Utah Legislator Officially Submits Jack Thompson Video Game Bill

February 11, 2009 -

Utah Rep. Mike Morley has officially introduced video game legislation drafted by disbarred Miami attorney Jack Thompson.

As GamePolitics previously reported, H.B. 353 would amend Utah's current Truth in Advertising statute. If passed, retailers who claim that they don't sell M-rated games to underage buyers could be held liable if they did. The measure would also apply to R-rated DVDs as well as tickets to R-rated movies.

The language of the amendment has changed slightly from that which GP reported on Sunday. It now reads:

[Deceptive trade practices occur when, in the course of a person's business, vocation, or occupation that person:]

 

(u) (i) advertises that the person will not sell a good or service labeled with an age restriction or recommendation to a person under the age restriction or recommendation; and (ii) sells that good or service to a person under the age restriction or recommendation.

For his part, Thompson issued a press release this morning which says that the purpose of the bill is to "punish major American retailers who falsely claim they do not sell Mature-rated video games and R-rated movies and movie tickets to kids under 17."

While Thompson claims that H.B. 353 has no free speech implications, that remains to be seen; the bill clearly targets certain types of media content.

As GamePolitics readers may recall, Thompson also claimed that his 2006 Louisiana bill was constitutional (it wasn't) and that Grand Theft Auto: Vice City was a "device," not a form of speech, (he was wrong about that, too).

So, please excuse us while wait for a real constitutional expert to weigh in.

Hearings on the proposal may begin as early as next week.

GP: Thanks to Nathaniel Edwards of LegalArcade.com for the artwork.


Comments

Re: Utah Legislator Officially Submits Jack Thompson Video ...

Ok, fine.  Zombies are allowable if they obey the "No eating of other customers" rule.  Also, no Boomers.

Robots may also buy games, but only if they're not Ridiculously Human Robots that have been programmed to love.

Vampires may buy video games, but only World of Darkness vampires.  Twilight vampires are strickly banned from anywhere cool.

Re: Utah Legislator Officially Submits Jack Thompson Video ...

Please, they prefer the term "living impared"

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: Utah Legislator Officially Submits Jack Thompson Video ...

And the bastards never use a coaster.

I JUST BOUGHT THAT TEAK WOOD COFFEE TABLE

Re: Utah Legislator Officially Submits Jack Thompson Video ...

Oh I'm starting to despise them for eating my flesh and complaining about RE5.

----------------------------------------------------

Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: Utah Legislator Officially Submits Jack Thompson Video ...

They never share with me.

---
The Mammon Industry

---
Fangamer

Re: Utah Legislator Officially Submits Jack Thompson Video Game

Personally, I'm hoping for number 2 just to see the bill blow up in JT's face.

Re: Utah Legislator Officially Submits Jack Thompson Video Game

Still unconstitutional on First Amendment(freedom of speech), and Fourteenth(equal protection, as this  still doesn't cover music). Next.

Thompson is still the Metropolitian Moron of Miami.

Geaux Saints, Geaux Tigers, Geaux Hornets, Jack Thompson can geaux chase a chupacabra.

Geaux Saints, Geaux Tigers, Geaux Pelicans. Solidarity for the Saints = No retreat, no surrender. 2013 = Saints' revenge on the NFL. Even through the darkest days, this fire burns always.

Re: Utah Legislator Officially Submits Jack Thompson Video ...

Fourteenth Amendment protects individual "citizens" not companies. Equal Protection does't apply to corporate liability, although it would if like the CEO of GameStop was sued personally.

But yeah, there are MAJOR First Amendment issues here.

Re: Utah Legislator Officially Submits Jack Thompson Video ...

14th amendment has played a good part of the video game legislation defense. I know in Oklahoma, the ruling had as a major point the unequal treatment of movies and books compared to video games.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: Utah Legislator Officially Submits Jack Thompson Video ...

@nighstalker & EZK:

A corporation is a "person" for the purposes of constitutional analysis. And, as a matter of fact, for the purposes of most every other sort of legal analysis. After all, a corporation is essentially a collective of persons (i.e., the corporate shareholders).   

Re: Utah Legislator Officially Submits Jack Thompson Video ...

Or books.

I really, really, really want to see it apply to books in Utah. I would then travel to the Utah office of my company and have some fun while I'm there.

 

Re: Utah Legislator Officially Submits Jack Thompson Video ...

by putting warning labels on the bibles?

岩「…Where do masochists go when they die?」

岩「…I can see why Hasselbeck's worried about fake guns killing fake people. afterall, she's a fake journalist on a fake news channel」

Re: Utah Legislator Officially Submits Jack Thompson Video ...

Give that man a cigar! Right in one.

 

 

Re: Utah Legislator Officially Submits Jack Thompson Video Game

So, businesses change the wording of their stance from "we do not sell M rated video games to children" to "we strive to prevent the sale of M rated video games to children"

 

Sortableturnip's Law: As an online discussion of video game violence grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Jack Thompson approaches 1

Re: Utah Legislator Officially Submits Jack Thompson Video ...

The wording makes it to broad for just M-rated. According to this, retailers can't sell T games to anyone under 13, or E+10 to anyone under 10. Constitution aside, this is pure-D WRONG!
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Michael ChandraSo really the guy's own words strike me as "wah! How dare you disagree with me!" behaviour, which is the sort of childish attitude I am unfortunately not surprised by.10/20/2014 - 2:17pm
Michael ChandraCorrect AE, but then again the owner's own words are about "wishes", not about an order. No "we told him not to", but going against his wishes.10/20/2014 - 2:16pm
Matthew Wilsonyup. sadly that has been true for awhile.10/20/2014 - 2:10pm
james_fudgewelcome to 2014 politics. Increasingly fought online10/20/2014 - 1:54pm
E. Zachary KnightIt is honestly a shame that anyone has to publicly state they are against such vile behavior, but that is the sad life we live.10/20/2014 - 1:46pm
E. Zachary KnightDecided to publicly reiterate my opposition to harassment campaigns. http://randomtower.com/2014/10/just-stop-with-the-harassment-and-bullying-campaigns-already/10/20/2014 - 1:45pm
Andrew EisenMichael Chandra - Unless I overlooked it, we haven't seen how the directive to not talk about whatever he wasn't supposed to talk about was phrased so it’s hard to say if it could have been misconstrued as a suggestion or not.10/20/2014 - 12:35pm
Andrew EisenHey, the second to last link is the relevant one! He actually did say "let them suffer." Although, he didn't say it to the other person he was bickering with.10/20/2014 - 12:29pm
Neo_DrKefkahttps://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/SxFas https://archive.today/1upoI https://archive.today/0hu7i https://archive.today/NsPUC https://archive.today/fLTQv https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 11:21am
Andrew EisenNeo_DrKefka - "Attacking"? Interesting choice of words. Also interesting that you quoted something that wasn't actually said. Leaving out a relevant link, are you?10/20/2014 - 11:04am
quiknkoldugh. I want to know why the hell Mozerella Sticks are 4 dollars at my works cafeteria...are they cooked in Truffle Oil?10/20/2014 - 10:41am
Neo_DrKefkaAnti-Gamergate supporter Robert Caruso attacks female GamerGate supporter by also attacking another cause she support which is the situation happening in Syia “LET SYRIANS SUFFER” https://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 10:18am
Neo_DrKefkaThat is correct in an At-Will state you or the employer can part ways at any time. However Florida also has laws on the books about "Wrongful combinations against workers" http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2012/448.04510/20/2014 - 10:07am
james_fudgehe'd die if he couldn't talk about Wii U :)10/20/2014 - 9:16am
Michael ChandraBy the way, I am not saying Andrew should stop talking about Wii-U. I find it quite nice. :)10/20/2014 - 8:53am
Michael Chandra'How dare he ignore my wishes and my advice! I am his boss! I could have ordered him but I should be able to say it's advice rather than ordering him directly!'10/20/2014 - 8:52am
Michael ChandraIf GP goes "EZK, do not talk about X publicly for a week, we're preparing a big article on it" and he still tweets about X, they'd have a legitimate reason to be pissed.10/20/2014 - 8:52am
Michael ChandraIf GP tells Andrew "we'd kinda prefer it if you stopped talking about Wii-U for 1 week" and he'd tweet about it anyway, firing him for it would be idiotic.10/20/2014 - 8:51am
Michael ChandraLegal right, sure. But that doesn't make it any less pathetic of an excuse.10/20/2014 - 8:50am
ZippyDSMleeYou mean right to fire states.10/20/2014 - 8:50am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician