Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why to GP Reader

July 31, 2008 -

As GamePolitics reported last month, Sen. Thomas Duane (D) was the lone member of the New York State Senate to vote against a video game bill that was eventually signed into law by Gov. David Paterson. The measure, sponsored by Sen. Andrew Lanza (R) was approved by a 61-1 margin in the New York Senate.

An enterprising GP reader who happens to be a New York resident (and who wishes to remain nameless) wrote to the State Senator regarding his stance on the legislation:

Dear Sen. Duane

 

...I would like to congratulate you on your lone opposition vote on the above referenced bill... As informed citizens are aware, this law addresses none of the issues associated with video games, redundantly mandates provisions that are already in place such as per product industry ratings and console parental controls, establishes yet another toothless advisory committee, and likely constitutes a violation of the First Amendment...
 
I welcome government efforts in the form of education for parents, but do not welcome intrusive government efforts to usurp parents' role as arbiter of their children's exposure to mass media.
 
Sen. Duane's Chief of Staff, Laura Morrison, wrote back:
 
Dear Mr. [GP reader]:

 

...Senator Duane shares many of your concerns about S.6401-A.  He recognizes that there is already an effective, voluntary [ESRB] rating system in place... and that parental controls are available on all current video game consoles.  Parents should determine which games their children have access to and the marketplace should decide which games sell and which do not.  

 

Like you, Senator Duane questions this bill's constitutionality and points to the fact that similar bills have been struck down in other jurisdictions.  He regrets that he was the lone voice in dissent on this matter.

GP: It's great to see gamers involving themselves in the political process and even better to see an elected official who writes back with something more than a form letter.


Comments

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

Personally, I can't blame the GP reader for wishing to remain anonymous. I understand why they would want to. I figure game-bashers like Jack Thompson will start bashing him/her for "allowing makers of violent and/or pornographic material to distribute their products to minors," or some random bullshit like that.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I AM CONDEMNED TO HAUNT THE DREAMS OF JACK THOMPSON UNTIL HIS CRUSADE AGAINST VIDEO GAMES ENDS.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I AM DOOMED TO HAUNT JACK THOMPSON'S DREAMS UNTIL HIS CRUSADE AGAINST VIDEO GAMES ENDS.

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

I hadn't actually thought of that, but now that you mention it, that's a damn good reason to leave my name out of it.

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

A Democrat NOT voting in favor of government intervention?!Say it ain't so!

Just joking,but this is very weird,nonetheless.

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

Being level headed and logical will probably single-handedly destroy sen duane's political carrier.

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

You say that like it's a BAD thing!

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

Man, he'd get my vote for sure. Kudos to him

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

WOW...

 

...instead of a form letter, he got an informed letter.

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

Man that was bad.

E. Zachary Knight
http://www.editorialgames.com
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
MySpace Page: http://www.myspace.com/okceca
Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1325674091

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

               the marketplace should decide which games sell and which do not

What kind of crazy talk is that?!!??!

</sarcasm>

 

 

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

More logic in polotics? WTF is this world coming to? :P

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

If that letter was hand written, and he referred to himself throughout as Senator Duane then he deserve to make president.

 

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

"Sen. Duane's Chief of Staff, Laura Morrison, wrote back:"

 

 

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

Must have missed that somehow....

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

I am reminded of an old countpoint for the "Majority wins!" argument back in my college days:

"And who was it that yelled 'Crucify him!' to Pilate?" An angry mob. Majority wins indeed.

Good to see that people like Duane are getting elected. A shame that voices of reason like his are getting muffled out by the clattering of the bandwagon.

 

 

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will Target Australia sell the next GTA game upon its release?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MattsworknameAndrew: Im not sure Im the one to be explainging this really, Im not sure im articulating it right07/31/2015 - 9:20pm
Big PermI got to around 30 in tera before giving up. I liked my sorc, but I need better motivation to grind07/31/2015 - 9:14pm
Andrew EisenAh TERA. I made a video about TERA censorship. One of my more popular ones. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO26h9etTbw07/31/2015 - 8:52pm
Goth_SkunkI've been playing TERA all day. Just took a break to barbecue some chicken. :3 And Andrew: I'm using Cabal to suggest a group of people secretly united in some private views or interests within a community.07/31/2015 - 8:50pm
Andrew EisenI'd love to but I'm at work. But once I get home... I'm going to work out for a while. But after THAT... I'm going to shower. Then eat. Then prep tomorrow's meals. And THEN play video games! YEAH!!!07/31/2015 - 8:38pm
Big Permlol, ya'll are still going back and forth? Take a break and play some video games07/31/2015 - 8:37pm
Andrew EisenGoth - Are you using "cabal" to describe a group of writers or to suggest they all worked together in secret to publish those articles?07/31/2015 - 8:30pm
Andrew EisenMatt - That doesn't disprove the general premise of the various articles as that's not what they're about. Unless, again, he's talking about a different batch of articles.07/31/2015 - 8:28pm
Goth_SkunkThe difference between one voice being offensive and a cabal being offensive.07/31/2015 - 8:22pm
MechaCrashFunny how "you're offended, so what" flips into "we're offended, retract everything and apologize."07/31/2015 - 8:18pm
MattsworknameIts not the only argument he points out ,its just one of them07/31/2015 - 8:06pm
Mattsworknameidea that Gamers as the articel puts it, the "White male sterotype are dead, essentially was compltely false07/31/2015 - 8:03pm
MattsworknameThe video actually shows that the shaw study actually disproves the Premise of the artices by showing that the "Gamer" dentity, has no actual meaning to thsoe who use it other then "I play games", its not connected to race, gender, or orientation. So the07/31/2015 - 8:01pm
Andrew EisenWith the exception of a brief mention in Golding's Tumbr post. Even so, he's talking about gamer identity, not desire for diversity in gaming.07/31/2015 - 7:50pm
Andrew EisenI'm not calling his examination of the Shaw study into question. I haven't read the study nor seen his video. All I'm saying is that it has nothing to do with the Gamers Are Dead articles I've been referencing for the last year.07/31/2015 - 7:49pm
MattsworknameSome times sargon just goes off on tangents but in this case he was pretty direct and went through teh research in detail, did the whole first video about the shaw study itself07/31/2015 - 7:45pm
Andrew EisenWell, unless it's disingenuous twaddle but I like to give people the benefit of the doubt.07/31/2015 - 7:42pm
Andrew EisenGotta be. The argument you describe makes no sense otherwise.07/31/2015 - 7:40pm
MattsworknameThat is a possibility, they looked like offical articles but its possible they are different from the articles you mentoin07/31/2015 - 7:28pm
Andrew EisenNot unless he's referring to a completely different set of Gamers Are Dead articles.07/31/2015 - 7:19pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician