In Australian Govt., One Guy is Blocking Badly-needed R18+ Rating

October 30, 2008 -

With a number of high-profile games facing bans or near-bans, gamers in Australia are literally begging for the addition of an R18+ classification.

But, as The Age reports, one guy is screwing it up for everyone.

GamePolitics has reported in the past on the anti-game antics of Michael Atkinson, the South Australian Attorney General. The Age has the latest:

Censorship ministers in March agreed "in principle" to canvas public opinion on the proposed introduction of a R18+ classification for games and release a discussion paper on the issue, but Mr Atkinson has refused to agree to make the report public, effectively shelving it...

"Games may pose a far greater problem than other media - particularly films - because their interactive nature could exacerbate their impact," Mr Atkinson said. "The risk of interactivity on players of computer games with highly violent content is increased aggressive behaviour."

Australia is the only developed country without an R18+ classification for games... Ron Curry, CEO of the Interactive Entertainment Association of Australia, [said] "You could be forgiven for taking a view that the South Australian Attorney-General has now actively censored the debate on censorship. What's next?"

GP: It's amazing that one guy can stand in the way of a nation of gamers.

Big thanks to: GP reader Jarrod from Australia for the tip!

And did we mention that... The Australian government is moving toward implementation of mandatory Internet censorship? Just like China!

Now that's progress...


Comments

Re: In Australian Govt., One Guy is Blocking Badly-needed R18+

Here you go.

Findings:

-Games provide a sense of acheivement, unlike passive mediums like television.

-Active participation decreases the tendency to "forget" your experiencing a fantasy vs. non-interactive visual mediums.

-Gamers find violence in television and movies more upsetting than violence in games.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: In Australian Govt., One Guy is Blocking Badly-needed R18+

thank you

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: In Australian Govt., One Guy is Blocking Badly-needed R18+

Thats a great study.

Thanks for the link!

Re: In Australian Govt., One Guy is Blocking Badly-needed R18+

Why doesn't anybody get rid of him?  He obviously doesn't represent the people of Australia.

--- Official Protector of Videoland!

--- Official Protector of Videoland!

Re: In Australian Govt., One Guy is Blocking Badly-needed R18+

 We see this censorship in Asia, Australia, and Europe. Can a U.S. censorship be far behind? We've passed unconstitutional, anti-amendment-one laws before...

Re: In Australian Govt., One Guy is Blocking Badly-needed R18+

 If no one does anything, then sure, US censorship could be on it's way. It's really just a question of how far can government push it's power without anyone really pushing back.

Re: In Australian Govt., One Guy is Blocking Badly-needed R18+

Hopefully if it ever does come to that (heaven forbid), I think the people in the States would be very, very vocal about it, hopefully.

Re: In Australian Govt., One Guy is Blocking Badly-needed R18+

We've already got the FCC, which dictates what you can and can't do/say on tv or radio.

Re: In Australian Govt., One Guy is Blocking Badly-needed R18+

The FCC is limited (though there is a push on extending its power) but basically it only has power for things that can be accessed freely (ie the radio air waves and tv air waves).  Cable isn't restrained by this, though the push for ala carte may send it that direction.  Plus, the courts have been pushing back against some of the more stupid FCC censor stuff (the fleeting explitives for instance).

 

Foaming at the mouth

Foaming at the mouth

Re: In Australian Govt., One Guy is Blocking Badly-needed R18+

He is likely damn proud of this too.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which Feminist Frequency video are you looking forward to most?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Wonderkarpwell we had to christen it some way01/31/2015 - 7:13pm
Andrew EisenThank goodness the Shout box now goes back 100 shouts, eh folks?01/31/2015 - 7:10pm
Wonderkarpyouve said youre stuff. I gave you a point on one thing.01/31/2015 - 7:04pm
Andrew EisenNo, they're facts. Not beliefs. Not opinions. Facts. Do I need to list them all for you again? I'm happy to oblige.01/31/2015 - 7:02pm
Andrew EisenAnd I have seen no evidence (and would find it very hard to believe) that her fans and funders, even the most radical, would be the ones perpetuating that nonsense.01/31/2015 - 7:01pm
Wonderkarpabout as right as Glenn Beck is about the gays, man. Its all your beliefs and opinions.01/31/2015 - 7:01pm
Andrew EisenI didn't say you did. And this talking head is still right about everything he's said so far.01/31/2015 - 6:58pm
Andrew EisenAlso, considering the number of non profits that merchandise, I'm going to guess you're wrong on that one too but I don't really know as it's not my area of expertise.01/31/2015 - 6:58pm
WonderkarpYou can keep saying that all you want. Its just a talking head, man. there's all the proof in the pudding. I never said she was trying to take away games, or get rid of male protagonists, or any of the BS thats perpetraited by her more radicalfans/funders01/31/2015 - 6:56pm
Andrew EisenNo, as I've spelled out throughout this discussion, you're wrong.01/31/2015 - 6:53pm
Wonderkarpok. that one I am wrong. I'll give you that one. That was one I didnt research properly. BUT I'm right on the others.01/31/2015 - 6:53pm
Andrew EisenFact: It makes no difference whether she recorded the footage or not. Fact: yes she does have a Section 107 'fair use' disclaimer at the end of every video and in the video description.01/31/2015 - 6:47pm
Wonderkarpsaying otherwise. I've presented a video with cited sources combined with opinion. Youre presenting just your opinion. 01/31/2015 - 6:43pm
Wonderkarpits still important information brought up on the original video. and by not saying anything, the casual observer thinks its her footage. there's no "section 107 Fair use" disclaimer. Its as if she's showing star wars and saying "look what I made" without01/31/2015 - 6:43pm
Andrew EisenIf that's true, maybe she's willing to lose her tax exempt status by merchandising. So? Also not a problem with her Kickstarter. And no, I don't have to be a rep of FemFreq to point out how nonsensical, irrelevant and untrue all this nonsense is.01/31/2015 - 6:43pm
Andrew EisenShe doesn't say it's not her footage and she never said she'd record all her own footage. So this isn't a problem. I doubt she's said anything like "no women or non white people are critics of mine." Regardless, nothing to do with her Kickstarter.01/31/2015 - 6:41pm
Wonderkarpvalet about parking info01/31/2015 - 6:41pm
Wonderkarpyour glenn beck to her republican party. you can refut all you want, but its not going to matter until femfreq comes out and disputes these claims because you are not a member of fem freq. you are a second party. I dont ask the man standing next to the01/31/2015 - 6:39pm
Wonderkarpis free gifts01/31/2015 - 6:39pm
WonderkarpListen and Believe is one of the slogans Femfreq touts on twitter. and Non profits are in danger of losing their tax exempt status by merchandising. Its a big nono. I worked at the MDA for a while and they do NOT sell merchandise. anything they do have01/31/2015 - 6:38pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician