Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK Game Ratings Scheme

June 16, 2009 -

Although our initial coverage of today's Digital Britain report focused on the long-awaited decision regarding ownership of U.K. video game ratings, there is much more to the story.

In relation to PEGI's big win over BBFC, gamesindustry.biz reports that Britain's Video Standards Council will be given tough enforcement powers to ensure that game publishers and retailers conform to content rating guidelines. The VSC will be empowered to fine companies which do not adhere to the PEGI system and, in extreme cases, may even ban titles from being sold in the U.K.

Of the VCS's role in enforcing the new system, EA's Keith Ramsdale told gi.biz:

The VSC will be an independent body, as is the PEGI system, and while I'm sure there's some joining up to do, it's a tough system.

We've gone further than the recommendations and PEGI will impose fines for non-compliance and possible exclusion from the PEGI system for non compliance...


Of course there will be checks on what content people put in, and there will be highly punitive measures should publishers not comply.

Comments

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

The decision to give the VSC additional powers shows that the government does not trust PEGI and believes that as PEGI is an European wide classification agency that it will not take British culture into account and may be too liberal (although in fact PEGI are a much more prudish organisation than the BBFC). It never saw the need for these additional powers when the BBFC was in control.

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

Incidentally, why is GP quoting an EA suit instead of anyone actually INVOLVED IN THIS DECISION?

(OK, he's quoting a website that quoted the suit, so I guess he's off the hook, but still.....why did they go with him?)

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

*Reads the comments to the story*

Tolds you so.

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

Can't help but notice it was those who wouldn't be affected at all by the outcome which were so quick to say the BBFC is terrible and PEGI is wonderful. 24 hours makes a lot of difference.

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

Well, them and beemoh. He's about the only UK person who was smearing the BBFC.

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

Ah yes, forgotten that... does that mean we can blame him

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

Works for me. Where's me pitchfork?

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

Nothing changes, I felt that the Byron Review was more of Politics wanting to control Videogames rather than Professor Byron trying to tell politicians that they should not worry too much about Videogames and allow the Videogame Industry to be itself.

I think that Tanya Byron will be sorely dissapointed with the way her hard work is now being treated as another way for the Government to control the industry.

 

TBoneTony

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

Coungratulations UK, for you guys now have the worst of both words: government mandated ratings administered by an organization that is less accountable to the public than a government body.

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

This is pretty much the same as we had before.

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

It's actually, at least on paper, WORSE than what we had before. I was happy to support PEGI's choice despite favouring the BBFC, but all these strings attached to the change do not bode well in my eyes.

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

I hope Postal 3 is untuched. I was going to import it from the UK if the ESRB decides to swing the AO hammer at it.

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

darned double-post. Pretend there's some witty comment here instead and ignore it.

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

I'd be surprised if there's many games scheduled for release over the next 12 months that will be affected. If the government is involved, any change is unlikely to be quick.

I don't recall there being a date attached to it but some of the other things had dates like 'by 2012' on them.

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

Damnit I thought banning games would be over now that the BBFC are gone.

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

Really? Why?

This was always going to be just a change in pictures on the box and the name people cry when a game gets a "refused classification" or "AO" sticker slapped on (or what ever other default ban you care to mention).

I am MORE worried now that I was before, the BBFC had a method of banning games, but they have been crippled with the overturning of Manhunt 2. A clear system of overturning the BBFC decisions had been tested and proved working. Now we have an unknown quantity (the VSC) and the PEGI. Has PEGI has been challenged on a rating?

--
A house is not a home unless it contains food and fire for the mind as well as the body. Benjamin Franklin

--
A house is not a home unless it contains food and fire for the mind as well as the body. Benjamin Franklin

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

The second the Government took an interest in the ratings system it was most likely going to end badly unless they left things exactly as they were.

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

Yeah, this hardly seems like the "victory" I was expecting.  If the government is going to stick their fingers in the pie anyway, it hardly matters which ratings system they use.

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

if a game has some really nasty stuff in it just slap "21 adult only" on it and publish it anyway

its fine so long as it doesnt have rape , child porn or beastiality in it

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

As long as the game is labeled appropriately, that content should be fine as well.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

Not if it offends 'uk-specific sensibilities' it won't. The VSC have the ability to ban a game even if it got a rating now. And it was the VSC that set the standards that enabled the BBFC to ban Manhunt 2.

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

"Of course there will be checks on what content people put in, and there will be highly punitive measures should publishers not comply."

Absolutely unacceptable and completely against everything a content rating system should be.

(Assuming, of course, that means what I think it means.)

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

If you think it means that the games developer could possibly face legal problems for non-compliance with a ratings board decision over content they put in a game, then yes, I think it means exactly what your thinking.

This is turning out to be the worst possible outcome.

Re: Video Standards Council to Play Enforcer Role In New UK ...

What concerns me most is that it seems like this power was set up to deal with Hot Coffee scenarios more than it is to deal with banning games.

It seems like they will happily fine companies for hidden content even though it would potentially have no effect on the overall classification. The ESRB went wild over a moderate sex scene because it was hidden content (yet only revealed by a hack to the source code), no doubt the VSC could have the attitude.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

What is #GamerGate about?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenMarvel has replaced Manara on the variant covers for Thor #2 and Avengers and X-Men: AXIS #1. I hope I'm wrong but I don't think Marvel is learning the right lesson here.09/23/2014 - 6:26pm
quiknkoldI'm 7 years old, and my cousin(Also 7, maybe 8 at this time) tells me has Battletoads. its Summer Vacation. We play and play and play until finally, We won coop. Those were the days.09/23/2014 - 5:29pm
quiknkoldlets take a moment to share some gaming memories, shall we?09/23/2014 - 5:28pm
MechaTama31I buy stuff off the eshop because it gives me the convenience of a flashcart without the guilt.09/23/2014 - 5:03pm
Montewell thanks for the info Eisen; try that the next time i need something off the eshop09/23/2014 - 3:54pm
james_fudgere: MP, i've sent tech support a note - thank you :)09/23/2014 - 3:14pm
IanCNah that wasnt directed at you Andrew :)09/23/2014 - 3:00pm
Papa MidnightRe: SIEGE 2014 Keynote: oh dear...09/23/2014 - 2:44pm
MaskedPixelanteDear GP, something called "doubleverify" is causing some nasty browser issues on my end. Probably one of your ads.09/23/2014 - 2:36pm
Andrew EisenOh hell no. No, it took Nintendo a dog's age just to get to the point its competitors have been at for a while! (And it's still not there yet, in a lot of respects.)09/23/2014 - 2:26pm
IanCSame as PSN handles it, fi you are trying to say only nintendo do that.09/23/2014 - 2:23pm
Andrew EisenYou have to try to purchase something first. Pick a game, hit purchase and if your wallet doesn't have enough to cover it, you'll be given an option to "add exact funds" or something like that.09/23/2014 - 2:05pm
MonteI have seen no option for that on my 3DS; anytime i want to add funds it only gives me the option to add in denominations of $10, 20, 50 or 10009/23/2014 - 2:03pm
IanCWhat Andrew Wilson said. PSN is the same when you make a purchase over a certain price (£5 in the UK)09/23/2014 - 2:02pm
Andrew EisenNeither eShop charges sales tax either. At least in California.09/23/2014 - 2:00pm
Andrew EisenBoth Wii U and 3DS eShops allow you to add funds in the exact amount of whatever's in your shopping cart. If your game is $39.99, you can add exactly $39.99.09/23/2014 - 1:57pm
Infophile@Matthew Wilson: As I understand it, any regulations to force tax online would also set up an easy database for these stores to use, minimizing overhead.09/23/2014 - 1:30pm
MonteReally, the eshop just does next to nothing to make buying digitally advantagous for the customer. Its nice to have the game on my 3DS, but i can get more for less buying a physical copy at retail. And that's not even counting buying used09/23/2014 - 1:18pm
MonteIanC, The Eshop wallet system only lets you add funds in set denominations and the tax makes sure you no longer have round numbers so you ALWAYS loose money. A $39.99 game for instance requires you to add $50 instead of just $4009/23/2014 - 1:13pm
Matthew Wilsonbut thats just it those sites, even the small ones, sell all over the country.09/23/2014 - 11:12am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician