Canadian Government Launches Public Consultation on Copyright

July 23, 2009 -

In Canada, the government has decided to consult with its citizens on copyright issues. To that end, an official site has been launched.

University of Ottawa law proessor Michael Geist, however, sees both opportunity and threat to average Canadians in the new government initiative:

While Canadians can ensure that the government understands that copyright matters and that a balance is needed, some groups will undoubtedly use the consultation to push for a return of a Canadian DMCA like Bill C-61.

 

The recording industry has already said that bill did not go far enough. That means we could see pressure for a Canadian DMCA, a three-strikes and you're out process, and the extension of the term of copyright to eat into the public domain.

Geist has been an outspoken critic of efforts to push U.S.-style copyright restrictions into the Great White North. To help Canadians stay current on copyright issues, the law prof has launched Speak Out on Copyright and has a related Twitter feed.

Via: boingboing


Comments

Re: Canadian Government Launches Public Consultation on ...

IMO copy right is about preventing illict sales/profit and nothing else, go after the money not the distrobusion, it would create a much smoother playing filed than the absolute "PCisim" that prevents people from talking about works in the open..

 


I am a criminal because I purchase media,I am a criminal because I use media, I am a criminal because I chose to own media..We shall remain criminals until Corporate stay's outside our bedrooms..


http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Canadian Government Launches Public Consultation on ...

Well, your opinion is completely wrong, at least here in the states.  Copyright laws state that the owner of an IP, and anybody the owner says, are the only people allowed to make money on said IP.  That money is made on distribution as well as sale.  Distribution of an IP without the owner's consent is just as illegal as making money, as unauthorized distribution money never gets back to the owner of an IP, as that would be admitting committing a crime.  I believe that the government should go after the money BEFORE the distribution, but saying they should go after it INSTEAD OF distribution is akin to saying "Go after THIS illegal activity, but leave THAT illegal activity alone."

---

Freedom of speech means the freedom to say ANYTHING, so long as it is the truth. This does not exclude anything that might hurt someone's feelings.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: Canadian Government Launches Public Consultation on ...

This'll cement their place place on the US governments corpoarate-sponsored piracy shitlist. They aren't supposed to ask the PUBLIC what they think, heaven's no. They were just supposed to do what the US government (advised by private corporations of course) told them to do!

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: Canadian Government Launches Public Consultation on ...

Yeah, because the US Government really has the power to tell Canada what to do.

---

Freedom of speech means the freedom to say ANYTHING, so long as it is the truth. This does not exclude anything that might hurt someone's feelings.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: Canadian Government Launches Public Consultation on ...

---------   <-- The joke.

    O         <-- Your head.

 

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: Canadian Government Launches Public Consultation on ...

Maybe your comment was just too retarded for me to get.

---

Freedom of speech means the freedom to say ANYTHING, so long as it is the truth. This does not exclude anything that might hurt someone's feelings.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: Canadian Government Launches Public Consultation on ...

Make a trade make pot leagle in the US if canada will make copy right  illegal!

 

er....copy right infringment.... LOL :P


I am a criminal because I purchase media,I am a criminal because I use media, I am a criminal because I chose to own media..We shall remain criminals until Corporate stay's outside our bedrooms..


http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Canadian Government Launches Public Consultation on ...

I am fine with copyright laws, as long as we don't have to have bad rootkits like what Sony did.

Re: Canadian Government Launches Public Consultation on ...

I suggest you read up on ACTA, of which Canada is a part. Canada's copyright laws as of right now are perfectly fine. Any further laws passed will be at the behest of corporations trying to further control what you can do with their product after you've already bought it.

Good for Michael Geist though, he's always seemed to be a pretty standup sort of guy. 

Re: Canadian Government Launches Public Consultation on ...

So, they're going to go out and ask average citizens, many of which like to get things for free regardless of who's getting screwed on the other side, if they think it should be a crime to download music and games without paying for them?  Gee I wonder what the response will be.  Hey, maybe Sweden's new political party, the Piracy Party, could have an outreach to Canada!

Re: Canadian Government Launches Public Consultation on ...

That would be wonderfull...

 

I am a member of Brazillian Pirate Party.

 

criadordejogos.wordpress.com

--- MaurĂ­cio Gomes twitter.com/agfgames

Re: Canadian Government Launches Public Consultation on ...

Thanks for assuming we're all pirates. Look, I don't know how you do things in your country but we're socialists here: we believe corporations SHOULD NOT be allowed to abuse us, but that's exactly what they want to do. Despite what your politicians tell you, (bought and paid for by the various media industries mind you) Canada is not a lawless, barren land of pirates and commies. So we have public health care, social programs that keep people fed with a roof over their heads, and people here believe the consumer actually has rights. What great western nation doesn't have these things?

Oh, wait... could I possibly have forgotten "the greatest nation in the world"? Oh my, I'm sorry if my red tricorne hat offends you Now, go read up on Canada again from non-american sources. We're really not that bad.

Re: Canadian Government Launches Public Consultation on ...

Not Canadians, average citizens, even Americans.  If asked, many people couldn't care less about copyright, and would voice in favor of de-criminalizing downloads.  Do a "public consultation" in any country, and people will usually side with what's free.

My problem isn't with Canadians.  It's with your average net junkie who thinks music and games are magically created from thin air.  But IP theft is ok if you weren't planning to spend money on it in the first place, right?

(disclaimer:  bad attitude not directed at you, just generally pissed off today)

Re: Canadian Government Launches Public Consultation on ...

Regardless if you're a socialist or a capitalist, what we DON'T want it corporatism, which what all the DCMA (which hopefully won't happen in Canada) stuff is.

Re: Canadian Government Launches Public Consultation on ...

Interesting that you're more than willing to label most Canadians pirates.  That's just what the industry shills who are behind DRM do.  I guess it's always best to treat customers as the bad guys when you want to get laws passed that allow you to screw everyone so you can make more profit.

Last I heard, no company ever went out of business due to the activities of software pirates.  They do tend to go out of business when they screw their customers, no matter how many laws they pass to make it legal to do so.

Trust me, the only way DRM will work is if the companies behind it can get a law passed making it illegal NOT to buy games.  Because as soon as DRM gets into every video and computer game, electronic gaming will become a thing of the past.

No one is willing to pay $60+ for a game rental.

Re: Canadian Government Launches Public Consultation on ...

What I'm curious about is when is not allowing people to steal stuff "screwing the customers?"  Don't you have to BUY something to be considered a customer in the first place?  Now, while Arell was a bit harsh, there is an interesting point, that, if left to common people, "piracy" would be made legal, because who would choose to pay for something if they can make it so they could get it for free with little to no effort?

---

Freedom of speech means the freedom to say ANYTHING, so long as it is the truth. This does not exclude anything that might hurt someone's feelings.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: Canadian Government Launches Public Consultation on ...

The majority of society, because sheeple are hard to trend break. It’s just easier to buy it than to done a peg leg and eye patch. And even then if it was easier the consumer driven mentality of modern society would still keep more people buying than trying to save money by not buying.

 


I am a criminal because I purchase media,I am a criminal because I use media, I am a criminal because I chose to own media..We shall remain criminals until Corporate stay's outside our bedrooms..


http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Canadian Government Launches Public Consultation on ...

Yeah, it's easier to purchase legally now, but, give the people the legal choice, they'll go for the free one, especially in this economy.

---

Freedom of speech means the freedom to say ANYTHING, so long as it is the truth. This does not exclude anything that might hurt someone's feelings.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

How do you usually divide up your Humble Bundle payments?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelantehttp://i5.minus.com/iN5o9iu1ON2NG.jpg "It cursed my gear? WHY WOULD IT DO THAT?! THIS GAME IS BUGGED!"04/24/2014 - 9:51pm
Matthew Wilsonthe lose of nn would not be good for us, but it will not be good for verizion/comcast/att in the long run ether.04/24/2014 - 2:16pm
Matthew Wilsonsadly yes. it would take another sopa day to achieve it.04/24/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoI am also confused. Are you saying NN would only become law if Google/Netflix pushed the issue (against their own interests)?04/24/2014 - 2:10pm
E. Zachary KnightMatthew, you are saying a lot of things but I am still unclear on your point. Are you saying that the loss of Net Neutrality will be good in the long run?04/24/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew WilsonOfcourse it does I never said it did not.though over time the death of NN will make backbone providers like Google, level3 and others stronger becouse most isps including the big ones can not provid internet without them. they can peer with smaller isps04/24/2014 - 1:54pm
E. Zachary KnightMatthew, and that still plays in Google's favor over their smaller rivals who don't have the muscle to stand up to ISPs.04/24/2014 - 1:45pm
Matthew Wilsongoogle wont pay becouse they control a large part of the backbone that all isps depend on. if verizon blocks their data, google does the same. the effect is Verizon loses access to 40% of the internet, and can not serve some areas at all.04/24/2014 - 1:14pm
Neenekolack of NN is in google and netflix interest. It is another tool for squeezing out smaller companies since they can afford to 'play'04/24/2014 - 12:57pm
Matthew WilsonI have said it before net nutrality will not be made in to law until Google or Netflix is blocked, or they do what they did for sopa and pull their sites down in protest.04/23/2014 - 8:02pm
Andrew EisenGee, I guess putting a former cable industry lobbyist as the Chairman of the FCC wasn't that great of an idea. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/24/technology/fcc-new-net-neutrality-rules.html?_r=204/23/2014 - 7:26pm
Andrew EisenIanC - I assume what he's getting at is the fact that once PS3/360 development ceases, there will be no more "For Everything But Wii U" games.04/23/2014 - 5:49pm
Andrew EisenMatthew - Yes, obviously developers will eventually move on from the PS3 and 360 but the phrase will continue to mean exactly what it means.04/23/2014 - 5:45pm
IanCAnd how does that equal his annoying phrase being meaningless?04/23/2014 - 5:09pm
Matthew Wilson@Andrew Eisen the phrase everything but wiiu will be meaningless afer this year becouse devs will drop 360/ps3 support.04/23/2014 - 4:43pm
Andrew EisenFor Everything But... 360? Huh, not many games can claim that title. Only three others that I know of.04/23/2014 - 3:45pm
MaskedPixelantehttp://www.joystiq.com/2014/04/23/another-world-rated-for-current-consoles-handhelds-in-germany/ Another World fulfills legal obligations of being on every gaming system under the sun.04/23/2014 - 12:34pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/steam-gauge-do-strong-reviews-lead-to-stronger-sales-on-steam/?comments=1 Here is another data driven article using sales data from steam to figure out if reviews effect sales. It is stats heavy like the last one.04/23/2014 - 11:33am
Andrew EisenI love RPGs but I didn't much care for Tales of Symphonia. I didn't bother with its sequel.04/23/2014 - 11:21am
InfophileIt had great RPGs because MS wanted to use them to break into Japan. (Which had the side-effect of screwing NA PS3 owners out of Tales of Vesperia. No, I'm not bitter, why do you ask?)04/23/2014 - 10:52am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician