Research: Gamers Love the Challenge, Not the Gore

January 16, 2009 -

While video games are often slammed over violent content, a new study suggests that it is the challenge presented by a game rather than graphic violence which attracts players.

The research, which appears today in the Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, was conducted  at the University of Rochester in cooperation with Immersyve Inc., described as a "player-experience research firm."

A press release quotes University of Rochester grad student Andrew Przybylski, the study's lead author:

For the vast majority of players, even those who regularly play and enjoy violent games, violence was not a plus. Violent content was only preferred by a small subgroup of people that generally report being more aggressive.

Immersyve president Scott Rigby commented on potential ramifications for the video game industry:

Much of the debate about game violence has pitted the assumed commercial value of violence against social concern about the harm it may cause. Our study shows that the violence may not be the real value component, freeing developers to design away from violence while at the same time broadening their market.

Researchers incorporated the popular Half-Life 2 and House of the Dead III into their study, using both high and low gore scenarios.

Iowa State University Professor Craig Anderson, a frequent critic of video game violence, praised the new research in an interview with the Canadian Press:

A common belief held by many gamers and many in the video game industry - that violence is what makes a game fun - is strongly contradicted by these studies.

Furthermore, the research convincingly shows that there is no relation between amount of violence in a game and the enjoyment experienced by the players, once opportunities for satisfying competence needs and autonomy needs have been equated in violent and non-violent games.


Comments

Re: Research: Gamers Love the Challenge, Not the Gore

same here. and if you enjoy horror movies like I do, you can always watch the 'behind the scenes' stuff afterward, that always lessens the shock value for me

岩「…Where do masochists go when they die?」

岩「…I can see why Hasselbeck's worried about fake guns killing fake people. afterall, she's a fake journalist on a fake news channel」

Re: Research: Gamers Love the Challenge, Not the Gore

Upon reading this, I thought, "I could have told you that."  A lot of gamers play games because of the challenges they present and not the gore.  I've never liked movies or games that just used gore or violence as its sole selling point.  It just points to sensationalism and suggests the developers or filmmakers have nothing else to say and have no point other than to shock people.  At which point, then, it becomes pornography.

However, that having been said, having at least some violence in a game does make it appealing.  I don't think, for example, Mortal Kombat would be as fun to play without the absurdly over-the-top Fatalities.  And games like BioShock and Dead Space wouldn't have been as effective in their presentation if their imagery was less disturbing.  I see violence in games or movies as the eqivalent of spice in cooking; no it doesn't need to be there, but it sure makes it taste a lot better!

Re: Research: Gamers Love the Challenge, Not the Gore

"once opportunities for satisfying competence needs and autonomy needs have been equated in violent and non-violent games."

 

You don't believe in non violent games, remember Anderson?

Re: Research: Gamers Love the Challenge, Not the Gore

A common belief held by many gamers and many in the video game industry - that violence is what makes a game fun

Who the heck thought that?

I've only ever thought that the level of violence should be as realistic (or as excessive) as the game style, I don't want buckets of gore in my Ratchet & Clank, and I don't want people popping into smoke in my Fallout 3.

Thanks Mr University Proffessor, thanks for telling us all that it's gameplay that makes a game fun, not the violence, Mortal Kombat may have fooled me when I was 10 but by the time I was 12 and the second one was coming out I'd worked that out myself thanks!

Re: Research: Gamers Love the Challenge, Not the Gore

When I was younger I was attracted to violence in games, it may have been because I was young, it may have been because my parents wouldn't let me get the violent T or M games (although strangely I've never cared about any of the M games until I was old enough to get T games), but that's what excited me.

In fact the promise to blow things up was what led me to try the Ratchet and Clank games.

I'm still a big fan of the series because I think they're fun (and funny), although I still enjoy getting to use the big exotic guns on enemies. I don't think I've quite grown over violence = amusing, but I don't equate lots of violence with a good game.

----------------------------------------------------

Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: Research: Gamers Love the Challenge, Not the Gore

I was about to comment on the exact same thing...

Re: Researchers: Gamers Love the Challenge, Not the Gore

One more piece of research to add to the arsenal against people who slam ALL gamers as violent sociopaths...

Re: Researchers: Gamers Love the Challenge, Not the Gore

And one more piece of research to add to all the other research that states the bleeding obvious.

Re: Researchers: Gamers Love the Challenge, Not the Gore

And more money down the drain because of A-holes like JT, that could be put to better use if they didn't exist.

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Should 'Hatred' have been removed from Steam Greenlight?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
PHX Corp@Adam802 We'll break out the popcorn in June12/19/2014 - 9:23pm
ZippyDSMleeMaskedPixelante: I'm itching to start it too but I will wait till the patch goes live. >>12/19/2014 - 7:52pm
Adam802Leland Yee and Jackson get trial date: http://sfbay.ca/2014/12/18/leland-yee-keith-jackson-get-trial-date/12/19/2014 - 5:24pm
MaskedPixelanteNevermind. Turns out when they said "the patch is now live", they meant "it's still in beta".12/19/2014 - 5:07pm
MaskedPixelanteSo I bought Dark Souls PC, and it's forcing me to log into GFWL. Did I miss something?12/19/2014 - 5:00pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/12/republicans-may-have-plan-to-save-internet-providers-from-utility-rules/ this is intreasting. congress may put net nutrality in to law to avoid title 2 classification12/19/2014 - 2:45pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.polygon.com/2014/12/19/7421953/bullshit-cards-against-humanity-donated-250k-sunlight-foundation I have to admit I like the choice o organization. congrats to CAH.12/19/2014 - 1:51pm
E. Zachary KnightIf you are downloading a copy in order to bypass the DRM, then you are legally in the wrong. Ethically, if you bought the game, it doesn't matter where you download it in the future.12/19/2014 - 12:06pm
InfophileEZK: Certainly better that way, though not foolproof. Makes me think though: does it count as piracy if you download a game you already paid for, just not from the place you paid for it at? Ethically, I'd say no, but legally, probably yes.12/19/2014 - 11:20am
ZippyDSMleeAnd I still spent 200$ in the last month on steam/GOG stuff sales get me nearly every time ><12/19/2014 - 10:55am
ZippyDSMleeMaskedPixelante:And this is why I'm a one legged bandit.12/19/2014 - 10:51am
ZippyDSMleeE. Zachary Knight: I buy what I can as long as I can get cracks for it...then again it I could have gotton Lords of the Fallen for 30 with DLC I would have ><12/19/2014 - 10:50am
MaskedPixelantehttp://www.joystiq.com/2014/12/19/marvel-vs-capcom-origins-leaving-online-storefronts-soon/ Speaking of "last chance to buy", Marvel vs. Capcom Origins is getting delisted from all major storefronts. Behold the wonders of the all digital future.12/19/2014 - 9:59am
MaskedPixelanteSeriously, the so-called "Last Chance" sale was up to 80% off, while this one time only return sale goes for a flat 85% off with a 90% off upgrade if you buy the whole catalogue.12/19/2014 - 9:37am
E. Zachary KnightInfophile, Tha is why I buy only DRM-free games.12/19/2014 - 9:37am
MaskedPixelanteNordic is back on GOG for one weekend only. And at 85% off no less, which is kind of a slap in the face to people who paid more during the "NORDIC IS LEAVING FOREVER BUY NOW OR FOREVER HOLD YOUR PEACE" sale, but whatever...12/19/2014 - 9:28am
InfophileRe PHX's link: This is one of the reasons the digital revolution isn't all it's cracked up to be. There's also the flip side where Sony can block access to games you've bought if they ban your account for unrelated reasons. All power is theirs.12/19/2014 - 8:52am
MaskedPixelantehttp://uplay.ubi.com/#!/en-US/events/uplay-15-days You can win FREE GAMES FOR A YEAR! Unfortunately, they're Ubisoft games.12/18/2014 - 6:29pm
Papa MidnightAh, so it was downtime. I've been seeing post appear in my RSS feed, but I was unable to access GamePolitics today across several ISPs.12/18/2014 - 6:06pm
james_fudgeSorry for the downtime today, folks.12/18/2014 - 5:54pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician