Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

April 1, 2009 -

On Monday GamePolitics reported on disbarred Miami attorney Jack Thompson's vague threat to "proceed" against Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff (R) if the popular, third-term A.G. didn't immediately take action against major retailers like Best Buy, Target and Wal-mart for alleged sales of Grand Theft Auto IV to minors.

On that score, we should note that no law enforcement official anywhere in the United States has done what Thompson is suggesting Shurtleff do.

The backstory to Thompson's ire seems to stem from Gov. Jon Huntsman's veto last week of HB 353, the video game/movie bill conceived by Thompson. Following the veto, Shurtleff told the Salt Lake Tribune that he had been troubled by concerns about the legality of the bill. Going further back in history, in 2007 Thompson called for Shurtleff's impeachment after the A.G. gave a legal opinion that a measure proposed by Thompson was unconstitutional.

Given the nature of the public attacks on Shurtleff by Thompson (which include referring to the A.G. as "dead meat"), GamePolitics interviewed Attorney General Shurtleff yesterday on the HB 353 fallout:

GP: You’ve come under severe criticism from Jack Thompson in recent days in regard to the video game bill vetoed by Gov. Huntsman last week. Can you comment?

Shurtleff: Well, I just consider the source. I don’t take what Jack Thompson says – give it much credence. This latest demand that I prosecute certain crimes shows me that he knows about as much about criminal law as he does about constitutional law...

GP: Thompson, as you probably know, was given a lifetime disbarment last year by the Florida Supreme Court.

Shurtleff: Right. Yes.

GP: Given that fact, does it seem odd that he was invited to Utah and apparently met with the Lt. Governor and other political forces there to help craft the video game legislation?

Shurtleff: Yes. Absolutely. I do think that’s odd. I also think it’s odd that he received some kind of award from [the] 4th of July celebration in Provo last year. (click 'Read more' below for the rest...)

 

GP: Thompson apparently believes that you should be stopping sales of games like Grand Theft Auto to minors in Utah. Is there any indication that such sales are taking place and is any intervention legally possible?

Shurtleff: First of all, we have no direct evidence that it is happening. Does it happen? Probably. But, last year we had my investigators with my Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force go through the entire game Grand Theft Auto IV because we’d heard that a lot of people had concerns about pornographic references and so forth and whether it could meet the definition of material harmful to a minor. After they reviewed it with staff prosecutors they determined it wasn’t prosecutable.

GP: In recent years, you have had a friendly relationship with the video game industry. You did a public service announcement for the ESRB in 2006 and, in 2008, the ESA donated money to your campaign.

Shurtleff: My attitude is there’s a great rating system. I feel very strongly that the ESRB rating system works. It’s something that every parent ought to know about. And let me make it very clear that, while our officers and prosecutors didn’t think we could prosecute someone for selling Grand theft Auto IV, I certainly would strongly recommend against any parent letting their kids play the game. I don’t let my kids play it. Parents ought to be parents when it comes to games like that.

So, my attitude is rather than waste money on bills that are going to be unconstitutional like what Jack Thompson was pushing a couple of years ago [in Utah] in criminalizing the sale of these types of mature-rated video games, my attitude was, why do that if we’re going to lose? [Thompson's earlier bill] lost everywhere that it was proposed and we’re going to end up paying significant attorneys’ fees [to the video game industry]. Let’s put that money into educational programs. Let’s teach parents on how to use the rating system. Let’s have parents be parents and use the system. It works. That’s been my attitude from the beginning and that’s why I did the PSA, to better inform and educate parents about the system itself and how to use it and to make the decision as parents on what’s appropriate for your kids to be playing.

This year’s bill had concerns. They weren’t as significant as they were two years ago, or three years ago, whenever it was because there hadn’t been all the court decisions on it. It’s obviously a brand-new effort to try and do something [about violent games]. We did have concerns. Ultimately, we told the sponsor [Rep. Mike Morley] that there’s probably some arguments we can make to defend it if you want to pass it. We’re going to be sued. We’ll defend it. But if we lose we’re going to pay attorneys’ fees.

They made the policy decision, apparently, in the legislature to go ahead. The Governor made a different policy decision. Let’s make it very clear that I did not - Jack’s blaming me for everything - (chuckles) as far as this bill went, but my understanding was, Gov. Huntsman vetoed the bill not necessarily for legal concerns but he just had a policy decision that [the bill] actually put Utah children at more risk at having access to these games because the result would be that nobody would say that they weren’t selling to kids or weren’t going to market to them. So the Governor made his own independent policy decision on this. I think it was irrespective of some of the legal concerns.

GP: On the other hand, I recall that you were among those calling for a boycott of the cops-and-robber game 25 to Life in late 2005 and early 2006.

Shurtleff: I did, primarily because I was contacted by a law enforcement community and in particular the children of a police chief who was murdered – shot and killed in a hostage-type situation where the hostage was being used as a human shield similar to what was in that game. And so they were very concerned about it because of the fact that cops had been killed, including their loved ones.

So I felt strongly: You know what, company, take some responsibility and don’t issue this game. What was more important though, is that because of my association with ESRB and ESA – ESA in this particular case - I was able to, on a weekend, contact the new owner of, I think it was…

GP: Eidos

Shurtleff: Eidos? Yeah. Through my contacts at ESA they immediately got me in touch with [the CEO]. I think he was at a soccer match or something like that. But he took my call, listened to my concerns, ultimately said, "Well, okay, look, you know what, we’re going to hold off on issuing it so that we can address those concerns."

I think it was set to come out sometime before Christmas that year, if I remember correctly. They held off until sometime later to do it. Ultimately, I’m a free market guy and so I would like a company to take some responsibility. If they choose not to and go ahead, then I wanted to see what I could do to work with the company to perhaps limit the sales.

The biggest concern is once you start protesting something and you don’t want it to be sold and you don’t want people to buy it, more people will buy it if you raise a big stink about it. So, I felt it was really good to be able to talk with them. They understood our concerns. I asked the ESRB to take it back and take another look at [re-rating] it. I guess they decided not to do that. Again, it’s just asking companies to be responsible and the rating system to work and be responsible and ultimately to be accurate in how you are rating a game and hopefully educate others as to what’s in it. And ultimately I think that was a pretty lousy game from what I understand. Didn’t really have huge sales.

GP: While Thompson has been extremely harsh in his criticism of you, Rep. Mike Morley who sponsored HB 353 and Utah Eagle Forum head Gayle Ruzicka, who backed the bill, have been keeping a low profile in that regard. Have you heard from them?

Shurtleff:  No, I haven’t. Again, because we tried to work with them. When it’s the legislature, we’re not their attorneys, they have their own in-house attorneys. But we end up having to defend a bill once it passes, so often we try to get involved to give [the legislature] our concerns. We gave them our concerns with [HB 353]. We did raise issues of First Amendment, we raised concerns of Dormant Commerce Clause [of the U.S. Constitution] and some of these things that were being raised by industry out there and discussed them with [the legislators], made some recommendations.

Ultimately, at the end of the day with what they had to go, they said, "Well, is it defensible?" And we ultimately said, "Yeah. We can make our argument." There’s no case law on this like there was before [with Thompson's 2007 bill] that we knew absolutely you’re going to lose the case, we couldn’t tell them that. So then it becomes just a policy decision if the legislature wants to go forward on something like that, spend the money defending it. And it’s our job to defend it, so that’s how [HB 353] ended up getting passed. We said, "It's not our bill. I'm not going to go out there and support it, but I won’t oppose it either. We're just neutral on the bill."

GP: Anything else you want to add?

Shurtleff: No. (chuckles) I almost hate to respond because it just gives Jack Thompson the limelight that he so craves, apparently… He once accused me of calling him once when I was drunk, which I don’t drink - at all. He’s just that kind of guy you just would better off ignore... But I’m not concerned about his threats of impeachments or lawsuits or anything else. I just won reelection by 70% of the vote and he himself is facing his own troubles out there [in Florida]. So, whatever, bring it on, Jack. I’m really not going to give it much thought, frankly.


Comments

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

$500 will maybe buy you a plate at a campaign luncheon...WAY in the back, near the alley door.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

One of the best interviews I've read...how refreshing to see a political figure use common sense and thought on a hot-button topic that is usually used only to score more political capital.  "Parental responsibility"...wow, what a notion...

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

 

So, whatever, bring it on, Jack.

 

Oh looks like a Street Fighting Mortal Combat is going to happen anytime between him and JT.  This would be the fight of the century, LOL.

 

Anybody got Soul Calibur 4, somebody make JT and Shurtleff and have them fight one another, and make sure JT lose when fighting Shurtleff. 

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

Oh looks like a Street Fighting Mortal Combat is going to happen anytime between him and JT.  This would be the fight of the century, LOL.

I don't know about that?  Would a fight between Dan and Akuma from Street Figher really be the fight of the century.

 

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

Depends. If this is CvS2 Dan and Akuma, my bet's straight on Dan. Akuma was horribly underpowered there. SF4 might be a bit more even since there's no more rolling or parrying.

 

I hate broccoli/ and think it totally sucks/ Why isn't it meat?

I hate broccoli/ and think it totally sucks/ Why isn't it meat?

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

I hate to take this analogy and make it into MUGEN, but wouldn't it be more like Shin Akuma vs. that generic blue robot from Rise of the Robots?

300 Episodes and counting: http://www.orangeloungeradio.com/

400 Episodes, TEN YEARS and counting: http://www.orangeloungeradio.com/ | Voice of Geeks Network - http://www.vognetwork.com

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

Wow.. that was so... rational.. 

It was almost.. grounded in reality.

Is it April Fools day?

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

a joke this good takes half a year so no, this has to be real

岩「…Where do masochists go when they die?」

岩「…I can see why Hasselbeck's worried about fake guns killing fake people. afterall, she's a fake journalist on a fake news channel」

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

Well, seems how he doesn't drink--your next glass of milk is on me AG Shurtleff!

Praetorian

"I've been told I'm the resident skeptic, but I wouldn't believe that."

http://www.myspace.com/pree_tawr_ee_uhn



Praetorian

"If you sit by the river long enough, you will see the body of your enemy floating by."

http://www.myspace.com/pree_tawr_ee_uhn

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

There's a reason this man was re-elected you know.  This interview shows the backing of why.

---- There is a limit for both politicians against video games, and video games against politicians. http://www.goteamretard.com

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

Best... interview... EVER.

Okay, that's a little extreme, but still this is good.  Someone finally gets it.

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

Seconded.  Nice to see it when somebody in government actually shows good judgment and common sense.

Sortableturnip's Law: As an online discussion of video game violence grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Jack Thompson approaches 1

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

"Shurtleff: ...So, whatever, bring it on, Jack."

Respect.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------



"A Chrono Trigger is anything that unleashes its will or desire to change history!" -Gaspar

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

I would have even more respect for him if he did this.

Jack: Oh Lord why have you forsaken me?

Govenor: CAN IT!

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

When Gov Shurtleff gives Jack lemons, Jack finds a new Gov!

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

Shurtleff is Attorney General. Get it right!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------



"A Chrono Trigger is anything that unleashes its will or desire to change history!" -Gaspar

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

Calm the fuck down, skippy.

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

Finally! FINALLY! SOMEONE WHO USES THEIR HEAD! God, this is great to see, that someone is seeing that we have esrb for a reason!

As for Jack Thompson, Jack you're up againts a foe who isn't afraid of you. Plus he's able to see through your bulltshit and call you out in public.

So what are you going to do Jack? I'd back off if I were you. It would definitly save what little dignigty you have left.

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

Somewhere in Miami, a man (dizzy from his mad consumption of gay porn the night before) is readying a boatload of faxes, emails, threats, and insanity...

 

Nice to finally see government types start to see Thompson for what he is.  That disbarrment really is beginning to destroy what little credibility "Batman" had.  About time.

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

Well, I just consider the source. I don’t take what Jack Thompson says – give it much credence.This latest demand that I prosecute certain crimes shows me that he knows about as much about criminal law as he does about constitutional law...

GP: Given that fact, does it seem odd that he was invited to Utah and apparently met with the Lt. Governor and other political forces there to help craft the video game legislation?

Shurtleff: Yes. Absolutely. I do think that’s odd. I also think it’s odd that he received some kind of award from [the] 4th of July celebration in Provo last year.

But, last year we had my investigators with my Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force go through the entire game Grand Theft Auto IV because we’d heard that a lot of people had concerns about pornographic references and so forth and whether it could meet the definition of material harmful to a minor. After they reviewed it with staff prosecutiors they determined it wasn’t prosecutable.

(chuckles) I almost hate to respond because it just gives Jack Thompson the limelight that he so craves, apparently… He once accused me of calling him once when I was drunk, which I don’t drink - at all. He’s just that kind of guy you just would better off ignore...

So, whatever, bring it on, Jack.

Just some of my favorite parts. This is an awesome interview.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

All of his points are logical, he promotes and believes in parental responsibility, he is knowledgeable regarding the constitutional and enforcement problems surrounding these silly laws and he is polite and responsive when interviewed. He also doesn't take Thompson seriously.

It's like he is the complete opposite of Thompson.

My favourite part is this:

"We gave them our concerns with [HB 353]. We did raise issues of First Amendment, we raised concerns of Dormant Commerce Clause [of the U.S. Constitution] and some of these things that were being raised by industry out there and discussed them with [the legislators], made some recommendations."

It completely invalidates Thompson's complaint that he said nothing about his concerns.

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

Nobody takes Jack seriously anymore. Every interview he ever did when he was an attorney, he always brought up these shootings. Erfurt, Columbine, and Peduka, none of which had to do with gaming despite his claims. Too bad somebody hasn't invented a time machine so we can prevent him from being born.

When Jack Thompson runs his mouth, does anyone really care what he has to say anymore?

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

Say what you will about John Bruce, but we are far better off with him than without him. If he had never been born, someone else, possibly someone far more intelligent and conniving, could've started the legal war against video gaming and been far more sucessful. With him, we now have several legal precedents AGAINST the regulation of video games BECAUSE of his constant campaigning against gaming. He's like the Warren Burger to gaming's Perry Mason, his failures and ineptitudes are beneficial to our cases.

Put it this way (in a better gaming context), fighting JT has been like repeately fighting Winston Payne or Glass Joe. Be thankful we've been up against him instead of Von Karma or "Mr. Dream"

 

I hate broccoli/ and think it totally sucks/ Why isn't it meat?

I hate broccoli/ and think it totally sucks/ Why isn't it meat?

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

You totally read my mind. I was just thinking the other day how JT has done more to legitimize videogames than Mike Gallagher ever has.

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

Could it be that Jack Thompson's a lying jackass who pulls statements from the deep recesses of his colon just to get attention?

Surely not...

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

I think Jack Thompson is NOT a liar...

he's just an idiot who doesn't think, who does not carefully think about something before talking, who shoots his mouth like he knows everything... like.. like... a Narcist!?

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

Well of course not; current medical science has yet to figure out where his head ends and his colon begins. It's far too confusing to be able to properly pull stuff out of. He more likely just deficates the statements from his vocal opening, to avoid the confusion

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

Sad thing is, Jack is only going to read the part that says "bring it on" and ignore the rest.

 

then in some later letter, months down the road he'll reference this letter claiming that the AG cannot be trusted or should be impeached or something like that.

Re: Utah Attorney General to Thompson: Bring it on, Jack

In other words, he'll never actually 'bring it.'

Reminds me of that whole Colbert skit that went on after he issued that challenge to that senator or whoever it was...

As you can see, i'm not that much into politics.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

How do you feel about Amazon buying Twitch?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelantehttp://m.tickld.com/x/something-you-never-realized-about-guardians-of-the-galaxy Right in the feels.08/29/2014 - 6:56pm
AvalongodAgain I think we're conflating the issue of whether Sarkeesian's claims are beyond critique (no they're not) and whether its ever appropriate to use sexist language, let alone physical threats on a woman to intimidate her (no it isn't)08/29/2014 - 5:04pm
prh99Trolling her or trying to assail her integrity just draws more attention (Streisand effect?). Which is really not what the trolls want, so the only way to win (if there is a win to be had) is not to play/troll.08/29/2014 - 5:02pm
prh99Who cares, just don't watch the damn videos if you don't like her. Personally, I don't care as far as she is concerned as long there are interesting games to be played.08/29/2014 - 4:34pm
Andrew EisenZip - And yet, you can't cite a single, solitary example. (And no one said you hated anyone. Along those lines, no one claimed Sarkeesian was perfect either.)08/29/2014 - 3:51pm
Andrew EisenSaint's Row: Gat Out of Hell was just announced for PC, PS3, PS4, Xbox 360 and Xbox One making it the 150th game For Everything But Wii U! Congratulations Deep Silver!08/29/2014 - 3:49pm
ZippyDSMleeI do not hate them jsut think its mostly hyperlobe.08/29/2014 - 3:40pm
Andrew EisenSleaker - I'd say that's likely. From my experience, most who have a problem with Sarkeesian's videos either want to hate them in the first place (for whatever reason) or honestly misunderstand what they're about and what they're saying.08/29/2014 - 3:16pm
james_fudgeWe appreciate your support :)08/29/2014 - 2:55pm
TechnogeekIt gives me hope that maybe, just maybe, the gaming community is not statistically indistinguishable from consisting entirely of people that your average Xbox Live caricature would look at and go "maybe you should tone it down a little bit".08/29/2014 - 2:49pm
TechnogeekI just want to say that while I've disagreed with the staff of this site on several occasions, it's still good to see that they're not automatically dismissing Anita's videos as a "misandrist scam" or whatever the preferred dismissive term is these days.08/29/2014 - 2:49pm
E. Zachary KnightZippy, So you can't find even one?08/29/2014 - 1:04pm
ZippyDSMleeAndrew Eisen:Right because shes prefect and never exaggerates... *rolls eyes*08/29/2014 - 12:53pm
SleakerAnd honestly, nearly all of the games she references, or images she depicts I've always cringed at and wondered why they were included in games to begin with, from pinups through explicit sexual depictions or direct abuse. I think it's cheap storytelling.08/29/2014 - 12:35pm
Sleaker@AE - aren't most people fundamentally misunderstanding her at this point? haha.. On a related note I think a lot of the backlash is coming from males that think she is telling them their 'Generic Male Fantasy' is bad and wrong.08/29/2014 - 12:33pm
Andrew EisenAnd no, I don't think the female community would be upset over the performance of a case study in and of itself. Possibly the mostivations behind such a study, the methodology or conclusions but not the mere idea of a case study.08/29/2014 - 12:29pm
Andrew EisenAmusingly, these videos aren't saying you can't/shouldn't use tropes or that sexual representations are inherently problematic so those are very silly things to have a problem with and indicate a fundamental misunderstanding of the series.08/29/2014 - 12:29pm
SleakerDo you think the female community would get extremely angry over a male doing a case study on the negative impact of sex-novels and their unrealistic depiction of males and how widespread they are in american culture?08/29/2014 - 12:25pm
SleakerThe other thing that people might find problematic is that they see no problem with sexual representations of females (or males) in games. And realistically, why is there anything wrong with sexual representations in fiction?08/29/2014 - 12:24pm
SleakerTo even discuss or bring up these issues at a cultural level to begin with. Going straight for games to many probably feels like a huge overstepping given that it's interactive story in many cases, and when you're telling a story why can't you use tropes.08/29/2014 - 12:21pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician