E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

October 23, 2008 -

Reports this week which claimed that E3 2009 would be at least partially open to the public were just wrong, it would now appear.

Yesterday game publishers trade group the ESA, which owns E3, issued a press release detailing the new format. And you're probably not invited. Here's what we know:

  • Dates: June 2-4, 2009
  • Location: L.A. Convention Center
  • Invited: "all qualified computer and video game industry audiences, including international and U.S.-based

When we asked ESA P.R. guy Dan Hewitt to clarify whether the public would be eligible to attend, he told us:

There will be opportunities to view the E3 Expo and learn about what's going on at the show, but it won't be open to the general public.

The show will be capped at 40,000 attendees, well up from the ghost town feel of this year's 5,000 attendee flop, but just a bit more than half of E3's peak years of 2004-2006.

ESA boss Michael Gallagher was interviewed on the new E3 format by Destructoid. Among his comments:

We have a much, much broader audience than the targeted show that we ran the last two years, which was very focused on press-only and really U.S. press. This is meant to target international press, mass media, as well as just gamer press. It's meant to look at retailers in particular.

 

We moved it earlier in the year to make it more relevant to the retail environment. We're looking [for] developers, business partners, hardware and accessory manufacturers. It's a much broader audience, which is much more traditional, or shares more in common with the older versions of E3.



Comments

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

One more nail in the coffin people?

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

One more nail in the coffin people?

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

I well theres always next year.  Eventually ESA will get their heads out of their behinds and finally hear what their wallets are saying.

And to be honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if more of the industry leaves the ESA and start their own E3.

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

Why can't E3 be a week long event, which is closed to the public from monday to friday and then opens to the public on Saturday and Sunday.

This would mean that the gaming companyies could talk to the press do any buisessness stuff they needed to in the week and when the weekend came go into full overblown hype mode and hand out lots of cheap plastic things.

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

ESA seems to be nothing but a bunch of idiots.

What do they expect to accomplish by letting industry employees and media be the only ones in?

I hear about good upcoming games from my friends who make it to various expos and I tell my friends about the games I see at E For All and PAX. Word of mouth is very powerful.

Ben Burgess

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

New headline from the ESA, "And in a related story, I like pie!"  Yep, we have a definite case of bloated ego related moron syndrome here.

"We do not hear debates about teaching whether the holocausts happened or did not in history classes, so why should we even entertain the notion for Intelligent Design?"

"If you really want to enslave people, tell them you are going to give them Total Freedom." - L. Ron Hubbard

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

Yay, the ESA keeps proving it's jsut a bunch of suits and they have no qualms with alienating who practicalyl pays their salaries.

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

Mysterious suitcases full of money can change anybody's opinion.

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

 Wow, talk about a failboat. They're just hammering more nails into the coffin, meanwhile PAX and Blizzcon and similar, run by people with a clue, will continue to grow and be successful.

The game industry exists because of consumers. Not letting consumers into gaming trade shows is absolutely retarded, and recent history has shown us this is true.

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

"Cartman land is going to be awesome, but you can't come."

----------------------------------------------------

"What for you bury me in the cold cold ground?" - Tasmanian devil

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

So, in other words, after more than two years, millions of dollars wasted, and tons of bad press, they've finally started to realize that "scaling back" E3 to almost nothing was a bad idea?

-Gray17

-Gray17

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

E3 is back! ...but it's not. Gotcha. Lulz.

******************** "Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor, and the contrary opinion is wishful thinking at its worst. Breeds that forget this basic truth have always paid for it with their lives and freedom

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

And this is where they are going to go wrong...  should have scrolled down before posting in the newer one...

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

They really should stop beating this dead horse with a stick. Not only is it starting to make a distressing smell, it's beginning to leak unsavoury fluids too.

 

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
E. Zachary Knightquiknkold, I stand corrected on the buttcrack thing. Still, I know of no fabric that actually does that.09/17/2014 - 5:05pm
Andrew EisenSo... it's unethical to discuss the ethics surrounding public interest vs. personal privacy?09/17/2014 - 4:45pm
prh99The source for the game was just released not long ago, it's at https://github.com/keendreams/keen09/17/2014 - 4:43pm
prh99An Indiegogo champagin bought the rights to the early 90's game Keen Dreams to make it open source and release it on GOG etc. https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/let-s-get-keen-dreams-re-released-legally09/17/2014 - 4:42pm
james_fudgeAlso http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/09/17/Exposed-the-secret-mailing-list-of-the-gaming-journalism-elite09/17/2014 - 4:29pm
Andrew EisenI read the Kotaku story. Nowhere does it say anything close to "Gamers are white bigoted sexist losers." It's commenting specifically on the crap being slung at people discussing gender issues in games. So, what's the problem?09/17/2014 - 4:06pm
Andrew EisenYeah, I can imagine Spiderwoman posed like in your second link.09/17/2014 - 4:00pm
Andrew EisenThat's not the same pose. Spiderman (who is wearing an actual outfit rather than body paint) is crouched low to the ground. Kinda like a spider! Spiderwoman has her butt up in the air like she's waiting to be mounted.09/17/2014 - 3:59pm
quiknkoldAndrew Eisen : Kotaku did a whiole article on it, as did others http://kotaku.com/we-might-be-witnessing-the-death-of-an-identity-162820307909/17/2014 - 3:59pm
CMinerQuiknkold: Do you think that there are no cases where a piece of art (painting, movie, videogame, comic cover, etc) is unambiguously sexist?09/17/2014 - 3:58pm
quiknkoldand can you imagine if Spiderwoman was posed like this? http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/spider-man1.jpg09/17/2014 - 3:58pm
Andrew EisenWhat games outlet is writing articles saying "Gamers are white bigoted sexist losers"? What examples have you seen of journalists being paid off for favorable reviews? Who's shaming what now? What's the problem with critiquing the Spiderwoman cover?09/17/2014 - 3:57pm
james_fudgeWell there's def "politics" involved in this issue. The movement was hamstrung by bad behavior and illegal activites here. We would have covered it more if not for those unforutnate happenings.09/17/2014 - 3:56pm
quiknkoldhttp://i.imgur.com/v3p8Bwf.jpg Here you go EZacharyKnight. Spidermans Buttcrack.09/17/2014 - 3:56pm
quiknkoldwhile another person doesnt see it09/17/2014 - 3:56pm
quiknkoldJames_fudge : I feel like the people challenging Games are the same people who Challenge Art because Michaelangelo's David shows Wang. The problem is, alot of things with Games are left to the eye of the beholder. One Person see's Sexist Antiwomen views.09/17/2014 - 3:55pm
E. Zachary Knightquiknkold, I don't recall Spider-man's costume conforming to the contour of his buttcrack.09/17/2014 - 3:54pm
quiknkoldIts the same Agenda Fueled Journalism youd find on Fox News or MSNBC. I appreciate Gamepolitics for just stating the facts.09/17/2014 - 3:54pm
james_fudgeQuiknold: you're entitled to your opinion on creatives being left alone. Others are entitled to their opinions that they should be challenged.09/17/2014 - 3:53pm
quiknkoldI can point specifically to the Spiderwoman Milos Manara cover as an example. Not strictly VG Related, its still the same example of journalists attacking Milos's artwork, claiming its sexist, when its the exact same pose Spider-man has done on a cover.09/17/2014 - 3:52pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician