Much has been written about RapeLay since the controversial Hentai game was discovered for sale on Amazon a few months back.
But while the debate thus far has largely centered around whether Japan, where RapeLay and most similar titles originate, should allow games featuring sexual violence to be published, a recent court ruling suggests that U.S. citizens who possess RapeLay and games of its ilk may be guilty of a federal offense.
Wired's Threat Level blog reports that on Monday the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals refused to consider the appeal of Dwight Whorley, a Virginia man who was convicted in U.S. District Court of possessing actual kiddie porn. But, under what is known as the 2003 Protect Act, prosecutors also charged Whorley with possessing manga which depicted minors having explicit sex. From the relevant section of the Protect Act:
Any person who... knowingly possesses a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that—
(1) (A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
(B) is obscene; or
(2) (A) depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and
(B) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value... shall be subject to the penalties provided...
(c) Nonrequired Element of Offense.— It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exist.
Threat Level also cites a similar conviction against Christopher Handley, a comic book collector who imported sexually explicit manga containing illustrations of child sex abuse and bestiality. Unlike Whorley, Handley possessed no actual child pornography.
So how does this connect to the RapeLay situation? A [NSFW] review of the game posted on Something Awful describes graphic, forced sex with a mother and her two minor daughters, the youngest of whom appears to be about ten years old. Save for the fact that it's interactive, RapeLay is not much different from the type of hardcore manga which earned federal time for Whorley and Handley.
We should note that a single judge on the 4th Circuit dissented from the opinion upholding Whorley's conviction and urged that the case be sent to the U.S. Supreme Court. But for now, at least, owning a copy of RapeLay seems like a risky legal proposition, indeed.




Comments
Re: Is Possessing RapeLay a Federal Crime in the United ...
"Hate campaign" may be a little harsh and undeserved, but I am sometimes surprised that some of the RapeLay articles aren't tagged with one of those "Editorial" thingys.
Re: Is Possessing RapeLay a Federal Crime in the United ...
Yeah, I thought it was a bit harsh too, looks like I snipped that word a split-second before your reply.
It's amusing that Rapelay is NOTHING to do with these court cases, but he uses it as an excuse to bang his tired old drum anyway.
--------------------------------------------------
I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.
Re: Is Possessing RapeLay a Federal Crime in the United ...
That's not how I see it.
To me, using Rapelay as an example is just a way make a very interesting story relevant to this site's subject matter. It’s true that the court cases by themselves go outside the scope of this site’s reporting but the law would appear to include video games.
Andrew Eisen
Re: Is Possessing RapeLay a Federal Crime in the United ...
But the law hasn't been applied to video games yet. He's just picked out the most tenuous of tenuous connections to bang his 'Rapelay is disgusting' drum again.
--------------------------------------------------
I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.
Re: Is Possessing RapeLay a Federal Crime in the United ...
I don't think it's that he's beating his drum, I think it's that he's trying to distance the video game community at large from RapeLay in the eyes of those who peruse this site.
Whoever added non-photographic art to the terms of the law needs to read some more Orwell.
No, Luke, I AM the Walrus
Re: Is Possessing RapeLay a Federal Crime in the United ...
True, the law hasn't been applied to video games yet but I'm happy GP decided not to wait until then because I didn't know about this absurd law before now and was most interested to learn about it.
I also don't see anything in the article suggesting that GP's motivation for writing it was to communicate his personal opinion on the game's content. Especially considering he says nothing along the lines of "Rapelay is disgusting" anywhere in the story.
Andrew Eisen
Re: Is Possessing RapeLay a Federal Crime in the United ...
Yah, in this article Dennis doesn't even mention his opinion of RapeLay: it's as neutral an article as anyone could want.
Re: Is Possessing RapeLay a Federal Crime in the United ...
Fair enough. But beyond dispute, the larger context is clearly that he's no fan of RapeLay. Which is fine. That's his opinion and he's certainly entitled to it. But, having made that opinion abundantly clear, it's hard to fault those like DarkSaber who smell a whiff of bias underlying the seemingly neutral. And I say this while being on record as questioning the fairness of DarkSaber's response.
Re: Is Possessing RapeLay a Federal Crime in the United ...
While I have been unhappy with GP's 'Rapelay is filt!' mantra, I agree with AE here.
This is a law that has been seeing slowly broadening use and as it is being used could easily be applied to a video game. Thought TBH, standard obsenity laws already cover the case since things like rape play videos have already been prosecuted as obsene material.
Re: Is Possessing RapeLay a Federal Crime in the United ...
If it's one thing Rupert Murdoch teaches us, it is that there's a thin line between controlling news media content and banging your own drum. But it's not a new trick. Murdoch stole it from William Randolph Hearst.