Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

July 29, 2008 -

By now most gamers have probably seen Fallout 3 screenshots depicting a nuke-ravaged Washington, D.C.

But if you were thinking that the game developers were making some type of political statement, think again.

MTV's Stephen Totilo spoke with Fallout 3 executive producer Todd Howard, who nixed the political angle:

No political statement intended, according to Howard... The timing of the release of “Fallout 3″ so close to a national election is “all a coincidence...” Development of the game started in 2004 without any sense of when it would come out... Howard maintains the game “has nothing to do with the current state of affairs.”

 

...Few games have been set in the area... His game’s Washington is full of ruined monuments and references to real-world D.C. museums, like the Air & Space, which manifests itself as a museum of unusual technology... “Fallout 3″ has the Washington Monument, the National Archives, the Capitol, and the Lincoln Memorial. As for the White House, Howard says, “We have it, and we don’t have it.” How else to describe the giant irradiated crater where 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue should be?

 


Comments

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

Beat everybody ten bucks that a Fox Noise pundit will pick up on this and accuse the video game industry of Far Left trechory by the election.

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

I remember someone on Huffington Post whining, when the trailer for I Am Legend came out, that she was sick of seeing devastated images of New York after 9/11.

My immediate response was that post-apocalyptic science fiction relies on showing famous landmarks in ruins -- and that the best-known landmarks in America are in New York and DC, which is precisely the reason those cities were targets on 9/11.

I would pay to see a movie or a game that showed Scottsdale, Arizona in ruins.  But I have a hunch I'm in a minority there.

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

The original Fallout series was awash with a subversive, left-leaning socio-political critical commentary.

 

That is all.

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

What are you -talking- about?

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

My only problem is that by setting the game in such a vast urban area, they are kind of stripping it of the whole "post-apocalyptic spaghetti western" feel that the other two games had. But I definitely never got the impression that Bethesda was trying to make some sort of political statement. However, I also don't remember the other two games going into such detail about why the war happened, and I certainly don't remember them having the vague relevence to real life current events.

Even so, I'm totally willing to except that they chose to place the game in DC simply because the city has made relatively few appearances in games. It's the same reason I didn't really think twice about RE4 taking place in Africa. I was too busy thinking "Hey, I haven't played that many games set in Africa, this should be cool!" People need to realize that, as a medium for storytelling, videogames have to take place somewhere, and it's not always an attempt to rattle the cages. Sometimes it's just because the developers wanted a cool backdrop.

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

Geez.  When did everybody get so touchy all of a sudden that now you can't show a famous city, building or monument being blown-up or in ruins without people questioning your intent?  I've seen hundreds of post-apocalyptic Sci-Fi movies made between the 1950's to the 1980's where you saw famous cities like New York and D.C. either destroyed or in ruins (Logan's Run and Beneath the Planet of the Apes just off the top of my head).  And nobody complained then.  We saw the White House and the Empire State Building get blown to smithereens in Independence Day and nobody complained then either.  Nobody as I recall questioned the filmmakers' poltical motivations then.  Japan got nuked TWICE and they've been making movies of giant monsters destroying Tokyo for years.  You don't hear them bitching and moaning.

This smacks of around the time just after 9/11 when everybody got into a tizzy about depictions of the World Trade Center on film and in video games.  Microsoft had to remove them from the edition of Flight Simulator at the time and Activision had to remove them from their Spider-Man game.  The box cover art from Red Alert 2 had to be changed as it showed New York under attack (although they left the missions involving the Pentagon and the WTC unchanged).  There was even some serious talk about removing the WTC from all movies that depeicted it, like it never existed.  (Incidentally, whatever I think about Steven Spielberg these days, I have to give him props for sticking to his guns when he said he wouldn't remove the WTC when A.I. was coming out on DVD) Thankfully cooler heads prevailed before the trend got out of hand.  Sensitivity is one thing, but when you get to the point of revisionist history, that's something else.

Still it's like ever since then whenever in important place is seen destroyed, now everybody has to question the motivations behind it.  I have to agree with Bethesda; just as with 9/11 the timing may be unfortunate,  but it was completely coincidental and there was no way they could have known the game would be finished and released when it is.  They shouldn't have to be questioned or taken to task for it, nor should they be made to feel they should change it or reschedule the release date out of "sensitivity." 

Give me a break.

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

 I thought this "sensitivity" bullshit ended when the Conservatives took over. Weren't the men supposed to start acting like real men just like Ann Coulter always says?

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

I'm sorry, why are trying to make this into a political statement?  Haven't they noticed that this is the 3RD Fallout game?

There are two other Fallout games(ignoring the crummy console ones when interplay was bleeding for money), the "the nuke distroyed world is now a wasteland" plot has been well established for quite some time, and it isn't surprising that Washington DC --the "head of the US"-- is among them.

Not surprising to me that people WANT TO make it into a political statement when it is NOT.  Yes the Whitehouse got nuked, but something like that is obviously a target with all the other countries out there.  Also there is the time frame, I think I remember it being in an alternative reality revolving around the time of WWII....

Another good point, how many movies, books, etc do the same thing?

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

 Yeah things diverge sometime after WW2, the nuclear war doesn't occur until toward the end of the 21st century if I'm remembering correctly. It really is odd to think that this would be somehow political, I mean a countries capital is going to be one of the first targets in a nuclear war thats just common sense.

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

whoops

 

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

Lack of Oil results in global war which ends in a show down between a new superpower(china) and an imperial USA...

Then we have a nuked crater where the white house used to be... yet the democratic congress still stands...

All this and it ships during presidential election...

oh yes no political statemtns there at all...

I mean, it doesn't even have anything to do with todays politics...

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

Building materials and distance. One nuke is enough for DC.

Most people in the congress don't have the ability to launch nukes.

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

There's no way it could be a political statement, I mean it IS our national capitol. If you were an enemy of the US and you wee going to suddenly nuke the hell out of the US wouldn't you hit the national capitol just on the off chance you take out most of the national leadership? Plus, the rest of the word of Fallout is an irradiated wasteland, doesn't this make since?

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

Remember the army base from Fallout 1? Nuked a whole bunch of times, like the enemy *really* wanted it gone.

-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

 

-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

I think it is just being practical. In the event of an apocalyptic situation, you think nobody is going to try and turn DC into glass? If not enemies or uneasy allies, then ourselves as we riot ourselves into oblivion. When the chips are down, all bets are off, and clashing metaphors WILL be mixed.

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

lol, I think you've missed the point of the term "turn into glass."  It's applied when people discuss nuking the Middle East because it's all sand.  That term has no meaning when applied to DC, which has very little sand.

But, your point is valid.  I'm sure DC is on the first wave target list of every potential nuclear adversary.

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

Common usage no longer restricts it to the Middle East.

Not to mention the fact that sand isn't required for glassing.

 

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

I believe the statement is:

"Nukes are bad, mmmkay?"

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

I thought it was "War never changes." That seemed to be the intro theme of both 1 & 2.

-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

Yup war is always bad.

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

The most recognizeable symbols of power in the US, if not the world, reduced to crumbling, radioactive ashes in crisp, shining 3-D, all due to the incompetence and stubborness of its leaders?

Of course it's not a political statement! :p

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

I think the main statement is that while the whole of the world is an irradiated wasteland, most of the monuments in our capital still stand strong, I mean its not like anyone would target our pentagon in a nuke exchange right?

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

 The vegas strip was also an irradiated wasteland. The whole of the US is. 

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

I know. I wasn't trying to be a smartass there.

Still, it's a rather ominous picture, so I see why they had to make the statement.

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

The most recognizeable symbols of power in the US, if not the world, reduced to crumbling, radioactive ashes in crisp, shining 3-D, all due to the incompetence and stubborness of its leaders?

Incompetence and stubborness? In Fallout, WWIII follows the Resource Wars, in which the EU strikes at the Middle East over high oil prices. Later on, after the ME oil supply runs out, China invades Alaska to gain access to the oil there.

Instead of the US being dependant on the rest of the world, the conflict begins because the rest of the world runs out, and demands access to US oil supplies.

-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

Re: Fallout 3 Devs Say Nuked D.C. Not a Political Statement

 I'm not too suprised, they had to get away from the southwest, they've been mining that area since Wasteland. IIRC, the BOHS tactical game used the midwest, so it was logical to go to the east coast. Given the important part the new world government played in Fallout 2 it makes even more sense to place it around DC.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenKrono - Many of the people pushing gender issues aren't nice people? I'm sure not everyone's a sweatheart but so far, everyone I've seen with such a critique had absolutely nothing to back them up.09/19/2014 - 10:46am
InfophileI think there's a qualitative difference between a site and a hashtag though. GP can ban anyone from commenting, so they can have the image they want. But anyone can use any hashtag and try to poison it. Granted, that hasn't happened to the other one yet09/19/2014 - 10:13am
E. Zachary KnightKrono, your comparison to GP does not work. We do not need to get rid of GP, because no one associates GP with trolls and abuse. The same can't be said for gamergate.09/19/2014 - 10:09am
Krono@Michael You don't remember the "other hashtag" because no one actually uses it. We're talking 836,983 uses of #gamergate over it's lifetime, and 8,119 for the "alternative". 47,129 uses on the 18th vs 41. With #notyourshield at 140,133 uses & 5,209 uses09/19/2014 - 9:48am
Kronoresearch it. Changing tags to get away from trolls would be like wiping GamePolitics and restarting under a new name to get away from people calling Jack Thompson a filthy names in the comments section.09/19/2014 - 9:35am
Sleaker@quiknkold - seems like all that page is is a bunch of random developer opinions and rumors that we're supposedto do what with?09/19/2014 - 9:31am
Kronoas an opportunity to push back against them. It's one of the things muddling the issue. @conster A new hashtag would do nothing to improve anything. Trolls will simply follow to the new hashtag, and it will confuse the issue for anyone attempting to09/19/2014 - 9:25am
Krono@Andrew aaah. Yes, I'm sure there's some of that. Part of the problem is many of the people pushing gender issues are not very nice people. Basically the latest incarnation of moralists we've seen in the past couple decades. Naturually some will take this09/19/2014 - 9:23am
quiknkoldhttp://www.nichegamer.net/2014/09/real-gamedevs-sound-off-regarding-the-gamergate-controversy/09/19/2014 - 8:35am
MaskedPixelanteMeanwhile, in news that actually DOES matter, Scotland voted "NO" to Scottish independance.09/19/2014 - 8:20am
ConsterSeriously? "We shouldn't make a new hashtag - it's better to associate ourselves with psychos than to decrease our visibility"?09/19/2014 - 7:54am
Michael ChandraI forget what it is exactly, but there already is another hashtag that some use, exactly to separate themselves from the abusive behaviour. So don't bother lying to me.09/19/2014 - 7:06am
quiknkold2 to 3 or more09/19/2014 - 6:53am
quiknkoldMichael Chandra : I'll say this. The only reason they havent used another hashtag is because it would look like a form of dividing the arguement. Using another Hashtag has come up, and they feel like if they made a new hashtag, it'll split the debate from09/19/2014 - 6:53am
Michael ChandraYou want a debate? Build a wall between you and the poisoned well. Make clear you despise it, despise the behaviour. Then get into the other issues you are troubled with, and don't say a single word again about the poisoned well.09/19/2014 - 3:46am
Michael ChandraAnd someone claiming #notyourshield was to be taken serious, when chatlogs show they wanted it going to hide even more harassment behind? Yeah, not buying a word you're saying. You poisoned your own well.09/19/2014 - 3:45am
Michael Chandraallegedly fired over giving a game a mediocre review and the company threatened to pull ads? Sorry but I ain't buying this.09/19/2014 - 3:45am
Michael ChandraBut people arguing this is horrible and just about ethics, even though there's very little support that journalistic integrity was actually violated here, while they never spoke up when a journalist was09/19/2014 - 3:43am
Michael ChandraIf people start with condemning the way GamersGate was used as a misdirection, then use a better hashtag, that would work in convincing me they mean it.09/19/2014 - 3:43am
Andrew EisenOoo, this one came down to the wire! https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/749082525/nefarious09/19/2014 - 1:03am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician