Conflict of Interest? NIMF Responds to GP Queries on ESA Grant

September 30, 2008 -

Buried deep in last week's ESA press release which detailed a million bucks worth of grants to non-profits was word that the National Institute on Media and the Family was to be one of nine funding recipients.

NIMF is an interesting selection for the ESA, to say the least. Over the years the group has been a highly vocal, politically well-connected, and rational (in contrast to certain other critics) thorn in the side of the video game industry.

As recently as November, 2005, for example, NIMF head David Walsh, flanked by Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), gave the ESRB an "F" on its Annual Video Game Report Card. In its 2007 report card, NIMF charged the game industry with "an ominous backslide on multiple fronts." Walsh has also worked with Hillary Clinton and other members of Congress on video game sex and violence issues.

Given NIMF's history as self-appointed media watchdog, it's more than a little surprising to see the group accept funding from the video game industry. Doing so raises obvious conflict of interest questions and GamePolitics put those issues to NIMF. Late yesterday, spokesman Darin Broton responded on behalf of the organization:

For 12 years, the Institute has been a leader in helping families maximize the benefit and minimize the harm of media. To continue our success in helping parents navigate the constantly changing technology, the Institute will work with organizations that support its mission to give parents the tools to make them even more successful. Reasonable organizations can disagree on principle, but can work together for the betterment of families and children. 

 

This isn’t the first time the Institute has worked with an organization it has been at odds with in the past. As you may recall, we worked together with the ESRB earlier this year during the release of GTA IV. The two organizations issued a joint statement telling parents to beware and follow the ESRB’s rating on the box. Where there are areas of agreement, the Institute will work with reasonable organizations to help parents and families. If the Institute has concerns with a particular issue within the gaming industry, we will respond appropriately. Nothing has changed.

Broton also told GP that the amount of the ESA grant is $50,000, but did not respond to our question as to whether NIMF approached the ESA regarding funding or vice-versa. According to the ESA press release the grant will be used to "develop an on-line e-learning zone for using the latest interactive technologies to help kids and adults understand the issues and potential areas of concern with the Internet."

GP: Broton is correct to point out that NIMF worked with ESRB on the GTA IV advisory. However, there's a wide gap between "working with" and "accepting money from." Whether one agrees or disagrees with NIMF and its mission, taking funding from the industry it purports to be watching is a credibility-damaging decision on the organization's part.

What were they thinking?


Comments

Re: Conflict of Interest? NIMF Responds to GP Queries on ESA

Hey guys shut up the ESA wants us all to sit on our thumbs and twirl well everyone else is trying to ban games

Re: Conflict of Interest? NIMF Responds to GP Queries on ESA

It'll be interesting to see what the report card says this year.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Conflict of Interest? NIMF Responds to GP Queries on ESA

Who was is that promised to out organizations/politicians/whoever that accepted donations from the video game industry? Was that NIMF or someone else? Or am I remembering something that never happened?

Re: Conflict of Interest? NIMF Responds to GP Queries on ESA

That was the PTC.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
MySpace Page: http://www.myspace.com/okceca
Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1325674091

Re: Conflict of Interest? NIMF Responds to GP Queries on ESA

Actually, "working with" is a lot more damaging to credibility than "accepting money." Let's all calm down now people. The NIMF has been a lot more logical and less persecuting than anyone else. This isn't Liberman; this isn't Clinton, and it sure as hell isn't Thompson. The only problem I've had with the NIMF is their attacks towards the ESRB, claiming the ESRB isn't doing it's job. We've got 2 players, on the same team, fighting for the same goal, but the NIMF was attacking their own quarterback for the opportunity to make that winning touchdown for their own personal glory, rather than thinking about what's best for the team. If they want to be on our side, let'em.

Re: Conflict of Interest? NIMF Responds to GP Queries on ESA

While I can see where this can be a potential 'conflict of interest', I could also see how this could be a step twoards both groups being on the same side.  While NIMF and ESA have locked horns in the past there is no fundemental reason for them to be fighting eachother.

I could easily see a bit of middleground being found.  If the ESA puts work in to addressing NIMF concerns, that reduces the need of NIMF to go to people like Lieberman and Clinton to pull weight for them.  At that point the NIMF can reduce it's hostility and help the ESA keep things going too.   In other words, much of the conflict between them exists simply to manage the conflict.. the actual goals are not incompatible.

Re: Conflict of Interest? NIMF Responds to GP Queries on ESA

So the ESA sold us out?  Doing business with any company with any connections other than negitive ones with Joe Lieberman, Hillary Clinton, and other worthless like minded politicians is not good for the industry.  What is this for?  More DRM laws that let publishers put the software in the games?  This would be like ECA having Jack Thompson or a group that represents Jack Thompson represent them legally isn't it?

I like this whole situation as much as I like hearing Bush assure us that everything is going to be okay, or Palin even being close to the VP seat.

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: Conflict of Interest? NIMF Responds to GP Queries on ESA

"develop an on-line e-learning zone for using the latest interactive technologies to help kids and adults understand the issues and potential areas of concern with the Internet."

If this is what the money is to be used for, then I don't see it as a conflict of interest. The "areas of concern" to an extent dovetail with areas and topics that effect video games. For example, there are sites and services on the internet that are for adults only. Same with games. People should be responsible with their personal details on the internet, same as within games online (remember the xbox live nude pics for points and the DS pedophile tool reports?).

Anything that helps kids and especially parents become more knowledgeable about how to be more responsible with technology can only help the video game industry. I would prefer however, if they included things like parental controls on the consoles and the ESRB ratings in this program to ensure that parents have this knowledge, but anything that raises parental awareness and responsibility is a good thing.

Re: Conflict of Interest? NIMF Responds to GP Queries on ESA

They do have parental controls on consoles, they have them this gen and I'm pretty sure they had them last gen.

----------------------------------------------------

God created alcohol so that the Scottish and the Irish could never take over the world. -Chris 'Jedi' Knight

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: Conflict of Interest? NIMF Responds to GP Queries on ESA

Last gen was only for the DVD-movie component. It was first implemented with the new gen and vista.

Re: Conflict of Interest? NIMF Responds to GP Queries on ESA

Looks like the ESA has decided to go for a 'Bribe them until they like us' approach.


-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: Conflict of Interest? NIMF Responds to GP Queries on ESA

Conquer and divide comes to mind as well.

A really weird move by NIMF. Jackhole has been on David Walsh'es case for the imaginary BestBuy funding, and now they take money from the very industry they're trying to influence with their campaign. Critics of NIMF are going to have a field day with this one.

-- http://pixelantes.blogspot.com/

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Is King right? Should all games adopt the free-to-play model?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelanteNumber 3: Night Dive was brought to the attention of the public by a massive game recovery, and yet most of their released catalogue consists of games that other people did the hard work of getting re-released.04/17/2014 - 8:46pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 2: If Humongous Entertainment wanted their stuff on Steam, why didn't they talk to their parent company, which does have a number of games published on Steam?04/17/2014 - 8:45pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 1: When Night Dive spent the better part of a year teasing the return of true classics, having their big content dump be edutainment is kind of a kick in the stomach.04/17/2014 - 8:44pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.giantbomb.com/articles/jeff-gerstmann-heads-to-new-york-takes-questions/1100-4900/ He talks about the future games press and the games industry. It is worth your time even though it is a bit long, and stay for the QA. There are some good QA04/17/2014 - 5:28pm
IanCErm so they shouldn't sell edutainment at all? Why?04/17/2014 - 4:42pm
MaskedPixelanteNot that linkable, go onto Steam and there's stuff like Pajama Sam on the front-page, courtesy of Night Dive.04/17/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOkay, again, please, please, PLEASE get in a habit of linking to whatever you're talking about.04/17/2014 - 4:05pm
MaskedPixelanteAnother round of Night Dive teasing and promising turns out to be stupid edutainment games. Thanks for wasting all our time, guys. See you never.04/17/2014 - 3:44pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the consequences were not only foreseeable, but very likely. anyone who understood supply demand curvs knew that was going to happen. SF has been a econ/trade hub for the last hundred years.04/17/2014 - 2:45pm
Andrew EisenMixedPixelante - Would you like to expand on that?04/17/2014 - 2:43pm
MaskedPixelanteWell, I am officially done with Night Dive Studios. Unless they can bring something worthwhile back, I'm never buying another game from them.04/17/2014 - 2:29pm
PHX Corphttp://www.msnbc.com/ronan-farrow/watch/video-games-continue-to-break-the-mold-229561923638 Ronan Farrow Daily on Video games breaking the mold04/17/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoAh yes, because by building something nice they were just asking for people to come push them out. Consequences are protested all the time when other people are implementing them.04/17/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew Wilsonok than they should not protest when the consequences of that choice occur.04/17/2014 - 1:06pm
NeenekoIf people want tall buildings, plenty of other cities with them. Part of freedom and markets is communities deciding what they do and do not want built in their collective space.04/17/2014 - 12:55pm
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician