E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

October 23, 2008 -

Reports this week which claimed that E3 2009 would be at least partially open to the public were just wrong, it would now appear.

Yesterday game publishers trade group the ESA, which owns E3, issued a press release detailing the new format. And you're probably not invited. Here's what we know:

  • Dates: June 2-4, 2009
  • Location: L.A. Convention Center
  • Invited: "all qualified computer and video game industry audiences, including international and U.S.-based

When we asked ESA P.R. guy Dan Hewitt to clarify whether the public would be eligible to attend, he told us:

There will be opportunities to view the E3 Expo and learn about what's going on at the show, but it won't be open to the general public.

The show will be capped at 40,000 attendees, well up from the ghost town feel of this year's 5,000 attendee flop, but just a bit more than half of E3's peak years of 2004-2006.

ESA boss Michael Gallagher was interviewed on the new E3 format by Destructoid. Among his comments:

We have a much, much broader audience than the targeted show that we ran the last two years, which was very focused on press-only and really U.S. press. This is meant to target international press, mass media, as well as just gamer press. It's meant to look at retailers in particular.

 

We moved it earlier in the year to make it more relevant to the retail environment. We're looking [for] developers, business partners, hardware and accessory manufacturers. It's a much broader audience, which is much more traditional, or shares more in common with the older versions of E3.



Comments

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

One more nail in the coffin people?

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

One more nail in the coffin people?

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

I well theres always next year.  Eventually ESA will get their heads out of their behinds and finally hear what their wallets are saying.

And to be honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if more of the industry leaves the ESA and start their own E3.

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

Why can't E3 be a week long event, which is closed to the public from monday to friday and then opens to the public on Saturday and Sunday.

This would mean that the gaming companyies could talk to the press do any buisessness stuff they needed to in the week and when the weekend came go into full overblown hype mode and hand out lots of cheap plastic things.

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

ESA seems to be nothing but a bunch of idiots.

What do they expect to accomplish by letting industry employees and media be the only ones in?

I hear about good upcoming games from my friends who make it to various expos and I tell my friends about the games I see at E For All and PAX. Word of mouth is very powerful.

Ben Burgess

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

New headline from the ESA, "And in a related story, I like pie!"  Yep, we have a definite case of bloated ego related moron syndrome here.

"We do not hear debates about teaching whether the holocausts happened or did not in history classes, so why should we even entertain the notion for Intelligent Design?"

"If you really want to enslave people, tell them you are going to give them Total Freedom." - L. Ron Hubbard

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

Yay, the ESA keeps proving it's jsut a bunch of suits and they have no qualms with alienating who practicalyl pays their salaries.

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

Mysterious suitcases full of money can change anybody's opinion.

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

 Wow, talk about a failboat. They're just hammering more nails into the coffin, meanwhile PAX and Blizzcon and similar, run by people with a clue, will continue to grow and be successful.

The game industry exists because of consumers. Not letting consumers into gaming trade shows is absolutely retarded, and recent history has shown us this is true.

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

"Cartman land is going to be awesome, but you can't come."

----------------------------------------------------

"What for you bury me in the cold cold ground?" - Tasmanian devil

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

So, in other words, after more than two years, millions of dollars wasted, and tons of bad press, they've finally started to realize that "scaling back" E3 to almost nothing was a bad idea?

-Gray17

-Gray17

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

E3 is back! ...but it's not. Gotcha. Lulz.

******************** "Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor, and the contrary opinion is wishful thinking at its worst. Breeds that forget this basic truth have always paid for it with their lives and freedom

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

And this is where they are going to go wrong...  should have scrolled down before posting in the newer one...

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

They really should stop beating this dead horse with a stick. Not only is it starting to make a distressing smell, it's beginning to leak unsavoury fluids too.

 

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilsonyes it help a sub section of the poor, but hurt both the middle and upper class. in the end way more people were hurt than helped. also, it hurt most poor people as well.04/16/2014 - 12:13am
SeanBJust goes to show what I have said for years. Your ability to have sex does not qualify you for parenthood.04/15/2014 - 9:21pm
NeenekoSo "worked" vs "failed" really comes down to who you think is more important and deserving04/15/2014 - 7:04pm
NeenekoThough I am also not sure we can say NYC failed. Rent control helped the people it was intended for and is considered a failure by the people it was designed to protect them from.04/15/2014 - 7:04pm
NeenekoIf they change the rules, demand will plummet. Though yeah, rent control probably would not help much in the SF case. I doubt anything will.04/15/2014 - 1:35pm
TheSmokeyOnline gamer accused of murdering son to keep playing - http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Crime/2014/04/15/21604921.html04/15/2014 - 11:50am
Matthew Wilsonyup, but curent city rules do not allow for that.04/15/2014 - 11:00am
ZippyDSMleeIf SF dose not start building upwards then they will price people out of the aera.04/15/2014 - 10:59am
Matthew Wilsonthe issue rent control has it reduces supply, and in SF case they already has a supply problem. rent control ofen puts rent below cost, or below profit of selling it. rent control would not fix this issue.04/15/2014 - 10:56am
NeenekoRent control is useful in moderation, NYC took it way to far and tends to be held up as an example of them not working, but in most cases they are more subtle and positive.04/15/2014 - 10:24am
PHX CorpBeating Cancer with Video Games http://mashable.com/2014/04/14/steven-gonzalez-survivor-games/04/15/2014 - 9:21am
Matthew Wilsonwhat are you saying SF should do rent control, that has never worked every time it has been tried. the issue here is a self inflicted supply problem imposed by stupid laws.04/15/2014 - 8:52am
E. Zachary KnightNeeneko, Government created price controls don't work though. They may keep prices down for the current inhabitants, but they are the primary cause of recently vacated residences having astronomical costs. Look at New York City as a prime example.04/15/2014 - 8:50am
NeenekoI think free markets are important, but believe in balance. Too much of any force and things get unstable.04/15/2014 - 7:25am
NeenekoWell, the traditional way of keeping prices down is what they are doing, controls on lease termination and tax code, but it will not be enough in this case.04/15/2014 - 7:24am
Matthew WilsonI said that already04/14/2014 - 4:22pm
E. Zachary KnightMatthew, The could also lower prices by increasing supply. Allow high rise apartment buildings to be built to fulfill demand and prices will drop.04/14/2014 - 3:48pm
Matthew Wilsonthe only way they could keep the price's down, would be to kick out google, apple, amazon, and other tech companies, but that would do a ton of economic damage to SF, but I am a major proponent of free markets04/14/2014 - 2:54pm
NeenekoThe community people are seeking gets destroyed in the process, and the new people are not able to build on themselves. Generally these situations result in local cultural death in a decade or so, and no one wins.04/14/2014 - 2:09pm
NeenekoWell yes, that is the 'free market', but the market is only a small piece of a much larger system. The market does not always do the constructive thing.04/14/2014 - 2:06pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician