Video Camera Bowls Over Cops Following Bust

September 22, 2009 -

Playing Wii Sports in a suspected drug house following a raid is probably not the best way for police officers to ingratiate themselves with their superiors, especially if the house, as part of the investigation, was previously wired with a video camera.

The Associated Press reports that police in a Polk County, Florida were caught doing exactly that however, with one participant “furiously jumping up and down in celebration” while playing Wii Bowling. Another detective was also witnessed taking “several breaks” from cataloging evidence in order to bowl a few frames.

Some of the officers “could be disciplined.”

Is this better or worse than playing Solitaire while in session?


Comments

Re: Video Camera Bowls Over Cops Following Bust

Is this better or worse than playing Solitaire while in session?

 

I find this worser then playing Solitaire while on the job.  The cops are playing Wii games at a suspect house.  That's kinda being lazy and slacking on the job, and you're kinda messing up the crime scene.  If the cop wanted to play video game, they should do it when they're not working or doing their job instead of using a criminal's video game system. 

 

Re: Video Camera Bowls Over Cops Following Bust

While I personally think that slacking off while on the job is wrong no matter what the job is, I'm not *too* upset about this particular waste of tax dollars. As long as the investigation was already done and arrests made, then it shouldn't be able to invalidate the evidence. It could be grounds for suing the police station for stealing/illegally using property, but I don't think that it would invalidate other evidence that was rightfully found with the warrent.

Then again, I don't think that using drugs or selling drugs (especially light drugs like weed) should be illegal. So I'm almost tempted to want the evidence to be thrown out.

As for the punishment, depending on the circumstances I'd say a good reprimand would be in order, but nothing drastic. Obviously a closer eye should be kept on how cops spend their on-the-hour time, but if they weren't in the process of arresting/chasing a criminal, I don't mind too much. If I was the boss I would, but I don't find it a misuse of power like what many cops have.

-If an apple a day keeps the doctor away....what happens when a doctor eats an apple?-

-Optimum est pati quod emendare non possis-It is best to endure what you cannot change-

Re: Video Camera Bowls Over Cops Following Bust

crack should stay illegal.

Re: Video Camera Bowls Over Cops Following Bust

The officers will get disciplined (And rightly so, though nothing as strong as them losing their jobs) and everyone will move.

Re: Video Camera Bowls Over Cops Following Bust

They'll probably get a reprimand from their boss about staying focused while on the job.

And then asked if they know where they still sell Wiis. :3

Re: Video Camera Bowls Over Cops Following Bust

Yep. At the most, a few days on the beach.  But most likely a Reprimand.

Some officers got caught playing the inmates pong/pacman/frogger games in their cells a while ago where I work.  They just got an ass chewing. LOL.

Re: Video Camera Bowls Over Cops Following Bust

Worse, because playing solitaire while in session will not enable a criminal's lawyer to get him off the hook.

Re: Video Camera Bowls Over Cops Following Bust

I wrote about this on my blog when Gamespot posted it.  Are we sure it's real?  The video quality seems sketchy.

M. Carusi
Capitol Gaming
http://capitolgaming.blogspot.com

Re: Video Camera Bowls Over Cops Following Bust

The video camera is hidden as a speaker. It's in the crooks house.

It happened in the county just south of me. Here's a link to a news site that is affiliated with the local NBC station as well as a reputable newspaper:

http://www2.tbo.com/content/2009/sep/21/undercover-drug-investigators-em...

The sheriff apologized. It's real.


   Growing older doesn't have to mean giving up what makes you. - http://himynameistyler.com

Re: Video Camera Bowls Over Cops Following Bust

Nothing wrong here, let's not forget there was an actual criminal there. Actual drug lords/drug addicts are paranoid enough that they have security cameras.

Re: Video Camera Bowls Over Cops Following Bust

No, actually, if the Wii wasn't listed in the warrant, then using it might invalidate the raid.

Re: Video Camera Bowls Over Cops Following Bust

true. But seriously... how did this start? I can't imagine being dumb enough to even try that. And the officers probably had their own Wii's (They seem pretty familiar with it)... so why?

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilson@info depends on the sector. for example, have you looked at how powerful unions are in the public sector? I will make the argument they have too much power in that sector.07/07/2015 - 12:39pm
InfophileIt's easy to worry about unions having too much power and causing harm. The odd thing is, why do people seem to worry about that more than the fact that business-owners can have too much power and do harm, particularly at a time when unions have no power?07/07/2015 - 12:31pm
Matthew Wilsonthe thing is unions earned their bad reputation in the US. the way unions oparate the better at your job you are, the likely you want to be in a union.07/07/2015 - 11:33am
InfophilePut that way, "right to work" seems to have BLEEP-all to do with gay rights. Thing is, union-negotiated contracts used to be one of the key ways to prevent employers from firing at will. Without union protection, nothing stops at-will firing.07/07/2015 - 11:06am
Infophilehas an incentive to pay dues if they're represented either way, so the union is starved for funds and dies, unless things are bad enough that people will pay dues anyway.07/07/2015 - 11:02am
InfophileFor those who don't know, "right to work" laws mean that it can't be a condition of an employment contract that you pay union dues. That is, the right to work without having to pay dues. Catch is, unions have to represent non-members as well, so no one...07/07/2015 - 11:01am
MechaCrashUnexpected? Seriously?07/07/2015 - 10:55am
Mattsworknamejob they wanted without the unions getting involved. The problem is, it has some unexpected side effects, like the ones Info mentioned07/07/2015 - 8:49am
MattsworknameThe problem being, right to work states exsist specificly as a counter to Unions, as the last 20 or so years have shown, the unions have been doing this countries economoy NO favors. The right to work states came into being to allow people to work any07/07/2015 - 8:49am
Infophile(cont'd) discriminatory. This can only be done for protected classes which are outlined in law (race, sex, religion, ethnicity everywhere, sexual orientation in some states). So, a gay person could be fired because they're gay and have no recourse there.07/07/2015 - 7:27am
Infophile@Goth: See here: http://www.snopes.com/politics/sexuality/firedforbeinggay.asp for a good discussion on it. Basically, the problem is that in the US, most states allow at will firing, and it's the burden of the fired person to prove the firing was ...07/07/2015 - 7:25am
Goth_SkunkAssuming that's true, then that is a fight worth fighting for.07/07/2015 - 6:58am
Yuuri@ Goth_Skunk, in many states being gay is not a protected status akin to say race or religion. It's also in the "Right to work" states. Those are the states where one can be fired for any reason (provided it isn't a "protected" one.)07/07/2015 - 6:07am
Goth_Skunkregarded as a beacon of liberty and freedom that is the envy of the world, would not have across-the-board Human Rights laws that don't at the very least equal those of my own country.07/07/2015 - 5:47am
Goth_SkunkI find that hard to believe, Infophile. I have difficulty believing employers can *still* fire people for being gay. I would need to see some evidence that this is fact, because as a Canadian, I can't believe that the United States,07/07/2015 - 5:46am
InfophileFor that matter, even women don't yet have full legal equality with men. The US government still places limits on the positions women can serve in the military. And that's just the legal side of things - the "culture wars" are more than just laws.07/07/2015 - 5:43am
InfophileAnd that's just LGB issues. Get ready for an incoming battle on rights for trans* people. And then after that, a battle for poly people.07/07/2015 - 5:41am
InfophileA battle's been won. In many states employers can still fire people for being gay. And in many states, parents can force their children into reparative therapy to try to "fix" being gay. Those battles still need to be fought.07/07/2015 - 5:40am
Goth_Skunkand now they've switched to battles that don't need to be fought.07/07/2015 - 5:37am
Goth_SkunkIn my opinion, it was the final legal hurdle denying homosexual couples final and recognized statuses as eligible spouses. But even though this war's been won, some people are still too keen to keep fighting battles,07/07/2015 - 5:28am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician