EA Spanked for Misleading Wii Game Commercial

December 17, 2008 -

Electronic Arts needs to be more truthful in its advertising, according to a British goverment agency.

As reported by gamesindustry.biz, the UK's Advertising Standards Authority rapped EA's knuckles for including Xbox 360 footage in a commercial for the Wii version of Tiger Woods PGA Tour 09

From the gi.biz story:

The ads featured the sportsman swinging a Wii remote, but showed Xbox 360 gameplay footage at the same time, giving the wrong impression of the visual quality of the Nintendo version of the game. The publisher explained to the ASA that footage of the Wii game "would not be of broadcast quality" and had included text in the ad that the game was available on multiple formats in an effort to avoid confusion.

The ASA wasn't buying EA's explanation, however:

"Although we acknowledged that the message 'available on all formats' appeared in the final scene, we considered that viewers would infer from the ad that Tiger Woods was playing the game on a Wii console and the graphics shown behind him were representative of the actual game he was playing," said the watchdog.

 

"Because viewers would not be able to achieve the graphical quality shown in the ad on a Wii console, we concluded that the ad was misleading."

Bottom line? EA can't show the commercial for the August release again - not that they were planning to.

 


Comments

Re: EA Spanked for Misleading Wii Game Commercial

When is Activion getting the paddle for their Guitar Hero commercial?  You can't even play that song in Guitar Hero yet tehy advertise it...and why can't I play as Heidi Klum?

Re: EA Spanked for Misleading Wii Game Commercial

Why not fine EA? The only thing EA has to pay is probably one fewer purchase from each person that read this story...  that are likely already wise to their bullshit. So... no concequences.

Re: EA Spanked for Misleading Wii Game Commercial

Not really a spanking. More like a slap on the wrist.

With a wet noodle.


If you go crazy then I will still call you Superman.

Re: EA Spanked for Misleading Wii Game Commercial

This isin't anything new. Activision also got the paddle with Call of Duty 2 and Call of Duty 2: Big Red One. Showing COD 2 gameplay and saying to buy COD 2: Big Red One.

Re: EA Spanked for Misleading Wii Game Commercial

breaking news, EA being a jackass, more at 11.

------------------------------------

I am a signature virus, please copy and paste me into your signature to help me propagate.

------------------------------------ I am a signature virus, please copy and paste me into your signature to help me propagate.

Re: EA Spanked for Misleading Wii Game Commercial

Wow, EA's marketing folks dropped the ball here.  A typical Wii owner isn't that perturbed by graphics, and those that are, likly own another system.  You can't hurt sales on the Wii by showing real footage, especially when the controls are the typical sell/no sell on the Wii.  Plus I don't buy the, "Not of broadcast quality," bit, the Wii is 480p capable, and most standard brodcasts are less than that.  "Not of broadcast quality," is just PR-speak for, "We wanted to show the absolute best possible quality, and didn't think people were smart enough to notice."

Instead of "Available in all formats," why not also include a message saying, "Xbox360 footage shown."  That way consumers know that PS3's footage would be similar and the Wii would be less. 

~~All Knowledge is Worth Having~~

~~All Knowledge is Worth Having~~

Re: EA Spanked for Misleading Wii Game Commercial

Indeed. Thus, why I don't have a Wii.

Re: EA Spanked for Misleading Wii Game Commercial

This!

Believe it or not, the Wii is not a weak machine. Granted it's not as graphically strong as xbox360 or ps3, but Jesus the graphics aren't terrible  by any means!

Re: EA Spanked for Misleading Wii Game Commercial

Seems to be the console of choice this time around for cheapely knocked out tat, like PS2 was last generation. It's a shame because there are some fantastic looking games, both Mario Galaxy and Twilight Princess look great, and No More Heroes and the upcoming Madworld havn't exactly been beaten by the ugly stick.

Re: EA Spanked for Misleading Wii Game Commercial

This.

The Wii can knock the pants off the Gamecube, PS2 and Xbox with out even trying. So why are developers doing anything with it?

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
MySpace Page: http://www.myspace.com/okceca
Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1325674091

Re: EA Spanked for Misleading Wii Game Commercial

It's because dark, gritty graphics have become a crutch for developers.  It's much easier to make a good-looking game that it is to make a game that's good.

Re: EA Spanked for Misleading Wii Game Commercial

Would be wrong in saying time/cost spent on porting?


They are highly focused on the basic port spread PC/360 and PS3, they in turn also focus to much on graphics and base to much forward thinking on it, if you ported to the WII and sold a copy to 20% of tis user base that would be almost be a  million copies... surely that would then let you port it properly to the more "pretty" consoles...
=================================
Pirates,Shearers,Lenders and downloaders are not a market that can be taped by the mainstream.
---------------------------------
I is fuzzy brained mew =^^=
http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: EA Spanked for Misleading Wii Game Commercial

So far my experience with ported games is that the Wii version is the one they get the interns or guys they hate to make, wheras games made directly for it by developers who want to make a decent game instead of spin a quick buck, turn out great.

Re: EA Spanked for Misleading Wii Game Commercial

And sell like crap like Boomblox, Zack and Wiki, and Deblob. The fact of the matter is, is only shovelware and nintendo stuff sells on that system. Your game is probebly going to be most affected by your title name and box art than the actual quality itself.

Re: EA Spanked for Misleading Wii Game Commercial

Selling like crap on WII is like pissing in hottub of vodka!

 

Anyway sellign liek crap still psuhes the sale of hunderns if not thousands of titles, it also would not hurt to advertise them...besides a port is jsut that a port another platform to push sales on....
=================================
Pirates,Shearers,Lenders and downloaders are not a market that can be taped by the mainstream.
---------------------------------
I is fuzzy brained mew =^^=
http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: EA Spanked for Misleading Wii Game Commercial

Hey, BoomBlox and Zack and Wiki are awesome games (haven't played De Blob yet).  Just because you don't get to shoot people doesn't mean they suck.  All three of those games are definitely NOT shovelware.

Re: EA Spanked for Misleading Wii Game Commercial

Did you read what I said or skipped every other word? I said good (edited:) original games from 3rd parties SELL like garbage on the wii, while stuff like Game Party, Ski and Shoot, and freking Carnival Games sell thousands upon millions while are total garbage.

Edit: And I do consider PS2 ports to be shovelware, just not necessarly bad shovelware.

Re: EA Spanked for Misleading Wii Game Commercial

My bad, I missed the "sell like crap".  Though in all fairness, I never saw a commercial for Z&W or DeBlob and the only commercials for BoomBlox were on Nickelodeon and targeted at 10 year-olds.  Same with Okami and No More Heroes.  There is absolutely no marketing for most third party games that don't involve Babiez.  That's their fault, not Nintendo's.


Re: EA Spanked for Misleading Wii Game Commercial

it's from EA. The second we get truth in advertising is the day we see new commercials for spore

"Spore, These three minigames will screw your computer up for life!"

and

"Electronic Arts. Buy our game you frothingly immoral pirate! I'm watching you!!!"

Re: EA Spanked for Misleading Wii Game Commercial

Wow....... truth in advertising.....can we haz that here?
=================================
Pirates,Shearers,Lenders and downloaders are not a market that can be taped by the mainstream.
---------------------------------
I is fuzzy brained mew =^^=
http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: EA Spanked for Misleading Wii Game Commercial

Sorry, that is not allowed in places where corporations pretty much run the government.

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Is King right? Should all games adopt the free-to-play model?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelanteNumber 3: Night Dive was brought to the attention of the public by a massive game recovery, and yet most of their released catalogue consists of games that other people did the hard work of getting re-released.04/17/2014 - 8:46pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 2: If Humongous Entertainment wanted their stuff on Steam, why didn't they talk to their parent company, which does have a number of games published on Steam?04/17/2014 - 8:45pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 1: When Night Dive spent the better part of a year teasing the return of true classics, having their big content dump be edutainment is kind of a kick in the stomach.04/17/2014 - 8:44pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.giantbomb.com/articles/jeff-gerstmann-heads-to-new-york-takes-questions/1100-4900/ He talks about the future games press and the games industry. It is worth your time even though it is a bit long, and stay for the QA. There are some good QA04/17/2014 - 5:28pm
IanCErm so they shouldn't sell edutainment at all? Why?04/17/2014 - 4:42pm
MaskedPixelanteNot that linkable, go onto Steam and there's stuff like Pajama Sam on the front-page, courtesy of Night Dive.04/17/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOkay, again, please, please, PLEASE get in a habit of linking to whatever you're talking about.04/17/2014 - 4:05pm
MaskedPixelanteAnother round of Night Dive teasing and promising turns out to be stupid edutainment games. Thanks for wasting all our time, guys. See you never.04/17/2014 - 3:44pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the consequences were not only foreseeable, but very likely. anyone who understood supply demand curvs knew that was going to happen. SF has been a econ/trade hub for the last hundred years.04/17/2014 - 2:45pm
Andrew EisenMixedPixelante - Would you like to expand on that?04/17/2014 - 2:43pm
MaskedPixelanteWell, I am officially done with Night Dive Studios. Unless they can bring something worthwhile back, I'm never buying another game from them.04/17/2014 - 2:29pm
PHX Corphttp://www.msnbc.com/ronan-farrow/watch/video-games-continue-to-break-the-mold-229561923638 Ronan Farrow Daily on Video games breaking the mold04/17/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoAh yes, because by building something nice they were just asking for people to come push them out. Consequences are protested all the time when other people are implementing them.04/17/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew Wilsonok than they should not protest when the consequences of that choice occur.04/17/2014 - 1:06pm
NeenekoIf people want tall buildings, plenty of other cities with them. Part of freedom and markets is communities deciding what they do and do not want built in their collective space.04/17/2014 - 12:55pm
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician