Report: Video Games Good For Kids, Deserve Official Support

Report: Video Games Good For Kids, Deserve Official Support

June 25, 2009

A new report published by the Joan Ganz Clooney Center at Sesame Workshop discusses the potentially positive effects of video games in educating children and promoting their physical well-being.

Game Changer: Investing in Digital Play to Advance Children’s Learning and Health urges educators as well as government and the healthcare industry to look beyond the stereotype of video games as harmful. The report also calls for increased investment in the medium:

All groups committed to the public interest—educators, policymakers, the federal government, industry leaders, philanthropies, universities—should invest resources in learning how to maximize the impact of a potentially powerful phenomenon that can advance both children's learning and health.

Because a large percentage of American youth play video games, increased investment in their positive aspects could reap enormous benefits for the next generation, the report concludes. The authors note, however, that video games are under constant scrutiny due to their perceived negative effects:

Despite their reputation as promoters of violence and mayhem, digital games have in fact been shown to help children gain content and vital foundational and 21st century skills.

While noting that some stakeholders have reservations about investing in video game tech because of the perceived sedentary nature of games and potential links to rising childhood obesity rates, the report notes the popularity of  the Wii and Dance Dance Revolution. Nintendo’s popular console and Konami’s best-selling dance game franchise have helped to alter perceptions about negative physical effects of video games.

The authors also point to a number of well-established examples illustrating the potentially beneficial effects video games could have on the education and health of future American generations:

Digital games are here to stay and offer the country a rare opportunity to leverage children's already established enthusiasm in order to reform education and promote healthy development.

Via: Kotaku

DOCUMENT DUMP: Grab the full Game Changer report here. Grab the executive summary here.

GP: With this article we welcome Doug Buffone to the pages of GamePolitics. Doug, a student at Georgetown, is interning with GP's parent company, the Entertainment Consumers Association.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Re: Report: Video Games Good For Kids, Deserve Official ...

I used to weight 250, did DDR for a year, weighed 175.  Also, my Wii Fit age is 21, which is good for a 23 year old who usually sits around all day and could still stand to lose a few pounds.

 

I'm 5'8" and about 195 lbs.  Not too shabby, if I do say so myself.

 

"That's not ironic. That's justice."

Re: Report: Video Games Good For Kids, Deserve Official ...

I'm 5'8" and weigh 205. I would love to be back down to 165. I have DDR. Maybe I could trick myself into thinking that I am not really exercising but really playing a game.

I hate exercise for the sake of exercise. My physical activities need context in order for me to actually follow through with them.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: Report: Video Games Good For Kids, Deserve Official ...

Im 5'5" and went from 209 to 185 within a year. Wii fit and some real outdoor activies help me lose the weight. Also had some help with Alli.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: Report: Video Games Good For Kids, Deserve Official ...

I'm 47, 5'11" and 190lbs - that's a bit overweight.  Been playing video games and/or in sedentary jobs for nearly 30 years.  You can't exercise yourself fit unless you're eating fit (and with the correct portions) too.  I've seen folks who exercise for an hour a day religiously, but they can't get the weight off because they're massively overeating.  It works the other way too - if you're not exercising you can't eat few enough calories to counteract the lack of exercise.  If you put in more calories than you burn, you're going to gain weight.

That's why exercising or dieting alone can't help you keep weight off.  In order to successfully maintain a healthy weight it has to be a mixture of both.

Re: Report: Video Games Good For Kids, Deserve Official ...

The only problem is that very few people actually play games with "getting fit" as a goal. Most of the time they'll play whatever is most fun, and that's what games are made for.

It's possible that if enough investment is put in, we could start to see more top-sellers also be games that promote physical activity, especially with innovations such as Microsoft's Project Natal. Still, physical activity will always take a back seat to good gameplay, if for no other reason than good gameplay has a better chance to sell. People who want to spend money on physical activity are still more likely to go to a gym instead of buying a video game console and expensive accessories.

We need to find what other positive effects are and capitalize on them all - improved literacy from all the reading (especially in an RPG), improved planning and strategies, the ever-popular hand-eye coordination, etc. You can't really just focus on one, or critics will easily find a way to make it seem insignificant.

Re: Report: Video Games Good For Kids, Deserve Official ...

Video games have never been the problem with public health.  People driving everywhere and not walking is the problem with public heath.  Kids who are into gaming are less likely to be out on the street looking for a social group possilbly in dangerous people.  Instead they can learn social skills in multiplayer games.

There has for a long time been a mentality to blame what is popular with youth for the ills of society.

Re: Report: Video Games Good For Kids, Deserve Official ...

Bingo. Video games are the new Rock and Roll, or even Pool/Billiards depending on how far you go back.

Re: Report: Video Games Good For Kids, Deserve Official ...

Or even books.  At one time that was the new dangerous technology, which resulted in people burning other people at the stake.  At least we don't do that anymore, except maybe in Saudi, and parts of Pakistan.

Re: Report: Video Games Good For Kids, Deserve Official ...

Snooker and billiards tables have a cloth covering the playing surface, which has a nap, a slightly raised surface, which has a direction; it is smoother or 'with thegrain' going from the baulk end (the D end) to the black spot end andcoarser or 'against the grain' the other way round. This is why whencaring for the table, you must always brush from the D to the black spot, to keep the integrity of the nap. Note this is not the case with American pool, where high quality pool cloth is usually made of a nap less weave such as worsted wool, which gives a much faster roll to the balls. The faster or slower a cloth is, affects the amounts of swerve and deflection of the balls. Snooker table cloth traditionally has always had a directional nap, upon which the balls behave differently when rolling against the direction of the nap.

Re: Report: Video Games Good For Kids, Deserve Official ...

Although some dance arcade machines can be really expensive don't forget you can play these things off a ps2! or get yourself a dance pad and a cheap PC off ebay and all you need is a copy of Stepmania - tottalluy free - and you're off and running, its just schools (certainly in the UK) just like an easy ride and to get ripped off!

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 02/09/10 at 01:18pm
Valdearg: I do agree that it shouldn't be legal. That's for sure.
Posted 02/09/10 at 01:16pm
Andrew Eisen: Shouldn't be. Spirit of anti-discrimination laws would seem to include sexual orientation (and eye color). Plus there's always equal protection and such. Never know until you try.
Posted 02/09/10 at 01:14pm
Valdearg: @AE: Doubtful. Again, it's perfectly legal.
Posted 02/09/10 at 01:10pm
Andrew Eisen: Should have sued (unless that wasn't an option given her financial situation or something). Might have won.
Posted 02/09/10 at 01:00pm
Valdearg: Story about a Male to Female TG who was expressly told she wouldn't be given a job because she was TG. Its not the main point of the story, but explicit, perfectly legal discrimination like this exists.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:53pm
Valdearg: Lol, I don't know. It may very well be legal to do so. Though that might able to fall under the "race" restriction, depending on how that point is argued.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:51pm
Valdearg: I don't think they do have any legal recourse. I'll have to dig around, but I seriously believe that if the law doesn't specifically mention Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity, they can still be discriminated against in those 29 states.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:51pm
Andrew Eisen: Eye color isn't covered either but I doubt it would be considered legal to refuse to hire people with green eyes.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:48pm
Andrew Eisen: My explanation is longer than the Shoutbox will allow. Suffice to say that while those who are discriminated against do have legal recourse, anti-discrimination law should specifically cite sexual orientation so that there’s no question about it.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:42pm
Valdearg: "There is no federal law that consistently protects LGBT individuals from employment discrimination; it remains legal in 29 states, and in 38 states to do so based on gender identity or expression." From the Human Rights Campaign.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:40pm
Valdearg: @AE: Why don't you think I'm correct? I know Wiki could be flawed, but as far as it says, its up to date as of June 2009.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:39pm
Andrew Eisen: I don't think you're right but I really don't know and don't have the time to find out. However things actually are, it's very clear how they actually should be.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:34pm
Valdearg: "just because there's no specific state level protection for it, doesn't make discrimination right or legal." I would disagree. If there's no laws against it, it makes it perfectly legal. It's definitely not right, but perfectly legal to do.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:33pm
Valdearg: Meaning in 29 states, private sector discrimination against gays is perfectly legal.. Sickening.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:33pm
Valdearg: 19 states have no protections, and another 10 only have protections for public sector jobs.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:32pm
Andrew Eisen: Well, most businesses have equal rights policies in place and just because there's no specific state level protection for it, doesn't make discrimination right or legal. Still, no argument against adding such protections.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:28pm
Valdearg: More information. Apparently, it's worse than I actually thought.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:28pm
Valdearg: Check the link. Apparently, its more like 20 states that have no protections.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:26pm
Andrew Eisen: In the US? Not that I'm aware of. Sad if true.
Posted 02/09/10 at 12:25pm
Valdearg: @AE: Actually, I think, at least for now, businesses can still discriminate against gays in a few states.. Something like 5 or 8. Its part of why Gay Rights Advocates are in support of the Employee Nondiscrimination Act, or ENDA.
Login or register to post shouts