Scary IP Enforcement Legislation Awaits Dubya's Signature

Scary IP Enforcement Legislation Awaits Dubya's Signature

October 13, 2008

In his Law of the Game on Joystiq column, legal eagle Mark Methenitis reports on yet another piece of legislation designed to protect IP rights holders at the expense of consumers.

This time around it's the Intellectual Property Act aka the "PRO-IP Act". According to Methenitis, the proposed law, which has been passed by Congress and awaits President Bush's signature:

  • increases the penalties for infringement by expanding what is considered a 'work'
  • broadens the ability of the government to permanently seize goods
  • creates an Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator, a new cabinet position whose sole job is to increase intellectual property enforcement.

Terming the bill "a load of bad news for consumers," Methenitis writes:

The impact to the consumer is obvious... more or less anything that has come into contact with that pirated item can be seized by the government. The statute is worded in such a broad manner that it would be theoretically possible to seize all of the computers in a home or office if one pirated MP3 or piece of software was present.

 

...based on this new definition of 'works,' a game with a licensed soundtrack may be multiple works... For example, let's say someone is pirating Madden 2002. It might not be worth EA's time or trouble to go after those pirates, since their real concern at this point is Madden 2009, but the piracy of that game could now also potentially be considered the piracy of that music.

Methenitis notes that it is unclear whether Bush will sign the bill or leave it for his successor.

UPDATE: Gizmodo reports that President Bush signed the bill into law today.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Re: Scary IP Enforcement Legislation Awaits Dubya's Signature

Oh joy.
---
I'm not under the affluence of incohol as some thinkle peep I am. I'm not half as thunk as you might drink. I fool so feelish I don't know who is me, and the drunker I stand here, the longer I get.

Re: Scary IP Enforcement Legislation Awaits Dubya's Signature

from an outsiders perspective, it's really annoying to see the US waste so much money on laws that will be fought and overturned, wasting even more money yet.

Re: Scary IP Enforcement Legislation Awaits Dubya's Signature

We really needs someone to draft a consumer rights bill and call it pro consumer rights or something to that effect. This is getting truly reidculous.

----------------------------------------------------

 God created alcohol so that the Scottish and the Irish could never take over the world. -Chris 'Jedi' Knight

Re: Scary IP Enforcement Legislation Awaits Dubya's Signature

Living in Canada; law wouldn't apply to me.

Pointing, laughing, etcetera.

Re: Scary IP Enforcement Legislation Awaits Dubya's Signature

Hopefully "Dubya" will excercise his underused veto muscles on this. Or at least pass the buck to someone who will.

Re: Scary IP Enforcement Legislation Awaits Dubya's Signature

Yeah, sure. Your current president can't walk and breathe at the same time.

Re: Scary IP Enforcement Legislation Awaits Dubya's Signature

Hey that only happens when he is eating a pretzel at the time...

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush_pretzel_incident

Re: Scary IP Enforcement Legislation Awaits Dubya's Signature

A cabinet position? For something this trivial?

Re: Scary IP Enforcement Legislation Awaits Dubya's Signature

Great, so basically a Democrat controlled Congress voted for a law limiting your rights and you use a slang insult for Bush like he came up with? Great I wonder how much more biased this site is going to become

Re: Scary IP Enforcement Legislation Awaits Dubya's Signature

I always thought it was a nickname, not an insult.

Re: Scary IP Enforcement Legislation Awaits Dubya's Signature

It's meant as an insulting Nickname to make him look like a dumb *** hick

Re: Scary IP Enforcement Legislation Awaits Dubya's Signature

Yeah. Damn the media... them evil dictators of the world. But then again, you gotta admit that bush is one troubled soul.

----------------------------------------

"Because this town is under the stranglehold of a few tight eyed Tree Huggers who would rather play Hacky Sack than lock up the homeless" -- Birch Barlow

Re: Scary IP Enforcement Legislation Awaits Dubya's Signature

Maybe because he is a Dumb **** hick....

 

Not to mention an alchoholic, drugy, war monger and the worst president the USA has ever had.

 

 

 

 

Re: Scary IP Enforcement Legislation Awaits Dubya's Signature

Seems when it comes to politics, people just make shit up for the hell of it. Why not? I guess it is kind of fun. Gossip that influences people!

----------------------------------------

"Because this town is under the stranglehold of a few tight eyed Tree Huggers who would rather play Hacky Sack than lock up the homeless" -- Birch Barlow

Re: Scary IP Enforcement Legislation Awaits Dubya's Signature

Well it's no longer a questionmark... Dubya signed it into law.  Oh joy.

"Volume helps to get a point across but sharp teeth are better."

Re: Scary IP Enforcement Legislation Awaits Dubya's Signature

Wow, this is indeed scary. Now I wonder how much worse it'll get from here.

Re: Scary IP Enforcement Legislation Awaits Dubya's Signature

I'm pointing and laughing again.

Oh, and downloading Iron Man.

 

 

Re: Scary IP Enforcement Legislation Awaits Dubya's Signature

Oh Fuck...

Oh Shit...

Oh Goddamnit...

United we Stand, Divided we fall.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 02/09/10 at 01:18pm
Valdearg: I do agree that it shouldn't be legal. That's for sure.
Posted 02/09/10 at 01:16pm
Andrew Eisen: Shouldn't be. Spirit of anti-discrimination laws would seem to include sexual orientation (and eye color). Plus there's always equal protection and such. Never know until you try.
Posted 02/09/10 at 01:14pm
Valdearg: @AE: Doubtful. Again, it's perfectly legal.
Posted 02/09/10 at 01:10pm
Andrew Eisen: Should have sued (unless that wasn't an option given her financial situation or something). Might have won.
Posted 02/09/10 at 01:00pm
Valdearg: Story about a Male to Female TG who was expressly told she wouldn't be given a job because she was TG. Its not the main point of the story, but explicit, perfectly legal discrimination like this exists.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:53pm
Valdearg: Lol, I don't know. It may very well be legal to do so. Though that might able to fall under the "race" restriction, depending on how that point is argued.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:51pm
Valdearg: I don't think they do have any legal recourse. I'll have to dig around, but I seriously believe that if the law doesn't specifically mention Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity, they can still be discriminated against in those 29 states.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:51pm
Andrew Eisen: Eye color isn't covered either but I doubt it would be considered legal to refuse to hire people with green eyes.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:48pm
Andrew Eisen: My explanation is longer than the Shoutbox will allow. Suffice to say that while those who are discriminated against do have legal recourse, anti-discrimination law should specifically cite sexual orientation so that there’s no question about it.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:42pm
Valdearg: "There is no federal law that consistently protects LGBT individuals from employment discrimination; it remains legal in 29 states, and in 38 states to do so based on gender identity or expression." From the Human Rights Campaign.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:40pm
Valdearg: @AE: Why don't you think I'm correct? I know Wiki could be flawed, but as far as it says, its up to date as of June 2009.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:39pm
Andrew Eisen: I don't think you're right but I really don't know and don't have the time to find out. However things actually are, it's very clear how they actually should be.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:34pm
Valdearg: "just because there's no specific state level protection for it, doesn't make discrimination right or legal." I would disagree. If there's no laws against it, it makes it perfectly legal. It's definitely not right, but perfectly legal to do.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:33pm
Valdearg: Meaning in 29 states, private sector discrimination against gays is perfectly legal.. Sickening.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:33pm
Valdearg: 19 states have no protections, and another 10 only have protections for public sector jobs.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:32pm
Andrew Eisen: Well, most businesses have equal rights policies in place and just because there's no specific state level protection for it, doesn't make discrimination right or legal. Still, no argument against adding such protections.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:28pm
Valdearg: More information. Apparently, it's worse than I actually thought.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:28pm
Valdearg: Check the link. Apparently, its more like 20 states that have no protections.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:26pm
Andrew Eisen: In the US? Not that I'm aware of. Sad if true.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:25pm
Valdearg: @AE: Actually, I think, at least for now, businesses can still discriminate against gays in a few states.. Something like 5 or 8. Its part of why Gay Rights Advocates are in support of the Employee Nondiscrimination Act, or ENDA.
Login or register to post shouts