Report Links Game Violence to Aggression in U.S. and Japan

November 3, 2008 -

A new report links violent video games to aggressive tendencies in children in both the United States and Japan.

According to the Washington Post, the report published in the journal Pediatrics examines research conducted by Dr. Craig Anderson (left) of Iowa State University as well as work by a pair of Japanese researchers. All three studies are of the longitudinal variety. From the WaPo:

Anderson said the collaboration with Japanese researchers was particularly telling because video games are popular there and crime and aggression are less prevalent. Some gamers have cited Japan's example as evidence that violent games are not harmful.

Yet the studies produced similar findings in both countries, Anderson said. "When you find consistent effects across two very different cultures, you're looking at a pretty powerful phenomenon," he said. "One can no longer claim this is somehow a uniquely American phenomenon. This is a general phenomenon that occurs across cultures..."

 

"We now have conclusive evidence that playing violent video games has harmful effects on children and adolescents," Anderson said.


Anderson also told the WaPo that video games are only one of a number of influences on a child's behavior:

A healthy, normal, nonviolent child or adolescent who has no other risk factors for high aggression or violence is not going to become a school shooter simply because they play five hours or 10 hours a week of these violent video games... [Extreme forms of violence] almost always occur when there is a convergence of multiple risk factors.

The Des Moines Register has additional comments from Anderson:

The [Japanese] culture is so different, and their overall violence rate is so much lower than in the U.S. The argument has been made - it's not a very good argument, but it's been made by the video game industry - that all our research on violent video game effects must be wrong because Japanese kids play a lot of violent video games and Japan has a low violence rate.

By gathering data from Japan, we can test that hypothesis directly and ask, 'Is it the case that Japanese kids are totally unaffected by playing violent video games?' And of course, they aren't. They're affected pretty much the same way American kids are.

Anderson's study was previously detailed in his 2007 book Violent Video Game Effects on Children and Adolescents: Theory, Research and Public Policy.

Full report available here.


Comments

Re: Report Links Game Violence to Aggression in U.S. and Japan

Actually this study shows that violence is NOT CAUSED BY GAMES.

IF kids are affected the same but the violence level is on different sides of the spectrum then maybe something else is responsible? Like something completely UNRELATED?

Seriously if anything this study proves what we have been saying all along... violence not caused by games... and this idiot is trying to twist his findings to fit his ideology against every possible logical interpretation...

Re: Report Links Game Violence to Aggression in U.S. and Japan

''IF kids are affected the same but the violence level is on different sides of the spectrum then maybe something else is responsible? Like something completely UNRELATED? ''

 

Thats what i thought!!

 

The reasoning makes NO SENSE!

Violent videogames affect Japanese kids in the same way they affect American kids..

But Japanese kids are prone to less violence than americans..

So surely another factor is in play here?

Re: Report Links Game Violence to Aggression in U.S. and Japan

You know what? no. I don't think so.

 

once again a study tries to claim causation when it's really just wrong.

And there's one comment he says that just damns the entire study

 

 

"By gathering data from Japan, we can test that hypothesis directly and ask, 'Is it the case that Japanese kids are totally unaffected by playing violent video games?' And of course, they aren't. They're affected pretty much the same way American kids are."

 

 

I'm sorry what?

they are affected the same way, but japan has less violence?

 

this is basically apples and oranges. nothing more.

 

The other thing that disturbs me is that they only compare videogames. I mean if they tried other things like sports, or movies, or even actual violence I think they'd find much more than just "vidjagames cause violence" 

 

 

and for the record

NO ONE EVER CLAIMED VIDEOGAMES BEING BLAMED FOR VIOLENCE WAS EVER UNIQUELY AN AMERICAN PHENEMON

Re: Report Links Game Violence to Aggression in U.S. and Japan

Japan has no guns, you idiot.

November 3, 2008 Chairman Kevin Martin Commissioners Copps, Adelstein, Tate, and McDowell Melanie Godschall Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. Via e-mails to KJMWEB@fcc.gov, Michael.Copps@fcc.gov, Jonathan.Adelstein@fcc.gov, dtayl

Re: Report Links Game Violence to Aggression in U.S. and Japan

...um... no??

Re: Report Links Game Violence to Aggression in U.S. and Japan

''Japan has no guns, you idiot. ''

 

Wow.. you just beat yourself in an argument. Takes quite a bit of skill.

Not the best point to make as supporting evidence that videogames  DO cause violence. Your suggestion is clearly that the increased violence is due to the availability of guns. So lets say your right.

Therefore increases in violence are not due to violent videogames, but availability of guns.

now who is an idiot. You sound an awful lot like DisbarredGuy. Hows it going working in macdonalds?

 

 

Re: Report Links Game Violence to Aggression in U.S. and Japan

Wow, Jack that

was

fucking stupid

And let see, than that must mean I'm a cow.

ARE YOU THAT FUCKING STUPID?!

>:(

Re: Report Links Game Violence to Aggression in U.S. and Japan

So basicly what they are saying is: "Japan's violence rates fly in the face of our theory, so are are choosing to ignore Japan."

 

-Ultimately what will do in mankind is a person's fear of their own freedom-

Re: Report Links Game Violence to Aggression in U.S. and Japan

Damn...you quoted that blatent self contradiction of an argument before I could.

So, his argument is this....

A)  Causes violence among American youth

B)  Has the same effects on Japanese youth

C)  Japan has a stunningly low violence rate

D)  Thus, because the same effects that occur with American youth happne with Japanese youth, they're also super violent like we are.

I'm sorry....what?  If this guy's argument held any water, Japan would have a similar reaction as the US, which in his argument means more violence.  The sheer fact that this violence isn't happening proves how false his argument is. 

Occam's Razor shows that this guy got it wrong.  There are too many variables present for his argument to hold, and after that the empirical evidence still doesn't match up.  Wouldn't it be much easier to see and argue that, because Japanese youth and American youth are affected in the same way, yet because Japan's violence rate is so low, that video games don't lead to outbursts of violence?  Out of the two possible arguments, this one has the fewest variables and the empirical evidence correlates to it, thus Occam's Razor is used to make an argument which has a better chance of being logical (ie, correct).

Science is logical.  You can become very good at understanding Science.  However, this doesn't mean that you become logical as well.

Re: Report Links Game Violence to Aggression in U.S. and Japan

Nowadays, scientific papers sometimes can be just as bad as toilet paper. I don't even know how this kind of crap is allowed to be written and distributed.

Re: Report Links Game Violence to Aggression in U.S. and Japan

This guy sounds like he learned his arguements from everyone's favorite disbarred idiot lawyer.

Re: Report Links Game Violence to Aggression in U.S. and Japan

As least he says that it's only one out of many factors. But I believe violent video games are as harmful as television shows, and movies.

Re: Study Links Game Violence to Aggression in US, Japan

Sorry, but doesn't it seem that yet again we have a classic case of correlation as opposed to causation? Anderson's comment that this is "conclusive evidence" that video games have harmful effects seems to be missing quite a bit of ground.

Re: Study Links Game Violence to Aggression in US, Japan

No, the study finds causation, not correlation.  Apparently you are unable to read.

November 3, 2008 Chairman Kevin Martin Commissioners Copps, Adelstein, Tate, and McDowell Melanie Godschall Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. Via e-mails to KJMWEB@fcc.gov, Michael.Copps@fcc.gov, Jonathan.Adelstein@fcc.gov, dtayl

Re: Study Links Game Violence to Aggression in US, Japan

That's strange coming from someone who refuses to acknowledge his own spelling errors, blaming on the owners of blogs, Mr. 'I sign my name and you don't.'

Oh, wait, you didn't sign your name here. Guess that makes you an anonymous coward, Mr. Thompson.

Have a nice life in the loony bin.

David "DavCube" Gagnon, Mature Human Being, and You're Not.

Re: Study Links Game Violence to Aggression in US, Japan

Wrong again.  Longitudinal studies are by their very nature correlational.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Study Links Game Violence to Aggression in US, Japan

The study shows that playing video games triggers an aggresive behavior, like the kind triggered by any sporting activity. It makes no mention of gaming cause violent behavior at all.

Do video games make people competitive? Yes, but violent tendencies and competitve aggression are two totally different things.

"

Re: Study Links Game Violence to Aggression in US, Japan

I agree that this looks a lot more like correlatlion.  To claim that this is "conclusive" simply because they got the same results across two different cultures means nothing and is little more than an interesting footnote.

I've heard time and time again that comic books, television, movies, books, and any other type of storytelling medium can lead to increased agression in various forms.  I doubt that many people run off after reading a Steven Ding novel with the intention of doign harm to anyone.

I'd like to see a study of how much agression is "generated" by a hotly debated political issue vs. how much agression is "generated" by a violent game, book, movie, etc...

I can't believe these studies are even done and that people think they are legitimate.  Its about as legitimate as all those studies that wern't able to link smoking to cancer.  It was even the same story.  Correlation, not causation.

 

Such crap.

Re: Study Links Game Violence to Aggression in US, Japan

"Japanese kids are affected in the same way American kids are." Which is not much. 

Basically, their research failed to find anything, and yet they still consider the link between games and violence "conclusive." We've heard it all before.

Re: Study Links Game Violence to Aggression in US, Japan

I betcha hotly debating something especially with people who can't consider or comprehend your line of reasoning generates more aggression.

----------------------------------------------------

"What for you bury me in the cold cold ground?" - Tasmanian devil

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: Study Links Game Violence to Aggression in US, Japan

Then we DEFINITELY need to ban religion, cars, bikes, hell all transportation, work, TV, radio, birds, and people.  Hell I have found the solution.  Lets just nuke this damn planet and kill everyone on it, then there is no more aggression.  I think causing aggression in kids, and the parent teaching them the correct way of dealing with that aggression is a good thing, not a bad one.

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
E. Zachary KnightThe Daily WTF has a nice run down of some of the impact to software that the US Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage has. http://thedailywtf.com/articles/i-m-not-married-to-the-idea07/02/2015 - 7:45am
MechaCrashGee, how did people ever get the idea Gaters are morons who argue in bad faith? It's such a mystery.07/02/2015 - 7:03am
E. Zachary KnightGoth, again, no one is saying that we shouldn't be writig uncomfortable subject matter. What people are saying is that chances are you are going to write it poorly so it would be better to not have done it at all.07/02/2015 - 7:00am
Goth_Skunkdiscussed or portrayed in an expressive medium. Such an opinion only serves to stifle discussion. And as I said before, the only thing not worth talking about is what shouldn't be talked about.07/02/2015 - 6:50am
Goth_Skunk@Info: The same reason why I would entertain the notion that the Wired article writer could be right: Curiosity. Except in this case, I'm not curious at all. I'm not interested in hearing anyone's opinion on why uncomfortable subject matter shouldn't be07/02/2015 - 6:49am
IvresseI think the problem with the Batmobile is that they made it a core aspect of the game that you have to do continuously. If it was basically a couple of side games that were needed for secret stuff or a couple of times in the main game, it would be fine.07/02/2015 - 5:38am
Infophile@Goth: If you're not willing to entertain the idea you might be wrong, fine. That's your right. But why should anyone else entertain the idea that you might be right? If they go by the same logic, they already know you're wrong, so why listen to you?07/02/2015 - 3:53am
MattsworknameEh, I love the new batmobile personally, it's a blast to mess aroudn with. Plus, the game is set in a situation that mroe or less leaves batman with no choice but to go full force. And even then, it still shows him doing all he can to limit casualties.07/01/2015 - 11:38pm
Andrew EisenAgreed. Luckily, we don't seem to be in danger of that of late. No one's suggesting, for example, that tanks shouldn't be in video games, only that the tank in Arkham Knight is poorly implemented and out of place from a characterization standpoint.07/01/2015 - 11:27pm
MattsworknameConfederate flag, Relgious organizations, etc etc. Andrew isnt[ wrong, just remember not to let that mentality lead to censorship.07/01/2015 - 11:20pm
Mattsworknamefind offensive or disturbing, and that mindset leads to censorship. It's all well and good to say "This would be better IF", just so long as we remember not to let it slide into "This is offensive, REMOVE IT". IE , the current issues surroundign the07/01/2015 - 11:19pm
MattsworknameAndrew and goth both have points, and to that point, I'll say. Saying somethign is improved by changing something isn't a problem, on that I agree with , but at the same time, on of the issues we have in our society is that we want to simply remove things07/01/2015 - 11:18pm
Andrew EisenSee? Suggestions for improvements that involve taking things away do not mean the work is garbage or performing poorly, critically or commercially.07/01/2015 - 9:29pm
Andrew EisenSkyward Sword is spiff-a-rific but it would be an improved experience if the game didn't explain what each item and rupee was every single time you picked them up!07/01/2015 - 9:27pm
Andrew EisenHere's another: De Blob is a ton of fun but it would be improved without motion controls. Incidentally, THQ heard our cries, removed motion controls for the sequel and it was a better game for it!07/01/2015 - 9:24pm
Andrew EisenI'll give you an example: Arkham Knight is a ton of fun but the tank sucks and the game would be even better without it.07/01/2015 - 9:23pm
Goth_SkunkWell clearly we're diametrically opposed about that.07/01/2015 - 9:03pm
Andrew EisenNot even remotely true.07/01/2015 - 8:59pm
Goth_SkunkIt is, if the suggestion involves taking something away from a product in order to make it better.07/01/2015 - 8:49pm
Andrew EisenOffering suggestions for improvement does not mean that the work in question is garbage or not doing fine.07/01/2015 - 8:21pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician