First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

April 14, 2009

Although Judith Krug's name may not be a familiar one to gamers, she was well-known - and highly-regarded - by those on the front lines of the battle against censorship of games and other forms of media.

Krug, 69, who died on Saturday, is best known as the founder of Banned Books Week. The annual event celebrates the freedom to choose what one reads. She was the Executive Director of the Freedom to Read Foundation and Director of the Office for Intellectual Freedom of the American Library Association.

Jennifer Mercurio, VP and General Counsel of the Entertainment Consumers Association, commented on Krug's passing:

Judith was instrumental in pushing for First Amendment issues being broadened to include video games.

Sean Bersell, VP of Public Affairs for the Entertainment Merchants Association, added:

Judith was instrumental in the fight against video game censorship. She was a forceful advocate for Media Coalition amicus briefs in the Indianapolis, St. Louis, Illinois, Minnesota, and California video game cases. It would have been easy for the librarians to say, "That's not our battle," but thankfully that wasn't Judith's temperament.
 
Judith was a fierce believer in the importance of freedom of expression to our culture and our society and was zealous defender of the First Amendment. We all have truly benefited from her passion.

The American Library Association has posted a tribute to Krug.
 

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

Lame. :( Someone with more than an ounce of sense on this issue in particular, to be sure. Rest in peace.

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

***

When Jack Thompson runs his mouth, does anyone really care what he has to say anymore?

AE: No.

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

Is this really appropriate?

-- Dan "SWATJester" Rosenthal; Executive Director, http://www.gameslaw.net

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

dude thats not cool at all.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

While I personally think this is highly inappropriate, I do have to say that, knowing Jack, it is possible.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

This may be the absolutely most idiotic comment I've ever seen on this site.  Congratulations.

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

....Dude. Joke or not, that's just wrong.

He's still probably in the process of writing something along the lines of 'her death is an omen that i was right' or something to that effect, but...

No. Just no. There's a line, and you crossed it.

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

 

As Much as I hate Jack Thompson.  I don't like that comment you made.  It wasn't just appropriate, you're on the same level as him if you start blaming something on a death.  

The world including the gaming world lost a person who defended first amendment and fight against people who tried to bend it also.  Rest in Peace, o great defender.  I wish we could have had her as a good allies.

 

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

Rest in peace.

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

Pass in review. A great loss to be sure.

-- Dan "SWATJester" Rosenthal; Executive Director, http://www.gameslaw.net

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

What a shame, may she rest in peace

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

Now SHE was an expert in the First Amendment.

Banned Books Week has been one of my many causes that I get behind each year.

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

Nightwng2000 has also updated his MySpace page: http://www.myspace.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

People like this are why I think that free speech is something worth fighting for. They could use their influence to fight to oppress us, much like people like Jack Thompson or Rush Limbaugh do, or they could just do nothing, but instead they do everything in their power to create a world where we have the freedom to choose.

Rest well, Mrs. Krug. You will be remembered and honored.

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

I'm not a Limbaugh listener or fan, but what specific First Amendment right has he ever tried to deny to anybody?  Or are you just talking out of your ass?

Think about it:  if he managed to silence the other side of the debate, HE WOULD HAVE NO RADIO SHOW.  Limbaugh is a beneficiary of the First Amendment.  He would have no reason to deny it to others.  There's a huge difference between disagreeing with someone and trying to silence them.

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

Point taken. I was actually thinking of some dumbass pundit,but his name popped into my mind for some reason. I've been reading/watching a lot of political stuff recently and some of the Republican spiel is bringing my piss to a slow boil.


Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

Nevermind that he's generally one for personal responsibility, such as his comments on the V-Tech where he addressed the videogames/guns thing.

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

She will surely be missed. It's a shame she never got to debate Jack, though. Epic battle of all time.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

Now who'll challenge JT?!? In an epic way?!?!?

 

==========================================================

We're all outta PIE! and adult comic books. and i've misplaced my Turbografix

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

Epic?  Yeah, right.

A sad day, to lose such a staunch ally.

"De minimus non curat lex"

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

I have never heard of this woman before, but it sounds like she devoted her life to a great cause.  Condolences to her friends, family and colleagues.  Rest in peace.

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

Rest in peace.

As my father once said 'always respect your elders.'

This is true for those who have faught hard so we can have the choise of what games we want to play in this sad cruel world.

 

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

She may be gone, but her work carries on.  God speed Mrs. Krug.

PSN: bracomadar

http://i284.photobucket.com/albums/ll20/longtrang83/b-1.jpg

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

I have nothing but respect for a judge who's fought censorship as hard as she did. I'd trade JT and the other media whores for her in a heartbeat.

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

She'll be missed, Dont know who she is;But whatever she's done is heroric.

 

I hope they'll be more people like her in this country that wont stand for censorship.

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

I remember her and Banned Book Week. A true patriot who stood up for everyone's right to express themselves.

/salute

Re: First Amendment Defender Will Be Missed

A shame we need more sane and un buyable judges...not less....

 


Gore,Violence,Sexauilty,Fear,Emotion these are but modes of transportation of story and thought, to take them from society you create a society of children and nannys, since adults are not required.


http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 02/09/10 at 01:18pm
Valdearg: I do agree that it shouldn't be legal. That's for sure.
Posted 02/09/10 at 01:16pm
Andrew Eisen: Shouldn't be. Spirit of anti-discrimination laws would seem to include sexual orientation (and eye color). Plus there's always equal protection and such. Never know until you try.
Posted 02/09/10 at 01:14pm
Valdearg: @AE: Doubtful. Again, it's perfectly legal.
Posted 02/09/10 at 01:10pm
Andrew Eisen: Should have sued (unless that wasn't an option given her financial situation or something). Might have won.
Posted 02/09/10 at 01:00pm
Valdearg: Story about a Male to Female TG who was expressly told she wouldn't be given a job because she was TG. Its not the main point of the story, but explicit, perfectly legal discrimination like this exists.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:53pm
Valdearg: Lol, I don't know. It may very well be legal to do so. Though that might able to fall under the "race" restriction, depending on how that point is argued.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:51pm
Valdearg: I don't think they do have any legal recourse. I'll have to dig around, but I seriously believe that if the law doesn't specifically mention Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity, they can still be discriminated against in those 29 states.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:51pm
Andrew Eisen: Eye color isn't covered either but I doubt it would be considered legal to refuse to hire people with green eyes.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:48pm
Andrew Eisen: My explanation is longer than the Shoutbox will allow. Suffice to say that while those who are discriminated against do have legal recourse, anti-discrimination law should specifically cite sexual orientation so that there’s no question about it.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:42pm
Valdearg: "There is no federal law that consistently protects LGBT individuals from employment discrimination; it remains legal in 29 states, and in 38 states to do so based on gender identity or expression." From the Human Rights Campaign.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:40pm
Valdearg: @AE: Why don't you think I'm correct? I know Wiki could be flawed, but as far as it says, its up to date as of June 2009.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:39pm
Andrew Eisen: I don't think you're right but I really don't know and don't have the time to find out. However things actually are, it's very clear how they actually should be.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:34pm
Valdearg: "just because there's no specific state level protection for it, doesn't make discrimination right or legal." I would disagree. If there's no laws against it, it makes it perfectly legal. It's definitely not right, but perfectly legal to do.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:33pm
Valdearg: Meaning in 29 states, private sector discrimination against gays is perfectly legal.. Sickening.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:33pm
Valdearg: 19 states have no protections, and another 10 only have protections for public sector jobs.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:32pm
Andrew Eisen: Well, most businesses have equal rights policies in place and just because there's no specific state level protection for it, doesn't make discrimination right or legal. Still, no argument against adding such protections.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:28pm
Valdearg: More information. Apparently, it's worse than I actually thought.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:28pm
Valdearg: Check the link. Apparently, its more like 20 states that have no protections.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:26pm
Andrew Eisen: In the US? Not that I'm aware of. Sad if true.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:25pm
Valdearg: @AE: Actually, I think, at least for now, businesses can still discriminate against gays in a few states.. Something like 5 or 8. Its part of why Gay Rights Advocates are in support of the Employee Nondiscrimination Act, or ENDA.
Login or register to post shouts