Silent Hill: Homecoming Un-banned in Australia

Silent Hill: Homecoming Un-banned in Australia

January 6, 2009

In September, GamePolitics reported that Silent Hill: Homecoming had been refused classification (i.e., banned) by Australia's Office of Film and Literature Classification.

However, as we've seen with other game bans, OFLC censorcrats move in mysterious ways. GameSpot Australia is now reporting that the OFLC has revised its earlier refusal to classify Silent Hill: Homecoming and the game has been approved for sale:

At the time of the ban last year, an Atari spokesperson (Atari is the local distributor of the Konami game) confirmed to GameSpot AU that the board's grievances were with the game's high-impact violence, copious blood spray, decapitations, partial corpse dismemberment, and depictions of torture.

 

The spokesperson also indicated that the distributor's intention was to resubmit the game "early next year," after discussing the feasibility of making edits to the game for the region. An Atari spokesperson was unavailable at time of print today to confirm what, if any, changes have been made to the Australian version of the game to pass Aussie censors.

UPDATE: Games.on.net has details of edits made by Konami to get Silent Hill: Homecoming past OFLC censors:

Several depictions of violence have been edited or removed altogether from the game. This includes the removal of many finishing moves that contained high level violence, as well as explicit scenes of torture using a power drill.

The more impactful scenes are 'cut scenes' consisting of non-interactive action sequences depicting pivotal plot sequences that expand on the storyline of the game.

Torture consists of implied cutting and drilling using power tools. Much of this violence is depicted during 'cut scenes'. The most extreme examples of this violence are obscured, which mitigates the impact of the violence.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Re: Silent Hill: Homecoming Un-banned in Australia

I forgot. Is Dead Space banned there?

Re: Silent Hill: Homecoming Un-banned in Australia

Nope, released uncut. Which I find really hypocritical

 

IMA FIRIN MAH LASER!!!

Re: Silent Hill: Homecoming Un-banned in Australia
Sadly its censored. :( Oh and Dead Space is uncut in Australia IIRC.
Re: Silent Hill: Homecoming Un-banned in Australia

The lack of an R18+ certificate for video games down there is perplexing. It's too bad there is no Freedom of Expression or Freedom of Speech in Australia.

 "No law means no law" - Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black on the First Amendment

Re: Silent Hill: Homecoming Un-banned in Australia

 I love the irony of the penal colony becoming a nanny state. I guess there is a reason Queen and Country shipped their ancestors over there.

Re: Silent Hill: Homecoming Un-banned in Australia

That would be because the English were paranoid about crime and had filled up their jails.


Which is what England did to the Carribean and pretty much any other colony to set up.

 

Perhaps you should learn about what you're talking about before you say anything.

Re: Silent Hill: Homecoming Un-banned in Australia

 I was actually mocking Australia, thanks for keeping up...

 Oh, and not all colonies were turned into social sewers, Canada only ended up with French people in it.

Re: Silent Hill: Homecoming Un-banned in Australia

Which is perhaps worse than being in a social sewer (joke)...

In any case, Adelaide in South Australia was set up as a free colony, the first in Australia, and there were others that followed. Not all the colonies set up in Australia were first populated by convicts.

Re: Silent Hill: Homecoming Un-banned in Australia

Convicts were sent to America for nearly 60 years before the American Revolution changed the convict destination to Australia.  So if Australia can be accused of being a nation of convicts, America also qualifies.

Re: Silent Hill: Homecoming Un-banned in Australia

The Classification Review Board is a separate entity to the OFLC so technically the ban hasn't been revised, but overturned.

Re: Silent Hill: Homecoming Un-banned in Australia

...the first half is correct, the Review Board is totally separate to the Classifications Board (the new name for what was once the OFLC), but the ban has not been revised or overturned. Instead, a completely separate version of the game was submitted and has been given the MA15+ rating. The original from September is still Refused Classification and will likely remain so. :)

Re: Silent Hill: Homecoming Un-banned in Australia

I really hope you were joking, Derovius.

I'd hate to think you really were that ignorant.

Re: Silent Hill: Homecoming Un-banned in Australia

"...The most extreme examples of this violence are obscured, which mitigates the impact of the violence."

Hmmm.  I would have thought the opposite.  In many cases, off-camera violence often makes violence seem mild and therefore more acceptable.  I'm just not sure that's a message we should be sending.  If violence is distasteful, shouldn't it be shown in all its horror?

Merhaba

This post makes no sense to me

sohbet - sohbet siteleri - özlü sözler - sevgi sözleri - madencilik - sikiş

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 02/09/10 at 03:51pm
DarkSaber: I think he just goes round the internet copy+pasting the same bollocks to get attention.
Posted 02/09/10 at 03:41pm
Valdearg: @DS: I have to admit, I chuckled when I saw the 4 Feb 2010 on that post.. >.<
Posted 02/09/10 at 03:31pm
DarkSaber: Hm, Bioshock. Not that Zippy likes to beat the dead horse by ranting about it for TWO $&%£ING YEARS!
Posted 02/09/10 at 03:30pm
DarkSaber: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/9.173063-Bioshock-yet-another-zippy-rant
Posted 02/09/10 at 03:26pm
Valdearg: @DS: Link!! LINK!
Posted 02/09/10 at 03:20pm
DarkSaber: Although, unsurprisingly, he's just being called an idiot alot and criticised for being as illegible as always.
Posted 02/09/10 at 03:18pm
DarkSaber: Oh good lord, I just found Zippy on The Escapist.
Posted 02/09/10 at 03:14pm
Valdearg: IE: Male body/Female Mind or Female Body/Male Mind.
Posted 02/09/10 at 03:13pm
Valdearg: @Zip: TG == Transgendered/Transsexual.
Posted 02/09/10 at 03:09pm
DarkSaber: Forget it Zippy, it's an abbreviation of a big word and so would be wasted on you
Posted 02/09/10 at 03:07pm
ZippyDSMlee: Vlag:....TG?
Posted 02/09/10 at 03:02pm
Valdearg: @DS: Im sure that's what they'd do if it wasn't legal to just tell Gays/TG's to "Screw off," just because they're who they are.
Posted 02/09/10 at 02:50pm
DarkSaber: Whoever told him/her/it that is dumb. They should have done like most companies and made-up some bullshit, yet legal, reason for it not getting the job.
Posted 02/09/10 at 01:18pm
Valdearg: I do agree that it shouldn't be legal. That's for sure.
Posted 02/09/10 at 01:16pm
Andrew Eisen: Shouldn't be. Spirit of anti-discrimination laws would seem to include sexual orientation (and eye color). Plus there's always equal protection and such. Never know until you try.
Posted 02/09/10 at 01:14pm
Valdearg: @AE: Doubtful. Again, it's perfectly legal.
Posted 02/09/10 at 01:10pm
Andrew Eisen: Should have sued (unless that wasn't an option given her financial situation or something). Might have won.
Posted 02/09/10 at 01:00pm
Valdearg: Story about a Male to Female TG who was expressly told she wouldn't be given a job because she was TG. Its not the main point of the story, but explicit, perfectly legal discrimination like this exists.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:53pm
Valdearg: Lol, I don't know. It may very well be legal to do so. Though that might able to fall under the "race" restriction, depending on how that point is argued.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:51pm
Valdearg: I don't think they do have any legal recourse. I'll have to dig around, but I seriously believe that if the law doesn't specifically mention Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity, they can still be discriminated against in those 29 states.
Login or register to post shouts