Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

September 13, 2008 -

A new ad from the Obama campaign employs a virtual roulette interface in an effort to paint John McCain as a politics-as-usual, Beltway insider...


Comments

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

Good point.  :)

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

Really how adept is one nowadays if he/she does not have the competent ability to check email? I guarantee McCain is the last presidential nominee ever to have that incapability.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

It's not exactly a necessity at running the government though, unless we replaced all forms of communication from the postal system to telephones with e-mail. Now, if McCain started taking political action against e-mailing, I could see a point, but otherwise that was a poor ad even for Obama's people.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

 I think the point is, How competent can you be if you can't even figure out how to use a computer in a day and age where the world is practically run by computers. Not something i jump on board with, but i think that's the point some people make when they bring that up.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

Probably with time anyone can learn to use a computer but lets think about this.  What time will he need to be on a computer?


Frankly I would rather have the most competent person running the white house retardless of whether one can use a computer or not.

 

 

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

You've obviously never tried to teach your parents how to use a computer.  My dad is 15 years younger than McCain, and I found it a blessing I was able to get him to check his email on his own after teaching him how to do it for 2 weeks.  Face it, computers and the know-how to use them just aren't something the generation that runs things were built for, especially if they didn't have jobs that required them to adapt and use computers (like being a politician).  I honestly can't fault McCain for not knowing how to use a computer.  Sure, that fact turns me off from him slightly, but not enough to say "this candidate is useless."

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

I've criticized GP in the past for all of the anti-McCain/Palin stories that had little to no link to gaming. They just seemed like excuses for GP to bash those candidates. This one also seems to be pretty unrelated to gaming. Is GP trying to even the score? Or do they want more peeps to see this ad? Who knows. Frankly GP ought to just stay away from this kind of stuff. It may be politics, but it isn't GAME politics.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

Teh gambling is wrong, dawg!  Vote for my McCain you bitches!

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

Hi, I'm a socialist.  Vote for me.  I'm Obama.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

At least McCain actually votes one way or another on issues, instead of simply "Present"
 

It was an okay ad. A smear ad of course, something that McCain is trying to steer away from, but that's what Democrats are best at, smearing. I actually didn't find any of the facts on the ad to be any real reasons for me to not vote for McCain over Obama. Both candidates suck. But I'd rather a bit more of a moderate same than just "change" for the sake of "change" that is leaning towards socialism.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

Thank you CHADA!! 

Here's the problem with this add.  Obama, in the US and IL State Senate voted present numerous amounts of times.  The man rarely voted on anything because he didn't care...and mostly waited to see how the Lobbyists wanted him to vote. The mans mentor or as I call him, the scum of the earth, was Emil Jones.  I do have an interesting story that came from a family member who was in the IL Senate while Obama served.

There was a Nursing Home lobby bill going through the Senate, and at the time needed votes to be passed to start new Nursing Home Legislation, an elderly woman approached the podeum to give her speech, part way thorugh this is what she got from Barack "I believe in Hope and Change" Obama, and I quote:

"Shut up, I don't want to hear it, I'll vote the way the lobbyists want me too."

Really?  Well then we aren't going to see much change if he becomes president are we?  The man then tried to have said family member and a group of about 10 forcibly removed from the Senate floor, thanks to a friend of the family's she kept our family member out of jail as the police were brought in to remove them...

 

Sorry any time I see Obama attack McCain about Lobbyists issues it just burns me up.  The man is a liar and has little to no experience...and I think I'm probably with the rest of the group when I say, I no longer care about these damn slam ads that politcs is all about now.  I'm over them...its annoying and I change the channel.

 

 

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

Yeah right... that story is really believable...

Here's the thing about politicians especially those who are the type to get chubby with Lobbyists and want nothing more than to advance their careers... They would NEVER do anything that would blatantly make them look bad. That would be committing political suicide that would go against what they want. Even if Obama was actually thinking "shut up, i'm gonna vote with the lobbyists" he would not be so stupid as to actually say it out loud. He would do what is most politically convenient for him which would be to sit down and wait, or at most find a non-corrupt way of getting the woman to stop; like trying to tell her she is out of time and they need to move on to the next speaker. A Corrupt politician is pretty careful to make sure their true nature does not come out.

Not to mention, something as blatant as that would have been all over the news... if Obama was stupid enough to do that then he might as well punch a baby on national television.

Honest politicians and corrupt politicians act the same damn way publicly... the only difference is that one is scheming behind the scenes. The most you ever see of a corrupt politicians true side is when evidence of their behind the scenes actions come up... When it comes to speaking, you will never hear them say something blatantly corrupt; the most you might get  is a slip of the tounge

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

You do realize what state Barack Obama came from right???? Illinois, the most corrupt State in the country, where the last 2 governors and the current is being indicted and trying to have his election recalled right?  I don't doubt this story, but if Iit came from a reputable source someone you know, family member, its believeable. 

 

My question is how do you people not actually believe the fact this story may actually be true we just don't hear about it because our media is so flipping biased and because Barack is the "first black man running for office." that novelty is wearing off really quickly, so is his idea for change.  He has yet to say what he wants to change.  I honestly believe the store but really some of you seem very gullible to believe whatever you hear. 

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

So by that reasoning we are totally free to connect Sarah Palin to the recently indicted Ted Stevens and the most egregious and disproportianate acceptance of Eermarks per capita in the United States?

A reputable source does not equal a family member...in fact, I would say just the opposite.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

 that would be quite damning. If it you know, actually happened. Which it didn't, it's been repudiated before.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

yeah, i'm sure that actually happened. Totally believable, like when that homeless guy in Alberta (canada) claimed that ralph klien (premier, like a governor in canada) had gotten out of his limo, and drunkedly started to curse and swear at him for no apparant reason.....

Yup, i'm sure it happened.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

I'm not denying that it's a smear ad.  However Republicans are great at smearing too.  Every single add I have seen so far, for Obama or McCain has in some way attacked the other.  So ya... I do agree though that they are both dissapointing to me as well. McCain too differnt in values and Obama... well he's flip flop wishy washy dressed up in a suit of Charisma, which he does have a lot of I'll admit, as far as I can tell.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

 Wishy- washy? Do you have any idea how mnay times McCain has flipped sides on a issue in recent years? from, torture, to abortion, to stem cell research, and many, many others that he changed to be more in line with the republican majority.

but hey, don't take my word for it : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_John_McCain

vote for whoever you want, but at least be informed about it.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

Wishy washy probably was not the best phrase, however it does not mean flip flop, at least to me.  I have always looked at wishy washy as being very non-committal with issues.  I simply meant Obama to me seems to mostly have charisma going for him and not much else.  I would still prefer him to McCain for the simple fact that I disagree with many of McCain's ideas/beliefs, even more so with Palin on board now.  However since I'm in Canada I'm not exposed to too much of American politics.  I can vote though since I am a citizen, but since I have never lived it the States I'm not sure what the process is, but I wouldn't be surprised if it's stupidly complicated, may not though.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

I just think it's sick how much more the Democrats and the media do than Republicans in terms of smearing (like going after Palin's family, for Christ's sake). Not that Republicans don't do it, but they definately don't do it as much.

All I want is the facts, I don't want ads that only paint the worst of one and the best of another, I want a simple chart that outlines all the facts and issues for all candidates.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

John McCain 1996: "Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because Janet Reno is her father."

Rush Limbaugh displayed a picture of a dog with Chelsea Clinton as a caption on his show.

How about the nasty, racist ads in Tennessee the GOP put out against Democrat Harold Ford ("Harold, call me")?

And today? Republican and Conservative PAC ads paint Obama as a "Secret Muslim". How about making up stories that he doesn't have a birth certificate to prove his American citizenship? Or Rush Limbaugh said he had heard a rumor that a tape exists of Michelle Obama using the word “Whitey”...a tape that doesn't exist?

I love how Palin can use her family for all the positive spin you want, but when you question how this is relevant or if it in fact takes away from her policies, platforms and possible job performance, the family only THEN becomes off limits.

We all know that negative ads and smear campaigns work...otherwise they wouldn't be so popular.  Yes, Democrats and left-wing PACs use plenty of smear tactics too...but don't for ONE SECOND believe that one side is dirtier than the other.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

 Is that a joke? Every ad (and there have been a lot of ads) by the McCain camp has been blatantly false, and not to forget very disgusting. Fox News as well has wasted no time smearing the democrats. No, scratch that. Any liberal organization as nazis. No joke, O'Reilly wastes his time whining about how the Daily Kos is apparently more hateful than the nazis.

So don't sympathize with the republicans, they don't deserve it.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

 Are you kidding? Republicans smear much more than democrats (swift boat anyone?), and it's done with party knowledge and resources ad knowledge. Read about the ''secret muslim'' chain letters, read zell Millers 2004 convention speech (then read Obama's 2004 speech, and try to tell me that democrats are the party of smears.), read about the 2000 republican primaries, specifically about John Mcain's ''bastard half black child'' , read about the campaign ad that featured Obama's wife, read about the national review saying that he wasn't a US citizen, and read about the accusations that he's a terrorist (completly unfounded of course, but that never stops them). The right engages in character attacks far more than the left. Shit, it isn't even really a matter of debate. And where has the Obama campaign attacked palin's family?

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

McCain trying to steer clear of smear ads? Really?

How about the one where he claims Obama wants to teach graphic sexual details to kindergarteners? (Actually a bill that was for teaching age-appropriate sex education from K. to grade 12. Taught kindergardeners about inappropriate touching, and that kind of thing to protect them from pedophiles.)

Or how about anything about Obama's plan to heavily tax the middle class? (He'll actually reduce taxes on anyone making under $250k, while McCain's plan actually raises taxes on middle-class and poor, and cuts taxes to the very rich.)

Or how about any questioning of Palin as sexism? ("She never tried to ban books. That was just a loyalty test..." That she tried several times, and tried to fire the librarian when she refused to bow to censorship... "You can actually see Russia from Alaska." You can see a part of Siberia from a tiny island off Alaska, and how exactly does that let her understand what's going on much, much further away in Moscow anyways? "If you dare question the talking points, you are obviously a sexist pig, unlike McCain, who would never, ever make sexist jokes about Hillary Clinton, Chelsea and Janet Reno...")

Come on. More than half of what the man says is an outright lie. The press is just starting to grow the pair to ask him, now that his POW defence is worn out.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

There you go, listening to everything The Chosen One and his Obamabots says...

 

I doubt "A boy/man has nipples, a penis, a scrotum, and testicles." " A girl/woman has breasts, nipples, a vulva, a clitoris, a vagina, a uterus, and ovaries." and "Both boys and girls have body parts that feel good when touched.",  are "age approritate"...

 

 

Ok maby sending an army of lawyars to Alaska to find negetive information on the governer isn't sexist... But do you really think the media would treat her any ware near as bad if Palin was male?

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

Holy shit! People have nipples?!?!?!

 

Seriously though, I'm pretty sure everybody of pretty much all ages already knew that women have breasts and everyone has nipples. They're kinda hard to miss...

 

-Remember kids, personal responsibility is for losers! For information on games and psychology, look up: Jonathan Freedman(2002)Block & Crain(2007) Just to name a few...

Reality/////////////////////////////////////Fantasy. Seems like a pretty thick line to me...

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

Ah ah ah! They're called "areolas".

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Those who sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither." -- Ben Franklin Game on, brothers and sisters.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

 Zomg! Human anatomy!

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

 Well i know McCain wouldn't have chosen Palin for VP if she was a male...

One thing i am tired of hearing is how people blame Obama (or any candidate for that matter) for attacks from the media or his supporters... The campaign has no control over independent journalists/pundits or their own supporters. You can tell them not to do something but in no way do they gotta listen; idiots are always free to be idiots, especially those who thinks that when their candidate says "no" they mean "yes"   *cough*PUMA*cough*. It's like nearly the entire basis for the "obama is sexist" rhetoric is people taking attacks from the media and applying their words to Obama.

How would the media treat Palin if she was a woman... pretty darn bad. Yes certain things probably would not come up, like the question of juggling raising kids and VP (even though it's a fair question for men as well)... However much of the media attacks would still occur. Her Daughter would be attacked since the media finds it relevent to her strong abortion and sex education stances; She would be dogged for her lack of experience; She would would be attacked on how little time she spent on the national or international track... She would still face most of the criticism if she was male

Palin is a person who has never really been on the national scene... as such the national media has never tried to probe into her life and dig up every piece of dirt she has. Unlike Obama who the media has been digging into for the last 18 months, and McCain, Biden and Clinton who have all been in the national media spot light for years. The Media took one look at Palin, an inexperienced candidate, a virtual unknown that no one ever REALLY dug dirt on, and thay saw massive opportunity... They began to sap Palin for all she was worth like an untapped oil source... Frankly i think what the media would just love most and is searching for is proof that, without a shadow of a doubt is, that McCain picked her MAINLY because her gender

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

Hey do you have the details of the sex ed bill? What is your source on that info eh? I would really love to know

And I do believe that the media would tear Palin equally as bad if she were a male. A previously unknown figure who was picked mostly so they can appeal to disgruntled democrats. Of course the media would go after such a person. Think if Hillary won the nomation, picked Biden as her running mate and Mccain picked a black Vp you think that the media wouldn't be all over it?

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

I think that the media is being much too rough on Palin, considering they are looking for anything and everything to smear her with. Obama and Biden, on the other hand, are not being nearly as criticized, even though Biden plagerized his way through college...

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

Biden and Obama have been in the public eye for a long time. Until recently, i doubt .0001 percent of amercans even knew Palin's name. They're just going after what's new, not what's female.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

After a few forums, good give me this

http://www.jewcy.com/feature/2007-07-26/premature_education

 

But I first learned about this threw Sean Hannity (and I didn't beleive untill I did more reserch to verifiy, it was just that outlandish)

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

err "google gave me this"

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

From that article (which is amazing by the way)

In the president’s own home state of Texas, the Board of Education rejected textbooks for mentioning condoms and breast cancer, opting instead to tell students that the best way to avoid STDs was to “get plenty of rest,” “respect yourself,” and “go out as a group.”

holy shit!!!!

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

I never thought Bush was a great president, and has a lot of flaws (big goverment...) but he has cirtenly handled War on Teror well.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

*facepalm*

Having a war on terror is like having a war on lucky.

It is an intagible concept, and guess what, the more the government waves around the notion of 'terrorist are everywhere and they could be right next to you' the more actual terror they instill. In effect, they are putting more terror into the populace than what would be there normally.

 

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

Oh, yeah, really. He's really handled that well. Let's see how well:

Spending billions and billions of dollars each year, money that the U.S. does not have.

Sending a buttload of troops to look for the right guy (Osama bin Laden) in the wrong damn country. 

Starting a war with Saddam Hussein under false pretenses (anyone remember WMDs?).

Yeah, he's really handled the War on Terror well. He's done such a crackerjack job...

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Those who sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither." -- Ben Franklin Game on, brothers and sisters.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

 please tell me you're being ironic. America is in it's worst world position in the last decade right now.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

This ad isn't created or endorsed by the Obama Campaign. It's from a 527 political group (think Swift Boat Veterans for Truth), which both campaigns lack the ability to control. There's dozens of these across the country, some running state-wide, some running for one ad cycle in Small Town, Alabama. The post title is grossly, grossly misleading.

I agree that this seems like a bit of a stretch of a "gaming" post, but I can't blame GP. Video games aren't a major issue being talked about in this Presidential campaign, and with so much politics in the air, one can't help but want to get in on the action. So ultimately, I'm alright with it - save the title. If you're going to try to take equal shots at each side, at least get it right.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

If you go to the McLobbyist website featured at the end of the ad you'll find, at the bottom of the page, "PAID FOR BY OBAMA FOR AMERICA" (aka the Obama Campaign) and www.BARACKOBAMA.com .

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

An energy plan is at stake?

 

You do realize this is comeing from the campaign of the man who wants to choke domestic oil companys with a "wind fall profit" tax and increase our dependence on forign oil... all because it is "fair" (read:Marxist)

 

 

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

Actually, Sarah Palin endorses the oil tax to the oil companies that operate in Alaska.  Recently, she told everyone, that Alaskians, would recieve $2500 bonus each.  So, the Republicans are not exactly taking the high road either on gas tax.  Cus guess what, those oil companies, just raise their price at the pump, so its really Alaskians, paying themselves through a HUGE, maze of beuarcratic BS. 

 

As far as the ad is concern, I do not see any direct advertising from either Barack Obama OR the Democratic National Convention (DNC).  Its not from Moveon.org, or several of the other goverment groups that operate on either side of this campaign.  So really, GP, WHERE is the source of this ad?

As far as I can tell, someone rigged some nice music, colorful graphics and some facts of Mr. McCain.  And GP says that is from the DNC or Mr. Obama.

 

Lastly, is GP going to report every time, something Video Gamish appears in the cultures of each country?  Does GP have any real guidelines or borders on what is considered 'Game Related' or 'Video Game Industry' related?

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

Also the man who's too much of a jackass to realize he could use nuclear power.  Let's not forget that.  Obama's kind of an idiot.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

I'm all for building some new Nuclear power plants. Where do we house the waste? Who wants to let companies come in and build one in their neighborhood?

For the record, Sen. Obama has kept an open mind about Nuclear Energy, but to pander to the masses, McCain has stated unequivocally that he'd like to build 45 new power plants. The question is where? And what new waste storage facilities will we require? Just Yucca Mountain?

The political reality is that a lot of us want nuclear energy, but no one seems to want a new plant within sight of them. Let's get some volunteers.

And I love the names people throw out if they oppose Obama: elitist, idiot, jackass.  

Fine. To reciprocate -- McCain: senile, temperamental, out-of-touch, absent-minded and dangerous.

Because it's stupid to have reservations about Nuclear technology, but it's "going with your gut" when interviewing a person once for the second-in-command of the entire United States.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

You forogt "marxist"...

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

Solar power, Wind, Geothermal, and many others.

You know what gets my goat though? The amount of people that list oil as a power source should be beaten with a stick, because it isn't. COAL!!!  Why can't people realize that coal is the number one power source for most power plants? It is still readily available and cheap as hell. It ain't clean though.

Nucklear power would probably be one of the cleaner power sources, though, to be honest Geothermal and Solar would be the best routes to go ecologically.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

But what about thirty years ago on the other side of the world with highly flawed technology!?!?! That could be us if we were to dare use nuclear power! Because clearly we don't now since otherwise we'd all be glowing green and otherwise dead since nuclear power is so bad!

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

LOL, do people REALLY still use terms like Marxist in this day and age with a straight face?


-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: Obama Campaign Goes Negative with Gambling Game Ad

Just like Obama, you can't bring yourself to claim he isn't, because you know he is.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
TechnogeekIf the developer were male there wouldn't have been a "conversation" in the first place.10/19/2014 - 2:27am
Montetrolls are just at their absolute worst when it comes to women and feminist. You could bet good money that if the developer were male the trolls would be silent and the conversation would actually focus on the journalism.10/18/2014 - 9:18pm
MontePapa: Not the first time we've had a journalism scandals before, but the harassment never got close to this level; the difference with this scandal is that feminists are involved. Without the feminist angle, their would be A LOT less harrassment10/18/2014 - 9:15pm
Papa MidnightMonte: That's honestly rather short-sighted. As has been proven with other persons who have been targeted, if it wasn't Quinn, it would be someone else.10/18/2014 - 6:26pm
AvalongodI think that's part of what gives an esoteric news story like this real life...it taps into a larger narrative about misogyny in society outside of games.10/18/2014 - 3:29pm
Avalongod@Monte, well the trolls made death threats that came to police (and media attention). I think this is tapping into a larger issue outside of games about how women are treated in society (like all the "real rape" stuff during the last election)10/18/2014 - 3:28pm
WonderkarpZippy : Havent tried the PS4 controller. might later.10/18/2014 - 2:37pm
MonteSeirously, If Quinn was not involved and GG was instead about something like the Mordor Marketing contracts, the trolling would have never grown so vile and disgusting. There have been plenty of movements in the past that never sufferred from behavior..10/18/2014 - 1:57pm
MonteWe have seen scandel's before but the trolling has never been as vile as what we see with GG. Trolls usually have such a tiny voice you can barely notice them, but its like moths to a flame whenever femistist are involved.10/18/2014 - 1:53pm
ZippyDSMleeWonderkarp: You might be able to if you had a PS4 controller.10/18/2014 - 1:00pm
MaskedPixelantehttp://store.steampowered.com/app/327940/ Night Dive starts charging for freeware.10/18/2014 - 12:21pm
Matthew Wilsonthe sad thing is there are trolls on both sides of this. people need to stop acting like their side is so pure.10/18/2014 - 12:19pm
MechaTama31So, only speak out on a scandal that hasn't attracted trolls? I wouldn't hold my breath...10/18/2014 - 10:49am
MonteI feel like GG just needs to die. The movement is FAR to tainted by hatred and BS for it to be useful for any conversation. Let GG die, and then rally behind the NEXT gaming journalism scandal, and start the conversation fresh.10/18/2014 - 10:33am
quiknkoldand we dont have a Dovakin to call a cease fire10/17/2014 - 7:37pm
quiknkoldThe whole thing is Futile. Both sides are so buried deep in their trenchs that there isnt a conversation. Its just Finger Pointing, Name Calling, Doxxing, Threats. there needs to be a serious conversation, and GG isnt it.10/17/2014 - 7:37pm
quiknkoldI thought it was a good article. Jeff is right. I feel like GamerGate did destroy its message. I am for Ethics in game journalism, but man. so much hate. and its on both sides. I've seen some awful stuff spewed on twitter. Its a big reason why I exited..10/17/2014 - 7:34pm
Matthew Wilsonwhile he focused on gg, he did call out both sides crap.10/17/2014 - 7:18pm
Papa MidnightThat was a damn good read offered by Jeff Gertsmann.10/17/2014 - 7:17pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.giantbomb.com/articles/letter-from-the-editor-10-17-2014/1100-5049/ deferentially a nice write up.10/17/2014 - 6:44pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician