Thompson: God is Behind Take-Two Stock Slide

God can be spelled as God or god depending on understanding, belief or laziness.  This is due to the numerous number of gods in ancient religions that makes god not only a name but also a title such as graphic designer or physicist.  When we start capitalizing career titles, more non-believers will start capitalizing it as God instead of god. 

If the person understands of it as a title instead of a name, then it is god in any situation even as your god or my god.  If the person understands it as the name, then it would be God.

I would feel very weird typing, "Megan Fox is one hell of a hot Actress."  Though Microsoft Word grammar check doesnt dispute it for me, so maybe...  I claim that god has no name though, or that we are not told his original name ever because it does not matter, though according to Christians Jesus is his Earth name.  Now saying jesus would be disrespectful and incorrect, because that is definitely a name, though lord and god are titles which do not require capitalization, but it is typically done as so in respect.  I do capitalize Microsoft Word though, so I guess that is disrespectful in a way, but it just depends on the understanding of the use.

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

 The title of Doctor is not House's alone, there are legitimate incarnations of said professionals. Such is why I did not go off on a diatribe about you capitalizing Jesus, given that this is the alias the jewish prophet used. From what I understand, historical records back up the notion that there was a cultist matching his description and actions around the time in question.

It isnt that they are stupid, it is that they have flawed logic.  I think we all agree that Jack has flawed logic, and that he is definitely smart, you have to be to even try to begin to explain his flawed logic, but we would say he is stupid because of his flawed logic. 

It just does not compute.  It is much like 0.3 with 3 remaining (which is 1/3) plus 0.6 with 6 remaining (which is 2/3), it equals 0.9 with 9 remaining and 1.  So does 0.9 with 9 remaining exist? or is it really 1.

[I do not know why my brain loves this little thing, but it seems to be something I always revisit ever few years.]

The believers closed off to fully questioning their religion to the point that they say that the Noah flood story and the Sumerian flood story are not the same, or that many other stories in the bible were not taken from else where I would say were narrow minded.  Then the reality that man has so distorted religion in a way even from the gathering of stories for the new and testament, that it is illogical to follow any religion, especially based off of Christianity.  I would follow the Jewish belief before the Christian belief any day, but still I would poke and prod it to find every hole I can to try to figure out where truths lye and lies lye.

I just want science to dig into religion for science to prove the truths and falsehoods of religion because of the extremist groups, mainly Pentecostals in my experience, that so strongly believe in such things as a global flood, 6000 year old universe, and dispute evolution.  Then the governments to deal with Scientology, and societies to deal with violence, local and terrorist.

As the same time, there are idiots out there that still think the Earth is flat.  So I guess morons will always exist even with scientific proof, but at least scientific proof of things destroys their numbers.  I don't care as much about other Christian groups that stay the hell out of the way of scientific research.  They can go on their happy way, but for the dweebs that hinder research and our education system, by getting it to teach intelligent design instead of evolution. There is real scientific evidence that proves evolution but not intelligent design, and those people make be blow my top because of the waste in time of proving research to the dumbest of people, with their stupid flawed logic, like the people who believe that Earth is flat.

In the end, isn't flawed logic the same as non-intelligent?  Because that flawed logic affects the inner workings of their entire understanding of everything, and understanding is what intelligence is, isn't it?  In the end, I claim that we all have flawed logic, but to different degrees, and that we are all non-intelligent, and that science will eventually pull the people who have slightly flawed logic closer with even less flawed logic, while having them outcast people with extremely flawed logic, because it isn't worth our time to try to rationalize things to them. 

Just like why a more intelligent species wouldn't deal with us because we are so far intellectually beneath them, we wouldn't deal with teaching ants what we know.  I think the human race may one day separate between the ignorant with flawed logic and the more intellectually superior with far less flawed logic.

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls