Censorship Issues Raised in PlayStation Home Beta

December 30, 2008 -

A number of common, non-obscene words are being filtered out of text chat on Sony's new PlayStation Home service, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.

Reportedly, "gay," "lesbian" and "bisexual" are among the words, as are "Christ" and "Jew." Even "Hello" is being filtered, presumably because it begins with "Hell."

Gamer Michael Marsh told the Chronicle:

I can understand if they're filtering out profanity, but if feel like it's discrimination. By blocking a word like 'gay,' which is a preferred term by the gay community, you're encouraging it as a bad word.

SCEA spokesman Patrick Seybold, however, reminded gamers that Home is a work in progress:

The key message is it's a beta and it's evolving on a daily basis. We've said early on that user behavior and feedback will shape where we go with Home.


Comments

Re: Censorship Issues Raised in PlayStation Home Beta

Re: Censorship Issues Raised in PlayStation Home Beta

I'm a bit confused. Xbox live, have you been on there lately? Wat rubbish spews out of the mouths in a halo game. Censorship? Whatzz that???

Battlefield Heroes - Halo 4
Tel Domains - Home Security

Re: Censorship Issues Raised in PlayStation Home Beta

Why not just ban chat altogether?

people will get around chat filters, always, let them turn them on if they really want to, and then punish for going AROUND the filters, with up to a full year's ban on chat if it's a repeat offender.

PLEASE sony, DON'T encourage more 1337-speak.

Re: Censorship Issues Raised in PlayStation Home Beta

I would like there to be some kind of censorship on the chat, but I'd prefer it to be volntary. I normally don't mind it, but there are times I'd like to avoid having my sexuality (or someone else nearby) questioned repeatedly while playing chess, or have my text box filled with random crap like that while I'm trying to type to someone.  However, theres not much you can do about the real problem, the voice chat. 

I hear so many hooting assholes on Home that I think I'm playing on XBL.

Re: Censorship Issues Raised in PlayStation Home Beta

Can you say word "whitelist"?
=================================
Pirates,Shearers,Lenders and downloaders are not a market that can be taped by the mainstream.
---------------------------------
Gore,Violence,Sexauilty,Fear,Emotion these are but modes
of transp


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Censorship Issues Raised in PlayStation Home Beta

It's the **** Van **** show!

Starring **** Van ****!

Re: Censorship Issues Raised in PlayStation Home Beta

"By blocking a word like 'gay,' which is a preferred term by the gay community, you're encouraging it as a bad word."

Show of hands who here hasn't heard the word gay being thrown around as an insult?

*crickets*

that's what I thought.

----------------------------------------------------

Debates are like merry go rounds Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: Censorship Issues Raised in PlayStation Home Beta

Lesson learned: being gay is absolutely disgusting, and christians and jews should be banned.

 

Thanks Sony.

 

On a more serious note, I think the fact that by the age of eleven, a vast majority of kids know every "word". At least my dad had the common sense decency to tell me all the words when I was 10 and tell me why not to say them in school.

And if we want to go on the religious standard of what words can and can not be said, I say we use the Bible and Torah as standards. If the word is in there, its okay.

So feel free to say ass, damn, hell, and depending on what version of the bible you look at, bitch.

Y hello thar

Re: Censorship Issues Raised in PlayStation Home Beta

Filters should be more voluntary than mandatory.  Mostly because people find ways around it, such as using various symbols on the keyboard to the accents (those were fun to use).  It's more of a hassle than anything when it came down to just saying Hello to a friend and telling someone to go to hell.

Re: Censorship Issues Raised in PlayStation Home Beta

I've always hated filters like that.

Its like you can't even say "How do you do?" without asteriks covering the first two letters, which is totally counter productive because then it instantly looks like you're trying to offend someone.

****o, ** do you do?

Re: Censorship Issues Raised in PlayStation Home Beta

* *** *** ******* *** *** ********* **********

Whoops, guess it's back to room 101 for me!  augh, rats

raaaaaaaaaaats

---
The Mammon Industry

---
Fangamer

Re: Censorship Issues Raised in PlayStation Home Beta

Wait, people still care about Home?  I thought Beta had killed all interest...

Anyway, they'll work out the kinks.  Although, I can understand why they'd originally censor the word "gay."  It's the favorite insult of the under-15 crowd, who invariably ruin anything with chat options.  Generalization, of course.  Not that it's right to bleep out the word, but I just understand.

Re: Censorship Issues Raised in PlayStation Home Beta

You can't say hello? That sounds like something that should have been fizxed in the Alpha to me.

Re: Censorship Issues Raised in PlayStation Home Beta

Hopefully the filter can be turned off. Bad filters are a pain in the ass, but mandatory ones are absolutely atrocious because you never know what seemingly innocent word it will choke on. I've seen filters (in Phantasy Star Online, for the curious) that wouldn't let you say things like "toss me some shoes on Saturday" ("toss" is British slang for masturbation, "shoes" has <i>hoes</i> and "Saturday" has <i>turd</i>). But you could call someone a sloppy cunt without the filter raising a peep.

Re: Censorship Issues Raised in PlayStation Home Beta

I think this story is already out of date. I had some guy calling me "gay" just the other night, so it's clearly not banned.

Do Not Talk About Feitclub http://www.feitclub.com

Do Not Talk About Feitclub http://www.feitclub.com

Re: Censorship Issues Raised in PlayStation Home Beta

Man... all three people whom Home is relevant to are gonna be upset when they read this.

 

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety" - Benjamin Franklin

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety" - Benjamin Franklin

Re: Censorship Issues Raised in PlayStation Home Beta

I don't even get why they have a voice chat on there since all it does is allow old men to hit on young girls or who they think are young girls. The avatars can't be trusted.

----------------------------

When Jack Thompson runs his mouth, does anyone really care what he has to say anymore?

Re: Censorship Issues Raised in PlayStation Home Beta

That will piss more than a couple people off...

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: Censorship Issues Raised in PlayStation Home Beta

"That will **** more than a ***** people ***..."

 

You think?

Re: Censorship Issues Raised in PlayStation Home Beta

**** *****

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Is King right? Should all games adopt the free-to-play model?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelanteNumber 3: Night Dive was brought to the attention of the public by a massive game recovery, and yet most of their released catalogue consists of games that other people did the hard work of getting re-released.04/17/2014 - 8:46pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 2: If Humongous Entertainment wanted their stuff on Steam, why didn't they talk to their parent company, which does have a number of games published on Steam?04/17/2014 - 8:45pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 1: When Night Dive spent the better part of a year teasing the return of true classics, having their big content dump be edutainment is kind of a kick in the stomach.04/17/2014 - 8:44pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.giantbomb.com/articles/jeff-gerstmann-heads-to-new-york-takes-questions/1100-4900/ He talks about the future games press and the games industry. It is worth your time even though it is a bit long, and stay for the QA. There are some good QA04/17/2014 - 5:28pm
IanCErm so they shouldn't sell edutainment at all? Why?04/17/2014 - 4:42pm
MaskedPixelanteNot that linkable, go onto Steam and there's stuff like Pajama Sam on the front-page, courtesy of Night Dive.04/17/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOkay, again, please, please, PLEASE get in a habit of linking to whatever you're talking about.04/17/2014 - 4:05pm
MaskedPixelanteAnother round of Night Dive teasing and promising turns out to be stupid edutainment games. Thanks for wasting all our time, guys. See you never.04/17/2014 - 3:44pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the consequences were not only foreseeable, but very likely. anyone who understood supply demand curvs knew that was going to happen. SF has been a econ/trade hub for the last hundred years.04/17/2014 - 2:45pm
Andrew EisenMixedPixelante - Would you like to expand on that?04/17/2014 - 2:43pm
MaskedPixelanteWell, I am officially done with Night Dive Studios. Unless they can bring something worthwhile back, I'm never buying another game from them.04/17/2014 - 2:29pm
PHX Corphttp://www.msnbc.com/ronan-farrow/watch/video-games-continue-to-break-the-mold-229561923638 Ronan Farrow Daily on Video games breaking the mold04/17/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoAh yes, because by building something nice they were just asking for people to come push them out. Consequences are protested all the time when other people are implementing them.04/17/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew Wilsonok than they should not protest when the consequences of that choice occur.04/17/2014 - 1:06pm
NeenekoIf people want tall buildings, plenty of other cities with them. Part of freedom and markets is communities deciding what they do and do not want built in their collective space.04/17/2014 - 12:55pm
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician