National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to Veto Video Game/Movie Bill

March 21, 2009 -

Joining those who have called upon Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman to veto HB 353 is the National Coalition Against Censorship.

A post on the NCAC website says that the Jack Thompson-conceived bill "takes a voluntary effort by manufacturers to provide consumers with information about their products and turns it into a mechanism to deprive minors of their First Amendment rights."

More from the NCAC:

This bill would hold retailers responsible for selling minors material labeled for mature audiences.  Sellers of books, movies, video games, and music could be penalized up to $2000 for “violating” age guidelines created voluntarily for informational purposes only.

This bill takes a voluntary effort by manufacturers to provide consumers with information about their products and turns it into a mechanism to deprive minors of their First Amendment rights.  By incorporating the private voluntary ratings system, it also constitutes an unlawful delegation of legislative authority to a non-governmental entity...

 

The bill may result in consumers getting less information.  Stores not willing to risk lawsuit or fines for violating age restrictions may simply decide not to display ratings information.  The industry as a whole could even consider dispensing with its voluntary rating system if the result is to make retailers vulnerable to lawsuits and judgments.

We urge Governor Huntsman to veto this problematic bill.

UPDATE: The NCAC has written a letter to Gov. Huntsman urging a veto of HB 353.


Comments

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

So under Jack's...er... logic could a store get in trouble if they sell Monopoly to someone under the age of 8?

http://www.hasbrotoyshop.com/ProductsByCategory.htm?CD=3&BR=539

I don't see how those age recomendations should be any less legally binding than the ESRB's.

-Ultimately what will do in mankind is a person's fear of their own freedom-

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

Technically, the age recommendation on a Monopoly set is about as legally binding as the ESRB's age recommendations . . . that is, not at all legally binding on anyone. And, yes, if a seller advertised that they will not sell Monopoly to anyone under the age of 8 years-old and then did sell Monopoly to someone under the age of 8 years-old as described in HB353 (i.e., sold it the number of required times, without fake ID being presented, didn't train their staff, etc., etc.), then they would be liable. 

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

I've been attempting to find any advertised statement regarding store policy on the sale of R movies or M games.  Thus far I've come up empty handed.  Really it is starting to seem like Jack and his bill are trying to make legally binding a statement that no company I could locate has ever made.

-Ultimately what will do in mankind is a person's fear of their own freedom-

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

You've never heard or seen "Rating: PG13 - No one under 13 admitted without parent" as part of a movie's advertising? Here's one example: http://tinyurl.com/d4tgog. And here's Target's advertised policy on sales of M-rated games: http://tinyurl.com/c8mfuf. I'd imagine all the major retailers have stated a similar policy.
 

Granted, statements that they will not inappropriately provide an age-recommended videogame aren't part of most retailers' "advertising" (as that term is commonly thought of), but they're out there to be found . . . if you look hard enough. On the other hand, movie theaters make such statements all the time. Which could example why the theaters owners were more aggressive in their opposition to HB353 than was the videogame industry.   

 

 

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

@Zerodash (sorry, something went wrong with the "reply" attempt):

Technically, you have to give Morley and his colleagues in the Utah Legislature a pass for associating themselves with a notorious scumbag like Jack Thompson. It kinda isn't their fault. Gargoyle Ruzicka put them on to Thompson and, in Utah, what the Gargoyle wants, the Gargoyle gets. Plain and simple.

Of course, the question then becomes: what does the Gargoyle see in Jack Thompson?

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

I wonder if under Utah State Law these legislators might be liable for something. Normally floor statements are protected but usually there are rules about just bald faced lying.

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to

they should have killed this bill while it was still in the house.

When the lady from the Eagle Forum started ranting off her mouth about GTA having porn, that was when there should have been someone from Take Two to explain why that Eagle forum woman was dead wrong.

Another chance was when one of those politicians had a Book with JT on the cover and quoting his words. If there was someone from the Florida Bar inside that house, they would have been able to question the source of the Acusations.

But it is no use in dwelling in the past, all we need to do is to watch how this all plays out in court, and the chances of this bill getting though the court system are slim to none, and that is a good thing.

As long as we all have the proff of where the origins of this bill lies, we would have provided with critical evidence for someone to strike this bill down in court.

And all that would be left is the headless bodies of JT, the Eagle Forum and many of the Politicians who just can't understand where this all went wrong, because their heads would have exploded after hearing that after all their best efforts, this bill was still declared unconstitutional or even stinking with Slander and Threats from JT and the Eagle Forum.

 

TBoneTony

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to

I am still amazed that nobody in Utah looked at Jack's unethical track record and his disgraceful disbarrment.  Just a perusal of the Dava Tunis report (chock full with JT quotes, on the record), shows him for what an unethical, crazy, liar he is. 

Or...they know all about what a lying slimeball he is and choose to ignore it.  Which is even worse.

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to

Plausible denialbility for when he goes back to his old tactics.

 

"The Good, the Bad, and the Videogame" Reviews on the best, worst, and controversial issues of Videogames. gryphonosiris.blogspot.com/

"The Good, the Bad, and the Videogame" Reviews on the best, worst, and controversial issues of Videogames. gryphonosiris.blogspot.com/

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to

I'm going to bet that the governor just lets the bill become law, neither signing nor vetoing it.  It's really the only politically expedient way he has to handle it.

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to

I wonder if these guys in Utah really want this bill passed. Jack Thompson could always file a lawsuit against them. Oh right, he's not a lawyer anymore thanks to his agenda being exposed by the Florida bar. Plus no lawyer in their right mind would risk their career by helping a lunatic.

When Jack Thompson runs his mouth, does anyone really care what he has to say anymore?

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to

Even if he still was a lawyer, that was in Florida, so he wasn't allowed to practice law in Utah anyway.

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to

You're probably right, but I'm not 100 percent certain.  If I'm not mistaken, some states allow lawyers in good standing with their bar in another state to participate in (and "participate in" is key) litigation in that particular state without having passed their respective bar exam.  It's not terribly difficult, there is some paperwork involved, but it can be done.

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to

It's called pro hoc vitae. A lawyer licensed to practice in one state can apply for permission to practice in another state for a specific case.

Usually the applying lawyer will be required to associate with local counsel in order to facilitate procedure etc.

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to

Hyper-technically, that's "pro hac vice." Translates as "for this occassion." And it's pronounced "vee-cheh." Nothing makes me cringe like hearing it pronounced "vise."

The "facilitate procedure, etc." sounds good in theory, but the real and unspoken reason some jurisdictions require local counsel is to ensure that out-of-state carpetbaggers aren't taking away work from the in-state bar. In a word, "protectionism."

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to

By in "good standing" he likely meant he paid his membership dues on time.

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to

Glad these people see this bill for what it is, another censorship attempt. And yes, the chilling effect is a for mof censorship.

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to

If I was under 17 and lived in Utah, I think I would actually support this bill.

--------------------------------------------------------

Believe in something! Even if it's wrong, believe in it! -Glenn Beck

-------------------------------------------------------- Believe in something! Even if it's wrong, believe in it! GET OFF MY PHONE! -Glenn Beck

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

So why are some items age restricted? Doesn't the age limit on alcohol breach minors first admendment rights?

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

I always find it funny that age restrictions on alcohol and tobacco exist to "protect the children" when both are just as harmful to adults.  I mean, in the end, it's no better for an adult than a child.

Of course, I have no interest in doing either anyway.

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

Nightwng2000 has also updated his MySpace page: http://www.myspace.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

So how exactly is putting an age restriction on games restricting the minors' right to freedom of speech (they're not the one's making it), aren't parents breaching this right by not allowing them to access this content? Aren't ratings helping to prevent this right as they state what content is not suitable to children (thus sending people in a direction to deny the child the product)? If I was a child couldn't I say that a shop that refused to sell me a Mature game was breaching my rights?

Doesn't a minor have the right to freedom of speech whilst under the influence? The whole law is rather hyprocrital, whilst pretending to hold up such principles.

If there was governmental backed research into the effects of games on children which concluded that games, for whatever reason, were indeed harmful to children, then I suspect that that would be reason enough for legislation to be introduced against games due to their apparent harmful factor. Would this then mean that there would have to a government ratings board to decide on classifications?

Quite frankly I can't see how this legislation would change the current legislation as nearly all shops have a policy relating to game ratings, it just seems that it would destroy the pretense of supposed rights that minors apparently have (but in reality don't due to shops' own policies regarding game ratings).

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

Alcohol is harmful

Games are not

Any more questions?

-Ultimately what will do in mankind is a person's fear of their own freedom-

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

There's quite the big difference between a company not being interested in selling me media, and the government disallowing me to access media they think I shouldn't access. The first is a company's choice and there are plenty of other companies out there. The second, on the other hand, is the government violating the free access of speech.

And ratings don't say what isn't suitable, they say what probably isn't suitable. There's a difference there.

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

So does the army censor what isn't suitable or what probably isn't suitable? (Then again no one can categorically state what isn't suitable, as it is always opinion). So does that make it okay for the army to censor certain images from the public?

Also the issue with AO ratings arises again. Is it okay that Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft block AO content? They help censor this content, they prevent the developer from having freedom of speech buy not allowing the content. And the same goes for the shops that refuse to sell those games.

 

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

Ah, now there you have an interesting point. On one hand, nothing stops you from starting an internet distribution to just get your AO game to the PC instead, on the other hand the fact the main retailers and consoles don't dare touch the content is a reason why the government forcing an AO rating violates the free speech.

The rating is now voluntary, and based on that voluntary system retailers act, and due to that developers. With a government rating, the rating causes developers to act directly, due to the government, not due to what other companies are doing. If the second is seen as a lack of free speech, does that mean anyone who doesn't dare develope an OS due to not going to get a market is suffering from free speech due to Microsoft?

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

Alcohol is a religion now?

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

Ever been to an AA meeting?

______________________________ Because I have NO Life... :P I introduce the following. PSN User ID: FirebirdXR (Yes, I use that moniker often) Xbox Live ID: FirebirdLR (Don't bother, It's a Silver Membership) *Limited Time Only* I put both because I

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

All the time. It's the best place to pick up chicks.

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

Because those items are deemed harmful by the government and not by a voluntary system?  Keeping alcohol out of minors hands has nothing to do with the first amendment, while keeping ideas that may be offensive away from minors does involve the first amendment - maybe??

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

Precisely.  Alcohol and smoking are both proven to have detrimental effects on the minds and bodies of minors (and adults, but that's not the point), whereas video games are a different entity entirely.

"HEY! LISTEN!"

"HEY! LISTEN!"

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

I hate to be hyper-technical . . .  actually, that's a lie. I love to be hyper-technical. So I'll just go ahead and be hyper-technical without apology:

In most of the United States, you have to be 21 years or older to legally purchase alcohol, while the age of majority (i.e., a non-minor) is, in most states, 18 years-old. So, technically, the law doesn't prohibit only minors from purchasing alcohol. It also prohibits some adults from doing so.

What difference does this make to the discussion? None. That's why it's called "hyper-technical."

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to

Wow, you know you got a bad bill when everyone telling the govener to veto it.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to

The Senate and House have no chance to implement changes, meaning they can't respond to criticism in that way. It's either an approval now or wait a year. Furthermore, the way the bill has been defended speaks quite against it, such as blatant lies, deliberate spreading of misinformation to make it seem different than what it truly says and refusal to enter an amendment that in all ways was fair and reasonable.

The final result is a bill that has been defended poorly, and now the proper arguments come against its defense. And it's not on the heads on a whole bunch of people, it's a single guy's career at the line here. Does he act 'for the children', or does he act 'for the children'? By coming with the attacks NOW, amendments have been cut away from the possibility, to sign or not to sign, no other options left... Good timing?

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to

Wow.  I guess it's easy to forget that the ESRB is just a rating board, and that a youth can LEGALLY go and buy an M-rated game if the retailer will allow it.  I'd come to see the rating system as a law in its own right, as opposed to an informative source.

"HEY! LISTEN!"

"HEY! LISTEN!"

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

That's something that slipped my mind over this- would this law not give the ESRB guidelines, concieved by a non-government entity, the power of law?  It's like the ESRB would now have the power to dictate what games can and cannot be regulated by the government.

Jack has always hated the ESRB, but is he not aware that he may have given them more power than ever before? 

Or is this just another in his attempts to dismantle the ESRB and replace it with...nothing?  In that case, it is congruent with his stated objectives to make games for mature audiences non-existiant. 

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

Technically, no. HB353 focuses on advertising, and advertising is always voluntary. Because advertising is voluntary, HB353 doesn't have the force of law on the ESRB's rating system. Theoretically, there's nothing stopping the retailers from completely abandoning advertisements related to the ESRB rating system.

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

I´m not gonna complaining about their involment but: WHERE THE HECK THEY WERE LAST THURSDAY*?

Seriously, why everybody had to wait until this damn piece of paper got to Utah´s guv hands? They should kill it before this went too far.

 

 

 

*Enciclopedia Dramatica pun. I really don´t get that Last Thursday reference.

The cynical side of videogames (spanish only): http://thelostlevel.blogspot.com/ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com/

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to

This is a really good sign.

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

So does this bill have any supporters besides a disbarred liar, out of touch politicians and the Utah Eagle against freedom forum?

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

These people have infuence over and the support of a sizeable group of people who want these bills passed.  Think of the children.

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

Cliche, but an effective campaign slogan nonetheless.

"HEY! LISTEN!"

"HEY! LISTEN!"

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

MMMmmmm...

A hard issue when it comes to full Rights versus limited versus proxied Rights when it comes to minors.  ("Proxied Rights" as in the Right of a Parent to make decisions for children as opposed to children being free to make decisions over their Parent's wishes.  Consent and Contractural are examples.)

Children obviously DO have Rights.  Even the Rights to being protected from harm by their very Parents.  But, at the same time, Parents do, and should, have Rights over their own children, to make decisions they feel are in the best interests of their own children, even if by doing so some Rights of the children are limited to a degree.

And, in some sense, this is true of the Rights of adult authority figures over children that they are guardians of, though they are not the child's Parents.  For example:  A child's Parent may allow them to play GTA or COD, but when the child visits or is watched over by another adult, that adult may choose not to allow the child to do so, even if the child's Parent says it's ok.  I've usually referred to this as the "not my home" stance.

And, as I also always say "it sucks to be a kid".  :)

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

Nightwng2000 has also updated his MySpace page: http://www.myspace.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

Considering the increase in child molesters, school shootings and the educational, moral, and economical decrease; Yeah, I'd have to agree...

Because we know that today's Parents (at least the way the media presents it) won't take responsibility for shit.

So let make rules to force others into doing what is already being implemented.

______________________________ Because I have NO Life... :P I introduce the following. PSN User ID: FirebirdXR (Yes, I use that moniker often) Xbox Live ID: FirebirdLR (Don't bother, It's a Silver Membership) *Limited Time Only* I put both because I

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

 

All right, at least we have these guys on our side.

 

Jack Thompson, PTC, and every media watchdog in America calling NCAC a supporter of corrupting the children in 3...2...1

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

See thats a slippery slope though. Their heart was in the right place, but the execution lacks something to be desired.

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

oops -- deleted

Re: National Coalition Against Censorship Urges Utah Guv to ...

Yay! 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------



"A Chrono Trigger is anything that unleashes its will or desire to change history!" -Gaspar
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelanteNah, I'm fine purple monkey dishwasher.07/28/2014 - 4:05pm
Sleaker@MP - I hope you didn't suffer a loss of your mental faculties attempting that.07/28/2014 - 3:48pm
MaskedPixelanteOK, so my brief research looking at GameFAQs forums (protip, don't do that if you wish to keep your sanity intact.), the 3DS doesn't have the power to run anything more powerful than the NES/GBC/GG AND run the 3DS system in the background.07/28/2014 - 11:01am
ZenMatthew, the 3DS already has GBA games in the form of the ambassador tittles. And I an just as curious about them not releasing them on there like they did the NES ones. I do like them on the Wii U as well, but seems weird. And where are the N64 games?07/28/2014 - 10:40am
james_fudgeNo. They already cut the price. Unless they release a new version that has a higher price point.07/28/2014 - 10:19am
E. Zachary KnightMatthew, It most likely is. The question is whether Nintendo wants to do it.07/28/2014 - 10:12am
Matthew WilsonI am sure the 3ds im more then powerful enough to emulate a GBA game.07/28/2014 - 9:54am
Sleaker@IanC - while the processor is effectively the same or very similar, the issue is how they setup the peripheral hardware. It would probably require creating some kind of emulation for the 3DS to handle interfacing with the audio and input methods for GBA07/28/2014 - 9:30am
Sleaker@EZK - hmmm, that makes sense. I could have sworn I had played GB/GBC games on it too though (emud of course)07/28/2014 - 9:23am
E. Zachary KnightSleaker, the DS has a built in GBA chipset in the system. That is why it played GBA games. The GBA had a seperate chipset for GB and GBColor games. The DS did not have that GB/GBC chipset and that is why the DS could not play GB and GBC games.07/28/2014 - 7:25am
IanCI dont think Nintendo ever gave reason why GBA games a reason why GBA games aren't on the 3DS eshop. The 3DS uses chips that are backwards compatable with the GBA ob GBA processor, after all.07/28/2014 - 6:46am
Sleakerhmmm that's odd I could play GBA games natively in my original DS.07/28/2014 - 1:39am
Matthew Wilsonbasically "we do not want to put these games on a system more then 10 people own" just joking07/27/2014 - 8:13pm
MaskedPixelanteSomething, something, the 3DS can't properly emulate GBA games and it was a massive struggle to get the ambassador games running properly.07/27/2014 - 8:06pm
Andrew EisenIdeally, you'd be able to play such games on either platform but until that time, I think Nintendo's using the exclusivity in an attempt to further drive Wii U sales.07/27/2014 - 7:21pm
Matthew WilsonI am kind of surprised games like battle network are not out on the 3ds.07/27/2014 - 7:01pm
Andrew EisenWell, Mega Man 1 - 4, X and X2 are already on there and the first Battle Network is due out July 31st.07/27/2014 - 6:16pm
MaskedPixelanteDid Capcom ever give us a timeline for when they planned on putting the Megaman stuff on Wii U?07/27/2014 - 2:23pm
MaskedPixelanteIf by "distance themselves from Google Plus" you mean "forcing Google Plus integration in everything", then yes, they are distancing themselves from Google Plus.07/26/2014 - 12:20pm
MechaTama31I wish they would distance G+ from the Play Store, so I could leave reviews and comments again.07/26/2014 - 11:03am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician