Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

May 26, 2009

GameSpot Australia reports that government censors have banned Sexy Poker, a WiiWare title for Nintendo's popular console.

The game is apparently a strip poker affair in which A.I.-controled female opponents shed clothing when the player wins a hand. In refusing the game a rating, Australia's Classification Board said in a statement:

In the Board’s view Sexy Poker offers depictions of nudity as an incentive or reward to interactive game play. In the Board’s view, the general rule in the Guidelines for the Classification of Films and Computer Games prohibiting depictions of nudity as an incentive or reward, applies to the game play described above, as the player is shown increasingly detailed amounts of nudity following successful game-play

In the view of the Board, the impact of the game exceeds strong as except in material restricted to adults, nudity and sexual activity must not be related to incentives or rewards. As such the game cannot be accommodated in a MA15+ classification.

The MA15+ classification is currently Australia's highest, although many Down Under believe an 18+ rating is necessary to accomodate the increase in mature content in games.

Joystiq reported last month that Sexy Poker was originally developed as a mobile phone title but is being readied as downloadable WiiWare. It is unclear which regions will be able to access the game, although GoNintendo reports that the game will be released in the European market.

THANKS TO: Longtime GP reader Ryan...

Comments

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

For the better part of my life nudity was the incentive or reward for many interactions and plenty of game-playing.

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around nudity in a Nintendo game. Am I missing something here?
As such, I'll believe it when I see it.

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under
Licensed by Nintendo, not published. Oh darn. I can't watch a chic on the screen take off her clothes. Guess I'll have to resort to playing real strip poker with that girl next door. She would never take it beyond PG-13, right? Right? Then one thing leads to another...Oh well.
Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

It was developed for mobile phones by Gameloft.  I did the conversion design doc for the iPhone for this game while I was working there last year, and GL was wetting themselves over the idea of porting anything and everything they could to Wii VC, so I'm not surprised this was eventually submitted.

I _am_ a little surprised Nintendo accepted it, but whatever.  There are much better options for a poker game and for porn; I see no reason to buy it.

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

Did it actually manage to get approved for the iTunes app store? They seem to be very inconsistent concerning what is approved and what is not, and if this game made it in with nudity intact then I think Apple has some 'splainin to do.

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

Doesn't Australia have some nudity on some of their tv channels during primetime hours?

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

There is nudity on television, but unlike Sexy Poker it isn't offered for a reward. Because nudity is offered as a direct reward for positive action in the game, the standards office wont allow it.

If the women simply undressed during the course of the game without being connected to winning or not, then we'd be boiling a different kettle of fish.

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

I can see this being banned in America as well the ESRB will prob slap it with the AO rating.

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

It would not be "banned" in America, unless Nintendo themselves refused to allow it to be distributed in that market.  The US doesn't "ban" any games, although stores to voluntarily choose not to carry certain titles.

But yes, it would probably get an AO.  Some nudity is allowable in an M rated games, but when it is made a primary feature of the game, then it falls into the AO category.  Not to mention the gambling.

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

I stand corrected.  It got a Mature rating.

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

It's already been rated M by the ESRB.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

I remember seeing a video poker machine as a kid that had a picture of a woman slowly reveal as you progressed. The demo mode wouldn't show the full nudity but I already knew what it implied.

I wonder if they're still around in some bars. You know what, I don't think it even was poker. It was probably some puzzle game where you remove more pieces to show the woman.

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

I know its not banned banned by the country it self but the AO rating is a banning since no company allows it.

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

Just looked it up on the ESRB website.

Mature for nudity, sexual themes, and simulated gambling.

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

When did this get on WiiWare?

Like I can understand if Japan gets this game, what Western nations?

Come on.

 

Also Yes, there are nudity in TV shows Prime Time in Australia.

But there is no interaction in TV and movies, that is where Videogames have the problem with the OFLC's interpretation's of their laws.

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

 

Seems its already rated

 

http://gonintendo.com/?p=82862

 

http://www.esrb.org/

Search for sexy poker you can’t link directly to title listings…the fckers…

 


I am a criminal because I purchase media,I am a criminal because I use media, I am a criminal because I chose to own media..We shall remain criminals until Corporate stay's outside our bedrooms..


http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

Alternatively: all that pornography on the internet.

/b

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

Just wait till all the major nations have a tiered net system to protect the people from facts, truths.. wait I mean porn!

 


I am a criminal because I purchase media,I am a criminal because I use media, I am a criminal because I chose to own media..We shall remain criminals until Corporate stay's outside our bedrooms..


http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

Don't worry, Australia's got that covered too. They're heading towards a nation-wide internet filter based on blacklists.

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

Made by fear mongering Politician’s so basically everything will be blacklisted…..

 


I am a criminal because I purchase media,I am a criminal because I use media, I am a criminal because I chose to own media..We shall remain criminals until Corporate stay's outside our bedrooms..


http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

XBox Live release, plz.

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

"In the Board’s view Sexy Poker offers depictions of nudity as an incentive or reward to interactive game play"

So not that different than talking to women in the real world then?

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

I'm an Aussie and my god, this latest game ban is just straight out humiliating. It speaks of true, undeniable hypocrisy and lack of logic.

Why is it against the rules to use nudity as an incentive/reward, yet blowing innocent peoples heads and limbs off for experience points and loot in Fallout3 is OK for 15 year olds? It doesn't make the slighest bit of sense. What about Playboy: The Mansion also? It was released uncut in Australia and enables the player to unlock real-life nude shots of woman as REWARDS. Yet another blatant inconsistent decision by the OFLC. I can't understand how nudity in a video game is somehow worse than actually playing strip poker (which is legal of course), or viewing an unrestricted softcore Penthouse magazine which is available to people UNDER the age of 15. Why is it that simply because it's in video game form, politicans suddenly assume it's going to corrupt the population? What sense does it make that I, as an adult, can actually have sex but playing a video game with sex & nudity is unacceptable?

I am so very sick to death of this nanny state - the current classification system is based on heresay and conjecture rather than facts. What is this, 1458? We're in 2009 and laws are still being made based on personal opinions of politicans. Where is the objectivity? In Australia, apparently it doesn't matter.....Because the politicans know best *sigh*

It's time the classification system was completely overhauled. In a liberal democracy this kind of censorship is just straight out unacceptable and embarassing.

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

Ya what they did to necrovision was a joke...... the game was less gorey than BS and FO3 put togather....

 


I am a criminal because I purchase media,I am a criminal because I use media, I am a criminal because I chose to own media..We shall remain criminals until Corporate stay's outside our bedrooms..


http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com

Re: Sexy Poker WiiWare Title Banned Down Under

A nanny state and former colony of another nanny state.

ZAR.

 

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/07/09 at 04:27pm
ZippyDSMlee: man I got alot of junk and dup files too >< god I need orginization...and no not the knee capping media mafia kind :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:26pm
ZippyDSMlee: replaced :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:23pm
ZippyDSMlee: beemoh:hey its like 60GB porn,400GB anime 100GB games and crap I have took from all my DVDs, I hate waiting on dvds to install stuff..... oh and 40GB of my porn was in the found.000 folder...mostly corrupted.... least I got names of wut needs to be repa
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:18pm
beemoh: @Zip: ...and you'd have to spend all that time re-downloading that porn?
Posted 11/07/09 at 03:34pm
ZippyDSMlee: ggrrrrr......vista lost one of my hard drives and I had a heart attack thinking I lost 1TB of data....
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:58am
JDKJ: Which could be explained by both (a) and (b).
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:56am
Austin_Lewis: JDKJ: You forgot C) the fact that, for some reason, every time he did something that would suggest he shouldn't be in the military, let alone an officer, higher ups ignored it or let it slide.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:51am
JDKJ: Part of the problem is, I believe, that (a) the Army had a lot of time and money already invested in him and which they were unwilling to simply write-off and (b) an increasing need for the type of skills and services he provided.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:48am
JDKJ: And that even if he was begging not to get cut loose, he was apparently a real good candidate for being cut loose, anyway.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:11am
JDKJ: @chada: And while Kennedy once noted that there's usually more than enough blame for everyone to get a slice, the possibility that the Army was unwilling to cut loose someone who was asking to get cut loose could be a factor.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:07am
ZippyDSMlee: *noms on his feet*..nomnomnomnom*droooll* ...wuuutttttt uuu looking at?
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:05am
JDKJ: I'm no psychologist, but I'm told that crazy people have a tendency to do crazy things.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:03am
chadachada321: Whoops, was out of the convo for awhile. I do wonder what type of ammo he used etc, but the real issue is WHY he did it, not HOW
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:56am
JDKJ: But if it turns out that they actually did, they'll have Hell to pay.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:45am
JDKJ: And I'd tend to rule out the possibilty of FN Herstal supplying restricted ammunition to someone merely because they're ordering it from a military base.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:37am
JDKJ: I know you don't leave your gated community and get around much in dark alleys, so you may be surprised to learn that there's this thing called "the black market" where, if you've got enough money, ain't too much of anything which can't be bought.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:36am
Austin_Lewis: Or, maybe he or someone else at the base ordered the SS190 from FN Herstal.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:32am
Austin_Lewis: the hands of private owners. They run about 300 dollars minimum for a box of 50, and boxes of AP 5.7 are extremely scarce, mainly residing in the hands of Class III stores or individuals who for one reason or another got a demo box of it.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:30am
Austin_Lewis: There are other firearms that fire the 5.7. However, I too would like to know where he got the ammo and what kind was used. Maybe Hasan, planning not to live through this, went out and bought one the boxes of SS190 that are floating around in
Posted 11/07/09 at 08:44am
JDKJ: And it isn't yet clear what type of ammunition Hasan used. It's strange that he purchased a gun but didn't purchase ammunition for it at the same place and time. Especially because the calibre required is peculiar to the actual gun.
Login or register to post shouts