Tanya Byron Applauds PEGI Decision

June 19, 2009 -

Dr. Tanya Byron has thrown her support behind the British Government's recent decision to award the U.K.'s game rating chores to PEGI over the BBFC.

MCVUK reports that Byron, who in 2008 completed a review of the role of video games and the Internet in the lives of British children, said:

Video games were the big issue in my review, specifically their classification system. I didn't have time to outline a new classification system entirely, but I did outline principles for how it should look.

My suggestions then went to consultation and the Government have this week made their decision, which is an enhanced PEGI system. My recommendations have been upheld and it's a really great decision which I thoroughly support.


Comments

Re: Tanya Byron Applauds PEGI Decision

Such games can be banned, as I believe that she even included that in her review as I read last year.

However I am thinking that she was thinking more on the lines of games containing Porn.

Yes, they should be banned from commercial stores, but at least allow the games containing Porn to be avaliable on the internet, because that is the only place they can go. And they are not really going to be making much money from it anyone.

 

I believe that any rating system needs to think about two things, the need to protect children and also the need to allow adults to buy what ever they want even though what they buy may not be suitable for children.

Also a rating system itself is not always able to protect kids from material that is not for them, but with parents being aware of the ratings and being parents, they should be the ones who protect their own kids until they grow to the age of 18.

 

Much information from the Byron Review pretty much told me that parents either don't know about the ratings, or that they just don't care. And no matter what you do, there is nothing more you can do other than help those who want to know more.

 

You can even put information on the internet, but that will be useless for those who can't even use the internet.

 

You can try to talk about those issues on the news to help people be aware of the ratings, except various news media companies only care about selling the news and while this information is helpful for parents, it does not really sell the news so it will be forgotten.

 

Lets face it, the real problem lies with the Daily Mail and the News on TV for not giving the parents the accurate information and on some politicians only wanting to score political votes.

 

There is nothing wrong with Videogames or the Industry itself, they are doing their best.

 

TBoneTony

Re: Tanya Byron Applauds PEGI Decision

"Much information from the Byron Review pretty much told me that parents either don't know about the ratings, or that they just don't care."

Well, there is a third option - they know about them but find them unhelpful.  Personally, I find these ratings systems completely unnecessary.  I mean, the whole idea behind parenting is to take personal responsibility for one's kids.  I think too many folks who rely on ratings are trying to avoid their parental responsibilities.

Besides, the ESRB is infamous for in effect banning nudity and sexual content while giving violent content a much easier time.  The ratings system is half-arsed and topsy-turvy, and the ESRB is run by a bunch of prudish knee-jerk reactionaries.  I doubt PEGI is much better.  In my experience I'm better served when I take the time to actually sit down with my kid and play the games she plays so that I know first-hand what she's exposed to.  More often than not, the games that the ESRB has rated above her age level are perfectly innocuous, while those the ESRB says are appropriate for her are way below her intelligence level.

Re: Tanya Byron Applauds PEGI Decision

Here we go about the argument that ratings should be done away with and that people should buy and play the games first before they decide to buy and play the games to see what the content is like. Illogical I know but that's the argument you make.

Re: Tanya Byron Applauds PEGI Decision

Yay the bans can be over turned. :D

Re: Tanya Byron Applauds PEGI Decision

How does she feel about video games still being able to be banned by the VSC??? Oh and if they are banned are the perminitly banned or can it be overturned???

Re: Tanya Byron Applauds PEGI Decision

IIRC, Tanya believed the ability to ban games should remain in law. Bans can still be overturned.

/b

Re: Tanya Byron Applauds PEGI Decision

The idea of the government banning artistic and commercial works would be the only reason I might decide not to move back to England from the USA (which I have always planned).  The US Constitution's support for free expression is a quantum leap from the regressive British system in which works can be banned by governmental fiat.  In most other respects the British system is the equivalent of the American one in terms of freedom and fair access to (and influence over) government, and in some areas it's better, but I think this single issue trumps everything and makes the US a freer nation overall.

In short, for a country to consider itself truly free, it can't allow its government to go around banning artistic and commercial works.

Re: Tanya Byron Applauds PEGI Decision

At least Britain's open about it, not like in America where all different excuses are given. It may be written into the constitution but it doesn't mean much, afterall seperation of state and church is in there but no one follows that one.

Re: Tanya Byron Applauds PEGI Decision

Now I get it. She's happy because they used her ideas apparantly. Not because the right people for the job won it, but because her ideas were involved.

Re: Tanya Byron Applauds PEGI Decision

...why wouldn't she have picked the people she thought were the right people for the job?

/b

Re: Tanya Byron Applauds PEGI Decision

I didn't think her findings were that specific in regards to who she wanted to rate the games.

Re: Tanya Byron Applauds PEGI Decision

I'll say this much in support of Dr. Byron: she ain't bad-looking.

Re: Tanya Byron Applauds PEGI Decision

Heh.  She's got nothing on Patricia Vance, though.

"De minimus non curat lex"

"De minimus non curat lex"

Re: Tanya Byron Applauds PEGI Decision

Oh God!  I'm gonna be sick.

Re: Tanya Byron Applauds PEGI Decision

I'm with you on that one.

But the whole outcome of this thing wasn't a win for videogame publishers. The fact that there's another governmental committee that can override the PEGI rating makes it pretty toothless. 

Re: Tanya Byron Applauds PEGI Decision

Glad her report got soem good result for gaming.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: Tanya Byron Applauds PEGI Decision

It's scary to think one person can have this much influence over other people's ability to speak without prior government approval (or, in this case, that of a third party appointed by the government).

Re: Tanya Byron Applauds PEGI Decision

Has the government been paying that much attention to Byron or her report since it didn't get them the results they wanted?

Re: Tanya Byron Applauds PEGI Decision

Why do you say that? The government is happily going with PEGI it seems.

BBFC != The UK government.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Montetrolls are just at their absolute worst when it comes to women and feminist. You could bet good money that if the developer were male the trolls would be silent and the conversation would actually focus on the journalism.10/18/2014 - 9:18pm
MontePapa: Not the first time we've had a journalism scandals before, but the harassment never got close to this level; the difference with this scandal is that feminists are involved. Without the feminist angle, their would be A LOT less harrassment10/18/2014 - 9:15pm
Papa MidnightMonte: That's honestly rather short-sighted. As has been proven with other persons who have been targeted, if it wasn't Quinn, it would be someone else.10/18/2014 - 6:26pm
AvalongodI think that's part of what gives an esoteric news story like this real life...it taps into a larger narrative about misogyny in society outside of games.10/18/2014 - 3:29pm
Avalongod@Monte, well the trolls made death threats that came to police (and media attention). I think this is tapping into a larger issue outside of games about how women are treated in society (like all the "real rape" stuff during the last election)10/18/2014 - 3:28pm
WonderkarpZippy : Havent tried the PS4 controller. might later.10/18/2014 - 2:37pm
MonteSeirously, If Quinn was not involved and GG was instead about something like the Mordor Marketing contracts, the trolling would have never grown so vile and disgusting. There have been plenty of movements in the past that never sufferred from behavior..10/18/2014 - 1:57pm
MonteWe have seen scandel's before but the trolling has never been as vile as what we see with GG. Trolls usually have such a tiny voice you can barely notice them, but its like moths to a flame whenever femistist are involved.10/18/2014 - 1:53pm
ZippyDSMleeWonderkarp: You might be able to if you had a PS4 controller.10/18/2014 - 1:00pm
MaskedPixelantehttp://store.steampowered.com/app/327940/ Night Dive starts charging for freeware.10/18/2014 - 12:21pm
Matthew Wilsonthe sad thing is there are trolls on both sides of this. people need to stop acting like their side is so pure.10/18/2014 - 12:19pm
MechaTama31So, only speak out on a scandal that hasn't attracted trolls? I wouldn't hold my breath...10/18/2014 - 10:49am
MonteI feel like GG just needs to die. The movement is FAR to tainted by hatred and BS for it to be useful for any conversation. Let GG die, and then rally behind the NEXT gaming journalism scandal, and start the conversation fresh.10/18/2014 - 10:33am
quiknkoldand we dont have a Dovakin to call a cease fire10/17/2014 - 7:37pm
quiknkoldThe whole thing is Futile. Both sides are so buried deep in their trenchs that there isnt a conversation. Its just Finger Pointing, Name Calling, Doxxing, Threats. there needs to be a serious conversation, and GG isnt it.10/17/2014 - 7:37pm
quiknkoldI thought it was a good article. Jeff is right. I feel like GamerGate did destroy its message. I am for Ethics in game journalism, but man. so much hate. and its on both sides. I've seen some awful stuff spewed on twitter. Its a big reason why I exited..10/17/2014 - 7:34pm
Matthew Wilsonwhile he focused on gg, he did call out both sides crap.10/17/2014 - 7:18pm
Papa MidnightThat was a damn good read offered by Jeff Gertsmann.10/17/2014 - 7:17pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.giantbomb.com/articles/letter-from-the-editor-10-17-2014/1100-5049/ deferentially a nice write up.10/17/2014 - 6:44pm
james_fudgeI think Evan killed it. He's a great guy and super smart.10/17/2014 - 6:38pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician