Bringing Closure to EA's Brass Knuckles Episode

April 20, 2009 -

Recently, GamePolitics broke the news that a press kit for Electronic Arts' The Godfather II included, among other items, a set of brass knuckles.

As we pointed out, possession of brass knuckles is illegal in Pennsylvania where GP HQ is located. Kotaku subsequently noted that they are illegal in its Colorado home base, as well. As it turns out, brass knuckles are considered a prohibited weapon in a number of states.

A few days later, in a carefully-worded phone call, an EA rep advised us that the publisher would send a pre-paid shipping envelope in which we could return the brass knuckles. Not long after, a FedEx mailer arrived with an unsigned note on plain white paper:

Hello,

 

Pursuant to EA's phone call to you, please use the enclosed mailer for return of the brass curio item.

 

Thank you.

FedEx picked up the "brass curio item" from GP HQ on Friday, thus bringing to a close what has to rank as one of the biggest public relations gaffes in the history of the video game biz.


Comments

Re: Bringing Closure to EA's Brass Knuckles Episode

Isn't returning them admitting that you were going to use them for an illegal purpose?

Re: Bringing Closure to EA's Brass Knuckles Episode

I don't blame them for not checking. Knuckle Dusters are probably considered, by the average person, an archaic weapon. It really is more of a thing to have for the sake of having.

"Well, I can own a gun, why not a full fist of rings?"

Re: Bringing Closure to EA's Brass Knuckles Episode

 I find it amusing that brass knuckles are illegal but many other weapons I would consider far more dangerous are perfectly legal.

 

But yes EA should have checked to see if they can legally send those out though you might be able to argue they are a curio and therefore you are legal to have them =).

Re: Bringing Closure to EA's Brass Knuckles Episode

You never should have sent it back.  eBay would have paid a pretty penny for it!

Re: Bringing Closure to EA's Brass Knuckles Episode

I still think it's way wierd that the PR deparment didn't think that sending out actual WEAPONS would be a problem.  Or that they didn't bother to look into the legality of them.  Especially since they're also illegal in California.  If you're going to be mailing the things out, you at least ought to see if they're illegal in your own damn state.

Should have shipped glass knuckles.  I hear those are A-OK.

Re: Bringing Closure to EA's Brass Knuckles Episode

Not really a fiasco, just bad taste.

They should have gone all the way and planted horses heads in every editors bed. That would have been a stunt, this is not really a stunt.

Re: Bringing Closure to EA's Brass Knuckles Episode

 NAh it would have been a BIGGER PR fiasco if they had included them the Game's Box with the disk.  OF course then JT would have gotten his dearest wish in that Police would actually be able to arrest gamers as they are coming out of the store with the game in hand.

Re: Bringing Closure to EA's Brass Knuckles Episode

I wouldn't call this one of the biggest PR fiascos.  Nobody who doesn't follow gaming media will know about this, and really, not even a lot of them do.  This has nowhere near the exposure of something like Hot Coffee, or the Mass Effect = (Se)Xbox nonsense.

Granted, this is a major legal blunder, but its PR impact seems pretty negligible.

Re: Bringing Closure to EA's Brass Knuckles Episode

I'd call the whole fiasco Pepsi did as a giveaway of tickets for a baseball game in New York sa a bad PR fiasco.

This is simply not looking up whats legal to ship. xD

Re: Bringing Closure to EA's Brass Knuckles Episode

What fiasco was that?

Re: Bringing Closure to EA's Brass Knuckles Episode

Footbullets abound...

Re: Bringing Closure to EA's Brass Knuckles Episode

This doesn't exactly bring closure to the fact that EA have now asked you to break the law by shipping a weapon across state lines though, has it?

It's rather arrogant to simply state that their sending you the pre-paid envelope brings a close to the matter when there are many unanswered questions left.

Re: Bringing Closure to EA's Brass Knuckles Episode

I wouldn't have given it back.  It's obviously a curio piece, which means that you can still legally own it.  As long as you keep the whole set together, you should be fine.  What about the piano wire, eh?  Get some surgical tubing so it doesn't cut into their hands and you've got a cheap garrote.  And what about that cigar?  No this whole thing is weird, but there's no reason that you have to send the brass knuckles back.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will we ever get Half-Life 3?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
prh99The blog post by Quinn's exboyfriend suggesting she slept with journalists to get favorable reviews was impetus for #gamergate.10/02/2014 - 8:54am
SleakerTechRaptor seems to do a decent job of breaking down things in it's currently 6-part series: http://techraptor.net/2014/09/23/good-morning-orthodoxy-1/ - and why atleast for him, the whole Media-thing is offensive.10/02/2014 - 8:53am
SleakerSo from all of the articles I've read that give timelines and show tag trends, there's nothing to support GG being about AS or Quinn. These were a minority of people harassing.. The large portion of GG started when the 'Gamers are dead' articles started.10/02/2014 - 8:45am
prh99Btw apparently they've gone as far as creating a GitHub for this Operation Disrespectful Nod. http://bit.ly/1qsbWcq10/02/2014 - 8:44am
Sleakerthey don't consider the issue. This is the consumeristic nature of a market.10/02/2014 - 8:41am
prh99Attacking their integrity and now getting advertisers to pull their ads from those sites.10/02/2014 - 8:40am
Sleaker@EZK - Telling a company you disagree with the nature of a news sites methodology and feel it negatively impacts the ad-running company as a supporter of said articles is not censorship. It's voicing your opinion that you will vote with your wallet if10/02/2014 - 8:38am
prh99I don't think they have any interested in debate. They scared Anita and Quinn with threats of violence, now they are going to try and damage organizations who called them their behavior.10/02/2014 - 8:36am
E. Zachary KnightWhat I can't understand is why gamergate supporters feel the need to silence their critics. Why can't they simply fight free speech with free speech.10/02/2014 - 8:23am
E. Zachary KnightSo what I am saying is that since gamergate failed to force Gamasutra to retract their editorial directly, they are now going the starvation route.10/02/2014 - 8:22am
E. Zachary KnightAs an illustration, you can kill someone by shooting them in the head, or you can starve them to death. The means don't matter, just the ends.10/02/2014 - 8:18am
E. Zachary Knightquiknkold, I can't speak for James, but trying to silence a critic by blocking its financial supporters is a censorious activity. It may not be the same as direct censoring, but its ends are the same.10/02/2014 - 8:18am
E. Zachary KnightMecha, I found neither the title nor the content of Gamasutra's Gamers are Dead article inflammatory. But I guess that just means I was the target audience for it.10/02/2014 - 8:16am
prh99@james_fudge Agreed, but then again this group doesn't exactly have high ethical standards or even a grasp of hypocrisy. They do pretty much anything to damage their targets.10/02/2014 - 8:14am
MechaTama31Are... Are you guys suggesting that the content of the "Gamers are over" article is *less* inflammatory than the title?10/02/2014 - 7:58am
quiknkoldhey James, Boycotts are not Censorship. Supreme Court NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co. (1982)10/02/2014 - 7:37am
Michael ChandraWhat's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet. That said, the name says it all.10/02/2014 - 7:34am
E. Zachary KnightYes.10/02/2014 - 7:29am
ConsterQuestion: is Kefka on drugs, or is he secretly a conspiracy theorist character from a TV show?10/02/2014 - 7:21am
james_fudgeEnjoy my comedy stylings.10/02/2014 - 7:10am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician