ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on Price-Gouging Bandwidth Caps

April 17, 2009 -

Consumers won a big victory this week as Time Warner Cable backed down on a plan that would have placed a cap on bandwidth usage for broadband customers, while at the same time charging users a wildly inflated price per gigabyte.

When Time Warner announced recently that it would expand its broadband caps into New York and North Carolina, Ars Technica reports that the plan immediately ran afoul of Rep. Eric Massa (D-NY) and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY). The two lawmakers helped torpedo Time Warner's scheme.

The Entertainment Consumers Association, which also lobbied vigorously against the Time-Warner plan, was delighted with the cable provider's decision to back down. ECA VP and General Counsel Jennifer Mercurio commented on the outcome:

We're pleased that Time Warner has come to their senses on this issue... Having worked against caps and tiered pricing for over a year, and being the leading consumer rights organization to aggressively defend the American public on this issue, we're glad to see our efforts pay off even as we continue to work with Senator Schumer, Congressman Massa, and others to stop this type of consumer price gauging moving forward.

When Mercurio mentions price gouging, she's not kidding. Price comparison done by Nate Anderson of Ars Technica show how blatantly Time Warner planned to rip off its customers:

As TWC expands its test markets for the data caps, it offers plans with 5GB of monthly data transfer for $30. Plans with 40GB of data go for $55... That base rate works out to a truly jaw-dropping $6 per GB per month, and it's so far out of line with competitors' plans as to shock even the most cynical heart.

Take AT&T's DSL, for comparison... AT&T DSL comes out to 9¢ per GB. Verizon's fiber-optic FiOS system... this comes out to $.11 per GB. Upgrading to the much faster 50Mbps service for $144.95 a month still means that the charge per GB is only 36¢.

The situation is similar at other cable operators. Comcast offers Internet service starting at $42.95 per month and has a 250GB cap in place; this works out to 17¢ per GB.

FULL DISCLOSURE DEPT: The ECA is the parent company of GamePolitics.


Comments

Re: ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on ...

By the way, AT&T is testing some markets and wants to try to pull the same thing.

 

http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/ATTs-Own-Metered-Billing-Plans-Move-Forward-102010

Re: ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on Price-Gouging

If cable companies want to charge rediculous prices, then let them. But then there HAS to be an end to the monopolies in certain areas if they want to proceed with this pricing lunacy. They can't have it both ways.

So as long as the FCC ends the monoplies in certain areas where cable is the only choice I have no problem with Time Warner pricing themselves out of the game. Good riddance. I hope they choke on the short term profits that will eventually lead to long term bankruptcy at TW.

Re: ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on ...

Yikes...the capitalist in me says "yea fair-use would kill them from competition with rates that crazy, let them eat cake and see if they live" but the internet-archivist in me screams "WTF!!??!??OMFWTFFBBQ!!!11"

I'm glad my internet is county owned and operated, the only time they had a problem with me is when my download settings were still on from visiting my mom's (and she had dish internet when it was still new and cool) and I ended up essentially filling their packet queue because my bandwidth settings were set to god-like proportions; they just wagged their finger, reset me, and we both went our happy ways since (and I seriously download at least 100Gb/month)

Re: ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on Price-Gouging

More porn for me!

Steam ID: canadakiller

 

Steam ID: canadakiller

Re: ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on ...

When I heard about these caps I was worried about my netflix instant streaming and buying games on Steam, but then I realized it's eveb worse than that. This plan wouldn't just kill off what I have now, it would also kill the things that haven't been invented yet. What about that onlive service that everyone's so excited about? How could anyone get a bandwidth intensive product off the ground in that environment?

Just imagine, five years from now, using an internet that's not any better or more useful than the one we have now. That's depressing.

Re: ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on ...

Judging from the fact OnLive (which has limited potential) needs a 1.5 Mbs (or is it MBs?) connection, I agree it runs into severe limitations with this kind of 'deals'.

Re: ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on ...

I would assume 1.5Mbs. 1.5MBs is 12Mbs, which is relatively uncommon.

 

Re: ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on Price-Gouging

If they did that quite a few of their customers would dump them like the shitty garbage that they are.   Include my household in that number.  

 

PMBD http://paysites.mustbedestroyed.org/ The truth about T$R http://tsr.mustbedestroyed.org/ EA + T$R = We're all screwed

PMBD http://paysites.mustbedestroyed.org/ The truth about T$R http://tsr.mustbedestroyed.org/ EA + T$R = We're all screwed

Re: ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on Price-Gouging

I always have a jealous chuckle when I hear about bandwidth caps in other countries. We have bandwidth caps for everyone, including most businesses, here. Could you imagine paying 15 cents per MB when you went over your limit when that limit is around 50GB with no warning? Of course you can always just be shaped down to dial-up speeds...

I pay $140 AUD for ADSL2+ with a 55GB limit (they don't even offer higher)...that's $2.54 per GB....if they cap us on the NBN *shakes fist*...

Re: ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on Price-Gouging

My upload/download combined always exceeds 100GB per month, and often exceeds 130. I pay a flat rate per month, every month, and have a 8mb/1mb line that never falters.

I'd hate to live somewhere that politicians had to get involved to keep that going.

Re: ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on ...

Wow, I feel like my ADSL2+ is almost decent value now. I'm paying the equivelent of us$57 a month for 160gb. Then again I'm getting screwed out of a lot of that because the bandwidth is time divided, I get a peak & off-peak period the off-peak is from 3am to 10am every day with a data allowance is 120GB out of my 160...

Its not too bad really, I just queue large downloads to happen overnight, its just annoying that I have to wait until mmorning to watch my newly downloaded porn

Re: ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on Price-Gouging

YES!!!

Now, I still rather see about legislation looming in the air to deter them from even THINKING about trying this...

There's a conflict of interest when a content owner (TWC) has control over other distribution methods (BT, streams, etc) and offer the same content and basically extort more money from you for choosing another method.

I just hope those NY guys keep on the prowl and see about legislation existing regardless. As some have said, they'll just wait for the smoke to clear... I rather not be the case and wish companies would just play nice... but *sigh*...

Re: ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on Price-Gouging

Its not even that normal surfing can take as much as 10-20GB a month and thats wihtout heavy audio/video useage they want to rake in money comming and going at the cost of doing whats right...

 


Gore,Violence,Sexauilty,Fear,Emotion these are but modes of transportation of story and thought, to take them from society you create a society of children and nannys, since adults are not required.


http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

Patreon

Deviantart

Re: ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on Price-Gouging

But they didn't. They have already said it will rise again. So all that is happened is that it is delayed until they figure out a way to spin it so we consumers don't know its happeneing, or hide it in some other legal double talk.

schadenfreude

Re: ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on Price-Gouging

Ya comiecast is doing it too, TWC is just waiting for the smoke to clear before doing it again...... ain't nothing gonna change till  big brother forces them to change... or a few class action lawsuits...

 


Gore,Violence,Sexauilty,Fear,Emotion these are but modes of transportation of story and thought, to take them from society you create a society of children and nannys, since adults are not required.


http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

Patreon

Deviantart

Re: ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on Price-Gouging

 IF I am not mistaken Greensboro, NC also is a virtual TWC monopoly.   I know that TWC has all but bought out every Cable company in NC and their only real competitor in highspeed internet is DSL and everyone in NC thinks At&T is evil for buying BellSouth (who wasn't highly thought of).

 

Now given the information I've found in these articles it also explains why 3 local channels here in Charlotte have been in dispute in the past year over carrying said channel on its cable network.   TWC has made sure  everyone KNEW it was the channel's fault because TWC put out an ad blizt to the public about it.  The channels also made public service announcements but at the same time I highly doubt TWC allowed those announcements to get through to their customers.

 

Basically TWC offered each channel substantially LESS money to license carrying the channel through cable, claiming with the switch to Digital signals it was incurring more costs on its network.  

Now given this DISH & Direct didn't do such a thing but then they have more HD channels in the first place.

 

This just strikes of "we want our monopoly on TV & Internet back!!!"

Re: ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on Price-Gouging

Just a quick note, AT&T didn't buy Bellsouth.  When AT&T went up for sale, SBC bought the rights to the name and did an across the board rebranding of all it's holdings to AT&T.

 

Same company with all new signs and letterhead.

Re: ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on Price-Gouging

Comcast has a cap?  that's news to me.

Of course i doubt many people approach the 250GB mark on a regular basis.

Re: ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on ...

As noted by others, there were so many inconsistencies in Time Warner's plan and press releases. They claim they pursued this venture in an effort to defend the low-bandwidth users and to seek capital to upgrade their infrastructure. Yet, there own claims proved that only a small minority were actually overusing their tier. Also if the intent was to go to consumption based pricing, why would the same idea not apply to their cable business (pay for only the channels you use/time you watch)?

It is no coincidence they chose a city like Rochester either. The lack of FiOS and only small market share of Frontier made it an ideal test location so they could tout the numbers for justification of further integration. Best of all is their release to the FTIC regarding "now is not the time to enter into a debate of Net Neutrality". In their viewpoint, this is supposed to have after the precedent has been set and their foothold solidfied.

Re: ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on ...

Honestly, the internet really shouldn't be controlled by any of these companies. They are there to provide access, and we gladly pay them for it. But moderating and limiting the usage, coupled with charging thier customers more and more money is just wrong.

IMO, internet access should be free, personally. Every household in America should have free, unfettered access to the web. However, that would require the government to take over ISP's to provide those services, and, we all know that certain aspects of society would throw a fit. Not that I would blame them.

Re: ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on ...

I really don't see a problem with Time Warners plan to rip off its customers so long as the mentioned competitores are competing in the same area... this would have simple killed Time Warner internet. The End.

Now it will continue to compete despite the fact that Time Warner is apparently evil...

Re: ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on ...

I can't get a different provider than TW where I am for some reason?

(In the U.S.)

Re: ECA Pleased To See Time Warner Back Down on ...

I think you underestimate TW. They're pretty tough.

How do you think this plan got so far? Unfortunately, there are still those who don't understand what caps are. Hell, they don't even know what a Gig is, so they have no idea how bad they'd get gipped. And they'd pay it. We'd all pay...

 

Re: ECA Lauds Time Warner's Backing Down on Price-Gouging ...

As a customer of TWC, let me just say "PHEW!" Caps like that are just wrong. We pay a monthly fee already, and just because we happen to use it more, it doesn't mean that we should be charged more, especially with that pricing structure. WTF?

Re: ECA Lauds Time Warner's Backing Down on Price-Gouging ...

 I second that!  Whew!  thought i was gonna have to go DSL.

Re: ECA Lauds Time Warner's Backing Down on Price-Gouging ...

And to think, I was living on Comcast in Maryland not two years ago...

"HEY! LISTEN!"

"HEY! LISTEN!"

Re: ECA Lauds Time Warner's Backing Down on Price-Gouging ...

 Legend of Zelda Reference?

Re: ECA Lauds Time Warner's Backing Down on Price-Gouging ...

This is an interesting story. I think we are all fooling ourselves if we think that this is NOT the future. Capping bandwidth? Think about this. Is anyone here willing to share what they do with their bandwidth? Like tally up what it was you were downloading? The reality is, that most of the bandwidth usage is for torrents. You know, the "free" stuff. I know there are some legit means of driving up your bandwidth per month, but let's be serious. Let's be good boys and girls and send our governments our bandwidth usages each month. I'm just saying, at some point, they have to have a solution to illegal downloads. I partially support them going in this direction. Again, they have to control the tap.

Re: ECA Lauds Time Warner's Backing Down on Price-Gouging ...

so downloading those 10-15gig steam games you purchased while watching TV online, using voip and watching youtube videos. all at the same time as 3 other people in your house - yeah no one but people using bittorrent uses any bandwidth right?

and how are online HD movie and tv services meant to take off when no one can use them because they are worried about their caps? this is the problem we have in Australia (with capped internet, and increasingly uploads are counting towards that cap)

Re: ECA Lauds Time Warner Decision to Drop Price-Gouging ...

No one puts a cap on my consumption of porn!  Ain't no way, ain't no how!

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: ECA Lauds Time Warner Decision to Drop Price-Gouging ...

Hehe, "puts a cap on..."

 

"That's not ironic. That's justice."

"That's not ironic. That's justice."
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenI'm on YouTube. I've got journalistic ethics out the wazoo. Therefore, YouTube is a bastion of ethics. Science says so!08/03/2015 - 6:17pm
DocMelonheadIP: drop it, man, we get it: Total Biscuit Defamed Leigh Alexander, and encourage the harassment campaign.08/03/2015 - 6:17pm
IronPatriotSo far, total FAILURE in defending TotalBiscuit's lies and distortions which I posted.08/03/2015 - 6:17pm
IronPatriotIt's HILARIOUS that Mattsworkname fails to discredit a single fact posted on medium.com, so he tries to dicredit ALL of medium.com. OK, prove the jounalistic ethics of Youtube, home of your gamergate hero TotalLYINGBiscuit. LOL.08/03/2015 - 6:15pm
Andrew EisenYou realize I'm going to tease you with this every time you link something now, right? Bwa ha ha!08/03/2015 - 6:09pm
MattsworknameAndew: im a jaded skeptic with way to much mistrust of media, sadly, thats hard for me to do anymore08/03/2015 - 6:07pm
Andrew EisenI would advise evaluating what's said by what's said, not where it's said.08/03/2015 - 6:05pm
Mattsworknamealso, I ment unfettered08/03/2015 - 6:05pm
MattsworknameAndrew:: Noit on facebook, not on twitter, not really on reddit. And on youtube im very skeptical about content from scertain sources08/03/2015 - 6:04pm
MattsworknameDoc: I don't think anyone argues that there were jerks and others who latchs onto the movments, but it was a small portion of the activity around that movment08/03/2015 - 6:03pm
DocMelonheadIP: Give GamerGate a rest okay; we get it, it's a cover for bigots to continue their hate speech and harassment against minorities.08/03/2015 - 6:01pm
Andrew EisenMatt - "unettered"? What was that supposed to be? Anyway, so, I imagine you turn your nose up at anything written on Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit or said on YouTube?08/03/2015 - 6:00pm
DocMelonheadThen again, none of this matter since what TB did is victim blaming on a minority for receiving harassment.08/03/2015 - 5:59pm
Andrew EisenReminder: posts with heavy profanity will be deleted.08/03/2015 - 5:58pm
DocMelonheadIn fact, while while you were banned, someone made a 6-part series on said "bigotry": https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJA_jUddXvY62dhVThbeegLPpvQlR4CjF08/03/2015 - 5:56pm
Mattsworknameandrew: never really trusted it cause I worry it's to unettered, while its good that it's an open platform, it's lack of any kind of quality control has always been apparent and worries me08/03/2015 - 5:53pm
Matthew Wilsonhttps://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/08/movie-studios-seek-sopapower-through-broad-site-blocking-order ..... ofcourse they would try this.....08/03/2015 - 5:46pm
Andrew EisenMatt - Why would you immediately turn your nose up at medium.com? It's just a blog-publishing platform anyone can use. I've been linked to articles by people on both sides of the argument. 08/03/2015 - 5:43pm
MattsworknameIP: at this point, theres pretty much nothing you can say that we don't discount right away cause your bias and personal hatred colors pretty much everythng you say. But, for the record. Medium.com? really? We should belive that in any way shape or form?08/03/2015 - 5:38pm
IronPatriotbenohawk, TotalBiscuit is a totalLIAR and decided to be part of the gamergate problem.08/03/2015 - 4:27pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician