Under New Rules, Obama Avatars (and lots of other stuff) Will Disappear from Second Life

August 12, 2009 -

Recently, GamePolitics reported on the availability of Barack and Michelle Obama avatars for use in Second Life.

But it seems that those virtual depictions of the President and the First Lady are destined to have short careers.

New World Notes reports that, beginning next month, SL publisher Linden Lab will implement strict new rules on the sale of real-world products and brands - including depictions of actual celebrities. Barack Obama and Angelina Jolie avatars are specifically referenced as examples of prohibited content in the new Linden Lab guidelines.

Readers may recall that stun gun manufacturer TASER, Inc. brought a trademark lawsuit against Linden earlier this year over virtual copies of its weapon which were being sold by third-party content creators for use in Second Life. The suit was later dropped, but the new SL guidelines are almost certainly a response to such legal concerns.

As New World Notes mentions, enforcing the new policy may be problematic for Linden Lab:

While I'm not a lawyer, I would think avatar imitations of celebrities, especially political figures, would fall under the parody safe harbor of fair use. In the real world, you can still buy an unauthorized Barack Obama mask for Halloween. Not so in Second Life very soon...

 

The biggest challenge to this policy, in any case, is likely to be the SL content creation community itself, who often do reference the real world in their works, but are still proprietary about their products.


Comments

Re: Under New Rules, Obama Avatars (and lots of other ...

so to go around this rule would be to make bootleg knock off parody versions of the items and avatars and the names.

Re: Under New Rules, Obama Avatars (and lots of other ...

 If it's Bush and your trying to make him a Nazi I bet it's allowed but dare you not showth the Messiah!

Re: Under New Rules, Obama Avatars (and lots of other ...

I think this has more to do with the fact that second life has a lot of creepy pervs that would love to have a virtual Obama screwing some furry

and considering the mass effect fiasco I could easily see FOX news running a story on Obama's "Secret beastiality" or something especially considering the political leanings of the network

I think this could be for preventing stuff like that

There have always been motherf*ckers, there will always be motherf*ckers, but what we can't do is let them control our motherf*cking lives. -John Oliver, December 1st, 2008

There have always been motherf*ckers, there will always be motherf*ckers, but what we can't do is let them control our motherf*cking lives. -John Oliver, December 1st, 2008

Re: Under New Rules, Obama Avatars (and lots of other ...

I think the big issue here is people are making the av's and such and selling them, if they were tradeing them for free there would be more room for fair use and parody claims.


Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! Stop supporting big media and furthering the criminalization of consumers!! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Under New Rules, Obama Avatars (and lots of other ...

I can conceive of nothing wrong with offering copyrighted, trademarked, or otherwise branded items as long as an unathorized source is getting paid. Receiving payment for the trademark or work of others without license seems a bit shady though.

So NO pre-existing copyright or trademark may be used regardless of licensed monetary commission?

Re: Under New Rules, Obama Avatars (and lots of other ...

I take it you meant "authorized source?"

Re: Under New Rules, Obama Avatars (and lots of other ...

I believe celebrities can copyright their image but politician's visages are fair game as, to my knowledge, they can't be copyrighted or protected by their owners. If this were not the case you'd have politicians doing it to 'protect' their image from political cartoons that display them in a less-than-favourible light.

I don't think the rules will be as strict as LL are suggesting due to the fact that a pretty significant portion of their user base would be against it.

Re: Under New Rules, Obama Avatars (and lots of other ...

what about Jack Thompson? didn't he try to stop a Photoshop contest about him?

岩「…Where do masochists go when they die?」

岩「…I can see why Hasselbeck's worried about fake guns killing fake people. afterall, she's a fake journalist on a fake news channel」

Re: Under New Rules, Obama Avatars (and lots of other ...

I know he tried to sue Midway because someone made him in a Mortal Kombat game, and he tried to sue a buddy icon website because there was a character in a suit gettign injured that vaguely resembled him.

Re: Under New Rules, Obama Avatars (and lots of other ...

Everyone has the sole right to exploit their image and likeness unless they've licensed that right to another or others. Political cartoons are an excluded "fair use," usually as either satire or parody or both. 

Re: Under New Rules, Obama Avatars (and lots of other ...

What about politicians? I doubt all the crappy Obama merchandise that's available for sale is in any way licensed from Obama.

 

Re: Under New Rules, Obama Avatars (and lots of other ...

If it isn't falling under the fair use doctrine, then I assume there's some calculation that a sitting politician, particularly one with as high a profile as the POTUSA, isn't going to spend their time tracking down and suing unauthorized users of their image and likeness. Best that I know, the mere fact of holding elected office doesn't negate one's rights to the use of their image and likeness.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Who's responsible for crappy Netflix performance on Verizon?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilson@pm I doubt it. Google seems to be distancing themselves from G+07/25/2014 - 9:31pm
Papa MidnightGoogle+ Integration is coming to Twitch!07/25/2014 - 8:41pm
MaskedPixelanteThis whole Twitch thing just reeks of Google saying "You thought you could get away from us and our policies. That's adorable."07/25/2014 - 2:52pm
Sleaker@james_fudge - hopefully that's the case, but I wont hold my breath for it to happen.07/25/2014 - 1:08pm
SleakerUpdate on crytek situation is a bit ambiguous, but I'm glad they finally said something: http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2014-07-25-crytek-addresses-financial-situation07/25/2014 - 1:07pm
E. Zachary KnightMan Atlas, Why do you not want me to have any money? Why? http://www.atlus.com/tears2/07/25/2014 - 12:06pm
Matthew WilsonI agree with that07/25/2014 - 10:45am
james_fudgeI think Twitch will have more of an impact on how YouTube/Google Plus work than the other way around.07/25/2014 - 10:22am
IanCWelp, twitch is going to suck now. Thanks google.07/25/2014 - 6:30am
Sleaker@MP - Looked up hitbox, thanks.07/24/2014 - 9:40pm
Matthew WilsonI agree, but to me given other known alternatives google seems to the the best option.07/24/2014 - 6:30pm
Andrew EisenTo be clear, I have no problem with Google buying it, I'm just concerned it will make a slew of objectively, quantifiably bad changes to Twitch just as it's done with YouTube over the years.07/24/2014 - 6:28pm
Matthew WilsonI doubt yahoo has the resources to pull it off, and I not just talking about money.07/24/2014 - 6:15pm
SleakerI wouldn't have minded a Yahoo purchase, probably would have been a better deal than Tumblr seeing as they paid the same for it...07/24/2014 - 6:13pm
MaskedPixelanteIt's the golden age of Hitbox, I guess.07/24/2014 - 6:08pm
Matthew Wilsonagain twitch was going to get bought. It was just who was going to buy it . Twitch was not even being able to handle the demand, so hey needed a company with allot of infrastructure to help them. I can understand why you would not want Google to buy it .07/24/2014 - 5:49pm
Andrew Eisen"Google is better than MS or Amazon" Wow. Google, as I mentioned earlier, progressively makes almost everything worse and yet there are still two lesser options. Again, wow!07/24/2014 - 5:43pm
Andrew EisenI don't know. MS, in my experience, is about 50/50 on its products. It's either fine or it's unusable crap. Amazon, well... I've never had a problem buying anything from them but I don't use any of their products or services so I couldn't really say.07/24/2014 - 5:42pm
Matthew WilsonGoogle is better than MS or Amazon.07/24/2014 - 5:33pm
Sleaker@AE - I've never seen youtube as a great portal to interact with people from a comment perspective. like ever. The whole interface doesn't really promote that.07/24/2014 - 5:28pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician