Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

October 6, 2008 -

Did you ever wonder if the America's Army game ever actually inspired anyone to join the service?

Wonder no more.

A 17-year-old Wisconsin boy, Tyler Battig, told the Fond du Lac Reporter:

I felt like enlisting because I have a lot of family that joined the Army and served, plus 'America's Army,' the computer game, came out and that got me thinking more and more... I do face the fact that I could be going overseas, but that shouldn't stop anybody from joining.

America's Army has sparked protests in recent months from anti-war groups. In August, protesters marched outside Ubisoft's San Francisco HQ. Ubi published the console editions of America's Army, although the more popular PC version is freely distributed by the Department of Defense.

In the photo Tyler is seen with his mother, Kim Battig, who also enlisted, as well as two Army recruiters.


Comments

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

What surprises me is that this is "news," not that it has happened.  Just last week I was at MEPS (Military Entrance Processing Station) to take a language test and I spoke to a kid who was joining the Navy with the stated purpose of achieving the rank of Master Chief because, and I'm only barely paraphrasing, "that would be cool and Halo's awesome."

The good news, for anyone who's interested, is that the vast majority of the people I spoke to had made much more reasoned and reasonable decisions prior to enlisting.

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

The way I'm reading it, this has more to do with his family's long-standing tradition of serving in the armed forces. America's Army was just a proverbial nudge.

An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.

An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

 All of this is a moot point in the end.  Nothing here violates any sort of law, treaty or convention.  Child recruitment is specifically meant for active recruitment into the military of a minor.  So basically anything less than the US military is giving children guns and body armor, and shipping them off to war is completely legal.  Of course, it then falls into the area of "is it moral?" and no internet forum argument is going to change your take on it.

 

As for the part it played in the kid's recruitment, I feel it's minor.  Family tradition seemed to play a major factor in the kid's decision, and the game just played the part of keeping the question of if he should join or not in his mind.  It's a shitty game, but I also think the same of Halo, and a lot of people seem to enjoy that one.

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

I'm more annoyed by the recruiters that came to my high school everyday and passed out free folders and pencils with the army on them.

--- Official Protector of Videoland!

--- Official Protector of Videoland!

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

The game sucks thats why you can;t forget it!

:P

I is fuzzy brained mew =^^=
http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/
(in need of a bad overhaul)


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

My Dad was a marine, and my grandfather was in the Army Air Corp. (or whatever division of the Army it was called before it became the Air Force... This is going back to WWII, just to say). I know this'll be dismissed, but I'd NEVER think of joining the military... Well, that's partly a lie. I'd join the military if there was a draft (before i was drafted), but ONLY if I couldn't make it out of the country first.

Anyway, AA, regardless, played a crucial role. It kept the idea in his mind, kept it a possibility. But the use of America's Army to recruit is just like offering to pay for college or the commercials (which I don't think they're supposed to do, but it's the military).

Also, I'd like to point out that if TV media outlets got their hands on this, they'd make it a positive thing. However, whenever someone shoots someone else, it's video games...

Or that kid that snuck into the zoo and fed other animals to the croc. I'm surprised JT hasn't said that video games have perverted his mind.

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

The game isn't the only thing that keeps this in people's minds.  Suggesting that only the AA game led to this decision is ridiculous, and I think the kid's probably a simpleton. 

You can see Army, National Guard, and Navy SEAL ads during primetime TV, latenight TV, and before movies. 

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

Suggesting that only the AA game led to this decision is ridiculous, and I think the kid's probably a simpleton. 

The kid's a simpleton for follow in several family member's footsteps?

"I felt like enlisting because I have a lot of family that joined the Army and served..."

Yeah, really sounds to me like only the AA game led to his decision.

-Gray17

-Gray17

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

I think you misinterpreted what he said. He said that "suggesting that only the AA game led to this decision is ridiculous" meaning that to say nothing else influenced him is wrong. At least that's how I took it to be. The last part of the sentence kind of offsets the first and makes it hard to tell what was really said.

I would have to agree that he would be a simpleton though if AA was the only reason he joined, which it obviously isn't. Family history of military service usually has a very strong influence on wether or not a person joins. In my case, both of my grandfathers and my dad were in the army, and all 3 of them advised me to avoid it if possible. Other families have the exact opposite view.

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

What it really comes down to is the controversy over games colliding with the controversy of the military.

"Veterans and recruiters are evil! How dare they seduce little kids into their assimilation of murderers and conquerors! Through toys, none the less!"

According to tesh.com, an Associated Press and MTV survey showed 90% of kids #1 inspiration on major decisions are their parents. This kid followed family tradition. THEN, AA helped establish his choice. 

 

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

His MOTHER enlisted, but the game was the only notable factor for his enlistment? I don't mean to imply she forced him or anything, just that I think having family in the military might be a bigger influence than a game.

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

Read it again. A lot of his family is apparently military, that was the main reason cited. AA's role was:

"plus 'America's Army,' the computer game, came out and that got me thinking more and more..."

In other words, it served as advertising that kept him considering enlisting for himself.

-Gray17

-Gray17

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

I don't know where you're getting this "advertising" angle from.  U.S. Army ads are all over the place.  He didn't say "and there was that Army commercial on television last night" or "I saw this Army ad in a magazine, and it got me thinking".  Advertising for the Army is so commonplace that it doesn't bear mentioning when discussing the factors that lead to a decision to enlist.  The fact that he explicitly mentioned it, in the same sentence as having several enlisted family members (a much more significant factor), suggests that the game itself was something that helped convince him to join, not just something that kept the idea of the army in the forefront of his mind.

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

Like Deepthorn said, the game itself is one big advertisment. I'd imagine he specifically mentioned it as it was the only advertising that actually succeeded in it's purpose of keeping enlistment in mind for consideration.

-Gray17

-Gray17

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

Oh god, dont let all of the big companies know this.   We really do not need Toyota Driving Experience, Bubble Smack Gumtastic, PETA hug the trees, Chase Bank: Release Your Money, and Menards Buildathon...  (of course, it would be nice to have less commercials, because when there is a commercial break every 5-10 minutes, it ticks me off...  thank god for hulu)

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

That is because most people worth a grain a salt ignore commercials other than for humor.  AA is a more solid form of advertisement, but it still advertisement.  Saying that it isnt is like saying that NASCAR isnt like one massive commercial.  So calling it an ad would be correct, or else it wouldnt have the title American Army, with the Army logo.

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

I would question whether someone citing AA as a non-trivial factor in his decision to enlist should be allowed to enlist.

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

So in other words, if advertising for the Army keeps someone thinking about it until they decide to enlist; they shouldn't be allowed to enlist because they payed attention to the advertisments?

-Gray17

-Gray17

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

...what?

If they're thinking about it, and AA is the thing that tips them in favor of enlisting, I think they need to seriously re-evaluate what they're expecting life in the Army to be, because AA it ain't.

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

I didn't say that AA was the thing that tips them in favor of it. I said it was the thing that kept them thinking about it. Like say, seeing TV ads for the army over and over kept the subject in their mind for consideration. Then after considering it for a while they decide to enlist. The ads didn't "tip them in favor of it", but merely kept it fresh in their mind. Likewise for AA.

Afterall, out of sight, out of mind does have some truth to it. Conversely keeping it in sight helps keep it in mind.

-Gray17

-Gray17

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

I would question whether someone citing America's Army as a factor in their decision to refuse enlistment should get to oversee enlistment.

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

What are you referring to?

Re: Teen Cites America's Army Game in Enlistment Decision

That those like yourself who would refuse enlistment simply because advertising had an impact on their decisions, probably should not be overseeing enlistment.

-Gray17

-Gray17
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenOoo, this one came down to the wire! https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/749082525/nefarious09/19/2014 - 1:03am
Andrew EisenI don't doubt that many are truly interested in journalistic integrity. The problem I'm often seeing is they seem to have no idea how or where to talk about it.09/18/2014 - 11:46pm
Andrew EisenDidn't word that well. Busy at work. I've seen people claim that GamerGate is solely about ethics and transparency in games journalism and then go on to show that what they're really after is silencing those who talk about gender issues in games.09/18/2014 - 11:45pm
Kronodebate. Becaus apparently people who only post on Reddit are supposed to police twitter before they're allowed to question anything about the people involved.09/18/2014 - 10:40pm
KronoI highly doubt many, if any are using journalistic integrity as a cover for harassment. The people harassing are essentially trolls. They aren't interested in subtle. More often it's othe other way around. People use "but X is being harassed" to shut down09/18/2014 - 10:38pm
Andrew EisenAnd exacerbating everything is the fact that all the cries of ethics violations have been obnoxious and easily proven false.09/18/2014 - 8:59pm
Andrew EisenProblem is, I would imagine, the sheer number of people who are using journalistic integrity as a cover for their harassing actions or only bringing it up on the false pretense of journalistic integrity.09/18/2014 - 8:47pm
Andrew EisenHaving said that, I can certainly see how one would be frustrated if they truly just wanted to talk about journalistic integrity and someone said they were one of the people harassing Sarkeesian, Quinn and others (though I've seen no examples of that).09/18/2014 - 8:44pm
KronoThat's been the common refrain, that talk of journalism ethics is just an excuse to harass people.09/18/2014 - 8:44pm
KronoLines like "like a partial compromise with the howling trolls who’ve latched onto ‘ethics’ as the latest flag in their onslaught against evolution and inclusion." are taring everyone questioning the ethics as a harasser.09/18/2014 - 8:43pm
Andrew EisenKrono - Except, none of the articles were talking about gamers complaining about journalist ethics, let alone called them white male misogynists. They were talking about the gamers who were harassing others.09/18/2014 - 8:36pm
Kronomakes plenty of sense. It's rather hard to dismiss someone as a white guy running a sock puppet when they've posted proof they're a woman, or black, or another minority.09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronothat any critics of journalists were white guys that hated women, and could be dismissed as such. It seems to have helped some. It's kind of difficult to maintain the white guy narrative in the face of a bunch of women and non-white guys. So the tag09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronothat, someone vented on a #gamergate 4chan thread about being dismissed like that. The suggestion they got in return was to organize their own hashtag in response, with #NotYourShield being suggested. Thus the tag came into use to combat the undercurrent09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronomuch more general problem. And while several of the articles were fairly tame, they spured a bunch of people to dismiss any critics of the journalism involved as misogynistic men. Usually with insults aimed at the geek stereotype. After about a week of09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Andrew EisenSleaker - Not sure what that has to do with anything but yeah, the gender percentages differ depending on how the study defines what a gamer is.09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
KronoThe rhetoric pushed by the spearheading articles that the "gamers" complaining about journalist ethics were just angry white male misogynists, insulted a lot of people that were previously fairly neutral. It made it go from a Kotaku problem, to a09/18/2014 - 8:31pm
Krono@Andrew I'm not surprised overlap exists. I expect much of it is a rush to jump on the bandwagon, either by reporting on the original articles, or rushing out their own. The point is that was a major flashpoint, much bigger than the reddit mass deletion.09/18/2014 - 8:31pm
Sleaker@AE - well the gamer trend was described with stats on Factual Femenist. Only 1 in 7 males plays games 20+ hrs going into college vs 1 in 40 females. So gaming is definitely still male dominated despite fake stats trying to say otherwise.09/18/2014 - 8:30pm
Craig R.Do conspiracies ever make sense? The fact that people are now having to defend themselves against nutjob websites like Breitbart.com shows how far down into the rabbit hole we've all been forcibly dragged.09/18/2014 - 7:05pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician