Nebraska Attorney General is Latest to Partner with ESRB on Ratings Ad Campaign

Nebraska Attorney General is Latest to Partner with ESRB on Ratings Ad Campaign

November 26, 2008

AS we enter the holiday shopping season, the ESRB has apparently been working overtime to gain endorsements for its content rating system from state-level political heavyweights.

In recent days GamePolitics has reported that key elected officials in Mississippi, Missouri, Kansas and New Jersey have endorsed the ESRB ratings.

The latest to climb on board is Nebraska's Attorney General Jon Bruning (R). Yesterday, Bruning and the ESRB jointly launched a public service announcement which will air on local radio and TV. The campaign is designed to raise parental awareness of game ratings as parents begin their holiday shopping. Bruning, no doubt, is also expecting that the ads will raise parental awareness of Bruning.

In the spot, the A.G. is seen playing Xbox 360 game with his children. The game isn't shown, but we can safely assume it isn't GTA IV or Left 4 Dead. Bruning offers a comment in the accompanying press release:

Parents should be involved and take an active role in choosing games for their kids. The ESRB ratings are an effective tool every parent can use to pick video games that are age-appropriate and family-friendly.  I use them when I buy games for my children.  I hope Nebraskans will too.

GP: In addition to Bruning and others who signed onto the ESRB campaign recently, more than a dozen elected officials, primarily governors and A.G.s, are already on board.

As GamePolitics has pointed out before, the ESRB PSAs are a win-win for the game industry as well as for the political figures involved. The ESRB proactively gets its message out to parents. The political figures in turn are able  to promote an image of helpfulness and concern. Production costs are on the game industry's dime, and, because they are public service announcements, radio and TV stations run the ads for free.

From a strategic perspective, this campaign has been little short of brilliant. Whoever thought of it deserves a raise.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Re: Nebraska Attorney General is Latest to Partner with ESRB on

Brilliant actually. Bring awareness to the parents, rather than fearmongering (much like some unreasonable idiots perfer to do). That is a great move and I welcome it.

Re: Nebraska Attorney General is Latest to Partner with ESRB on


It will be interesting to see what the world will be like in 5 years...

---
Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: Nebraska Attorney General is Latest to Partner with ESRB on

Did you catch the subliminal Nintendo message in the video?

Brunig is playing the 360, but he says, "Wii always follow the ratings..."


Re: Nebraska Attorney General is Latest to Partner with ESRB on

All of these videos are the same thing. Not much is changed. At least tell the parents that M means mature and not "mild" or something.

Re: Nebraska Attorney General is Latest to Partner with ESRB on

Rated 'M', for 'Mostly Harmless' 

Re: Nebraska Attorney General is Latest to Partner with ESRB on

yes, they are mostly the same. We chronicle them here at GP because, well, that's what we do...

Re: Nebraska Attorney General is Latest to Partner with ESRB on

Well, we all know what great parents they are in Nebraska.

Ago. Perceptum. Teneo.

Re: Nebraska Attorney General is Latest to Partner with ESRB on

amazing how JT never posts in these threads where things are actually going the way he wants them to.

Re: Nebraska Attorney General is Latest to Partner with ESRB on

Actually this is going the opposite of what he wants. He wants the ESRB to fail and be charged with RICO (even though there is no way they can be charged with that), and politicians to ban many mature games and heavily regulate the others. He'll grumble about this and claim it is another conspiracy...

Re: Nebraska Attorney General is Latest to Partner with ESRB on

There's only one thing Jack's interested in: Annoying us. Whatever he can use as fuel, he snatches it up like he just found a big nugget of gold. Which is what makes him both pathetic and dispicable.

Re: Nebraska Attorney General is Latest to Partner with ESRB on

I see one issue with these PA's.

Where are the PA's reminding parents to check the ratings on DVD's?

Where are the PA's reminding parents to check book jackets?

Where are the PA's reminding parents to evaluate the TV ratings?

While I applaud the effots to raise parental awareness of the ESRB ratings I still have concerns with the idea that a specific format of media is being targeted and treated differently.

It seems the AG's and gov's are deciding that video games are more dangerous that other media.

The different treatment still concerns me even though the format is encouraging.

Re: Nebraska Attorney General is Latest to Partner with ESRB on

1. Movies have been around much longer than games, people are in general more aware

2. where is the standardized book rating system to reccomend? this is generally a non-issue, anyway: kids barely read, the books they do read are the standard teen fare, and those who arent reading that are probably going to be mature enough to handle it anyway

3. i dont know, personally i see about 3 'v chip' ads per day

A specific format of media is being targeted and treated differently? do you prefer I watch The Office at the local cinema? Do you prefer I page through my videogames? media are different, and should be treated as such

Re: Nebraska Attorney General is Latest to Partner with ESRB on

To be completely honest.  I don't feel media should be treated differently.  That's not neutral treatment, its deciding one form of media is inherently more dangerous that another and I find that discriminatory and counter to first amendment law.  But that's my personal opinion.  I see your argument, jus tdisagree with it a little.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 02/09/10 at 03:31pm
DarkSaber: Hm, Bioshock. Not that Zippy likes to beat the dead horse by ranting about it for TWO $&%£ING YEARS!
Posted 02/09/10 at 03:30pm
DarkSaber: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/9.173063-Bioshock-yet-another-zippy-rant
Posted 02/09/10 at 03:26pm
Valdearg: @DS: Link!! LINK!
Posted 02/09/10 at 03:20pm
DarkSaber: Although, unsurprisingly, he's just being called an idiot alot and criticised for being as illegible as always.
Posted 02/09/10 at 03:18pm
DarkSaber: Oh good lord, I just found Zippy on The Escapist.
Posted 02/09/10 at 03:14pm
Valdearg: IE: Male body/Female Mind or Female Body/Male Mind.
Posted 02/09/10 at 03:13pm
Valdearg: @Zip: TG == Transgendered/Transsexual.
Posted 02/09/10 at 03:09pm
DarkSaber: Forget it Zippy, it's an abbreviation of a big word and so would be wasted on you
Posted 02/09/10 at 03:07pm
ZippyDSMlee: Vlag:....TG?
Posted 02/09/10 at 03:02pm
Valdearg: @DS: Im sure that's what they'd do if it wasn't legal to just tell Gays/TG's to "Screw off," just because they're who they are.
Posted 02/09/10 at 02:50pm
DarkSaber: Whoever told him/her/it that is dumb. They should have done like most companies and made-up some bullshit, yet legal, reason for it not getting the job.
Posted 02/09/10 at 01:18pm
Valdearg: I do agree that it shouldn't be legal. That's for sure.
Posted 02/09/10 at 01:16pm
Andrew Eisen: Shouldn't be. Spirit of anti-discrimination laws would seem to include sexual orientation (and eye color). Plus there's always equal protection and such. Never know until you try.
Posted 02/09/10 at 01:14pm
Valdearg: @AE: Doubtful. Again, it's perfectly legal.
Posted 02/09/10 at 01:10pm
Andrew Eisen: Should have sued (unless that wasn't an option given her financial situation or something). Might have won.
Posted 02/09/10 at 01:00pm
Valdearg: Story about a Male to Female TG who was expressly told she wouldn't be given a job because she was TG. Its not the main point of the story, but explicit, perfectly legal discrimination like this exists.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:53pm
Valdearg: Lol, I don't know. It may very well be legal to do so. Though that might able to fall under the "race" restriction, depending on how that point is argued.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:51pm
Valdearg: I don't think they do have any legal recourse. I'll have to dig around, but I seriously believe that if the law doesn't specifically mention Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity, they can still be discriminated against in those 29 states.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:51pm
Andrew Eisen: Eye color isn't covered either but I doubt it would be considered legal to refuse to hire people with green eyes.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:48pm
Andrew Eisen: My explanation is longer than the Shoutbox will allow. Suffice to say that while those who are discriminated against do have legal recourse, anti-discrimination law should specifically cite sexual orientation so that there’s no question about it.
Login or register to post shouts