Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling on California Video Game Law; Urges SCOTUS Appeal

February 23, 2009 -

As GamePolitics reported on Friday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court has upheld a lower court's ruling that California's 2005 video law is unconstitutional.

The Parents Television Council has now weighed in on the decision. The Los Angeles-based watchdog group criticized the 9th Circuit's ruling and called upon PTC members to support State Sen. Leland Yee's call for an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

In a press release, PTC President Tim Winter (left) said:

Let’s be clear on what – exactly – is going on here: The video game industry has established a policy to ‘protect’ children from a harmful product, yet they file lawsuit after lawsuit to oppose any enforcement of that same policy... The only motivation for the industry to sue is to keep collecting blood money from kids who aren’t supposed to be able to buy these games without their parents present at the time of purchase.

There are very responsible retailers out there – Wal-Mart and Game Stop come to mind – who take their obligation not to sell these games to kids very seriously.  Yet industry representatives claim this law is unfairly biased against them... If the industry actually followed its own rules, then this law would have absolutely no financial impact... 

Shockingly, the Court’s ruling claims that there isn’t enough research to support that children are affected by video game violence.  Yet countless independent studies confirm what most parents instinctively know to be true: repeated exposure to graphic sexual, violent and profanity-laced video games has a harmful and long-term effect on children...
This federal court decision is a disgrace and should be of great concern to all parents – not just in California but across our nation.  We applaud State Sen. Yee’s efforts to see that this decision goes to the U.S. Supreme Court...


Comments

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

The games industry (ESA) has been and seemingly continues to be run by spineless wimps.  Vince McMahon, love him or hate him, at least had the testicular fortitude to go after the PTC for their lies.

Would Mr. Gallagher ever dream of going Vince McMachon on the PTC?  Doubtful.   The ESA seems to think mod chips are a bigger threat to the industry than groups intent on regulating/banning their wares.

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

These pigs are such hypocrites and the people like them. They want their freedoms and rights respected and protected but heaven forbid if they grant that same respect to everyone else.

"With free speech either all of it is ok or none of it is." Kyle Broflovski

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

The PTC assumes that the because the law they want to enact is "intended" to protect the children, that alone should be enough to enact a law. It's sad really. They're blinded by this so-called noble cause to protect the children that they are willing to sacrifice certain liberties.

None of the studies they mention prove a causal link between playing violent video games and actual violent behavior.

"repeated exposure to graphic sexual, violent and profanity-laced video games has a harmful and long-term effect on children.  Researchers at the Indiana University School of Medicine – and countless other objective studies – have  proven violent video games do have an effect by using functional magnetic resonance imaging technology to observe which areas of the brain are stimulated when a subject plays violent video games."

It's odd. They say it has a harmful negative long-term effect on children. This is obviously misleading. And what are these harmful effects? It's so vague, it's almost funny. Here's their argument in a nutshell:

Them: Violent Video games are bad.

Us: Why?

Them: Isn't it obvious?

Us: No

Them: It harmfully affects them.

Us: How?

Them: You see this brain scan. Yea. This area was stimulated. It should never be stimulated. It's a bad part of the brain. Good children never have this area stimulated...

I wonder if that part of the brain gets stimulated when we play, say... pokemon. Or Zelda, Mario, Sonic, Mario Kart. They all involve some sort of violent attack behavior against another. What about fighting games such as street fighter, Smash Bros, or even Tekken. I wonder if they've done a study on that.

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

The PTC never EVER follows thier Rules, They're total hypocrites (like the AFA and Morality in Media) one minute they want to help the children, the next minute they want to badmouth Socitey as we now it

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parents_Television_Council

 

Watching JT on GP is just like watching an episode of Jerry springer only as funny as the fights

America has just became its own version of the Jerry Springer Show after a bizarre moment in Florida involving a carnival worker.

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

The bigger question should be "How are "kids" getting money to buy these games much less get to the store to buy them?" (short of being 16 + and has a car/job)

If we are trying to "protect the children", should we not also rate the bible, koran, etc as "AO" since they have been used to support violence and other crimes, so that kids are not corrupted?

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

For those interested, the NYC Council's webpage is

http://council.nyc.gov/html/home/home.shtml

They actually have a link on the side to "let them know" if you see RapeLay being sold.

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

Bla bla bla. Another Faith-Oriented group gets upset that they can't destroy the First Amendment in the name of "the children" and "families". 

If the Christian Right was so dedicated to "families", why are so many more of them breaking due to divorce than non-religious families?

 

Scumbags.

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

Heh.

One of the reasons the divorce rate is so high is it is getting harder and harder for the christian right communities to hide the abuse that goes on in thier households.

Over the decades the community has tried to shift the image of abuse to anyone other then themselves... gays, polys, feminists, satanists, atheists, etc etc etc.  This has made it easier to write off thier own abuse.  I've honestly heard pedophiles who have been raping their own daughters claim with a strait (and possibly even they believe it) face that they are not pedophiles because they are not gay, and poof, everyone ignores the incest and rape going on.

So today, you've got a male population in the community that doesn't want to change, but a female population that is starting to figure out that they don't HAVE to sit and take it (even though divorce often results in the woman being ostrasized) and thus have other options.

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

Do you happen to know anything about the Christian right? They're not a bunch of woman-beating chauvinists; those are only the crazy ones who go start their own little communes with an entire arsenal stashed in the basement (and even here I'm making an unfair generalization; some of those commune people could be completely sane and rather nice). You're talking about the extreme right loonies; they're no better representatives of Christianity and the moderate Christian right than Islamic terrorists are of Islam.

If you want a reason for divorce rates, try this one out. What you have in Christianity today is a conflict between Christian values and secular ideas about sex. People get into irresponsible physical relationships, and she gets pregnant. Since they're Christians (or at least claim to be), they'll likely get married. But, since they're also probably not ready for children or being married, the marriage ends in divorce. The higher divorce rate could stem from women who would otherwise be single mothers getting married because they feel it's the right thing to do and then realizing that they're really not compatible with the child's father.

No matter which option they pick, the women generally aren't ostracized. After the initial rumor flurry gets around all the church's old ladies, the church settles back down and doesn't make a big deal out of the divorced/single mother. Heck, there's a good chance they'll work out some way for her to get help from the rest of the church such as taking hand-me-down baby stuff that she'd otherwise have trouble affording.

I have friends whose parents have gone through this exact sequence of events, and I've never met any Christian couple who got divorced because the woman felt like she was being oppressed. Don't jump to stupid conclusions like "Christians have high divorce rates because they're chauvinists" without some sort of proof that actually represents more than a small group of nuts.

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

Beacuse the christian-right blames the non-religious and the homosexuals for that divorce rate and other marriage troubles? //boggle

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

* except in California and ... Utah, is it? I'm still beyond disgusted that prop 8 passed. >.<;

300 Episodes and counting: http://www.orangeloungeradio.com/

400 Episodes, TEN YEARS and counting: http://www.orangeloungeradio.com/ | Voice of Geeks Network - http://www.vognetwork.com

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

I'm more upset over the millions of dollars being wasted to fund these for/against campaigns.

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

Amen (I'll probably be struck by lightning for using that word).

I'm a California resident, and it really pisses me off that in a state with a $42 BILLION deficit (that's Billion, with a "B") where education cost-cutting is rampant, Yee and the PTC feel that their claptrap should take priority over sending our kids to decent schools.  I'm so mad about this I could crap a copy of GTA-4.  I've written Yee and told him something similar (in a much more politic voice, for sure).  Have yet to hear back.

I've seen a few references to higher divorce rates among the uber-religious.  What blows me away is how ready the ultra-right-wing-religious-"save-the-kids!"-mouthpieces are to lie and deceive as a means to their ends.  I'm not a religious guy, but among things that most religions decry, isn't lying one of the real bad ones? 

What blows me away more is how many people actually believe their lies.

***Homicide-free video gaming since 1972!***

***Homicide-free video gaming since 1972!***

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

We are not hypocrites. We don't don't want the landslide effect.  Also, how many of those countless independent studies hasn't been disproved. Most of them are theoretical anyway. There like the study of dinosaurs are made of wood. Why? Because they are brown, and wood is brown, therefore, dinosaurs are made of wood.

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

Dinosaurs are witches! Burn them! (Monty Python reference about wood).

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

You know, once...I was turned into a newt.

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

I take it you got better?

---
The Mammon Industry

---
Fangamer

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling on

Does anyone hate that dudes face as much as I do?

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

Looks like a high Jeff Daniels.

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

looks like a zombie

There have always been motherf*ckers, there will always be motherf*ckers, but what we can't do is let them control our motherf*cking lives. -John Oliver, December 1st, 2008

There have always been motherf*ckers, there will always be motherf*ckers, but what we can't do is let them control our motherf*cking lives. -John Oliver, December 1st, 2008

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

"The video game industry has established a policy to ‘protect’ children from a harmful product..."

No it has not.  Please try to understand what the ESRB ratings are actually meant to do.  Here, this might help.

"And they base their legal argument on a child’s ‘right’ to purchase the very product that they openly admit should not be purchased by a child."

Sorry PTC but like it or not, children have rights too.  The industry isn't saying children shouldn't purchase these products.  It's saying that games with an M-rating are not recommended for children under 17.

"...the result is a tragic consequence on America’s children."

Care to elaborate?

"How does the video game industry even have legal standing to sue on behalf of children who wouldn’t be able to pay them for the very products they admit that kids shouldn’t be buying?"

Huh?  If kids aren't able to pay for them, why is this even an issue?  Why are you supporting legislation preventing kids from doing something you claim they can't do anyway?

"The only motivation for the industry to sue is to keep collecting blood money from kids..."

Blood money?  Care to elaborate?

"If the industry actually followed its own rules, then this law would have absolutely no financial impact whatsoever on the industry."

I take it you've never heard of the concept of chilled speech?

"...repeated exposure to graphic sexual, violent and profanity-laced video games has a harmful and long-term effect on children."

No it doesn't.  Try reading the actual studies.  As for the Indiana study, it used an MRI to look at the difference between the brains of normal kids and kids with disruptive behavioral disorders when playing violent games.  The conclusion: kids with DBD have less activity going on in the frontal lobe (decision-making and behavioral control) then kids without DBD when playing violent games.  The games used?  A racing game and a James Bond game.

That in no way proves harm.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

A brilliant dissection of their flawed argument.

Unfortunately, I have come to the rather pessimistic conclusion that even if they do realise that they don't have a coherent argument they still wouldn't care as they have a vested interest opposing this supposed "moral backslide" etc.

I'm seriously considering starting my own decency campaign and charging people for joining. I will simply check GP and game news sites to see which games are popular, stage large internet protests about said games, rack up page views and paste the pages with ads. Hell, throw in a donation link to help "fight against immorality" and I'll be set.

Maybe I'll be able to buy a new 360 to replace my rrod'd one since MS seem to have lost it somewhere in the post (seriously, how long does it take them to repair them? Not to put to fine a point on it, but you think they'd have had a bit of pratice by now!).

-ConstantNeophyte: always the newb, ALWAYS.

-ConstantNeophyte: always the newb, ALWAYS.

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

"How does the video game industry even have legal standing to sue on behalf of children who wouldn’t be able to pay them for the very products they admit that kids shouldn’t be buying?"

Huh?  If kids aren't able to pay for them, why is this even an issue?  Why are you supporting legislation preventing kids from doing something you claim they can't do anyway?

that alone FTW

岩「…Where do masochists go when they die?」

岩「…I can see why Hasselbeck's worried about fake guns killing fake people. afterall, she's a fake journalist on a fake news channel」

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

Great breakdown of their arguments!

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

'Shockingly, the Court’s ruling claims that there isn’t enough research to support that children are affected by video game violence.  Yet countless independent studies confirm what most parents instinctively know to be true: repeated exposure to graphic sexual, violent and profanity-laced video games has a harmful and long-term effect on children.'

Amazing, simply amazing, could they stretch that just a little further, possibly to include martians?

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

"Shockingly, the Court’s ruling claims that there isn’t enough research to support that children are affected by video game violence.  Yet countless independent studies confirm what most parents instinctively know to be true: repeated exposure to graphic sexual, violent and profanity-laced video games has a harmful and long-term effect on children."

Y'know, after the FTC came out with their findings that the PTC didn't agree with, they made their own study, which had the results they wanted?

Replace independent with PTC

'Shockingly, the Court’s ruling claims that there isn’t enough research to support that children are affected by video game violence.  Yet countless PTC studies confirm what most parents instinctively know to be true: repeated exposure to graphic sexual, violent and profanity-laced video games has a harmful and long-term effect on children.'

Makes sense, right?

 - Warren Lewis

Consumer responsibility is just as important as Corporate responsibility. So, be responsible consumers.

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling on

Let’s be clear on what – exactly – is going on here: The video game industry has established a policy to ‘protect’ children from a harmful product, yet they file lawsuit after lawsuit to oppose any enforcement of that same policy.

Let's be informed about what we're talking about. The video game industry has established a set of guidelines to allow parents to better judge what their kids should and should not be playing, yet morons like the PTC seem to think that suggestions carry some sort of legal weight and that the industry and retailers are responsible for making sure children can't buy things that aren't suggested for them. It's not their problem if parents can't control their children and keep track of what they buy.

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling on

Took the words out of my mouth!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The most difficult pain a man can suffer is to have knowledge of much and power over little" - Herodotus

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- "The most difficult pain a man can suffer is to have knowledge of much and power over little" - Herodotus

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling on

Secondly, it protects the rights of Adult players who want to play games that would not be made if they could not get funding because "only E for everyone" games sell (just one example)

This is exactly what the First Amendment is about.  By restricting speech in any way, you censor it.

------- Morality has always been in decline. As you get older, you notice it. When you were younger, you enjoyed it.

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling on

Oh jeez.  Kiss my ass PTC.  You coddle children too much and what do you get?  A neurotic adult unable to deal with the realties of the world.

This whole "For the children!" crusade has screwed up a large portion of my generation. 

 

Tea and cake or death! Tea and cake or death! Little Red Cook-book! Little Red Cook-book!

Tea and cake or death! Tea and cake or death! Little Red Cook-book! Little Red Cook-book!

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

:P  Silly rabbits at the PTC certainly love to moo.

Re: Parents Television Council Assails Federal Court Ruling ...

This guy does not understand the slippery slope concept I guess.

Banana

Quack

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will the FCC preempt state laws that limit municipal broadband services?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
PHX CorpI'm going to do a test stream later today, if anyone is intrested07/31/2014 - 2:40pm
Andrew EisenYes, I'm such a big Nintendo dork that I read Nintendo's quarterly financial reports.07/31/2014 - 2:09pm
Andrew EisenCool tidbit - Mario Kart 8 sales account for more than half of total Wii U software sales for the last quarter even though it was only available for the last third.07/31/2014 - 2:09pm
Andrew EisenStill a pretty cool promotion. Unfortunately for me, I'm not interested in purchasing Mario Kart 8 and I already owned or didn't want any of the free games on offer.07/31/2014 - 1:43pm
Andrew EisenInteresting that EU had 10 games to choose from while North America only had four.07/31/2014 - 1:41pm
MaskedPixelanteIt certainly worked, I probably would never have bought Mario Kart 8 if it didn't come with a free copy of Wind Waker HD.07/31/2014 - 1:14pm
Andrew EisenI imagine will see similar promotions like "Buy Mario Kart 8 get a download code for one of these specific games" but almost certainly not for all of its (however you would define) biggest releases.07/31/2014 - 11:24am
MaskedPixelanteI wonder if Nintendo is going to be doing "buy one get one free" promos for all their biggest releases going forward.07/31/2014 - 10:48am
MaskedPixelantehttp://www.mcvuk.com/news/read/special-report-retail-revolt-over-pc-code-strippers/013614007/31/2014 - 8:27am
ZippyDSMleeWouldn't they be able to afford and get done in a timely manner a general gba emluator for the 3DS? It seems to me if they want to make money off sales they need to do it.07/31/2014 - 7:25am
Sora-ChanAmbassador program, that's what I was looking for. Anyway the other games that have been made no longer exclusive to the early adopters got updates in their software. It'll only be a matter of time more than likely for the GBA to get the same treatment.07/31/2014 - 5:35am
Sora-ChanI might be naming it incorrectly when I say "founder" i mean the program for earlier adopters.07/31/2014 - 5:34am
Sora-Chanthe 3DS's GBA emulator was a rush job due to the founder program. No other GBA titles have been released on the 3DS yet. If/When they do get around to it, they'll more than likely update the emulation software.07/31/2014 - 5:32am
Zenemulator...it's not just a slap job that makes "some" work..they do it for each which is why they work so well. I would rather have the quality over just a slap job.07/30/2014 - 5:48pm
ZenMatthew there is a difference between "worked" and "accurate". You play the Nintendo VC titles they play as damn close to the original as possible. The PSP would just run them as best they could, issues and all. And Masked...EACH VC title has their own07/30/2014 - 5:48pm
MaskedPixelanteOnce again, the 3DS already HAS a GBA emulator, it just can't run at the same time as the 3DS OS.07/30/2014 - 4:54pm
Matthew Wilsonyou cant street pass in ds mode ether, and if moders can make a gba emulator that runs very well on the psp as I understand it. you are telling me that Nintendo devs are not as good as moders?07/30/2014 - 4:49pm
Zenperformance. Halo 1 and 2 worked great because they actually did custom work on each of them...just like Nintendo does now lol07/30/2014 - 4:08pm
Zenexisting hardware while the GBA has to be emulated completely. Same reason the 360 couldn't run most Original Xbox games correctly, or had issues because they just did "blanket approach" for their emulation which led to game killing bugs or horrible07/30/2014 - 4:07pm
ZenSora/Matthew: It's not just Miiverse, but the whole idea of streetpass and things like that would be affected if the OS is not running. And just because a 3DS game can be downloaded and run does not mean that GBA can as easily. Those 3DS games use the07/30/2014 - 4:06pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician