In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New Game Violence Study

November 7, 2008 -

This week, GamePolitics has been tracking public outrage over Kaboom: The Suicide Bombing Game, a no-budget affair created by an amateur and posted online.

While the game is admittedly in very poor taste, there's not a lot to be done about it. As a non-commercial offering, Kaboom is not subject to any content rating requirements. And, since it is hosted outside the U.K., it would seem to be beyond the reach of English law.

But such logic has never been known to stop British Labour MP Keith Vaz, who has now taken his objections to Parliament. Vaz had the following exchange yesterday with MP Harriet Harman, Leader of the House of Commons:

Vaz: Has my right hon. and learned Friend had the opportunity to look at early-day motion 2416? (quoted):

[That this House condemns the creation of the online computer game Kaboom which asks the player to replicate the actions of suicide bombers; believes that this game is offensive to the families of those killed by suicide bombers and devalues all human life; further believes that this game depicts an unnecessary level of violence; is deeply concerned that vulnerable people under the age of 18 are able to access and play this game; calls upon the game's creator to show sensitivity and responsibility by removing it from the internet; welcomes the findings of a new study from Iowa State University which recognises the link between violent video games and aggressive behaviour; and calls on the Government to revise its regulation of violent video games.]

[The motion] refers to an online computer game called "Kaboom", which asks players to replicate the actions of a suicide bomber. Does my right hon. and learned Friend agree that that is offensive to the families of the victims of suicide bombings and that it devalues human life? I have raised this matter on several occasions at business questions and in other debates. What action are the Government taking to remove such material from the internet or, at the very least, to approach service providers to ensure that they take appropriate action? Children and young people will be able to have access to those games. Could we have a debate on this important matter?

Harman:
The Government are concerned about the effect on children of violent internet and video games, which is why we commissioned the Byron review. That set out how we need action from parents, from the industry itself and from the Government to ensure that there is proper control of content and clear labelling to protect young children. I pay tribute to my right hon. Friend's long-standing interest in these issues, which he had even before he became Chair of the Select Committee on Home Affairs. Under his leadership, the Committee has taken a strong interest in such matters. I bring to his attention the fact that on Thursday 13 November, in Westminster Hall, there will be a debate on the question of harmful content on the internet and in video games.

GP: Vaz is referring to the game violence study published by Dr. Craig Anderson earlier this week. Anderson's work has been challenged by Dr. Chris Ferguson of Texas A&M

GamePolitics will be tracking Parliament's game violence debate on Nov. 13th.


Comments

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

Remember, this is the country that bans video ames ads AFTER they stop running. film izle

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

another jesus jack jones thompson orginal burger... coming right up!!!!!

Jesus Jack Jones Thompson.... is dead... (funeral udruge, followed by Celebrate :D )

Jesus Jack Jones Thompson loves you, so kill for his amusement so we can get money for the new "People's Temple of Jesus Jack Jones Thompson"

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

OH GOD, THE HAMBURGLAR'S RETURNED!!!

_____________________________________________

Jack Thompson: future Good Burger employee of the month

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

"FACE PALM"

Never underestimate the power of idiots in large amounts.

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

Its like raining the thought police down on a news corp for printing a unpopualr story/ieda...wow...FAIL.....

I is fuzzy brained mew =^^=
http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/
(in need of a bad overhaul)


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

This game was posted online like 6 years ago. Old and boring. Why are they even bothering?

 

 

The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. ~ Benjamin Franklin

Yes, I am a liberal. I also believe in a strong military, less government, and the right to bear arms. 

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

Remember, this is the country that bans video ames ads AFTER they stop running.

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

Very simple questionm y friend. They are bothering because it furthers their own agenda. They take offense and put forth that anyone can play these and as such they need to increase regulation of totally unrelated games. He wants to get these things in place before people who know what is going on speak up.

The games that this guy has latched onto in order to push his ideals down other people's throats have nothing to do with what he is attempting to do, they are mearly a straw man. He waves them around like a flag, and while everyone looks over there, he picks their pocket of all sense and reason.

Vaz should be ashamed at the circus he is attempting to create.

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

All lies and jest.
Still a man hears what he wants to
hear and disregards the rest.
 

-Paul Simon

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

One the game is hosted in America ... and it seems the UK has the same problem that the good ol USA has you are not our boss your leaders are not our leaders that means your whining and your laws have no weight here so get over it. 

Two; we have this annoying document that was a result of the UK called the Bill of Rights it has this little section called the First Amendment which protects Freedom of Speech guess what the game falls under that’s right Freedom of Speech guess what that means not even our own government is capable of pushing for it to be taken down. 

And last but not least this game is what 7 years old?  God why don’t you find Custards Revenge and whine that innocent child can pull down an emulator, pull down a rom of this game, and then rape a poorly pixilated Indian over and over cause god that game is so relevant.

Frankly I know its pointless to post the above here but I am constantly amazed at zealots; it must be fun running around with blinders on.

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

Just so they will shut the hell up, the creator should put a screen up that ask how old the user is.  The guy has the right to make any type of art he wants, even if it offends people.  The university I went to had 2 deers having sex in missionary position even.  It offended a crap load of conservatives, which is most of what my state is, and they failed at getting it removed.

It is IMPOSSIBLE for them to make the guy remove it from the internet.  They may be able to get him to if they offer the right amount of money, but other than that, they can only ASK that he at least put a BS how old are you screen up, just like what most porn sites have.  He can even have the default set to 18.  I would put a note below it that it was not because of the UK I did it too if I was him.  Make sure this isn't a political victory for them, even though it would be a stupid one if it was.


---
Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
Financial Calculator for anyone interested in seeing the basic run

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

>Just so they will shut the hell up, the creator should put a screen up that ask how old the user is.

Yes, because the legally-enforced age rating system on commercial games in the UK stopped everyone complaining about those.

Oh, wait.

/b

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

Ach, ze narrow mindedness of zat generation. Ze tot horse iz flogged once more.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Papa MidnightWii U Games finding Solidarity with PC Gamers :(08/19/2014 - 6:09pm
Zenbuy all of the bad DLC before they even showed the main content everyone was waiting for. I paid for it, I wanted it, and I got tossed aside.08/19/2014 - 4:10pm
ZenIanC: Yep, both Call of Duty games did the same thing holding back all DLC and then releasing the day one map 2 YEARS later out of the blue. Why play what they won't support. Warner Bros canceled their DLC after promising it because Wii U owners didn't08/19/2014 - 4:09pm
Andrew EisenShe's the developer of Depression Quest. It's an interesting game (although I wouldn't call it fun) and you can check it out for free at depressionquest.com.08/19/2014 - 2:48pm
Sleakerwhat's all this Zoe quinn stuff all over and should I even bother looking it up?08/19/2014 - 2:37pm
IanCExactly Zen. The third one had random delays to the DLC and they just came out seemingly at random with no warning, and the 4th they didn't even bother.08/19/2014 - 2:31pm
ZenI may have bought both AC games on Wii U, but WHY would anyone be expected to get the game when they came out MONTHS before release that they were skipping DLC and ignoring the game? They poisoned the market on themselves then blamed Nintendo players.08/19/2014 - 1:27pm
Papa MidnightIn review, that's fair, Andrew. I just tend to take Gawker articles with a lot of salt, and skepticism.08/19/2014 - 12:07pm
Matthew WilsonFor one has a English speaking support team for devs. Devs have said any questions they have, were translated in to Japanese. then back in to English. 08/19/2014 - 11:41am
Adam802they need to realize the "wii-fad" era is pretty much over and start rebooting some old great franchises like they are doing with star fox08/19/2014 - 11:39am
Adam802unfortunatly, this seems to represent 3rd party's position on the wiiU in general. Nintendo has always sucessfully relied on 1st party but now since 3rd parties and console "power" are so important this gen, they're in trouble.08/19/2014 - 11:38am
IanCOkay, so what can Nintendo do to these 3rd parties? Huh? If a company release games late with missing content then of course it won't sell. Seems simple to me.08/19/2014 - 11:25am
Andrew EisenSakurai and Co. REALLY need to go back in there and re-pose Samus. She is so incredibly broken.08/19/2014 - 11:06am
ZippyDSMleeUntill Nin starts paying out the azz or doing much much more to help 3rd party games development, the WIIU is dead in the water.....08/19/2014 - 11:03am
ZippyDSMleehttps://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=316135481893472&id=22417313775637408/19/2014 - 11:02am
ZippyDSMlee*gets out the popcorn* this will be fun08/19/2014 - 11:01am
Andrew EisenIt's not as simple as "Nintendo gamers don't buy AC games."08/19/2014 - 11:01am
Andrew EisenACIII was late, missing DLC (so was IV) and was on a brand new platform that had never had the series competing against two platforms that had an install base of 80 million a piece who had all the previous games.08/19/2014 - 11:01am
Andrew EisenI'd say TechDirt is being a bit unfair towards Kotaku's article to the point of slightly mischaracterizing it. It's not really bad but, while a little muddled, neither is the Kotaku article.08/19/2014 - 10:59am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician