YA RLY!

Thus is how the game is played you are not going to make the US public smarter or wiser consumers over night nor are you going to make politicians in this day and age work outside the red tape that is modern politics.

He is what he is the lesser of evils, at least until the dim party implodes into a full bowen form of grade A fascism until then the dims are still lost and seeking to fullfill the needs of to many niches while sucking on rich man di...er... tit  and the reapers are your A typical robber barons who use morals as a launching ground for their careers of corruption and greed.

You simply have to remove money from politics and "force" those with money to work for the power and glory of the job for free, if you have 5 million or more in assets then you should only get security paid for the rest is on you. Unless you want to apply for hardship opening up all your records(and spouse records) and anything of more than 5K you have access to, to the public.

Gore,Violence,Sexauilty,Fear,Emotion these are but modes of transportation of story and thought, to take them from society you create a society of children and nannys, since adults are not required.

http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com

So all his lying, his spendthrift, his bills that don't stimulate anything, etc. aren't valid reasons to judge him?  Just because people have already stopped buying Obama's bullshit on this site doesn't mean that it's because they're judging him solely based on what we read here.  What about his constant lies, the fact that he spent in ONE month over 1,000,000,000,000 dollars that were not designed to stimulate or save any jobs (be on the lookout for stimulus part 2, the remix), the fact that he keeps nominating crooks (this guy is too, he was a crook when he was a lawyer), the fact that he's still not done wasting our money, the list can just keep going.

HE appointed this man.  OBAMA appointed him.  He's absolutely responsible for looking into their history.  He's also absolutely capable of looking into their history.  Hell, he could even have a team of people from his whitehouse or his campaign do it, and God knows he needs to, since he seems to keep nominating tax cheats.  But HE picked the man, and HE should probably have known (and I maintain he does know) where the man stands. 

Of course, when its criticism of a two-faced and wasteful president who's a democrat its 'hating', but when it's criticism of Bush its 'patriotism' or some other bullshit.