Take-Two's Zelnick: Financial Crisis? What Financial Crisis?

December 4, 2008 -

It's a good thing that Strauss Zelnick is so good at running media companies.

Because he'd never make it as a financial analyst.

Reuters reports on the Take-Two head's somewhat obtuse view of the current global financial meltdown. Zelnick made his remarks at the Reuters Media Summit:

I don’t think we’re in a financial crisis.

 

The use of the word crisis — I’m loathe to be critical of the media since I’m every bit a part of the media — but I don’t think the word has been especially helpful. We’re obviously in a recession and these are very very trying times.

Zelnick then pushed the metaphorical envelope with this bit of imagery:

We’re still seeing the car crash, and the ambulances are still showing up at the scene. Maybe we’re in the emergency room, but we’re not even in the intensive care unit yet for a lot of these companies. But they will get there.

A separate Reuters report offers the Z-man's take on how the game biz is weathering the current financial crisis ...oops, "very, very trying times":

I think everyone was encouraged by Black Friday. It was better than expectations, but it's pretty hard these days -- being slightly down is the new up.


Comments

Re: Take-Two's Zelnick: Financial Crisis? What Financial Crisis?

Google said the same thing, but they went down from $700 per share to just over $200 a share within one year.

Re: Take-Two's Zelnick: Financial Crisis? What Financial Crisis?

Their not going to have a great year next year, simply because they don't have a lot out. GTA (DLC) and GTA China Town Wars is basically it for them, and their NBA games are going to do okay as they have for the past few years but thats it, if anyone wants to remind me of other games 2K has next year.

Re: Take-Two's Zelnick: Financial Crisis? What Financial Crisis?

He's absolutely correct.  A good portion of this recession can be laid at the feet of the scare mongering media.

Recession?  Absolutely.  Depression?  Getting there.  Crisis?  Having nukes pointed at us from a country close enough to sail to on a make-shift raft is a crisis.  Having your 401-k lose a good chunk of money you never really had is NOT a fucking crisis.  It's plain ignorance.  Congress is just fucking a football if they think spending money they don't have to save businesses that are going to fail anyway is a solution. 

http://consumerist.com/5101440/2008-bailout-costs-as-much-as-several-large-and--famous-government-projects-combined

The scope of their ridiculous 'solution.'

You want a root cause of this financial turmoil?  Stop ignorantly blaming GW Bush and write some letters to your Congress members.  They are the cause.

~~All Knowledge is Worth Having~~

~~All Knowledge is Worth Having~~

Re: Take-Two's Zelnick: Financial Crisis? What Financial Crisis?

Tough to argue with, and I actually agree with everything you said.  Blaming GW for it all is kind of like firing the coach when the team sucks; the fans feel better temporarily but it doesn't really help your team that much.  I'm very anti-bailout myself for the reasons you mentioned, plus on the moral side, it just seems to reward the undeserving.

"There is no sin except stupidity." - Oscar Wilde

"De minimus non curat lex"

Re: Take-Two's Zelnick: Financial Crisis? What Financial Crisis?

He should've added some hookers and an uzi to that car-crash metaphor to turn it into a GTA ad.

"It's like, the economy is Lance Vance, and it's bleeding out in the garbage dump.  Now, Lance hasn't seen Tommy Vercetti yet, but he will, and then the two of them will go murder Diaz and take over Vice City for a while.  What I'm saying is, the economy is going to betray us to Sonny and we're going to have to kill it to preserve our assets.  Where's my chaingun?"

---
The Mammon Industry

---
Fangamer

Re: Take-Two's Zelnick: Financial Crisis? What Financial Crisis?

This is only 'not a crisis' if we compare it to the Wall Street Crash of 1929 (and it could still be that major - the Wall Street Crash took three years to hit bottom).  Compared to everything else, this is a huge crisis.

Re: Take-Two's Zelnick: Financial Crisis? What Financial Crisis?

"The use of the word crisis — I’m loathe to be critical of the media since I’m every bit a part of the media — but I don’t think the word has been especially helpful. We’re obviously in a recession and these are very very trying times."

I happen to agree with this sentiment. I don't think the use of the word "crisis" (or "meltdown" or "depression" or any of the other overblown terms) has been especially helpful. It creates fear in people and causes them to cut back more than they normally would or more than is necessary, which then causes a domino effect within the economy. If the media made it a point to simply present the facts without making it sound like the score in the latest football game we'd probably all be better off.

Re: Take-Two's Zelnick: Financial Crisis? What Financial Crisis?

He's right, crisis is a buzz word.

 

Not only are we not in a resseseccion (2 consecutive quarters of negetive GDP growth) until the end of this quarter, I have never heard the Carter years (stasticly much worse then the present) called a crisis.

Re: Take-Two's Zelnick: Financial Crisis? What Financial Crisis?

Well, maybe for him there is no Financial Crisis, but for us, we are pretty screwed... I wanted to buy a PS3 and some games, but with the dollar price falling and everything else rising as a rocket, I´ll have to wait even more.

Thanks, George Bush, you screwed my Christmas... :(

 

Somewhere in Miami:

JACK THOMPSON: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! I´ll destroy you Zelnick, I swear to God your soul will be mine!!! AAAAAAAAGH!!!!!! Vidjagamez are EV1lZZZ!!!! ILL SUE YOU AAAAAALL IM A LOWL PERSON!!!!

Costumer: Sir, where is my damn BigMac? I´ve been asking it to you for 20 minutes!

JACK THOMPSON: Quiet, moron gamer!, I´m bitching on my column at HumanEvents about random conservative facts that normal people don´t care!

Kid Costumer: Can I haz my Happy Meal, sir?

JACK THOMPSON: OMG! A gamer! Please, don´t kill me!!! (soils his pants)

Random Lady: Oh God, that´s awful!!!

CSI Miami Intro: YEAAAAAAAAAAHH!!!!!

 

The cynical side of videogames (spanish only): http://thelostlevel.blogspot.com/ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com/

Re: Take-Two's Zelnick: Financial Crisis? What Financial Crisis?

LMAO!  I wonder how the rest of the show would turn out.

--- Official Protector of Videoland!

--- Official Protector of Videoland!

Re: Take-Two's Zelnick: Financial Crisis? What Financial Crisis?

Jack and Horatio fight on a rooftop, and Jack shoots himself on his foot. Then Jack jumps from the building in waiting to be saved magically by Jesus. But Jack survives, because he fell on a truck loaded with manure. :(

Then Jack tries to sue Jesus and turns to the islam and blames videogames and Obama. CSI Miami cast do a colective facepalm at the end of the episode :(

The cynical side of videogames (spanish only): http://thelostlevel.blogspot.com/ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com/

Re: Take-Two's Zelnick: Financial Crisis? What Financial Crisis?

LOL, seriously though, i don't wish harm on JT, but JT always seem to bring pain to himself.... i feel bad (ALMOST) for JT for losing his licesnce to ramble about violent video games

Jesus Jack Jones Thompson.... is dead... (funeral udruge, followed by Celebrate :D )

Jesus Jack Jones Thompson loves you, so kill for his amusement so we can get money for the new "People's Temple of Jesus Jack Jones Thompson"

Re: Take-Two's Zelnick: Financial Crisis? What Financial Crisis?

Strauss Zelnick isn't wacky, he's a genius!

--- Official Protector of Videoland!

--- Official Protector of Videoland!

Re: Take-Two's Zelnick: Financial Crisis? What Financial Crisis?

His positive outlook is good. It's good to be optimistic.

of course someone will be in soon to claim Take Two is going down thanks to him, of course giving past predicitons, Take Two will be fine,.

Re: Take-Two's Zelnick: Financial Crisis? What Financial Crisis?

I thought Zelnick will be worried, unless that GTA4 DLC and GTA4 (for PC) sell well they are gonna have problems. As it stands, I heard problems are very bad on GTAIV PC. I say he is in a crisis, not much looking forward besides this DLC and relations with PC owners are damaged yet again from the buggy release.

Re: Take-Two's Zelnick: Financial Crisis? What Financial Crisis?

 Yeah, GTAIV-PC has higher requirements than Crysis. Har har

Re: Take-Two's Zelnick: Financial Crisis? What Financial Crisis?

I like his positive outlook.

oops didn't mean to reply to you, but to the thread.

 

lol

Re: Take-Two's Zelnick: Financial Crisis? What Financial Crisis?

I think it is better you did it this way, because it just shows how wacky this guy is.  Positive, but definitely a bit wacky, and not really seeing all the job losses happening, though T2 will prolly have to make cuts here soon.

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

 

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: Take-Two's Zelnick: Financial Crisis? What Financial Crisis?

That is a terrible metaphor the way he's trying to use it to make his point, given that being in ICU is when recovery is supposed to begin.

The car crash is what would be considered the crisis if he were using his metaphor more sensibly.

Re: Take-Two's Zelnick: Financial Crisis? What Financial Crisis?

If it isn't Strauss.

Needs more 1u1z. Therefore, needs more Jack.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Game on, brothers and sisters." -Leet Gamer Jargon

-----------------------------



"A Chrono Trigger is anything that unleashes its will or desire to change history!" -Gaspar
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
TechnogeekUnfortunately, the shoutbox moves fast enough that I can't find why I got that impression, so if was indeed erroneous I do apologize.07/02/2015 - 4:34pm
TechnogeekBut yeah, as far as my earlier comment re: you and the article, I did get the impression at some point that you felt there should have been some sort of reprecussions for the article's existence.07/02/2015 - 4:34pm
TechnogeekI got expletive-censored for posting something a few weeks back wherein I expressed my shock that I agreed with you about something, Skunk; so you're not the only one being hit with that stick.07/02/2015 - 4:31pm
Andrew EisenI know you don't. And you haven't recently so all's well.07/02/2015 - 4:25pm
Goth_SkunkI don't think I misrepresented anything.07/02/2015 - 4:24pm
Andrew EisenHeavy profanity is not permitted in the Shout box. Words like "moron" are but we ask that our readers not resort to name-calling.07/02/2015 - 4:23pm
Goth_SkunkSo I can't say a 4-letter curse word, but Mechacrash is free to call me a moron. Acknowledgment: Mecha was warned about his conduct, but his post was not edited, as mine was.07/02/2015 - 4:20pm
Andrew EisenWhat people took issue with was your misrepresentation of what the author said. Now that you're criticizing what she actually said, no one has a problem (though they might disagree with your opinion).07/02/2015 - 4:19pm
Andrew EisenThat's not comparable at all. One is advice, one is a rule.07/02/2015 - 4:17pm
Goth_SkunkBut apparently, people seem to take issue with my justification and have been jumping down my throat about it for... 24 hours?07/02/2015 - 4:17pm
Goth_SkunkAnd now we've just had an example wherein I was forced to moderate myself in order to minimize offense.07/02/2015 - 4:16pm
Goth_SkunkThat's what this whole conundrum's been about! I strongly disapproved with the Wired article writer's suggestion and made that opinion known here in the shoutbox.07/02/2015 - 4:16pm
Andrew EisenPlease keep such strong language out of the Shout box. Anyway, that's fine. If there's something you want to write about. Go right ahead. Don't like someone's suggestion? Feel free to say so.07/02/2015 - 4:13pm
Goth_SkunkIf I get a response "this rape scene you wrote was offensive. You should've done it differently. Consider examples A, B, C, or D" I would happily take it under advisement should I decide to write something similar in the future.07/02/2015 - 4:12pm
Goth_SkunkIf I get backlash for such a decision consisting of "this rape scene was offensive," that's fine. If I get criticism like "this rape scene was so offensive, you shouldn't have written it," I'll respond "Go (expletive) yourself"07/02/2015 - 4:11pm
Andrew EisenMatthew - Oh, absolutely. But no one's saying any specific trope or subject should be taboo.07/02/2015 - 4:11pm
Andrew EisenA few have opined that I should have left the "I'm on a whore" line out of my Old Spice Parody video. I don't see why that's a problem.07/02/2015 - 4:10pm
Goth_SkunkHypothetical: If I'm writing a story and in my story there is a rape scene, and that rape scene is present because I want it to be there, and it is very relevant to the story as a whole, I'm going to write it.07/02/2015 - 4:10pm
Matthew WilsonI think it should be criticized for being used badly, but I dissagree with the idea that is should never be used. as far as I am concerned its a story telling tool, and like all tools it can be used in a good or bad way.07/02/2015 - 4:09pm
Andrew EisenI could still put those lines in the story. But they sucked. That's why I didn't put them there in the first place. And had I, I think it's perfectly fine for readers to recommend I consider leaving such tripe out in the future.07/02/2015 - 4:09pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician