Activision Returns to E3

February 2, 2009 -

Activision's back!

The Entertainment Software Association has issued a press release which offers new details on E3 2009. But the biggest news is that Activision, which was not an official exhibitor at E3 2008, will be on the show floor when E3 opens in June.

While Activision will be exhibiting at E3, it has not, apparently rejoined the ESA's membership ranks.

As for ESA, the game publishers' trade group seems to be improving its P.R. efforts.  E3 2009, for instance, has a great-looking new website and the ESA has also established an official E3 presence on both Facebook and Twitter,
 


Comments

Re: Activision Returns to E3

Well, I'd take activision displaying anything at my event as a negative. "Hey, look, we've reskinned one of our old games, bought a better graphics engine, added ridiculous amounts of DRM, and expect you to pay full price for it, just like a real game!"

Re: Activision Returns to E3

Is E3 bringing Sexy Back? I know it took it away the past couple of years. Although IMO E3 has always been promises about Fable-esque games and looks at demos which will never compare to the real thing rather it be being far better or far worse.

But it was still nice to see the newest shit coming out.

Re: Activision Returns to E3

PAX is and has been for some time the replacement for E3; it has a much better atmosphere, more entertainment instead of showcasing, and a focus on fun instead of polishing up your crappy game (Too Human, I'm looking at you.)

Brain: "Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?" Pinky: "I think so, Brain, but we're already naked."

Re: Activision Returns to E3

Wish list for E3:

-Old E3 back, before it's fall a few years back.

-Open to the public. No more of this "Press and developers only" bullshit.

-Admission prices no more than $10 a person. Any higher and it's bullshit.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Game on, brothers and sisters." -Leet Gamer Jargon

-----------------------------



"A Chrono Trigger is anything that unleashes its will or desire to change history!" -Gaspar

Re: Activision Returns to E3

Let me get this straight.

Admission to E3 (priority pass) back in 2006 was at least a few hundred dollars, I believe.  Even the ESA's half-assed Entertainment for All was between $50-$100.  And you want the old E3 back but only want to pay $10 to get in, otherwise it's "bullshit"?

Is that what you're saying?

"There is no sin except stupidity." - Oscar Wilde

"De minimus non curat lex"

Re: Activision Returns to E3

You forgot the "Open to the public" thing. And I'm saying that the public shouldn't pay so much money to get in.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Game on, brothers and sisters." -Leet Gamer Jargon

-----------------------------



"A Chrono Trigger is anything that unleashes its will or desire to change history!" -Gaspar

Re: Activision Returns to E3

Why?

And you're forgetting that "open to the public" has nothing to do with the price.  It just means it's okay for non-industry types to attend.  And I know what you're saying, you said it already.  I want to know why you think that normal consumers should pay so little for an E3 similar to the ones before 2007, when the admission price for the old ones was much higher.

"There is no sin except stupidity." - Oscar Wilde

"De minimus non curat lex"

Re: Activision Returns to E3

I dunno 25 a day,250 for the whole thing or 500 for VIP status, sounds good to me and they can make moeny off that.


Gore,Violence,Sexauilty,Fear,Emotion these are but modes of transportation of story and thought, to take them from society you create a society of children and nannys, since adults are not required.


http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Activision Returns to E3

I have no idea how much it costs to put one of these things on, so I'm not really in a position to tell whether the price is unfair.  All I can do is choose to pay it or not.  That's why I want to know how Shadow came to his little $10 admission price conclusion.

"There is no sin except stupidity." - Oscar Wilde

"De minimus non curat lex"

Re: Activision Returns to E3

The public should pay more!  The average jackass isn't an investor, part of the industry, or anyone with anything to bring.  They're just coming to get a sneak peek at what's coming up in the world of videogaming.  They don't have any reason to be there other than that they wish to be there, and thus should pay more.

Re: Activision Returns to E3

It will be interesting to see if E3 can rise from the ashes of last year.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: Activision Returns to E3

I know I hate Activision, but hooray. Anything to get E3 back on its feet to me is a good thing.

Re: Activision Returns to E3

"I know I hate Activision"

Why?

Re: Activision Returns to E3

bad buisness practices, bad public relations, an ego the size of Russia, I could go on.

Re: Activision Returns to E3

Which is why they're not only still in business, but also top ranked among video game publishers?

"There is no sin except stupidity." - Oscar Wilde

"De minimus non curat lex"

Re: Activision Returns to E3

And I can't not like what they do?

Re: Activision Returns to E3

Of course you're free to not like them, my point is that if their business practices and customer relations are so bad, then they wouldn't be so successful.

Didn't mean to imply that you weren't entitled to your opinion, sorry.

"There is no sin except stupidity." - Oscar Wilde

"De minimus non curat lex"
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Whose next half decade of superhero films are you most looking forward to?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
E. Zachary KnightAlso, this is a hillarious view of Kickstarter "Fine, still doesn't justify taking people's money they gave her to do a project for herself." talking about Sarkeesian.10/30/2014 - 9:35am
MaskedPixelantehttps://twitter.com/DanSlott/status/527814374459977728 One More Shot at Marriage.10/30/2014 - 8:44am
E. Zachary KnightApparently, it is ok to review a games art on whether or not you like the style, but not ok to review a game's story or theme based on whether or not you like or agree with it.10/30/2014 - 8:40am
MechaCrashComics never change because the people in charge now read comics when they were kids, and keep reverting comics to what they remember. As long as that cycle holds, change will be slow at best.10/30/2014 - 8:18am
Neeneko@ MechaTama31 - That is the big reason fansubs were tollerated for so long in the US, japanese studios kept watch to see which ones became popular via those networks.10/30/2014 - 8:11am
quiknkoldJournalists shouldnt be bigger than the stories they report or products they review.10/30/2014 - 7:48am
E. Zachary KnightHere is some food for thought for gamergaters who want politics out of games journalism. https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20141026/06425828942/journalists-need-point-view-if-they-want-to-stay-relevant.shtml10/30/2014 - 7:18am
quiknkoldI didnt say all games are like that, Conster. Princess Peach was....different. though I had fun with it.10/30/2014 - 7:00am
james_fudgehttp://www.somethingawful.com/news/gamergate-with-cats/10/30/2014 - 5:20am
MechaTama31AE: Japan's doujin scene illustrates an interesting potential solution to that problem. Let people play around with the characters, and keep an eye on things to see what people are buying.10/30/2014 - 12:07am
ConsterI bought, played and liked the game (unlike Smash Basketball *shakes fist*), but that felt iffy to me.10/29/2014 - 10:52pm
Consterquiknkold: if Super Princess Peach had been Super Prince Peach instead, do you think emotions would've been a mechanic?10/29/2014 - 10:51pm
quiknkoldcore meaning Colossus, Storm, Wolverine, and Nightcrawler10/29/2014 - 8:51pm
quiknkoldMatthew, those core x-men were together for almost 2 decades, until one would always be dead so they couldnt have them all together.10/29/2014 - 8:51pm
quiknkoldmore of an unknown. background characters mostly, who had a book but it was mostly a waste. they bring in this powderkeg of diversity and boom. now they could do the same thing and with the right artist and writer and mystique to it...10/29/2014 - 8:50pm
Matthew Wilsondoes it though? they always seem to return to the original cast in a year or two.10/29/2014 - 8:49pm
quiknkoldWhen I think of the perfect catalyst of a melting pot hero team, I think of the All New All Different X-Men. A Russian, A African goddess, A Canadian Berzerker, a German elf, and Cyclops. and all have withstood the test of time mostly cause the x-men were10/29/2014 - 8:49pm
Andrew EisenOne reason is because the money people are often afraid it won't sell. "A new IP AND the protagonist is gay?! That'll never work!" Showing that diverse characters can work in popular IP is simply a place to start. The indie scene is another.10/29/2014 - 8:47pm
Matthew Wilsonisnt that the point? why not just make new heroes that are different races, sexual orientations, and genders to start with?10/29/2014 - 8:46pm
Andrew EisenYep, progress is a lot slower than it should be (especially for something that shouldn't have been a problem in the first place).10/29/2014 - 8:45pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician