Litigation Support Expert Comments on NCAA Video Game Lawsuits

August 3, 2009 -

As GamePolitics has reported, former college athletes have filed a trio of lawsuits this year alleging that the NCAA and video game publisher Electronic Arts profited from the unlicensed use of their images in video games based on college football and basketball.

If successful, the suits have the potential to change the way the sports licensing game is played. What are the chances that will happen?

IGN has posted an interview with litigation support/public relations expert Jason Maloni, whose firm represents Roger Clemens, among others. Maloni comments on the implications of the lawsuits for the NCAA and EA:

Technology is a huge part of it. When I was growing up playing Space Invaders, you couldn't be one of the characters in the game. But with sports games, it's become such a huge phenomenon to assume the identity of your favorite athlete, and it only increases the bond people have with both the game and the team. That's why the pro and collegiate ranks love this type of branding...

 

I expect the impact for EA Sports will be minimal. The company is still going to produce games and derive a profit. The NCAA and large institutions stand to lose a small part of their current revenue... however, they are making [money] hand over fist. I don't think compensating these athletes in some way at the end of the day going to put a crimp in their budgets. College sports are a big business and it will remain a big business...

Like a lot of laws, it takes someone to stand up and say this isn't right. You might also be seeing a growing sympathy for former athletes. Not everyone goes on to the pros or gets mega contracts. I think student athletes are seeing what former pro athletes have done recently seeking restitution against the NFL for the use of their images.

By "pro athletes," Maloni is referring to the recent $26.25 million settlement that a group of retired NFL players reached with the former union over the unlicensed use of their images in EA's best-selling Madden franchise.


Comments

Re: Litigation Support Expert Comments on NCAA Video Game ...

Seems to me like a bunch of spoiled rich folks on both sides of this issue squabbling about money.  Why isn't it a reality TV show already?

Re: Litigation Support Expert Comments on NCAA Video Game ...

Uhh, they don't all get scholarships. What was the point of all that blabbering? men of a certain age season 1 episode 3 | scrubs season 9 episode 5
Garry Wertu

Re: Litigation Support Expert Comments on NCAA Video Game ...

Because the one side doesn't exist of just spoiled rich folks. See, this is the problem, people don't realize what this issue is about and just assume everyone who does a lawsuit for a lot of money is wrong and should shut up.

Re: Litigation Support Expert Comments on NCAA Video Game ...

I'm not saying they're spoiled rich folk. I'm saying that they gave up their right to compensation when they signed as an amateur to go to the college and play football. The students CAN'T profit from the sales of the game or they would not be amateurs anymore. It's the SCHOOLS and the National Collegiate Athletic ASSOCATION who are involved in the contract with EA. The schools make the money. The athletes benefit through exposure, not cold hard cash.

Re: Litigation Support Expert Comments on NCAA Video Game ...

I don't see why they should get compensation. They get scholarships. They are available for the draft. By playing for the NCAA, they stand to make significant salaries, not just if they go pro, but there are other sports and sportscasting jobs available to them because of the extra visibility they get as players.

Do all of the students get a check when a game is televised? Of course not. And yet it's their likenesses and their performances that are selling ALL of that commercial time.

They are amateurs who signed an agreement with an organization. That organization has every right to market itself, and the students basically agreed to that when they agreed to play.

When someone plays college football, they aren't fighting for their own success as much as they are the success of their ol' alma mater. If their team as a whole, and their likenesses as individuals contribute to the financial success of the NCAA and their own individual college... it's total bullshit to say "Yeah, but what's in it for me?" How about a free university education, ya schmucks?

Re: Litigation Support Expert Comments on NCAA Video Game ...

Uhh, they don't all get scholarships. What was the point of all that blabbering?

Re: Litigation Support Expert Comments on NCAA Video Game ...

The ones on the games tend to.

 


Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! Stop supporting big media and furthering the criminalization of consumers!! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Litigation Support Expert Comments on NCAA Video Game ...

And still I do not understand why they can't equally diviy out a % of what a title makes to the players, and set aside money to the student players until they get out of collage.... sirously.....someone needs to take the leagues to court because they are raping the players, oh and FYI not all players make millions a year.

 


Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! Stop supporting big media and furthering the criminalization of consumers!! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Litigation Support Expert Comments on NCAA Video Game ...

How are they going to compensate NCAA players anyway? 

Re: Litigation Support Expert Comments on NCAA Video Game ...

Is it really going to be that much to EA? The end result will be a pay out and them attempting to be more careful with real athletes in their games in future.

Didn't I read that each Madden and FIFA makes a ridiculous amount of money (Hundreds of millions?)? That no doubt explains why it's not hard to resist pumping out constant sequels...

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Is King right? Should all games adopt the free-to-play model?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelanteNumber 3: Night Dive was brought to the attention of the public by a massive game recovery, and yet most of their released catalogue consists of games that other people did the hard work of getting re-released.04/17/2014 - 8:46pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 2: If Humongous Entertainment wanted their stuff on Steam, why didn't they talk to their parent company, which does have a number of games published on Steam?04/17/2014 - 8:45pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 1: When Night Dive spent the better part of a year teasing the return of true classics, having their big content dump be edutainment is kind of a kick in the stomach.04/17/2014 - 8:44pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.giantbomb.com/articles/jeff-gerstmann-heads-to-new-york-takes-questions/1100-4900/ He talks about the future games press and the games industry. It is worth your time even though it is a bit long, and stay for the QA. There are some good QA04/17/2014 - 5:28pm
IanCErm so they shouldn't sell edutainment at all? Why?04/17/2014 - 4:42pm
MaskedPixelanteNot that linkable, go onto Steam and there's stuff like Pajama Sam on the front-page, courtesy of Night Dive.04/17/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOkay, again, please, please, PLEASE get in a habit of linking to whatever you're talking about.04/17/2014 - 4:05pm
MaskedPixelanteAnother round of Night Dive teasing and promising turns out to be stupid edutainment games. Thanks for wasting all our time, guys. See you never.04/17/2014 - 3:44pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the consequences were not only foreseeable, but very likely. anyone who understood supply demand curvs knew that was going to happen. SF has been a econ/trade hub for the last hundred years.04/17/2014 - 2:45pm
Andrew EisenMixedPixelante - Would you like to expand on that?04/17/2014 - 2:43pm
MaskedPixelanteWell, I am officially done with Night Dive Studios. Unless they can bring something worthwhile back, I'm never buying another game from them.04/17/2014 - 2:29pm
PHX Corphttp://www.msnbc.com/ronan-farrow/watch/video-games-continue-to-break-the-mold-229561923638 Ronan Farrow Daily on Video games breaking the mold04/17/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoAh yes, because by building something nice they were just asking for people to come push them out. Consequences are protested all the time when other people are implementing them.04/17/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew Wilsonok than they should not protest when the consequences of that choice occur.04/17/2014 - 1:06pm
NeenekoIf people want tall buildings, plenty of other cities with them. Part of freedom and markets is communities deciding what they do and do not want built in their collective space.04/17/2014 - 12:55pm
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician