad is that it takes a lot of concentration and can monopolize the attention of the soldier using it… The Wiimote is far more intuitive because movements of the hand directly translate into movements of the robot.

Meanwhile, UK blogger Paul Mander noticed that a modified Xbox controller is being used to fly a drone in the British Army recruiting video at left.

Via: Hard OCP


Comments

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm ...

It makes perfect sense to try to employ a control interfacre that's easier to use than those complicated briefcases.

maxiview

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

I'm all for freedom of ttnet vitamin speech and allowing rent a car game makers to put whatever they want in games, but there's one thing about this app that has me scratching my head.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but from araç kiralama the previous article araba kiralama on this I gathered that players can use Google maps in-game to find the other (real-life?) dealers in their area.  If this is the case, has travesti anyone considered what's stopping someone from using this app to actually move drugs between hands for reals?

But majority araba kiralama of their outrage araç kiralama stems from what it could DO TO children, not the content itself.  Talk to one of these people and you'll find they don't think any books kiralık araba should be banned from children.  Mention American Psycho and they talk about kiralık araç the redeeming value of using imagination to construct a story.  Reading, no matter what the content, is largely viewed as a consequenceless activity for people of any age.  The reason why I mention American Psycho is because of the content itself.  Gaming never has and likely never will have any scenes where someone has sex with a severed head.  Not gonna happen.  Yet despite this, they'll fight tooth and nail to protect their children from two boys kissing in Bully but whatever they read is harmless... yeah.

The entire arguement is kiralık oto based upon a social normality inflicted by luddites who can't figure out the controls for Halo so it's frightening and terrifying and obviously the cause of youth violence on the rise even though, in reality, it's in decline (which is actually a HUGE suprise given minibüs kiralama the economies status).  In  a perfect world, we would have parents that actually parent.  The idea of sales restrictions on media on oto kiralama any form to accomidate parental unwillingness to get involved with their child's life is the real problem to me.  Here I am, 32 years old, and being held up at a self-scan rent a car needing to show ID before I can buy a $10 M rated game all because Soccer Momthra can't be bothered to look at the crap Billy Genericallystupidson does in his free time.  It's too hard for her, so I have to suffer?

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

I like this idea.

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

Using game controllers to pilot flying drones?

>.>

<.<

"Do a barrel roll Fox!"

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

PC gamers got that beat. Official secrets and military information is entered onto systems around the world every day using standard unmodified WASD controllers.

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

Well, you know, all the IMPORTANT people know that those little plastic button are leik TEH BEZT SIM-U-L8RZ EVAR!!!!

...meh, i got nothin'

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

"The problem with the joypad is that it takes a lot of concentration and can monopolize the attention of the soldier using it…"

Unless the solider is a gamer, which lets him use the control, eat, talk on the phone, sing and shout slurs at people all at the same time and still go 35-5 on CoD

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

I would prefer a keyboard and mouse

 

just saying...

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

now imagine if those drones had sensors that can send haptic feedback or motion sense to the controller

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

That would bring unmanned airiel dogfights straight to reality.

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

see, videogames do kill people

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

bombs are not people; disarming them actually does the opposite of killing people

岩「…Ace beats Jack」

岩「…I can see why Hasselbeck's worried about fake guns killing fake people. afterall, she's a fake journalist on a fake news channel」

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

yes but they may on the odd occasion use the drones to take out enemy soldiers. Some drones are equiped with a couple helfire missles to use in some occasions.

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

The hope is to use those as little as possible with as little collateral damage as possible.

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

Except that SWORDS and other projects are years of if they ever amount to anything.

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

I was more wondering why the militaries weren't already using game controllers in some capicity. Apparrently I was correct in thinking they should lol.

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

Well actually this makes sense.

The gaming industry spends millions upon millions on user-to-technology interfaces (controllers, keyboards, mice, wiimotes), so it doesn't come as a surprise when military organisations lends from the gaming industry in order to literally get more usable remote-control hardware for less taxpayer money.

As for the posters above mentioning the LaRouche guys and Thompson.. I doubt those douchebags can pull anything actually worthwhile out of this segment instead of the usual "games train to kill" jibberish that has been put down by REAL SCIENTIFIC WORK a couple billion times so far.

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

It makes perfect sense to try to employ a control interfacre that's easier to use than those complicated briefcases.

Now we jus wait for Thompson and the LaRouche-ites to descend upon here and the articel will be compelte [/sarcasm]

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

The cartoon eyes were good as well as the RRoD.

On a more serious note, it's not surprising. The Predator' control setup is effecively taken from MS Flight simulator.

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

I loved the above video "sarge, take a look at this!" *360 RRoD's*

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

Is this just a honeypot to trap jack thompson, possibly for scientific experiements into the connection between megalomania and paranoia?

Re: Military Using Game Controllers to Pilot Drones, Disarm

Oh god... I have to work really hard to avoid making or even referencing a joke about... ah! Almost got me there.

Almost said waggle.

****.

 

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MechaTama31Ok, a very different topic.07/28/2015 - 8:13pm
MechaTama31On a slightly different topic, in about a month my fiance will be a Mrs., but I'll still be a Mr., as I've always been. Hardly seems fair. I want a nifty new title!07/28/2015 - 8:13pm
E. Zachary KnightMatt, So, what is it? Is petitioning Intel to pull ads from Gamasutra "bullying and threatening" or is it justified? You can't have it both ways, especially if petition Target is "bullying and threatening".07/28/2015 - 8:10pm
Andrew EisenWhat this comes across as is "we need to find a way to silence anyone who says something we don't like."07/28/2015 - 8:08pm
Andrew EisenAnd how was Gamasutra not accountable for the opinion piece it published and refused to pull or edit even after advertising had been pulled?07/28/2015 - 8:08pm
Andrew EisenThere are tons of options when it comes to an opinion piece you don't agree with. Stating otherwise is dishonest or shows an extraordinary lack of imagination.07/28/2015 - 8:07pm
Mattsworknamethem acounatble. We just didn't have many opttions at the time07/28/2015 - 8:05pm
MattsworknameEZK:I never said it was justified, I just said that some people felt they didn't have any other means to hold them accountable. Weather it's justifited or not is somethign to debate, but I was never a big fan of it cause I wanted some other way to hold07/28/2015 - 8:04pm
Mattsworknameprice07/28/2015 - 8:03pm
MattsworknameAndrew: Your not wrong andrew, but gamasutra , and others like it , were called to task by the audiance that felt they had turned there backs on them. True or not, in media, you have to know how to reach an audiance, and chosing not to, well, you pay a07/28/2015 - 8:03pm
Andrew EisenAt the end of the day, even when Intel pulled its advertising (albeit, temporarily), Gamasutra showed its journalistic integrity by not removing or editing the opinion piece.07/28/2015 - 8:00pm
Andrew EisenNot liking Gamasutra is fine. The audience is primarily industry folk and it's not a game-focused site so it's probably not targeting you anyway.07/28/2015 - 7:57pm
E. Zachary KnightMAtt, So, an online petition asking Target to stop selling GTAV is "bullying and threatening" but a petition and boycott of Intel to force them to stop advertising on Gamasutra is justified?07/28/2015 - 7:56pm
Andrew EisenTrue or not, what it came across as a bunch of people lashing out at a publication over an opinion piece.07/28/2015 - 7:56pm
MattsworknameTo be honest, I've never liked them, but mostly cause rather then being a game focused site, they felt to political for my taste07/28/2015 - 7:56pm
Andrew EisenAnd in the case of Gamasutra?07/28/2015 - 7:54pm
Mattsworknameour concerns about them were well founded.07/28/2015 - 7:50pm
MattsworknameDepends on who you ask, accountable fto it's audiance, accountablie for lies and half truths, accountible for disengenous statements, everyone had there own reasons for going after them. Although in the case of gawker, recent events seem to indicate that07/28/2015 - 7:50pm
Andrew EisenAccountable for... what, exactly?07/28/2015 - 7:48pm
MattsworknameI think the intent was to force some kind of accountabilty on them. Granted As I said ,i wasn't exactly big on the ideas of attacking advertisers but it's a common and well used tactic. Sadly, theres not many other ways of holding media sites acountable07/28/2015 - 7:47pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician