February 14, 2009 -
As GamePolitics reported this week, online retailer Amazon.com has blocked sales of RapeLay, a Japanese hentai game being offered on Amazon by an affiliated re-seller.
While many were upset by news of the game, some felt that Amazon's decision amounted to censorship.
What do you think?
Register your opinion in the GP poll at left.



Comments
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
Huh? What? Who are you replying to, exactly? There's not a single person here arguing "that Amazon should be forced to sell this product", so where is this particular rant coming from? It's like you're arguing against your own made-up opponent.
*facepalm* *shakes head*
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
Hardly, the fact that the word "censorship" has come up brings up the argument. It wasn't simply that Amazon decided to stop the sale of the game from their website, it was claimed by many to be "censorship". It's almost as if people believe that Amazon offer a public service to the people of America, and that they should sell this game in the name of "freedom of speech", that they are custodians of the American way and that of anti-censorship (although America freely censors many things). Amazon don't have to follow these principles, they aren't state owned, in no way is Amazon causing censorship for deciding not to sell a game.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
"Hardly, the fact that the word "censorship" has come up brings up the argument."
Nonsense. Calling it censorship, with or without the double quotation marks, in no way implies that Amazon should be forced to carry the game. You're putting words in people's mouths and arguing against that instead of what they actually said.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
I believe that on Amazon's own site, they have the right to sell whatever products they want. They have that freedom. If there's a product that I have a problem with, I simply won't purchase that product. I have no interest in telling people how to live their lives, and in my view, nobody has that right. If Amazon wants to pull a product from their shelves, that is their business. If they want to place a product on their shelves, it is again, their business. In the end, freedom is what matters. If I want to swear, I will. If you don't want to hear me swear, don't listen. Besides, there's nothing in the Constitution protecting your right to be free from being offended.
As far as Amazon controlling the content that winds up in the hands of the public, I'm going to call bullshit. In regards to their site, yes. In regards to controlling the consumption of the populace, they don't. If you want something, regardless of how bizarre it may seem, chances are you can find somebody selling it, somebody making a website about it, and somebody writing slash-fiction about it. There are more online stores out there than just Amazon.
______________________________________________________________________ mykalgaidin.gamerdna.com
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
I don't think anyone is saying Amazon shouldn't be able to control their own company. That being said I think the question is asking if you agree with their decision. Would you have done the same thing?
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
No, I wouldn't have. Amazon wasn't selling the game themselves, it was being sold through a reseller. Granted, it was on Amazon's site, but I'm sure you can find a hundred things even more offensive to most if you dug around.
Makes me wonder how somebody found this game to begin with. Do they regularly go to Amazon and put "rape simulator" into the search engine?
______________________________________________________________________
"It's at times like this, when I'm trapped in a Vogon airlock with a man from Betelgeuse and about to asphyxiate in deep space, that I wish I'd listened to what my mother told me when I was young." "Why, what did she say?"
"I don't know, I didn't listen."
mykalgaidin.gamerdna.com
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
Amazon is within its rights to ban the game from the site, but that doesn't make what they did right.
Heck, the hentai anime 'Bible Black' has rape scenes galore, and diabolism and other depraved stuff, and in my opinion (after having watched it) it's garbage, but it's available at Amazon.com, and that's exactly how things should be.
Censorship - ESPECIALLY self-censorship (which is what Amazon.com is doing here) is not something to be supported. If I want to censor myself from getting Bible Black or this rape game, that should be up to me, not Amazon.com. That's how a liberal free market should work. Amazon.com has chosen, in this case, to exert a 'dictat' and to behave as a totalitarian power. That is it's right, but totalitarianism is not a good system, even for a business.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
So do you think Amazon should be forced to stock it?
What about other shops that sell DVDs, should they also be forced to stock it? How about the Christain shop down the road from me. They self-censor quite heavily, never seen a Koran in the window but the area has a high number of Muslims, I'm sure they would sell.
A house is not a home unless it contains food and fire for the mind as well as the body. Benjamin Franklin
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
Tell the trut I think self censorship is one of the only 2 forms that should be legal. The other is consumer censorship. If you dont want to see it dont buy it. And as for self censorship if they don't want to sell it they dont have to its there business they can run it as they see fit.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
Hentai is dumb. Anime is dumb. I think amazon should expand their idea to ban all of both. Maybe then it could leak over into the rest of the world.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
There is a simple solution to your problem with anime and hentai. Don't look at it. Ever.
I find that most people who claim to be outraged by something look at those same things for the very purpose of being outraged. Gives you something to talk about over your Cheerios.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
I do a pretty good of it.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
Care to elaborate? Why is Hentai and Anime "dumb"?
Also, do you believe that everything you view as dumb should be prohibited? How would you feel if someone prohibited something that you didn't think was dumb, and their reason amounted to it being dumb?
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
I do as a fact believe everything I think is dumb should be banned. I'm a smart guy and I think the world would do better to follow my lead.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
I cannot even express, just how deeply ludicrious that is, tapping into egotisticalism and breaking ground on even greater irrationale.
You, sir, have proven not only how shallow you are, and while you maybe, maybe, are smart in some perspective, you as a person, is incredibly far from it as a whole.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
Was Newton shallow for saying "for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction"? No. He was just correct. Same scenario.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
Except your reference doesn't apply, trying to connect Newtonian physics to the idea and claiming it's the "same scenario," your logic is riddled with fallacies, and so, your argument as a whole is void. Because what he said was correct, does not make you correct.
Bitch all you want, you're idiocy precedes you. This argument is over, because you are a failure at it.
I have more interesting arguments to tend to. You failed as soon as you started typing. Not worth my time arguing with someone who has no argument to present.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
It's good you gave up because I will continue to be right.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
your blatant, baseless and broad statement that all anime dumb is in and of itself dumb; therefore such a statement should be banned.... though really care to make an actual argument for anime being dumb
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
Actually I have very well thought out opinions on anime being dumb. You are dumb for assuming my accusations are baseless. Finally, no, I don't care to make an arguement for anime being dumb because each of us have already made up their mind on the situation. There isn't a single thing we can say to each other to change each other's opinion. Therefore arguing about it would be dumb.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
I'm sure you do... figures that you would not even care to debate such a thing that you feel so certain in... really i don't think i have ever met anyone won who hated anime and was also willing to debate on it; they just make their claim, declare themselves right and then leave without listening to a single counter point.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
Yea, cus we're smart and we realize that you may be borderline retarded.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
Or it's because you have no good argument and prefer just laughing and throwing insults, lacking the maturity to stand in a debate and defend your views
An absolutist mindset, not unlike JT's... believe that you are 100% correct, anyone who disagrees with you is an idiot not worth speaking to, and completly unwilling to listen to any level of reasoning; after to be willing to listen to such a thing would mean you are open to the possibility that you might in fact be wrong... totally unwilling to even believe that a middle ground on a point of view exists... it really is a mindset that leads to a lot of problems
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
Very well. I propose that hentai is dumb because of tentecle rape. How do you rebutt that?
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
Easily. That's as absurd as saying "comedy is dumb because of toilet humor," "lawyers are dumb because of Jack Thompson," or "marriage is dumb because of spousal abuse."
It is unfair and downright silly to condemn an entire genre because of one subset of the genre that you don't like.
To be clear, it's totally fine if you do personally feel that tentacle rape, hentai, or even all of anime is dumb, even if you're unable to articulate your reasons. No one's forcing you to watch it.
But advocating a ban on everything you personally don't like? Well, that's crossing the line and infringing on others' rights (the ban itself, not your opinion that it should be banned).
Andrew Eisen
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
toilet humor is meant to be dumb. JT isn't a lawyer anymore so that one doesn't hold up. Spousal abuse is actually the opposite of what marriage is for.
Grown men jacking it to a tentecle rapeing a school girl. That's dumb.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
Whether you like my analogies or not, my point still stands: "It is unfair and downright silly to condemn an entire genre because of one subset of the genre that you don't like."
Andrew Eisen
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
it's not a question of whether i like them. I am saying they are irrelevant to the conversation. YOu would have gotten that if you weren't dumb. You made my point.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
My analogies are completely relevant because they illustrate the point I'm making. Even if they were irrelevant, they still do not invalidate my point:
"It is unfair and downright silly to condemn an entire genre because of one subset of the genre that you don't like."
Furthermore, had my analogies actually been irrelevant, that still in no way would have made your point – it simply would have failed to illustrate mine.
Andrew Eisen
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
The point you made was that it was dumb for me to argue this.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
How about we ban they -themselves- cause I percieve them as dumb. Same argument they're making, so logically, it must be acceptable.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
The entire world should follow this mindset for one day. It would be the day everything was smashed with the ban hammer.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
And a crappy special-effects heavy movie will be made about it.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
Oh, oh...Michael Bay to direct. EXPLOSIONS :-)
To be persuasive we must be believable; to be believable we must be credible; credible we must be truthful. Edward R. Murrow
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
William Shatner has to be the hero that defiantly stands against the banhammer. Without doubt the banhammer must be wielded by the great Sir Thomas Sean Connery.
This conversation has now gone out of control in quite an amazing way.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
I can't really blame Amazon for trying to avoid a PR disaster, but I am well and truly fed up with the people who seek out these kinds of things just for the sake of stirring up controversy and trying to rid the world of anything that they do not personally approve of. Lots of things offend me. Take the Saw movies for instance. The entire premise of them seems sick to me and I have no desire to see them whatsoever. So, being the rational and capable adult that I am, I simply do not watch them. I feel no particular need to go on some holy crusade to rid the earth of Saw, just because I don't like it. It's fiction, nobody is actually being harmed, and nobody is forced to watch it. Just like this game.
According to the Jezebel crowd, any depiction of rape will turn men into rapists. Then again, according to the Jezebel crowd, all men already are rapists, or would be if they thought they could get away with it. This is the exact same kind of unsubstantiated crap argument that is made about violence in video games leading to real world violence. And for that matter, why is rape so much worse than the murder and mutilation that already feature in so many games?
Bottom line is, it's just a game. I know the alarmists are getting tired of that argument, and have started to preemptively dismiss it, but that's really what it comes down to. It's a work of fiction, just like any other book, movie, tv show, comic, or whatever, that depicts rape. "It's just a game" doesn't mean it can't be taken seriously, as the alarmists try to imply to help dismiss the argument. TV shows, movies and novels can all deal with sensitive subjects and be taken seriously. "It's just a game" means that the subject can be explored in a way that does not and cannot actually harm anyone. Does this particular example have much artistic merit? I'd say not, but that's just my opinion. I am quite comfortable with having my own opinion without needing to force it upon others, and I will always come down on the side of freedom of expression in such matters. One person's or group's mores and taboos should not be used as justification to silence somebody with a different outlook.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
I think it was right of them to drop this game. HOWEVER, they need to codify their offensive materials policy in a much more concrete way. Their policy is way to vague.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
While I voice the opinion that while Amazon does have the right to run their site as they see if, it still didn't make it right to drop the game.
There was nothing wrong with the game at all. Ooo, so it's rape, big deal. It's hentai. If you get into the world of hentai, it's something you better get used to real fast, along with a lot of other things. The whole thing is fictitious, with characters who don't even exist outside of the game.
And christ, what next? Maybe tentacles are offensive, too, cause it's inhuman. Or maybe yuri because it's homosexual. Or anything magic cause it might advocate witchcraft! Let's ban all erotic images from Amazon! Save the children from them! Etc.
Amazon caved in. That gives even more resolve to others who shouldn't have it.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
Absolutely - people stating that "It's their site and they can do what they want" are entirely missing the point - the poll is if it was right to do so, not if Amazon were allowed to do so.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
It all boils down to Amazon's choice what products they wish to sell or alow sale of through 3rd parties. It is their right to do so.
As to whether they are right? In this case, I believe they are. A company wishes to remain successful, and negative publicity will harm that success. There could have been incredible negative publicity involved with them making a game that portrays rape as fun available (or being seen to through 3rd parties), so it's a pretty clear cut choice, and the correct one for them to make.
Some might argue that it's a slippery slope, but I don't think so. There is a huge gulf of difference between this and a game like GTA.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
It is up to Amazon whether they choose to sell the game or not, another question is should we force retailers to actually sell the game?
If you believe in freedom of speech you must also believe in the company having the freedom to choose what items it decides to sell and not to sell.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
1. It's their site and they can do what they want.
2. It's a bit hypocritical of them to allow the sales of one type of product that can be seen as "offensive" but not another.
3. It was a used product offered by an individual/private business rather than a product offered directly by, let alone "endorsed" by, Amazon.com itself.
4. It's a fantasy game. Like it or not, fantasy and reality are not the same thing. The implication that one act in a fictional setting will not "spill over" into the real world while another one will is hypocritical and misleading. Implying that someone who plays a game that contains the act of rape is "sick" and may want to commit rape in the real world but that another person who kills in the name of "God", such as in the "Left Behind" series, doesn't want to go out an commit real murder in the name of "God" just shows where the REAL inability to distinguish reality and fantasy actually comes from.
5. It's their site and they can do what they want.
So, while I voted and believe in "No", because of my combined beliefs of Freedom of Speech, fantasy and reality are not the same thing, and it was a "used" game, I still wouldn't put up a major fuss because of thier Right to do what they want with their own site.
Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
Nightwng2000 has also updated his MySpace page: http://www.myspace.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
It's a bit hypocritical of them to allow the sales of one type of product that can be seen as "offensive" but not another.
I don't buy this. Levels of "offensive" exist. It is not binary. Nor is constant over time or people. So if X is (to them) very offenive it does not automatically mean they have to ban Y (which to you might be more offenive).
A house is not a home unless it contains food and fire for the mind as well as the body. Benjamin Franklin
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
1 and 5, nothing else. Amazon are a business and anything that makes this many waves needs to be dealt with to protect their corporate image. Hypocrisy and freedom of speech don't enter into it, Amazon has but one duty and it’s to their shareholders. They don’t need to be squeaky clean, just clean enough to keep the cash coming in. /shrug.
Gift.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
I agree. Shooting, slicing, blowing up, disemboweling, genocide -etc... are all "OK" topics but rape is not? WTF?
This strikes me as yet another religious sensibilities based decision. Fantasy is fantasy and reality for by far worse. By the censorship standard used here many movies would not be made nor romance novels or other "violent" acts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The most difficult pain a man can suffer is to have knowledge of much and power over little" - Herodotus
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
I dont think you can really compare normal violence with rape violence. Call it religious sensibility/idiocy if you want but to me thats simply to much.
Re: GP Poll: Was Amazon Right to Drop Rape Game?
I must concur. It's their site, they can choose to do as they see fit.
----
Papa Midnight
http://www.otakutimes.com
http://www.thesupersoldiers.com
----
Papa Midnight
How did Vaz found out about the game?
Re: How did Vaz found out about the game?
You might want to change that from anime hater to hentai/pornography hater. As for the question I've never heard of anyone call anime murder simulation, video games on the other hand. My grandfather is convinced that violent video games are just as good as child pornography. As for how that connection makes sense and why he would knowingly say that several of the people he cares about are just as good as pedophiles for playing these games I do not know. Didn't follow up the comment due to the presence of children.
Not yet, but anime haters may use that soon.
Anime haters hasn't used this word yet, but someone will. Anime hater targeted hentai also. I have met anime haters who hate video game and they are not over 40 years old. It's only a matter of time before anime haters may take the word out of JT and Grossman's mouth.