Litigation Support Expert Comments on NCAA Video Game Lawsuits

August 3, 2009 -

As GamePolitics has reported, former college athletes have filed a trio of lawsuits this year alleging that the NCAA and video game publisher Electronic Arts profited from the unlicensed use of their images in video games based on college football and basketball.

If successful, the suits have the potential to change the way the sports licensing game is played. What are the chances that will happen?

IGN has posted an interview with litigation support/public relations expert Jason Maloni, whose firm represents Roger Clemens, among others. Maloni comments on the implications of the lawsuits for the NCAA and EA:

Technology is a huge part of it. When I was growing up playing Space Invaders, you couldn't be one of the characters in the game. But with sports games, it's become such a huge phenomenon to assume the identity of your favorite athlete, and it only increases the bond people have with both the game and the team. That's why the pro and collegiate ranks love this type of branding...

 

I expect the impact for EA Sports will be minimal. The company is still going to produce games and derive a profit. The NCAA and large institutions stand to lose a small part of their current revenue... however, they are making [money] hand over fist. I don't think compensating these athletes in some way at the end of the day going to put a crimp in their budgets. College sports are a big business and it will remain a big business...

Like a lot of laws, it takes someone to stand up and say this isn't right. You might also be seeing a growing sympathy for former athletes. Not everyone goes on to the pros or gets mega contracts. I think student athletes are seeing what former pro athletes have done recently seeking restitution against the NFL for the use of their images.

By "pro athletes," Maloni is referring to the recent $26.25 million settlement that a group of retired NFL players reached with the former union over the unlicensed use of their images in EA's best-selling Madden franchise.


Comments

Re: Litigation Support Expert Comments on NCAA Video Game ...

Seems to me like a bunch of spoiled rich folks on both sides of this issue squabbling about money.  Why isn't it a reality TV show already?

Re: Litigation Support Expert Comments on NCAA Video Game ...

Uhh, they don't all get scholarships. What was the point of all that blabbering? men of a certain age season 1 episode 3 | scrubs season 9 episode 5
Garry Wertu

Re: Litigation Support Expert Comments on NCAA Video Game ...

Because the one side doesn't exist of just spoiled rich folks. See, this is the problem, people don't realize what this issue is about and just assume everyone who does a lawsuit for a lot of money is wrong and should shut up.

Re: Litigation Support Expert Comments on NCAA Video Game ...

I'm not saying they're spoiled rich folk. I'm saying that they gave up their right to compensation when they signed as an amateur to go to the college and play football. The students CAN'T profit from the sales of the game or they would not be amateurs anymore. It's the SCHOOLS and the National Collegiate Athletic ASSOCATION who are involved in the contract with EA. The schools make the money. The athletes benefit through exposure, not cold hard cash.

Re: Litigation Support Expert Comments on NCAA Video Game ...

I don't see why they should get compensation. They get scholarships. They are available for the draft. By playing for the NCAA, they stand to make significant salaries, not just if they go pro, but there are other sports and sportscasting jobs available to them because of the extra visibility they get as players.

Do all of the students get a check when a game is televised? Of course not. And yet it's their likenesses and their performances that are selling ALL of that commercial time.

They are amateurs who signed an agreement with an organization. That organization has every right to market itself, and the students basically agreed to that when they agreed to play.

When someone plays college football, they aren't fighting for their own success as much as they are the success of their ol' alma mater. If their team as a whole, and their likenesses as individuals contribute to the financial success of the NCAA and their own individual college... it's total bullshit to say "Yeah, but what's in it for me?" How about a free university education, ya schmucks?

Re: Litigation Support Expert Comments on NCAA Video Game ...

Uhh, they don't all get scholarships. What was the point of all that blabbering?

Re: Litigation Support Expert Comments on NCAA Video Game ...

The ones on the games tend to.

 


Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! Stop supporting big media and furthering the criminalization of consumers!! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Litigation Support Expert Comments on NCAA Video Game ...

And still I do not understand why they can't equally diviy out a % of what a title makes to the players, and set aside money to the student players until they get out of collage.... sirously.....someone needs to take the leagues to court because they are raping the players, oh and FYI not all players make millions a year.

 


Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! Stop supporting big media and furthering the criminalization of consumers!! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Litigation Support Expert Comments on NCAA Video Game ...

How are they going to compensate NCAA players anyway? 

Re: Litigation Support Expert Comments on NCAA Video Game ...

Is it really going to be that much to EA? The end result will be a pay out and them attempting to be more careful with real athletes in their games in future.

Didn't I read that each Madden and FIFA makes a ridiculous amount of money (Hundreds of millions?)? That no doubt explains why it's not hard to resist pumping out constant sequels...

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Kronodebate. Becaus apparently people who only post on Reddit are supposed to police twitter before they're allowed to question anything about the people involved.09/18/2014 - 10:40pm
KronoI highly doubt many, if any are using journalistic integrity as a cover for harassment. The people harassing are essentially trolls. They aren't interested in subtle. More often it's othe other way around. People use "but X is being harassed" to shut down09/18/2014 - 10:38pm
Andrew EisenAnd exacerbating everything is the fact that all the cries of ethics violations have been obnoxious and easily proven false.09/18/2014 - 8:59pm
Andrew EisenProblem is, I would imagine, the sheer number of people who are using journalistic integrity as a cover for their harassing actions or only bringing it up on the false pretense of journalistic integrity.09/18/2014 - 8:47pm
Andrew EisenHaving said that, I can certainly see how one would be frustrated if they truly just wanted to talk about journalistic integrity and someone said they were one of the people harassing Sarkeesian, Quinn and others (though I've seen no examples of that).09/18/2014 - 8:44pm
KronoThat's been the common refrain, that talk of journalism ethics is just an excuse to harass people.09/18/2014 - 8:44pm
KronoLines like "like a partial compromise with the howling trolls who’ve latched onto ‘ethics’ as the latest flag in their onslaught against evolution and inclusion." are taring everyone questioning the ethics as a harasser.09/18/2014 - 8:43pm
Andrew EisenKrono - Except, none of the articles were talking about gamers complaining about journalist ethics, let alone called them white male misogynists. They were talking about the gamers who were harassing others.09/18/2014 - 8:36pm
Kronomakes plenty of sense. It's rather hard to dismiss someone as a white guy running a sock puppet when they've posted proof they're a woman, or black, or another minority.09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronothat any critics of journalists were white guys that hated women, and could be dismissed as such. It seems to have helped some. It's kind of difficult to maintain the white guy narrative in the face of a bunch of women and non-white guys. So the tag09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronothat, someone vented on a #gamergate 4chan thread about being dismissed like that. The suggestion they got in return was to organize their own hashtag in response, with #NotYourShield being suggested. Thus the tag came into use to combat the undercurrent09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronomuch more general problem. And while several of the articles were fairly tame, they spured a bunch of people to dismiss any critics of the journalism involved as misogynistic men. Usually with insults aimed at the geek stereotype. After about a week of09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Andrew EisenSleaker - Not sure what that has to do with anything but yeah, the gender percentages differ depending on how the study defines what a gamer is.09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
KronoThe rhetoric pushed by the spearheading articles that the "gamers" complaining about journalist ethics were just angry white male misogynists, insulted a lot of people that were previously fairly neutral. It made it go from a Kotaku problem, to a09/18/2014 - 8:31pm
Krono@Andrew I'm not surprised overlap exists. I expect much of it is a rush to jump on the bandwagon, either by reporting on the original articles, or rushing out their own. The point is that was a major flashpoint, much bigger than the reddit mass deletion.09/18/2014 - 8:31pm
Sleaker@AE - well the gamer trend was described with stats on Factual Femenist. Only 1 in 7 males plays games 20+ hrs going into college vs 1 in 40 females. So gaming is definitely still male dominated despite fake stats trying to say otherwise.09/18/2014 - 8:30pm
Craig R.Do conspiracies ever make sense? The fact that people are now having to defend themselves against nutjob websites like Breitbart.com shows how far down into the rabbit hole we've all been forcibly dragged.09/18/2014 - 7:05pm
Michael ChandraBut when the mountain obviously exists...09/18/2014 - 5:49pm
Michael ChandraMind you, if someone makes a mountain out of a molehill with a secret agenda as motive, it'd be fine.09/18/2014 - 5:48pm
Andrew EisenOkay, so I guess I'm not making sense of #notyourshield because it doesn't make any sense.09/18/2014 - 5:28pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician