Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

March 3, 2009 -

Major retailer Toys R Us has apparently begun accepting used game trade-ins and offering store credit in exchange.

The news comes by way of a report on Cheap Ass Gamer:

I was at Toys R Us today and I saw this sign by the door. I'm not exactly sure when they started taking in trades. I didn't specifically asked but I did [see] some games on one of the walls in the R Zone. I think at this time they are only giving store credit for all trade-ins.

I think its a smart move seeing as how Gamestop took $8.8 billion in 2008 in over all sales but mostly in used game sales.

Basically the fine print states that they will not take games that are rated "A" and games must be in their original cases. I'm pretty sure they do but I hope they don't. Oh, and make sure the disc is not cracked (lol).

GP: Cue the usual whining about used game trades from certain quarters of the video game biz...

Posted in

Comments

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by ecco6t9 on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 14:51.

This won't take off.

It was test marketed at my old Toys R Us and it failed.

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by shady8x on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 14:47.

Those damn pirates!!!

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by deuxhero on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 10:44.

If this takes off, we will need a third competitor, that is normally when the consumer wins.

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by E. Zachary Knight on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 10:54.

There is plenty of competition. I have three differnet franchises, GameXChange, Vintage Stock and Game Haven(I think that is what it is called) within 15 minute driving range that deal primarily with used games. I can trade in and buy games at any of these store. I also have Gamestop and Hastings on top of that and now Toys R US that deal in both used and new. So I have six different franchises to trade and buy use games with three of which dealing in 100% used games.

But what is really interesting is that none trade or sell used PC games and any that sell new games do not deal with anything older than last generation.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

E. Zachary Knight
Divine Knight Gaming
OK Game Devs
Random Tower

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by SimonBob on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 13:02.

To say nothing of the user-driven market on sites like eBay and Amazon, especially if you're trying to find rare releases from well back in the olden days like EarthBound or Final Fantasy: Mystic Quest.

---
The Mammon Industry

---
Fangamer

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by E. Zachary Knight on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 13:41.

Why on earth would anyone want Mystic Quest? The game was crap. I laugh everytime I see it for sale at $5 or more.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

E. Zachary Knight
Divine Knight Gaming
OK Game Devs
Random Tower

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by sheppy on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 10:07.

This isn't the first time they did it. I foolishly traded in my Genesis collection for an N64 with Mario 64.

But I will say this. Why is GP sooo damn bullish on the used game market. Yes, cars allow you to sell your car to a new owner and even trade up to new cars. But the Apples and Oranges thing applies. For example, Ford will never force me to trade in 3-5 cars and even spend a little more to get a new car of same value. Likewise that car I just traded in doesn't suddenly double or triple in price for the person who buys the car next. I know it seems like an easy way out to bash game developers who look at their livelyhood being pushed on consumers in a way that cuts them out completely but c'mon.

Wall of Text Simulation- Insert coin to continue.

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by E. Zachary Knight on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 10:21.

Have you ever traded a car in before? Often you get a third to a half of what KBB says you could get if you just sold it to a third party yourself. Then when the car does go to sale by the dealership or one of the used car dealers that buys it, they will sell it for an extra 25% on top of KBB. If anything the used car market is worse than game stop.

But if you really want a comparison, take movie, music, and book used markets. They are much the same way, get pennies on the dollar for the trade, they mark them up 500% to just under what it would cost new. Very few industry reps from those industries complain about the used market and those that do are not nearly as vocal about it. The main difference is that those markets have gotten used to the idea of First Sale and just deal with it.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

E. Zachary Knight
Divine Knight Gaming
OK Game Devs
Random Tower

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by 1AgainstTheWorld on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 09:50.

>Basically the fine print states that they will not take games that are rated "A"

I'm assuming they mean "AO", right?

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by MaskedPixelante on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 10:26.

Well that's a stupid policy. Are there even any AO games in circulation right now?

---You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by E. Zachary Knight on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 10:37.

Well considering Toys R Us does not sell PC games, no.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

E. Zachary Knight
Divine Knight Gaming
OK Game Devs
Random Tower

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by sheppy on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 12:14.

Except certain copies of San Andreas...

Wall of Text Simulation- Insert coin to continue.

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by State on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 08:56.

Used games wouldn't be so bad if they didn't help in keeping the price of new games high. It's a very profitable business as there is this perception in the games industry that people should get rid of any game or system that is considered "old". I'll never understand this disposable attitude to games.

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by E. Zachary Knight on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 09:08.

Used games don't keep game prices high. They are one of the things actually keeping game prices as low as they are. It is called competition. Without the used games market the only option for people to buy games would be the new market. So when there is only one option, prices will rise.

Study economics a bit more.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

E. Zachary Knight
Divine Knight Gaming
OK Game Devs
Random Tower

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by sheppy on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 10:07.

If used games are keeping game prices low, then why is Gamestop the most expensive place to buy games? I mean no offense to the point you were trying to make but they are the last to drop price and the used version usually only saves you a few dollars.

Wall of Text Simulation- Insert coin to continue.

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by E. Zachary Knight on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 10:26.

I don't consider them any more expensive than any where else. Walmart's 2 cents cheaper price is not really a savings. But I have never noticethem drop the retail price any slower than any other store.

AS for the used price, it is based on two main factors, popularity and supply. The first is more weighted than the second. The more popular the game is, the higher the price is. The more they have in stock, the lower the price is. So a game like SFIV which is quite popular will only be a $5 savings, while a game like some random party game crap for the Wii will be about $10-15 cheaper.

It is all variable. If for some reason they start getting a huge influx of used trades on a game, the resale price will drop depending on how fast they sell it. If they are selling a trade at the same rate they are getting them in, they wil have a higher price, but if it takes longer to sell than to fill it, they will lower the price.

Again, this is all simple economics.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

E. Zachary Knight
Divine Knight Gaming
OK Game Devs
Random Tower

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by sheppy on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 12:13.

www.cheapassgamer.com

Go there, you are apparently in great need...

Wall of Text Simulation- Insert coin to continue.

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by chadachada321 on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 09:48.

Either way I think game prices should lower. I don't wanna pay $60 for a game that I'll probably only play for a little bit (given the quality of games today), I'd rather pay $40. or $30.

-If an apple a day keeps the doctor away....what happens when a doctor eats an apple?-

-Optimum est pati quod emendare non possis-It is best to endure what you cannot change-

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by E. Zachary Knight on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 10:36.

The $60 price you are paying for the game has two major factors and severl small almost meaningless factors. The two major factors are increased production costs (ie bloated budgets) and next generation console perspective. This first is directly relevant while the second is because they can get away with it.

The less important factors fall into two catagories, 'directly related but still minor' and 'they wish this actually affected cost like they say'.

Under directly related but still minor are used game sales. While yes there are some loss in sales, there is no loss in number of audience members. Everytime a game is traded in, the company loses one audience member, but they gain one back every time that game is bought agian. There is no gain here, but there is no loss either. If there was no used market it would still be the same, but there audience number will be skewed because they are still counting games that were sold but never played.

Under they wish this actually affected cost like they say is piracy. Piracy cannot fully be judged on its effect on cost. The key reason is the number of people downloading no-cd cracks or DRM cracks of games after they bought the retail version skews the results. The same for people who download the pirate game to try before they buy. So you can't get an accurate picture of how many lost sales you have from piracy bacuse a significant protion of piracy is from people who have or will buy the game.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

E. Zachary Knight
Divine Knight Gaming
OK Game Devs
Random Tower

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by test_432 on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 12:16.

I would dissagree with you here. Game prices are at $60 because that's what publishers want to charge for them, in spite of all sorts of evidence that points to $60 too high a price point for games.

Valve found that when titles were put on sale in Steam that unit sales were increased anywhere between three hundred and thirty six thousand percent and when SEGA priced NFL2K5 at $20 they saw a unit sales increase of eight hundred percent over NFL2K4. From a sales revenue standpoint SEGA made more money off of the lower priced NFL2K5 than they did from its more expensive predecessor. Things like this and the success of the used game market all point to the demand for games being elastic, in which case publishers would actually make more money if they lowered prices.

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by E. Zachary Knight on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 12:22.

I would dissagree with you here. Game prices are at $60 because that's what publishers want to charge for them

That is what I was getting at with the next gen console perspective. This new generation of consoles really added nothing to the production cost of games but they raised the price anyway. that is why it is all perspective.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

E. Zachary Knight
Divine Knight Gaming
OK Game Devs
Random Tower

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by SimonBob on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 13:00.

I dunno, it probably costs more to develop for the Wii, since they have to hire waggle specialists.

(Don't take me seriously, my facetious is showing.)

---
The Mammon Industry

---
Fangamer

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by beemoh on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 08:50.

>Cue the usual whining

Except that wasn't whining, merely identification of something that was happening. I don't believe that GP is a biased source by any means, but this one isn't something that is difficult to get into your head, GP. Stop interpreting things to support your agenda.

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by squigs on Wed, 03/04/2009 - 05:52.

To be honest, I think it's pretty wellestablished that anything after "GP:" is the editor's opinion, and in no way intended to be an objective summary.

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by Soga on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 11:33.

This isn't a newspaper. It's a news blog. Yes, he has to report on the news in a fair and balanced manner, but he's also allowed to state his opinion (and he's pretty clear that it's his opinion as opposed to say... fact).

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by Michael Chandra on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 11:21.

No offense but aren't you doing the same?

Re: Report: Toys R Us Moving Into Used Game Business

Submitted by E. Zachary Knight on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 09:09.

While yes, he did suggest ways to compete, he did whine about having to do it.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

E. Zachary Knight
Divine Knight Gaming
OK Game Devs
Random Tower

Shout box

Neo_DrKefka: Gawker loses advertiser MERCED ES https://mobile .twitter.com/TheRalphRetort/status/522813815260733441/photo/1 after Gawker writer advocates bullying of nerds with an anti Gamergate rant10/19/2014 - 12:32pm

Matthew Wilson: https://soundcloud.com/totalbiscuit/weaponised-charity a interesting audio log.10/19/2014 - 12:04pm

prh99: Also there is no story in rational and respectful discussion (where you can find it).10/19/2014 - 10:44am

prh99: Well they are probably doing it on Twitter and probably the GG hashtag so any voice reason gets drowned out by idiocy. Also it's far easier to broad brush a group.10/19/2014 - 10:41am

Wonderkarp: dont fool yourself, Technogeek. Remember Mass Effect 3? How about the ferver against Phil Fish?10/19/2014 - 10:18am

MechaTama31: None of which is the fault or responsibility of the people who are not trolling, harassing, threatening, doxxing, etc. So why is their opinion hostage to the people who are?10/19/2014 - 10:06am

Technogeek: If the developer were male there wouldn't have been a "conversation" in the first place.10/19/2014 - 2:27am

Monte: trolls are just at their absolute worst when it comes to women and feminist. You could bet good money that if the developer were male the trolls would be silent and the conversation would actually focus on the journalism.10/18/2014 - 9:18pm

Monte: Papa: Not the first time we've had a journalism scandals before, but the harassment never got close to this level; the difference with this scandal is that feminists are involved. Without the feminist angle, their would be A LOT less harrassment10/18/2014 - 9:15pm

Papa Midnight: Monte: That's honestly rather short-sighted. As has been proven with other persons who have been targeted, if it wasn't Quinn, it would be someone else.10/18/2014 - 6:26pm

Avalongod: I think that's part of what gives an esoteric news story like this real life...it taps into a larger narrative about misogyny in society outside of games.10/18/2014 - 3:29pm

Avalongod: @Monte, well the trolls made death threats that came to police (and media attention). I think this is tapping into a larger issue outside of games about how women are treated in society (like all the "real rape" stuff during the last election)10/18/2014 - 3:28pm

Wonderkarp: Zippy : Havent tried the PS4 controller. might later.10/18/2014 - 2:37pm

Monte: Seirously, If Quinn was not involved and GG was instead about something like the Mordor Marketing contracts, the trolling would have never grown so vile and disgusting. There have been plenty of movements in the past that never sufferred from behavior..10/18/2014 - 1:57pm

Monte: We have seen scandel's before but the trolling has never been as vile as what we see with GG. Trolls usually have such a tiny voice you can barely notice them, but its like moths to a flame whenever femistist are involved.10/18/2014 - 1:53pm

ZippyDSMlee: Wonderkarp: You might be able to if you had a PS4 controller.10/18/2014 - 1:00pm

MaskedPixelante: http://store.steampowered.com/app/327940/ Night Dive starts charging for freeware.10/18/2014 - 12:21pm

Matthew Wilson: the sad thing is there are trolls on both sides of this. people need to stop acting like their side is so pure.10/18/2014 - 12:19pm

MechaTama31: So, only speak out on a scandal that hasn't attracted trolls? I wouldn't hold my breath...10/18/2014 - 10:49am

Monte: I feel like GG just needs to die. The movement is FAR to tainted by hatred and BS for it to be useful for any conversation. Let GG die, and then rally behind the NEXT gaming journalism scandal, and start the conversation fresh.10/18/2014 - 10:33am

All shouts

<< Return To Top

Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :