Burn Center Game Trains Docs for Mass Casualty Events

September 4, 2008 -

The Orlando Sentinel reports on the development of Burn Center by 360Ed, a local startup. The training game is designed to teach medical professionals who are not burn experts to deal with mass casualties from an event such as an explosion

The Sentinel notes that 360Ed partnered with the University of Florida College of Medicine and the Florida Department of Health on the project. 360Ed CEO Ben Noel, formerly of Electronic Arts:

September 11 awakened us to the fact that we have to prepare for these mass-casualty type of events, and the best way to prepare is modern technology, simulation and games. Instead of simulating it in a field experience, which can be very expensive, we are simulating it on a computer, which can be played over and over...

 

They said, 'If we give you a playbook, can you make like a Madden football for mass-casualty emergency response?' I said, 'Yeah, we aren't creating any new technology here; we'd just be taking content to places it hasn't been before.'

As the game begins, players are told that bombs have just exploded at a theme park:

The first phase is a race against time in which the player has to quickly assess and triage 40 victims. The second phase takes place in the intensive-care unit, where players make treatment decisions during a simulated 36-hour period. To get training certification from the American Burn Association, players must reach a certain score.

 

Burn Center isn't for the faint of heart. The game features screaming people, many of whom have gruesome burns and are covered in blood. In fact, some of the 360Ed team had a hard time looking at the real photos provided by UF to ensure the graphics in the game were realistic.

 


Comments

Re: Burn Center Game Trains Docs for Mass Casualty Events

I looked to see if there was a way to get a copy of this (short of finding an e-mail address to ask.. their site is a little.. bare) with no luck. I want to see what they did for their work. Not from a poke and scream kind of thing but from a "Wow this is what they really do? I'm learning.." type thing. I hear about these cool simulations but there is never any information for someone like me to have access to them. Bleh.

---- There is a limit for both politicians against video games, and video games against politicians. http://www.goteamretard.com

Re: Burn Center Game Trains Docs for Mass Casualty Events

I agree. Video-games can never be used as pure training. As a suplement? It would work beautifully. It could assist alongside from future doctor's training, to be better deal with the potential of these horrible kinds of things.

Help yes, replacement of regular training...I hope not.

"Nurse, the X-button is suppose to start the triage right?"

"...Doctor...don't tell me, you've never..."

"Where is that controller! R2 for scalpel!"

Re: Burn Center Game Trains Docs for Mass Casualty Events

While I feel it wouldn't be as effective as actual training, it should help. I probably would have read too much into this before the study linking video games to better surgeons, but now I think the idea has realistic potential.

Re: Burn Center Game Trains Docs for Mass Casualty Events

I kinda want to play it...

Re: Burn Center Game Trains Docs for Mass Casualty Events

Poke the patient and make 'em scream!

Re: Burn Center Game Trains Docs for Mass Casualty Events

What rating do you think this game will gt if rated by the ESRB? I would imagine it would be "M" because it apparently is pretty graphic. As a guy that has Triage training, I rather want to see how this game actually works so I hope it will be readily available. (But I would'nt hold my breath)

But if it was....would the soccer moms of the world demand that the game be censored or banned because it is "too graphic and violent?"

Re: Burn Center Game Trains Docs for Mass Casualty Events

It doesn't say what platform its for, though I assume since the company is named 360Ed that it will be for the 360... unless Microsoft violates its own policies, the game will be required to be rated by the ESRB.  Content not run by those nazis isn't allowed. 

 

I imagine since it is a "serious game" and will likely have limited distribution (heaven forbid people learn to handle emergencies by themselves) the ESRB might give them a break and let them have an M so that it will be allowed on the console.  Normally any game with even a bare whiff of realism gets rated AO and banned.  Yes, BANNED.  Microsoft, like Sony and Nintendo, have both sworn that their consoles will never boot an AO rated game.  And making a game that could boot without them approving it would violate the DMCA and land you in prison, so it is an airtight ban. 

 

Soccer moms don't matter any more.  Gamers were dumb enough to allow the ESRB to take over the world of videogames out of a petty fear that government would start regulating videogames (which it obviously would NEVER be allowed to do) so now they have all the power.  They're psychotically ultraconservative and they will only get more so.  They will continue to make their standards stricter and more secret as time goes by in order to justify their own existence.  If you dream of a future where videogames make important artistic statements, or sweep you away with powerful, disturbing, or uplifting imagery informing you of the human condition and the things that every other form of art can do... forget it.  Gamers fucked themselves entirely.  The ESRB will never allow it.  In the mind of the ESRB, people aren't full of blood, they don't have bones that can snap, they never fight, they don't have nipples, penises, vaginas, or a sexual nature that starts in utero and ends only with death.  Any game that conflicts with that view will be rated harshly, and any that tries to make people give thought about these subjects will be banned by them. 

Re: Burn Center Game Trains Docs for Mass Casualty Events

At the same time, I'm always interested in seeing how newer, powerful simulation techniques can greatly benefit in training and education for everyone from emergency responders to elementary school students. It's still largely a positive development to have these tools...even seven years later, heh.

Re: Burn Center Game Trains Docs for Mass Casualty Events

 Not to disparage anyone because I do think that stuff like this is very imprtant, but using the phrase "September 11 awakened us to..." is sort of silly now.  I mean, if it really was 9/11 that begat this idea then these guys dropped the ball somewhere in the past 7 years.  

Unless Burn Center is the Duke Nuke'em 4 Ever of the serious games movement, of course.

Re: Burn Center Game Trains Docs for Mass Casualty Events

You do realize that not everything can find funding quickly, even in the wake of a national disaster right? Especially considering the company was only founded in 2006.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MattsworknameEZK: You can treat it as bullying or what not, As I've pointed out, I didn't like either practice, I made that clear. But I do hold some different between trying to pull a product from the shelves, and calling out a media outlet that you feel has acted07/28/2015 - 8:35pm
E. Zachary KnightMatt, So you feel confident enough to make the call that petitioning target to remove GTAV is "bullying and threatening" but not confident enough to make the call on Intel/Gamasutra. Finding it hard to take your gripes seriously.07/28/2015 - 8:27pm
Andrew EisenAs for gamers holding media sites accountable? If you mean, how to respond to opinion pieces you disagree with, yes, there are tons of more appropriate means.07/28/2015 - 8:27pm
Andrew EisenAgain, no one likes being lumped in with the bad apples. Gamers or feminists so lets all strive not to do that, yes? Could the petitioners gone about it a better way? Yes, it could have been more factual in its petition, for starters.07/28/2015 - 8:25pm
Mattsworknamefor gamers to hold the media sites they had issues with accountable? If we look at those questions, I think we find the answer to the first one07/28/2015 - 8:20pm
MattsworknameEZK: I can't answer that, Im split on it cause I feel both are wrong ,but at the same time, I don't know if theres other ways to go about those seperate con.cerns. Was there a better way for feminists to make there point about GTA? was there a better way07/28/2015 - 8:20pm
MechaTama31Ok, a very different topic.07/28/2015 - 8:13pm
MechaTama31On a slightly different topic, in about a month my fiance will be a Mrs., but I'll still be a Mr., as I've always been. Hardly seems fair. I want a nifty new title!07/28/2015 - 8:13pm
E. Zachary KnightMatt, So, what is it? Is petitioning Intel to pull ads from Gamasutra "bullying and threatening" or is it justified? You can't have it both ways, especially if petition Target is "bullying and threatening".07/28/2015 - 8:10pm
Andrew EisenWhat this comes across as is "we need to find a way to silence anyone who says something we don't like."07/28/2015 - 8:08pm
Andrew EisenAnd how was Gamasutra not accountable for the opinion piece it published and refused to pull or edit even after advertising had been pulled?07/28/2015 - 8:08pm
Andrew EisenThere are tons of options when it comes to an opinion piece you don't agree with. Stating otherwise is dishonest or shows an extraordinary lack of imagination.07/28/2015 - 8:07pm
Mattsworknamethem acounatble. We just didn't have many opttions at the time07/28/2015 - 8:05pm
MattsworknameEZK:I never said it was justified, I just said that some people felt they didn't have any other means to hold them accountable. Weather it's justifited or not is somethign to debate, but I was never a big fan of it cause I wanted some other way to hold07/28/2015 - 8:04pm
Mattsworknameprice07/28/2015 - 8:03pm
MattsworknameAndrew: Your not wrong andrew, but gamasutra , and others like it , were called to task by the audiance that felt they had turned there backs on them. True or not, in media, you have to know how to reach an audiance, and chosing not to, well, you pay a07/28/2015 - 8:03pm
Andrew EisenAt the end of the day, even when Intel pulled its advertising (albeit, temporarily), Gamasutra showed its journalistic integrity by not removing or editing the opinion piece.07/28/2015 - 8:00pm
Andrew EisenNot liking Gamasutra is fine. The audience is primarily industry folk and it's not a game-focused site so it's probably not targeting you anyway.07/28/2015 - 7:57pm
E. Zachary KnightMAtt, So, an online petition asking Target to stop selling GTAV is "bullying and threatening" but a petition and boycott of Intel to force them to stop advertising on Gamasutra is justified?07/28/2015 - 7:56pm
Andrew EisenTrue or not, what it came across as a bunch of people lashing out at a publication over an opinion piece.07/28/2015 - 7:56pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician