Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

December 15, 2008 -

The controversy continues over a torture quest found in the recent Wrath of the Lich King expansion for World of Warcraft.

As GamePolitics reported last week, the "Art of Persuasion" quest gained notoriety when MUD co-creator Richard Bartle wrote about his discomfort with for the mission's requirement that the player torture information out of a prisoner.

Some were appalled by the quest while others excused it as just a game. However, in a thought-provoking column, Wired's Clive Thompson looks deeper and argues for even more instances of virtual torture in games:

Torture has devastating repercussions. It permanently erodes the character of the torturer and, worse, of the public that condones the torture... From my perspective, Americans aren't thinking very seriously about those consequences...

 

Why? Partly because U.S. officials refuse to describe or admit clearly what they're doing. But equally important, I think, is that our mass culture is filled with wildly misleading ideas about how torture works... Which is why we need more torture in videogames.

Games are excellent vehicles for helping people inhabit complex, difficult situations... What's more, gamers love this stuff. Several of the biggest recent games were praised precisely because the moral acts inside them had long-term consequences. In BioShock, you could either save or exploit the Little Sisters... In Fable, decisions made in the first 15 minutes of play... change the moral tenor of your home town 15 years later...

I'd like to see games that had more torture — and better torture — in them. In this alarming chapter of American history, they might wind up fueling the best public debate yet.


Comments

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

I sort of a agree with Thompson here, I think ? (I'm torn here, I find) - especially if there is consequence for the player who decides to torture the (innocent?) man in the game.

On the other hand the tv-series ROOTS did show how 'evil' some plantations owners were to their slaves; waterboarding has also been shown on the news. In a Danish tv-documentary 'your neighbour's son' Danish tv proved that almost anyone could become a torturer or a tormentor/executioner. In the Harry Potter books nasty stuff also happens to Harry and his friends....

From a design point I find the torture quest in WoW lacking; you do not have the option to say 'no', or to kill the questgiver, or to liberate the prisoner.... In BG1, in the mines of Cloakwood? you could choose to flood the mines or not. In Icewind Dale 1, signs of horrible acts were all around. And in Mass Effect you have to make a choice concerning someone; you also get to decide whether a species will survive or not.

Given this information, I can sort of understand why some feel that people's reactions to this quest (art of persuasion) is that 'it is no big deal' and 'it is only virtual pixels that are being tortured'. And yes it is. And apparently the torture of the pixels have sparked a good discussion and debate over this at several WoW blogs and forums. And that is definetely a good thing...

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

Am i the only one who is tired of always being the hero, or in some cases the comical villain? Games should be what litterature is, free. Some of the people posting here make it sound like the only use for torture in games is to show the players, nay to teach the players that torture is ethically and morally wrong.

What's morally wrong is when you restrict storytelling elements to only one use.

RTS gamer

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

@

While I certanly wouldn't say we should be pointing at Manhunt 2 as an example to show the press about, originally the game had moral conflicts, before they were stripped away by the esrb/bbfc. Because apparently having a bad ending counts as an unlockable and therefore a good thing to achieve, thus prompting you to use more violence to get said bad ending. I mean yes, you get a different final level, but the bad one is naff. I would have loved to see the morals play into the final build, but sadly it was not meant to be.

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

You know what really disgusts me...

That people can get excited over virtual torture (and let's face it, a blue zap and some text =\= realistic torture scene, the character does not even move/react) and yet remain silent on the issue of real torture, particularly government mandated.

Reminds me of the Fat Princess drama that got the feminists all riled up.  There are enough problems in the real world without trying to solve 'issues' in the virtual one...

To me, the people that complain about this sort of shit are just too bloody lazy to get off their ass and tackle a real issue (which might involve some actual work), so they sit at their desk blogging away as if it actually makes any difference.  Which is a pity because there are plenty of real inequities and injustices in this world already...

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

I am of the opinion that there needs to be more controversial stuff in games. We need to make people think. Controversy is an easy and effective way of starting a discussion. But I am not talking about Manhunt type controversy, but more stuff like this.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
MySpace Page: http://www.myspace.com/okceca
Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1325674091

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

But the best way to stir up controversy would be manhunt style torture and excessive violence.

One could easily have the character go from waterboarding to castrating men with pliers to get information from the more adamant enemies (if that makes any sense).

----------------------------------------------------

"What for you bury me in the cold cold ground?" - Tasmanian devil

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

I keep track of some of the more prominent WoW blogs, and that torture quest provoked a lot of intelligent discussion. From a community that much more frequently is just discussing the ways to max their damage, there was a lot of discomfort with the idea of torture - a definite slipping into the skin of the character that isn't all that common even in a roleplaying game. It was really thought provoking and I was highly impressed at the time. I'm not at all in favor of stifling discussion about unpleasant realities, and the discussion I've seen has been both realistic and meaningful. I'm inclined to agree with Thompson, don't push it under the rug, people respond in surprising ways.

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

Here's an interesting parallel article along the same lines for another media format:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27917851/

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

Nightwng2000 has also updated his MySpace page: http://www.myspace.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

I would love to see a torture scene in a game, where you employ the most heinous tools, the most horrible practices, blood everywhere, with the victim begging for it all to stop, while you beg him to confess to his crimes and release the names of his cohorts.

Then, once you've nearly destroyed him, he collapses, near death. It's only then that your superior walks into the room and tells you that while you've been in the torture room, the real culprit has been found. The man you've been torturing was 100% innocent.....

This is the way many real life torture scenes end.

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

While I think a good use of torture in a game would be you go through that entire process and the victim finally gives up some information which turns out to be wrong because they would say anything to make it stop.

Thus teaching the player that torture for information doesn't always get you honesty (which in America is a big deal considering in TV/Movies it is always portrayed as 'torture someone and they will give you the truth', when in reality it is a pretty worthless form of information gathering)

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

Well, the real problem with torture is that it's wrong even if the guy is guilty.  John McCain, for example, was guilty of what his torturers were accusing him (i.e. bombing civilians), but that still doesn't mean that torturing him was right.

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

I think complex moral choices that effect the overall course of a game are always a great idea.

As for putting saddistic torture into games, sure why not? oh right the AO rating... and FOX telling everyone how they were right about games all along... and Bans... hmm kind of doubt that a major game deloper would risk millions of dollars on this...

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

Oh who cares what Fox has to say about games, all their whining and moaning will accomplish nothing except free advertising. Sure the games might be banned in Australia or Germany but torture is mostly an issue for the U.S.

And I bet if you have a certain portion of it off camera (although you might still be able to see sillhouettes (sp) or hear the brutal sounds) you can easily avoid an Ao rating.

----------------------------------------------------

"What for you bury me in the cold cold ground?" - Tasmanian devil

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

True, major publishers will probably shy away from things like this.

 

But it is yet one more thing that indy developers could probably address and hopefully bring some new blood into an increasingly dull and repeditive industry.

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

There are a lot of things in American History that should be taught in our schools but are not.  Not saying that we should train the kids that our country is bad, but that we are not always right, and learn from those mistakes.

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls


Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

What the hell are you talking about?

We are taught about slavery and the treatment of native americans...

What else should we be teaching? we shouldn't have challenged britain? we should have stayed out of wwII?

seriously what are you talking about?

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

Keep in mind, those things are still barely taught in many american schools and a few decades ago even less so.

The native american example is actually a good one.  Go back a generation and the mistreatment was not taught.  Even today it is handled very differntly from school to school and in some regions manifest destinty is still taught as a wonderful thing.

I can recall my school was unusual in that it questioned the Gulf of Tonkin insodent.  My GF's school didn't even talk about it.  The Japanese camps in WWII are only starting to be addressed over the last decade or so, and schools are not going over Regan erra (or cold war in general) ickyness.

Progress?  Yep! A long way to go.. also Yep!

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

My daughter was just taught at school that Christopher Columbus was a hero who helped the Arawak indians.  I guess my daughter's teacher didn't get the memo about him having the hands cut off of Arawaks who didn't bring him enough gold, or how he and his cronies eventually got so frustrated with the lack of gold that they just had the entire population hunted to extinction.

I was quick to get that memo to the teacher.  But the real question is this - now that she knows, will her teaching reflect it?  Somehow I doubt it.

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

Ugh.  ANY positive teaching of Christophere Columbus pisses me off.

He was a crack-pot who just happened to get lucky and find land.  All this BS about 'he thought the earth was round when everyone else thought it was flat!' garbage is pure fabrication.  He is one of the worst kinds of role models to give children (including as you mentioned, what he did to the Arawak)

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

Yeah it's funny how we make role models and icons over people who don't deserve it. Desperate for heros I guess?

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=279EE0C767B44D17

(one of my favorite episodes of the series).

----------------------------------------------------

"What for you bury me in the cold cold ground?" - Tasmanian devil

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

delete this, site error

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

Yeah, I think laziness will prevail, and there will be no change.  That is one of the things I was thinking about.  Of course things like slavery are pretty overplayed in some schools and underplayed in others.  Making it sound like everyone owned a slave, and treated the slaves like horrid animals that they beat and raped all of time just is insane, but acting like the slaves were given everything and treated great isn't right either.

There was abuse, but from my research, it wasn't common.  There were secret relationships and babies, that was rare because society looked down on interracial relationships, it still does today in some places.  There were tons of different things that happened around that time period and the founding of the nation.

Assisted suicide and death penalty stuff is good things for people to know about too.  Same with the fact that marriage didn't start out as part of religion but was adopted by it, but I am against religion being taught in schools, and that includes anti-religion, unless it is an absolutely optional class with as much credit to the curriculum as a study hall.

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

Yeah, slavery is a pretty poorly taught aspect of American history too.  They almost never mention that the Irish were treated even worse (they were cheaper then slaves and just as indentured)  for instance.

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

If there has to be a debate over something like torture (which in my mind only has to consist of "torture is bad" and "I agree, lets never do it... ever") then lets make it a really good one.  The more graphic, the better.  The more disturbing, the better.  The more people who get angry over this, the better.  The sooner torture becomes a thing of the past, like the Inquisition, the better.

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

The debate would include such questions as "What is torture?" and "What if the torturee had vital information that is a matter of national security and the only way to get him to talk is torture?  Would it be appropriate then?"

 

"That's not ironic. That's justice."

"That's not ironic. That's justice."

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

Thinking they're a thing of the past is just what the Inquisition want's you to believe. That way neither you nor anyone else will expect them.

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

Their chief weapon is surprise!

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

Surprise and Fear!

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

....and ruthless efficiency!

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

... and an almost Fanatical devotion to the Pope!

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

Amongst our weaponry...are such elements as fear, surprise...I'll come in again. *leaves*

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

Fetch ... the COMFY CHAIR!

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

POKE HER WITH THE SOFT CUSHIONS!!!!!

Sortableturnip's Law: As an online discussion of video game violence grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Jack Thompson approaches 1

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

Sadly, the numbers of people who will get that reference are becoming fewer and fewer.

Re: Wired's Thompson: We Need More Torture in Games

Well, there IS that Saw in development. Odds are it's gonna stink out load though.

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
TechnogeekAlso, it's the upgrade that's available for installation now. You might need to forcibly initiate the Windows Update process before it'll start downloading, though. (If there's a C:\$Windows.~BT folder on your computer, then you're in luck.)07/29/2015 - 8:46am
TechnogeekAdmittedly there's more room to push for an advertiser boycott when you get into opinion content versus pure news, but keep in mind that reviews are opinion content as well.07/29/2015 - 8:46am
TechnogeekMatts: There's a difference between "this person regularly says extremely terrible stuff" and "I don't like the phrasing used in this one specific editorial".07/29/2015 - 8:45am
MattsworknameWait, is that for the upgrade or the clean install only? cause I was gonna do the upgrade07/29/2015 - 8:32am
james_fudgehttps://www.microsoft.com/en-us/software-download/windows1007/29/2015 - 8:30am
PHX Corp@Wilson, I'm still waiting for My upgrade notice aswell07/29/2015 - 7:57am
MattsworknameWilson: how? Im still waiting for my upgrade notice07/29/2015 - 3:44am
Matthew WilsonI updated to a clean instill of windows 10.07/29/2015 - 2:36am
Mattsworknameargue that it's wrong, but then please admit it's wrong on ALL Fronts07/29/2015 - 2:06am
MattsworknameTechnoGeek: It's actually NOT, but it is a method used all across the specturm. See Rush limbaugh, MSNBC, Shawn hannity, etc etc, how many compagns have been brought up to try and shut them down by going after there advertisers. It's fine if you wanna07/29/2015 - 2:05am
Mattsworknamediscussed, while not what I liked and not the methods I wanted to see used, were , in a sense, the effort of thsoe game consuming masses to hold what they felt was supposed to be there press accountable for what many of them felt was Betrayal07/29/2015 - 2:03am
MattsworknameAs we say, the gamers are dead article set of a firestorm among the game consuming populace, who, ideally, were the intended audiance for sites like Kotaku, Polygon, Et all. As such, the turn about on them and the attacking of them, via the metods07/29/2015 - 2:03am
MattsworknameAndrew: Thats kind fo the issue at hand, Accountable is a matter of context. For a media group, it means accountable to its reader. to a goverment, to it's voters and tax payer, to a company, to it's share holders.07/29/2015 - 2:02am
Andrew EisenAnd again, you keep saying "accountable." What exactly does that mean? How is Gamasutra not accounting for the editorial it published?07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - I disagree with your 9:12 and 9:16 comment. There are myriad ways to address content you don't like. And they're far easier to execute in the online space.07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - Banning in the legal sense? Not that I'm aware but there have certainly been groups of gamers who have worked towards getting content they don't like removed.07/28/2015 - 11:45pm
DanJAlexander's editorial was and continues to be grossly misrepresented by her opponents. And if you don't like a site, you stop reading it - same as not watching a tv show. They get your first click, but not your second.07/28/2015 - 11:40pm
TechnogeekYes, because actively trying to convince advertisers to influence the editorial content of media is a perfectly acceptable thing to do, especially for a movement that's ostensibly about journalistic ethics.07/28/2015 - 11:02pm
Mattsworknameanother07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
Mattsworknameyou HAVE TO click on it. So they get the click revenue weather you like what it says or not. as such, the targeting of advertisers most likely seemed like a good course of action to those who wanted to hold those media groups accountable for one reason07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician