Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

October 6, 2008 -

Did you ever wonder if the America's Army game ever actually inspired anyone to join the service?

Wonder no more.

A 17-year-old Wisconsin boy, Tyler Battig, told the Fond du Lac Reporter:

I felt like enlisting because I have a lot of family that joined the Army and served, plus 'America's Army,' the computer game, came out and that got me thinking more and more... I do face the fact that I could be going overseas, but that shouldn't stop anybody from joining.

America's Army has sparked protests in recent months from anti-war groups. In August, protesters marched outside Ubisoft's San Francisco HQ. Ubi published the console editions of America's Army, although the more popular PC version is freely distributed by the Department of Defense.

In the photo Tyler is seen with his mother, Kim Battig, who also enlisted, as well as two Army recruiters.


Comments

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

What surprises me is that this is "news," not that it has happened.  Just last week I was at MEPS (Military Entrance Processing Station) to take a language test and I spoke to a kid who was joining the Navy with the stated purpose of achieving the rank of Master Chief because, and I'm only barely paraphrasing, "that would be cool and Halo's awesome."

The good news, for anyone who's interested, is that the vast majority of the people I spoke to had made much more reasoned and reasonable decisions prior to enlisting.

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

The way I'm reading it, this has more to do with his family's long-standing tradition of serving in the armed forces. America's Army was just a proverbial nudge.

An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.

An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

 All of this is a moot point in the end.  Nothing here violates any sort of law, treaty or convention.  Child recruitment is specifically meant for active recruitment into the military of a minor.  So basically anything less than the US military is giving children guns and body armor, and shipping them off to war is completely legal.  Of course, it then falls into the area of "is it moral?" and no internet forum argument is going to change your take on it.

 

As for the part it played in the kid's recruitment, I feel it's minor.  Family tradition seemed to play a major factor in the kid's decision, and the game just played the part of keeping the question of if he should join or not in his mind.  It's a shitty game, but I also think the same of Halo, and a lot of people seem to enjoy that one.

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

I'm more annoyed by the recruiters that came to my high school everyday and passed out free folders and pencils with the army on them.

--- Official Protector of Videoland!

--- Official Protector of Videoland!

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

The game sucks thats why you can;t forget it!

:P

I is fuzzy brained mew =^^=
http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/
(in need of a bad overhaul)


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

My Dad was a marine, and my grandfather was in the Army Air Corp. (or whatever division of the Army it was called before it became the Air Force... This is going back to WWII, just to say). I know this'll be dismissed, but I'd NEVER think of joining the military... Well, that's partly a lie. I'd join the military if there was a draft (before i was drafted), but ONLY if I couldn't make it out of the country first.

Anyway, AA, regardless, played a crucial role. It kept the idea in his mind, kept it a possibility. But the use of America's Army to recruit is just like offering to pay for college or the commercials (which I don't think they're supposed to do, but it's the military).

Also, I'd like to point out that if TV media outlets got their hands on this, they'd make it a positive thing. However, whenever someone shoots someone else, it's video games...

Or that kid that snuck into the zoo and fed other animals to the croc. I'm surprised JT hasn't said that video games have perverted his mind.

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

The game isn't the only thing that keeps this in people's minds.  Suggesting that only the AA game led to this decision is ridiculous, and I think the kid's probably a simpleton. 

You can see Army, National Guard, and Navy SEAL ads during primetime TV, latenight TV, and before movies. 

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

Suggesting that only the AA game led to this decision is ridiculous, and I think the kid's probably a simpleton. 

The kid's a simpleton for follow in several family member's footsteps?

"I felt like enlisting because I have a lot of family that joined the Army and served..."

Yeah, really sounds to me like only the AA game led to his decision.

-Gray17

-Gray17

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

I think you misinterpreted what he said. He said that "suggesting that only the AA game led to this decision is ridiculous" meaning that to say nothing else influenced him is wrong. At least that's how I took it to be. The last part of the sentence kind of offsets the first and makes it hard to tell what was really said.

I would have to agree that he would be a simpleton though if AA was the only reason he joined, which it obviously isn't. Family history of military service usually has a very strong influence on wether or not a person joins. In my case, both of my grandfathers and my dad were in the army, and all 3 of them advised me to avoid it if possible. Other families have the exact opposite view.

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

What it really comes down to is the controversy over games colliding with the controversy of the military.

"Veterans and recruiters are evil! How dare they seduce little kids into their assimilation of murderers and conquerors! Through toys, none the less!"

According to tesh.com, an Associated Press and MTV survey showed 90% of kids #1 inspiration on major decisions are their parents. This kid followed family tradition. THEN, AA helped establish his choice. 

 

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

His MOTHER enlisted, but the game was the only notable factor for his enlistment? I don't mean to imply she forced him or anything, just that I think having family in the military might be a bigger influence than a game.

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

Read it again. A lot of his family is apparently military, that was the main reason cited. AA's role was:

"plus 'America's Army,' the computer game, came out and that got me thinking more and more..."

In other words, it served as advertising that kept him considering enlisting for himself.

-Gray17

-Gray17

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

I don't know where you're getting this "advertising" angle from.  U.S. Army ads are all over the place.  He didn't say "and there was that Army commercial on television last night" or "I saw this Army ad in a magazine, and it got me thinking".  Advertising for the Army is so commonplace that it doesn't bear mentioning when discussing the factors that lead to a decision to enlist.  The fact that he explicitly mentioned it, in the same sentence as having several enlisted family members (a much more significant factor), suggests that the game itself was something that helped convince him to join, not just something that kept the idea of the army in the forefront of his mind.

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

Like Deepthorn said, the game itself is one big advertisment. I'd imagine he specifically mentioned it as it was the only advertising that actually succeeded in it's purpose of keeping enlistment in mind for consideration.

-Gray17

-Gray17

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

Oh god, dont let all of the big companies know this.   We really do not need Toyota Driving Experience, Bubble Smack Gumtastic, PETA hug the trees, Chase Bank: Release Your Money, and Menards Buildathon...  (of course, it would be nice to have less commercials, because when there is a commercial break every 5-10 minutes, it ticks me off...  thank god for hulu)

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

That is because most people worth a grain a salt ignore commercials other than for humor.  AA is a more solid form of advertisement, but it still advertisement.  Saying that it isnt is like saying that NASCAR isnt like one massive commercial.  So calling it an ad would be correct, or else it wouldnt have the title American Army, with the Army logo.

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

I would question whether someone citing AA as a non-trivial factor in his decision to enlist should be allowed to enlist.

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

So in other words, if advertising for the Army keeps someone thinking about it until they decide to enlist; they shouldn't be allowed to enlist because they payed attention to the advertisments?

-Gray17

-Gray17

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

...what?

If they're thinking about it, and AA is the thing that tips them in favor of enlisting, I think they need to seriously re-evaluate what they're expecting life in the Army to be, because AA it ain't.

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

I didn't say that AA was the thing that tips them in favor of it. I said it was the thing that kept them thinking about it. Like say, seeing TV ads for the army over and over kept the subject in their mind for consideration. Then after considering it for a while they decide to enlist. The ads didn't "tip them in favor of it", but merely kept it fresh in their mind. Likewise for AA.

Afterall, out of sight, out of mind does have some truth to it. Conversely keeping it in sight helps keep it in mind.

-Gray17

-Gray17

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

I would question whether someone citing America's Army as a factor in their decision to refuse enlistment should get to oversee enlistment.

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

What are you referring to?

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

That those like yourself who would refuse enlistment simply because advertising had an impact on their decisions, probably should not be overseeing enlistment.

-Gray17

-Gray17
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Is King right? Should all games adopt the free-to-play model?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.giantbomb.com/articles/jeff-gerstmann-heads-to-new-york-takes-questions/1100-4900/ He talks about the future games press and the games industry. It is worth your time even though it is a bit long, and stay for the QA. There are some good QA04/17/2014 - 5:28pm
IanCErm so they shouldn't sell edutainment at all? Why?04/17/2014 - 4:42pm
MaskedPixelanteNot that linkable, go onto Steam and there's stuff like Pajama Sam on the front-page, courtesy of Night Dive.04/17/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOkay, again, please, please, PLEASE get in a habit of linking to whatever you're talking about.04/17/2014 - 4:05pm
MaskedPixelanteAnother round of Night Dive teasing and promising turns out to be stupid edutainment games. Thanks for wasting all our time, guys. See you never.04/17/2014 - 3:44pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the consequences were not only foreseeable, but very likely. anyone who understood supply demand curvs knew that was going to happen. SF has been a econ/trade hub for the last hundred years.04/17/2014 - 2:45pm
Andrew EisenMixedPixelante - Would you like to expand on that?04/17/2014 - 2:43pm
MaskedPixelanteWell, I am officially done with Night Dive Studios. Unless they can bring something worthwhile back, I'm never buying another game from them.04/17/2014 - 2:29pm
PHX Corphttp://www.msnbc.com/ronan-farrow/watch/video-games-continue-to-break-the-mold-229561923638 Ronan Farrow Daily on Video games breaking the mold04/17/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoAh yes, because by building something nice they were just asking for people to come push them out. Consequences are protested all the time when other people are implementing them.04/17/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew Wilsonok than they should not protest when the consequences of that choice occur.04/17/2014 - 1:06pm
NeenekoIf people want tall buildings, plenty of other cities with them. Part of freedom and markets is communities deciding what they do and do not want built in their collective space.04/17/2014 - 12:55pm
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
Matthew WilsonSF have to build upwards they have natural growth limits. they can not grow outwards. ps growing outwards is terable just look at Orlando or Austin for that.04/16/2014 - 4:15pm
ZippyDSMleeIf they built upward then it would becoem like every other place making it worthless, if they don't build upward they will price people out making it worthless, what they need to do is a mix of things not just one exstreme or another.04/16/2014 - 4:00pm
Matthew Wilsonyou know the problem in SF was not the free market going wrong right? it was government distortion. by not allowing tall buildings to be build they limited supply. that is not free market.04/16/2014 - 3:48pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician