Happy Birthday ESRB: Game Biz Unveiled Rating System to Congress 15 Years Ago

July 29, 2009 -

It was 15 years ago today that the video game industry introduced the ESRB rating system to Congress, reports Wired's This Day in Tech blog.

The move came in the wake of Congressional criticism of game violence, particularly the original Mortal Kombat, which seems laughably tame by today's standards. Wired's Chris Kohler writes:

The [Congressional] hearings were largely a response to the popularity of... Mortal Kombat...

Nintendo chairman Howard Lincoln and Sega vice president Bill White took potshots at each other during the hearing. Lincoln said that the Sega CD game Night Trap, another photorealistic, occasionally violent game that the company had rated MA-17, “simply has no place in our society” and testified that “small children” had bought it.

Meanwhile, White’s position was that Sega was more responsible than Nintendo, because his company had [its own] rating system in place...  [Connecticut Sen. Joe] Lieberman would later express his shock that the two executives went after each other with such ferocity.

Lieberman's threat to regulate game content via legislation persuaded the game biz to get its act together. The IDSA (now known as the ESA) was formed and quickly set up the ESRB, which went into operation on September 1st, 1994.

Comments

Re: Happy Birthday ESRB: Game Biz Unveiled Rating System to ...

"Lieberman's threat to regulate game content via legislation persuaded the game biz to get its act together."

If by "get its act together" you mean "do exactly what the government wanted them to do while getting to pretend it was all voluntary", then yeah... the industry got its act together. The music industry, too, was once similarly threatened, and so with the movie industry, and the comic book industry. They all caved to pressure from congress. It's regulation through intimidation.

I wonder what's the point of having constitutionally protected speech when the industries that produce such speech will bend over backwards at any threat of regulation.

I wish more industries had the backbone to tell congress to fuck off just like webmasters did back when congress tried to regulate internet content (Communications Decency Act).

Re: Happy Birthday ESRB: Game Biz Unveiled Rating System to ...

The worst offenders when it comes to willingly bending over are broadcast radio and television. I suspect it has something to with the fact that they need their FCC licenses in order to keep on broadcasting. 

Re: Happy Birthday ESRB: Game Biz Unveiled Rating System to ...

So part of the ESRB's creation was due to complete falsehoods about Night Trap perpretraded by completely ignorant politicians?

Yeah, yet another reason why the ESRB needs to crawl away and die.

-Ultimately what will do in mankind is a person's fear of their own freedom-

Re: Happy Birthday ESRB: Game Biz Unveiled Rating System to ...

We need to get a gamer into the Senate and just have him start a filibuster in which he brings in a giant screen and a PS3 and just plays games in front of the Senate and talks them through them.

Re: Happy Birthday ESRB: Game Biz Unveiled Rating System to ...

I'd rather them bring an Xbox 360 or a PC; For only one reason, Mass Effect isn't on the PS3 so we can't show them the hot naked tits everywhere lesbian action.

----
Papa Midnight
http://www.thesupersoldiers.com

----
Papa Midnight

Re: Happy Birthday ESRB: Game Biz Unveiled Rating System to ...

The people who attacked this game are idiots

You run out of bullets not enemies

Never underestimate the power of idiots in large amounts.

Re: Happy Birthday ESRB: Game Biz Unveiled Rating System to ...

Those who condemned Night Trap for its violence would have been completely humiliated had they ever bothered to take a look at it.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Happy Birthday ESRB: Game Biz Unveiled Rating System to ...

No one actually EVER looks at it. They just jump on the bandwagon. News organizations have done this for years.

----
Papa Midnight
http://www.thesupersoldiers.com

----
Papa Midnight

Re: Happy Birthday ESRB: Game Biz Unveiled Rating System to ...

And now there are people who would like to eliminate it and replace it with a far more restrictive system

Re: Happy Birthday ESRB: Game Biz Unveiled Rating System to ...

I assume that this was when the infamous "promise to Congress" which forever contractually bound the manufacturers and the ESRB to an entirely voluntary rating system was made.

 

Re: Happy Birthday ESRB: Game Biz Unveiled Rating System to ...

IIRC, Lieberman testified that the goal of Night Trap was to trap the women in the game and mutilate them, wich is complete BS.

The goal was to prevent that.

An all too typical case of politicians failing to do any homework and talking out of their butts on topics they are completely ignorant of.

------ Ago. Perceptum. Teneo.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Is King right? Should all games adopt the free-to-play model?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelanteNumber 3: Night Dive was brought to the attention of the public by a massive game recovery, and yet most of their released catalogue consists of games that other people did the hard work of getting re-released.04/17/2014 - 8:46pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 2: If Humongous Entertainment wanted their stuff on Steam, why didn't they talk to their parent company, which does have a number of games published on Steam?04/17/2014 - 8:45pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 1: When Night Dive spent the better part of a year teasing the return of true classics, having their big content dump be edutainment is kind of a kick in the stomach.04/17/2014 - 8:44pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.giantbomb.com/articles/jeff-gerstmann-heads-to-new-york-takes-questions/1100-4900/ He talks about the future games press and the games industry. It is worth your time even though it is a bit long, and stay for the QA. There are some good QA04/17/2014 - 5:28pm
IanCErm so they shouldn't sell edutainment at all? Why?04/17/2014 - 4:42pm
MaskedPixelanteNot that linkable, go onto Steam and there's stuff like Pajama Sam on the front-page, courtesy of Night Dive.04/17/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOkay, again, please, please, PLEASE get in a habit of linking to whatever you're talking about.04/17/2014 - 4:05pm
MaskedPixelanteAnother round of Night Dive teasing and promising turns out to be stupid edutainment games. Thanks for wasting all our time, guys. See you never.04/17/2014 - 3:44pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the consequences were not only foreseeable, but very likely. anyone who understood supply demand curvs knew that was going to happen. SF has been a econ/trade hub for the last hundred years.04/17/2014 - 2:45pm
Andrew EisenMixedPixelante - Would you like to expand on that?04/17/2014 - 2:43pm
MaskedPixelanteWell, I am officially done with Night Dive Studios. Unless they can bring something worthwhile back, I'm never buying another game from them.04/17/2014 - 2:29pm
PHX Corphttp://www.msnbc.com/ronan-farrow/watch/video-games-continue-to-break-the-mold-229561923638 Ronan Farrow Daily on Video games breaking the mold04/17/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoAh yes, because by building something nice they were just asking for people to come push them out. Consequences are protested all the time when other people are implementing them.04/17/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew Wilsonok than they should not protest when the consequences of that choice occur.04/17/2014 - 1:06pm
NeenekoIf people want tall buildings, plenty of other cities with them. Part of freedom and markets is communities deciding what they do and do not want built in their collective space.04/17/2014 - 12:55pm
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician