U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, Sort of...

November 4, 2008 -

Gizmodo reports that the Office of Naval Research has funded a team at the University of California San Diego to begin developing what amounts to a power suit similar to that worn by Gordon Freeman, protagonist of Valve's uber-popular Half-Life series:

The system will monitor a few biomarkers for deviations from safe levels, at which point it will automatically medicate its wearer...

 

...the military applications are what's exciting about this. Take a current soldier's body armor, night vision goggles and communications equipment, throw in an automatic medical treatment unit and voila! You've basically got Gordon Freeman's HEV suit. There is no indication that the suit will make the satisfying "uhhuummuhhuummuhhuumm" sound like Mr. Freeman's, but there's no indication that it won't, either.


Comments

Re: U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, ...

It would need so much stuff, like:

Flashlight
Geiger counter
Morphine administrator
Long jump module
Radio
Tracking devices
HUD (Ammo, hp, weapon list)
Health monitor
Voice files                                                                                                                       Electrically hardened armour
Helmet
Binoculars
Antidote injector

Other stuff I forgot.

Re: U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, Sort

What about the vaguely British female voice? Will it have that too?

Re: U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, Sort

More importantly, will the flashlight be usable for more than 30 seconds at a time?

Re: U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, Sort

My dreams have all come true. What will come next? Perhaps a good mario movie? Maybe the army will develop mario armor. ahhh its nice too have tech these days

Shobidoo, the hardcore gamer

Re: U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, Sort

But Mario dies everytime someone throws a mushroom at him.

--
A house is not a home unless it contains food and fire for the mind as well as the body. Benjamin Franklin

Re: U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, Sort

They've been working on that tech for the past 15 years. It was called Task Force 21 in the '90s and their main purpose was to test enhancements and replacements for then current tech.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Re: U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, Sort

I want to know when they're going to develop the Gravity Gun.  And the Portal Gun.

Re: U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, Sort

Now you're thinking with portals.  Fuck...now I want to go play that game again.

Re: U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, Sort

Heh, that was perfect. I actually WANT the Gravity Gun. Any idea if they plan on making the organic version?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Game on, brothers and sisters." -Leet Gamer Jargon

-----------------------------



"A Chrono Trigger is anything that unleashes its will or desire to change history!" -Gaspar

Re: U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, Sort

I am surprised they dont secretly already have this...  They have some top secret planes that wont be unclassified for a good decade that are utterly amazing though...  They can go ungodly speeds, and use less fuel than flying normally at normal speeds.  What they say they want to have in 30 years, they already have typically.

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, Sort

Oh I'm sure they have a lot more than than this. At the risk of sounding the crackpot conspiracy theorist they've got to have more than they let on. The thought of having a full suit of rigid "powered" armor is the next natural evolution of warfare. We've already seen a serious shift in the recent past in tactics focusing toward small teams. So would it not follow that military R&D would focus on making those units more effective?

-- Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici... By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe

Re: U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, Sort

Good thing we have dedicated Internet Detectives such as yourself bringing these military secrets to light.

Re: U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, Sort

In that case, maybe they DO already have it, and just haven't revealed he fact yet. :-) The funding is just a trick, or to check and see whether this team's research will maybe bring to light some new ideas for the working model of the suit.

Re: U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, Sort

That suit is absolutly useless. What kind of hazard suit cant go through hazards??? It can't go through radioactive waste, it can't go through steam, can't go through fire, it can't take bullets very well, also can't go through electrical currents, doesn't protect you from explosions. Useless. Absolutly useless. For hazardous enviroments at normal, stereal, at STP.

Re: U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, Sort

Are you serious? Are you saying that you think you could go through the ridiculous punishment that Gordon Freeman does without a suit? Hundreds of bullet wounds, lacerations, falls, impacts, and so on?

A normal person blasted with steam could be maimed or killed by it. Most people die from less than a handful of bullet wounds; you'd frankly be lucky to survive being shot ONCE. Just because the armor doesn't make you invincible doesn't mean that it's not a monumental improvement over natural human durability.

Re: U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, Sort

I expect Hazardous Enviroment Suit to allow me to pass through small pockets of radioactive material... This Hazard suit does not protect you from many hazards....  Bullets are reasonable, but electrical currents? steam? even a small fire, Radioactive material which would be an every day object in Black Mesa? Those are hazards that the Hazardous enviroment suit can't save you from.

Re: U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, Sort

Acctualy, in Half Life 2 you are not effected by radiation unless you directly contact the source,  that could easily be atributted to the suit protecting you from the radioactive material's well... radiation?

 

Not to mention the core in episode 1.

Re: U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, Sort

Again, you're misconcieving invulnerablity for protection. Just because it doesn't stop EVERYTHING, doesn't mean it won't prevent the bulk of the damage.

What the Half-Life games didn't show you is how quickly Gorden would get his ass kicked without the suit. And he DID go everywhere without the helmet, so it's not like there was a perfect seal.

Still, I encourage you to compare walking through a fire in a flame retardant suit, and then without. Compare notes and see if your hypothesis still holds. Feel free to try this with a hazmat suit and radioactive materials, too.

Re: U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, Sort

I still expect it to do reasonably well in adverse conditions. This thing can't even go through a freezer without damaging!

Re: U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, Sort

Uh, yes it did, or did you not play threw the opening to Half Life 2? There is a brief segment where you can be sugmeneted to enemy fire before you get the suit.

Re: U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, Sort

Actually, they did show what'd happen to him without the suit.  Notice all those scientists in white lab coats that got totally rocked?  Yeah...that would have been Gordon.

Re: U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, Sort

It's so true. That haz-mat suit Gordon wore was pretty much worthless.

Re: U.S. Navy Wants to Build Gordon Freeman's Power Suit, Sort

You don't know that; think about how much damage Gordon WOULD take without that suit. And even if it didn't...

IT LOOKS TOTALLY AWESOME!

 

Now that's freaking awsome

Very cool indeed. And JT says video games only causes problems... haha

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenWhat I find most amazing is the fact that Yiannoppoulos's evidence doesn't in any way support his claim. And I still fail to see the lack of ethics in discussing the ethics surrounding public interest vs. personal privacy.09/19/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOh yeah, some outlets sensationalize things (especially with the chosen headline). No argument there. As far as gender issues not being widespread? I'm inclined to disagree but I suppose it depends on what specifically you're talking about.09/19/2014 - 3:43pm
SleakerI think I've been qualitatively informed by those Factual Femenist videos that there isn't reallly a widespread gender issue, and that there are select news outlets that try to sensationalize things.09/19/2014 - 3:37pm
james_fudgeI'm just going to leave this here before someone else does:http://yiannopoulos.net/2014/09/19/gamejournopros-zoe-quinn-email-dump/09/19/2014 - 3:21pm
NeenekoI have met some real jerks and slimeballs in gender activism, but when I hear the idea that there are many 'not nice' people it comes across as code for 'uppity people who do not know their place'.09/19/2014 - 12:10pm
Andrew EisenKrono - Many of the people pushing gender issues aren't nice people? I'm sure not everyone's a sweatheart but so far, everyone I've seen with such a critique had absolutely nothing to back them up.09/19/2014 - 10:46am
InfophileI think there's a qualitative difference between a site and a hashtag though. GP can ban anyone from commenting, so they can have the image they want. But anyone can use any hashtag and try to poison it. Granted, that hasn't happened to the other one yet09/19/2014 - 10:13am
E. Zachary KnightKrono, your comparison to GP does not work. We do not need to get rid of GP, because no one associates GP with trolls and abuse. The same can't be said for gamergate.09/19/2014 - 10:09am
Krono@Michael You don't remember the "other hashtag" because no one actually uses it. We're talking 836,983 uses of #gamergate over it's lifetime, and 8,119 for the "alternative". 47,129 uses on the 18th vs 41. With #notyourshield at 140,133 uses & 5,209 uses09/19/2014 - 9:48am
Kronoresearch it. Changing tags to get away from trolls would be like wiping GamePolitics and restarting under a new name to get away from people calling Jack Thompson a filthy names in the comments section.09/19/2014 - 9:35am
Sleaker@quiknkold - seems like all that page is is a bunch of random developer opinions and rumors that we're supposedto do what with?09/19/2014 - 9:31am
Kronoas an opportunity to push back against them. It's one of the things muddling the issue. @conster A new hashtag would do nothing to improve anything. Trolls will simply follow to the new hashtag, and it will confuse the issue for anyone attempting to09/19/2014 - 9:25am
Krono@Andrew aaah. Yes, I'm sure there's some of that. Part of the problem is many of the people pushing gender issues are not very nice people. Basically the latest incarnation of moralists we've seen in the past couple decades. Naturually some will take this09/19/2014 - 9:23am
quiknkoldhttp://www.nichegamer.net/2014/09/real-gamedevs-sound-off-regarding-the-gamergate-controversy/09/19/2014 - 8:35am
MaskedPixelanteMeanwhile, in news that actually DOES matter, Scotland voted "NO" to Scottish independance.09/19/2014 - 8:20am
ConsterSeriously? "We shouldn't make a new hashtag - it's better to associate ourselves with psychos than to decrease our visibility"?09/19/2014 - 7:54am
Michael ChandraI forget what it is exactly, but there already is another hashtag that some use, exactly to separate themselves from the abusive behaviour. So don't bother lying to me.09/19/2014 - 7:06am
quiknkold2 to 3 or more09/19/2014 - 6:53am
quiknkoldMichael Chandra : I'll say this. The only reason they havent used another hashtag is because it would look like a form of dividing the arguement. Using another Hashtag has come up, and they feel like if they made a new hashtag, it'll split the debate from09/19/2014 - 6:53am
Michael ChandraYou want a debate? Build a wall between you and the poisoned well. Make clear you despise it, despise the behaviour. Then get into the other issues you are troubled with, and don't say a single word again about the poisoned well.09/19/2014 - 3:46am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician