EA's Bid to Buy T2 Figures in Wall Street Insider Trading Charges

December 18, 2008 -

According to the Dow-Jones Newswire, federal investigators charged four men with today insider stock trading. One of the transactions named in the indictments was EA's bid to acquire T2 earlier this year.

No one from either Take-Two Interactive or Electronic Arts has been charged and there is no indication that the publishers had any inkling of the illegal stock trades. If government regulators are correct, however, information leaks from the Brunswick Group, a P.R. firm working on behalf of Take-Two, contributed to the crime. From the Dow-Jones report:

Four people were charged criminally Thursday in an insider trading scheme involving information about mergers or stock buybacks obtained from a Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. broker's wife who worked at communications firm Brunswick Group LLC...

 

According to court documents, they were among a group of clients and friends tipped by Matthew C. Devlin, a Lehman Brothers broker, about 12 planned deals before their public announcements between 2005 and 2008...

 

Devlin allegedly obtained the information from his wife, who worked at communications firm Brunswick Group, according to court filings. The deals included... Electronic Arts Inc.'s (ERTS) hostile bid earlier this year for Take-Two Interactive Software Inc. (TTWO)...

 

Devlin has been charged criminally and in the SEC case... [other defendants]... referred to Devlin or his wife as the "golden goose," according to court documents.

The Guardian reports that there is no suggestion that Devlin's wife, Nina, a partner at Brunswick, knew of her husband's alleged stock market manipulations.

Comments

Re: EA's Bid to Buy T2 Figures in Wall Street Insider Trading

GAMEPOLITICS.COM
 
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PETITION FORM
 
GP Statute 104.185: A person who knowingly signs a petition or petitions for a candidate, a minor political party, or an issue more than one time commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in GP 775.082 or 775.083.
 
BALLOT TITLE: REMOVAL OF JACK THOMPSON FROM GAMEPOLITICS.COM
 
BALLOT SUMMARY: This amendment removes the internet troll known as John Bruce Thompson aka Jack Thompson from this website.
 
I am a member of Gamepolitics.com and hereby petition the webmaster of Gamepolitics.com to place the following amendment to the ballot in the general election.
 
I AM A REGISTERED MEMBER OF GAMEPOLITICS.COM.      _____ YES          _____ NO
 
NAME_________________________________________________________________
                      (Please Print Name As It Appears on I.D.)
E-MAIL _______________________________________________________________
STREET ADDRESS _____________________________________________________
CITY __________________________________STATE__________ZIP____________
MEMBER NAME _______________________________________
                        -OR-               DATE OF BIRTH ____________/________/__________
 
X _______________________________________________Date_____/______/______
                     Signature of Member
 
FULL TEXT OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT:
 
BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF GAMEPOLITICS THAT:
 
Article V, Section 15 of the GP Constitution shall be amended to read:
 
John Bruce Thompson aka Jack Thompson is no longer allowed, by penalty of humiliation to come to GAMEPOLITICS.COM.
 
Serial Number: ___________________ Approval Date: ______________
 
Return to: Gamepolitics.com

EZK: Ammended to not conflict with other articles of the GamePolitics constitution.

Sortableturnip's Law: As an online discussion of video game violence grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Jack Thompson approaches 1

Re: EA's Bid to Buy T2 Figures in Wall Street Insider Trading

I like your amended version just as well, EZK  ;)

Sortableturnip's Law: As an online discussion of video game violence grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Jack Thompson approaches 1

Re: EA's Bid to Buy T2 Figures in Wall Street Insider Trading

FULL OF WIN.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Game on, brothers and sisters." -Leet Gamer Jargon

-----------------------------



"A Chrono Trigger is anything that unleashes its will or desire to change history!" -Gaspar

Re: EA's Bid to Buy T2 Figures in Wall Street Insider Trading

Uh-oh, Shadow. You posted a humorous picture to relate to the matter at hand. Devirous might come and insult people.

What EVER shall we do???

Re: EA's Bid to Buy T2 Figures in Wall Street Insider Trading

Pretend he does not exist? :)

Re: EA's Bid to Buy T2 Figures in Wall Street Insider Trading

Excellent option. Have a cookie.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Game on, brothers and sisters." -Leet Gamer Jargon

-----------------------------



"A Chrono Trigger is anything that unleashes its will or desire to change history!" -Gaspar

Re: EA's Bid to Buy T2 Figures in Wall Street Insider Trading

mmmm cookie! nom nom nom nom nom

Re: EA's Bid to Buy T2 Figures in Wall Street Insider Trading

Keep dreaming, sparky

Re: EA's Bid to Buy T2 Figures in Wall Street Insider Trading

By the way, the frozen turkey in the recent Mythbusters "Best of" show is the head of former T2 Chairman Paul Eibler.  Somebody finally found a use for Paul Eibler.

Re: EA's Bid to Buy T2 Figures in Wall Street Insider Trading

Next time you have a thought, just let it go.

ANd hey, I hear Buster needs a stand-in, sign up, now.

Re: EA's Bid to Buy T2 Figures in Wall Street Insider Trading

 When shall they find a use for you?

Re: EA's Bid to Buy T2 Figures in Wall Street Insider Trading

Wow, more SEC problems related to Take-Two.  What a freaking surprise.

Re: EA's Bid to Buy T2 Figures in Wall Street Insider Trading

How much money will EA lose because of this?

Re: EA's Bid to Buy T2 Figures in Wall Street Insider Trading

Probably none.

While it was EA's stock information that was being leaked, neither EA nor T2 had anything to do with the insider trading.  This is purely a case of a middle man taking advantage of some knowledge that they were not supposed to.

Re: EA's Bid to Buy T2 Figures in Wall Street Insider Trading

Not a lot really. TTWO's market  cap is only about 700 million while EA sits on a hefty 5 billion.

If you think about it, the Bioware and Pandemic buyout was actually more than the market value of TTWO, sitting at 860 million, so TTWO is actually a steal for anyone looking to buy it.

Re: EA's Bid to Buy T2 Figures in Wall Street Insider Trading

so TTWO is actually a steal for anyone looking to buy it.

Assuming that they're willing to be bought. If they aren't, then the price fast approaches unreasonable as EA found out.

-Gray17

-Gray17

Re: EA's Bid to Buy T2 Figures in Wall Street Insider Trading

Well you can just buy up all the stocks if you wanted to (51%) for only about 350 million and do a corperate takeover, but EA does't want that to happen since (by experience) they probebly know that it will make everyone there unhappy and leave.

Re: EA's Bid to Buy T2 Figures in Wall Street Insider Trading

You can't take the current stock price and multiply by the number of shares needed. Trying to buy up that much will trigger a price increase.

 

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Is King right? Should all games adopt the free-to-play model?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelanteNumber 3: Night Dive was brought to the attention of the public by a massive game recovery, and yet most of their released catalogue consists of games that other people did the hard work of getting re-released.04/17/2014 - 8:46pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 2: If Humongous Entertainment wanted their stuff on Steam, why didn't they talk to their parent company, which does have a number of games published on Steam?04/17/2014 - 8:45pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 1: When Night Dive spent the better part of a year teasing the return of true classics, having their big content dump be edutainment is kind of a kick in the stomach.04/17/2014 - 8:44pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.giantbomb.com/articles/jeff-gerstmann-heads-to-new-york-takes-questions/1100-4900/ He talks about the future games press and the games industry. It is worth your time even though it is a bit long, and stay for the QA. There are some good QA04/17/2014 - 5:28pm
IanCErm so they shouldn't sell edutainment at all? Why?04/17/2014 - 4:42pm
MaskedPixelanteNot that linkable, go onto Steam and there's stuff like Pajama Sam on the front-page, courtesy of Night Dive.04/17/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOkay, again, please, please, PLEASE get in a habit of linking to whatever you're talking about.04/17/2014 - 4:05pm
MaskedPixelanteAnother round of Night Dive teasing and promising turns out to be stupid edutainment games. Thanks for wasting all our time, guys. See you never.04/17/2014 - 3:44pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the consequences were not only foreseeable, but very likely. anyone who understood supply demand curvs knew that was going to happen. SF has been a econ/trade hub for the last hundred years.04/17/2014 - 2:45pm
Andrew EisenMixedPixelante - Would you like to expand on that?04/17/2014 - 2:43pm
MaskedPixelanteWell, I am officially done with Night Dive Studios. Unless they can bring something worthwhile back, I'm never buying another game from them.04/17/2014 - 2:29pm
PHX Corphttp://www.msnbc.com/ronan-farrow/watch/video-games-continue-to-break-the-mold-229561923638 Ronan Farrow Daily on Video games breaking the mold04/17/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoAh yes, because by building something nice they were just asking for people to come push them out. Consequences are protested all the time when other people are implementing them.04/17/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew Wilsonok than they should not protest when the consequences of that choice occur.04/17/2014 - 1:06pm
NeenekoIf people want tall buildings, plenty of other cities with them. Part of freedom and markets is communities deciding what they do and do not want built in their collective space.04/17/2014 - 12:55pm
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician