Report: ECA Membership Brings Amazon.com Discount

March 28, 2009 -

Ben Kuchera of Ars Technica reports that he caught up with Entertainment Consumers Association President Hal Halpin (left) at the Game Developers Conference this week.

While Ben has a full, issue-oriented interview with Hal coming up, he has in the meantime posted some good news for ECA members: You'll now get a 10% off software purchases at Amazon.com.

Of the deal, Hal told Kuchera:

If you buy three games or so a year through Amazon, your [$20] ECA membership is basically free.

 

FULL DISCLOSURE DEPT: The ECA is the parent company of GamePolitics.


Comments

Re: Report: ECA Membership Brings Amazon.com Discount

Might actually join now..or I might already have. I tend not to pay attention to these things. XD;

I'm likely going to join the EFF though, even if they are a bit more extreme. They're adamant about stopping invasive DRM and allowing modchips, which is what I'm looking for really..ECA is advocating for used game sales though, which is a reason to support them. I'm a PC guy though.

 

I will not buy securom games. http://www.wolvenmoon.com/sharedfiles/message1.jpg and http://www.wolvenmoon.com/sharedfiles/message2.jpg

Re: Report: ECA Membership Brings Amazon.com Discount

Bennett, sorry for the lack of response, it did indeed slip through the cracks.  Let me know what email account you sent to, so we can track down the email and figure out why it did indeed slip through the cracks.

The official roll out was supposed to be Wednesday but the cat got let out of the bag a little early.  The benefit is up but right now there's a slight technical glitch that's making it a one time use code, which will hopefully be resolved this week.

Brett Schenker

Online Advocacy Manager

the ECA

www.theeca.com

Brett Schenker
Online Advocacy Director
the ECA
www.theeca.com

 

Re: Report: ECA Membership Brings Amazon.com Discount

Your assertions and assurances don't exactly fill me with confidence.

The official roll-out was "A little early"?  You've been advertising it for at least 4 months.  By that reasoning, the US was 'a little late' joining WW2.

As for where I sent the email, I sent it to the email address that was then listed on the ECA website (membership@theeca.com).  The email was sent on 1/14/2009 at 1:11pm Eastern Time - I still have a copy of it in my 'sent items' folder.  This is what it said:

"Having found that the ECA member benefits are not what were advertised before I joined (specifically that the Amazon.com discount does not seem to be available), I hereby notify ECA that I do not wish to renew membership in the ECA Service pursuant to Section 4 of the ECA Terms of Membership.  Please do not renew my membership at the end of my 12 month membership term."

If you can't respond to emails your organization has big problems.

On the other hand I just went on the site, and now there is a clear way to cancel membership (there was not before).  Keep making progress in this direction and the ECA will win back my trust.

Re: Report: ECA Membership Brings Amazon.com Discount

I'm an ECA member and for months I looked for this fabled Amazon discount (which is not new - they were advertising it months ago), but I never could find it.  I just went there today and it does now - finally - exist (although I've yet to test to see if it really works).  For weeks I had emailed the ECA about it, I'd asked on their forums.  No one ever responded.  As far as I was concerned, until it appeared, it seemed to me it was a scam to get people to join.

Since receiving no response to my queries I sent an email asking for my membership (which automatically renews and charges my credit card every year - another thing that seems kinda scammy) to be stopped.  I've received no response on that either.  Seems to me that the ECA is very unresponsive.  I'm still not convinced that ECA is not simply milking members and giving little if anything back (unless you happen to be famous - in which case I'll bet they look after you really well).  However, this Amazon discount - if it indeed works - will mean that the ECA is definitely worth joining - at least for those of us who buy games at Amazon.

Since the discount has finally appeared, it seems this is NOT a scam and that my queries had simply fallen through the cracks.  I must admit I'm still very wary of the organization.  Hopefully the ECA will continue to work to be more responsive to its membership.  Perhaps answering the odd email inquiry would be a step in the right direction.

Re: Report: ECA Membership Brings Amazon.com Discount

I also looked all over for the discount and could never find it.  I also wanted to cancel my subscription that automatically renews, but there was no way to do so online, or anywhere describing how to do so.  Thankfully the credit card I used expired so they couldn't auto-renew anymore.  Of course then I got an email telling my renewal failed and they asked for a new card.  Yeah right, I'm not falling for that again.  

http://www.eliteownage.com/nice

Re: Report: ECA Membership Brings Amazon.com Discount

Yeah.  In nine months when they try to renew my membership they will find that mine is also expired.  I'm going to bide my time though - if they do get their act together it certainly will be worth staying/joining, but right now I'm tending towards not renewing my membership.  Even if I do renew, I think I'll be sure to use a card that will soon expire - just in case.

Re: Report: ECA Membership Brings Amazon.com Discount

I thought there was always an Amazon discount?

 

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: Report: ECA Membership Brings Amazon.com Discount

Wow that's pretty sweet. I may actually have to sign up now.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MattsworknameWilson: how? Im still waiting for my upgrade notice07/29/2015 - 3:44am
Matthew WilsonI updated to a clean instill of windows 10.07/29/2015 - 2:36am
Mattsworknameargue that it's wrong, but then please admit it's wrong on ALL Fronts07/29/2015 - 2:06am
MattsworknameTechnoGeek: It's actually NOT, but it is a method used all across the specturm. See Rush limbaugh, MSNBC, Shawn hannity, etc etc, how many compagns have been brought up to try and shut them down by going after there advertisers. It's fine if you wanna07/29/2015 - 2:05am
Mattsworknamediscussed, while not what I liked and not the methods I wanted to see used, were , in a sense, the effort of thsoe game consuming masses to hold what they felt was supposed to be there press accountable for what many of them felt was Betrayal07/29/2015 - 2:03am
MattsworknameAs we say, the gamers are dead article set of a firestorm among the game consuming populace, who, ideally, were the intended audiance for sites like Kotaku, Polygon, Et all. As such, the turn about on them and the attacking of them, via the metods07/29/2015 - 2:03am
MattsworknameAndrew: Thats kind fo the issue at hand, Accountable is a matter of context. For a media group, it means accountable to its reader. to a goverment, to it's voters and tax payer, to a company, to it's share holders.07/29/2015 - 2:02am
Andrew EisenAnd again, you keep saying "accountable." What exactly does that mean? How is Gamasutra not accounting for the editorial it published?07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - I disagree with your 9:12 and 9:16 comment. There are myriad ways to address content you don't like. And they're far easier to execute in the online space.07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - Banning in the legal sense? Not that I'm aware but there have certainly been groups of gamers who have worked towards getting content they don't like removed.07/28/2015 - 11:45pm
DanJAlexander's editorial was and continues to be grossly misrepresented by her opponents. And if you don't like a site, you stop reading it - same as not watching a tv show. They get your first click, but not your second.07/28/2015 - 11:40pm
TechnogeekYes, because actively trying to convince advertisers to influence the editorial content of media is a perfectly acceptable thing to do, especially for a movement that's ostensibly about journalistic ethics.07/28/2015 - 11:02pm
Mattsworknameanother07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
Mattsworknameyou HAVE TO click on it. So they get the click revenue weather you like what it says or not. as such, the targeting of advertisers most likely seemed like a good course of action to those who wanted to hold those media groups accountable for one reason07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
MattsworknameBut, when you look at online media, it's completely different, with far more options, but far few ways to address issues that the consumers may have. In tv, you don't like what they show, you don't watch. But in order to see if you like something online07/28/2015 - 9:12pm
MattsworknameIn tv, and radio, ratings are how it works. your ratings determine how well you do and how much money you an charge.07/28/2015 - 9:02pm
Mattsworknameexpect to do so without someone wanting to hold you to task for it07/28/2015 - 9:00pm
MattsworknameMecha: I don't think anyone was asking for Editoral changes, what they wanted was to show those media groups that if they were gonna bash there own audiance, the audiance was not gonna take it sitting down. you can write what you want, but you can't07/28/2015 - 8:56pm
MattsworknameAndrew, Im asking as a practical question, Have gamers, as a group, ever asked for a game, or other item, to be banned. Im trying to see if theres any cases anyone else remembers cause I cant find or remember any.07/28/2015 - 8:55pm
Andrew EisenAs mentioned, Gamasutra isn't a gaming site, it's a game industry site. I don't feel it's changed its focus at all. Also, I don't get the sense that the majority of the people who took issue with that one opinion piece were regular readers anyway.07/28/2015 - 8:43pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician