British Tax to Spur Broadband Growth

September 23, 2009 -

In order to drive the development and implementation of “superfast broadband” throughout the country, England is set to introduce a tax on every phone line in the country.

According to the Daily Mail, Stephen Timms, Minister for Digital Britain, is attempting to initiate the levy ahead of the next elections. Digital Britain is the British government’s “strategic vision for ensuring that the UK is at the leading edge of the global digital economy.”

The tax calls for a 50p per-month, or £6-per-year (approximately $9.82 a year U.S.), additional charge on all phone lines. It’s estimated that the tariff could raise between £150 million and £175 million  (approximately $245 million to $286 million U.S.) a year.

The British government defines “superfast broadband” as the transfer of over 40 megabits per second.


Comments

Re: British Tax to Spur Broadband Growth

Classic strategy! First you sell off telecomunications to companies (without demanding any guarantees). Since those companies don't invest anything into the infrastructure (hey, they want to make profit nothing else), the tax payer now has to pay TWICE. A classic sketch from Spitting Image: "Prime minister, British Telecom was useless and it STILL is useless!" - "So, privatise it AGAIN!" - "But it didn't work last time!" - "We clearly didn't privatise it enough!" - "So, what you say is, if something is particularly useless you have to privatise it TWICE! That means we have to privatise Lawson's* THREE times!" ZAR. (*Nigel Lawson - key proponent of the Thatcher Government's privatisation policy)

Re: British Tax to Spur Broadband Growth

Nice ideal but isn't Vats already a pain for the UK?

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: British Tax to Spur Broadband Growth

Stealth tax. Paid by the public the tax will go to the government, no doubt about that, but used as funding for new broadband lines? Highly doubtful.

Re: British Tax to Spur Broadband Growth

Agreed, that's my problem with it, the odds are highly unlikely that more than a few pence will go towards our Telecommunications. What was the point of privatizing the phone industry if we are still footing the bill for expansion and upgrade?

 

That's why I'm dropping BT and sticking to Skype. On my Broadband.

Re: British Tax to Spur Broadband Growth

Lets hope they make sure the fraking ISP(s?)  don;t run off with the money like they did in the us.....


Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! Stop supporting big media and furthering the criminalization of consumers!! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

Patreon

Deviantart

Re: British Tax to Spur Broadband Growth

I'm assuming the companies using the phone line pay? it's an interesting idea, but i'm curious how other politicians will view it.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
benohawkI hope the new ghostbusters is good regardless, but I also expect it to have to surpass the orignal for people to acknowledge that.08/03/2015 - 1:37am
benohawkMecha, those changes are also some of the bigger complaints I've heard about the Abrams Star Trek movie.08/03/2015 - 1:35am
MechaTama31https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vU_D96AdK0M <-- Letterman interview with Bill Murray, he seems to have a similar opinion to mine about the pink-slime movie.08/02/2015 - 11:27pm
MechaTama31I don't think it's as big a deal as you think, matts. After all, JJ Abrams' Star Trek removed the original cast (mostly) and changed the formula significantly. If the movie is enjoyable, people will enjoy it.08/02/2015 - 11:23pm
MattsworknameDoc: Hope he recovers soon.08/02/2015 - 7:49pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.pcgamer.com/what-directx-12-means-for-gamers-and-developers/#page-1 by Peter Thoman, and better known by the name Durante. he talks about dx12 in detail08/02/2015 - 7:45pm
DocMelonheadIGF's Chairman resigns due to cancer: http://igf.com/2015/07/letter_from_the_chairman_so_lo.html08/02/2015 - 6:46pm
Matthew Wilsonit wont let me update it, so the title is Tifa's Breasts Too Big for the FF7 Remake?08/02/2015 - 6:14pm
Andrew EisenRemember, when linking videos, please tell us what it is (title usually words) in addition to who it's from.08/02/2015 - 6:05pm
Matthew Wilsonhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxVv7pbqXvY a interesting video video by Gaijin Goombah08/02/2015 - 4:54pm
MattsworknameInfo: Well thats something at least08/02/2015 - 3:04pm
Infophile@Matt: Apparently Dan Aykroyd actually is involved. We don't know how yet, though, but he's apparently going to be in the movie in some way.08/02/2015 - 4:17am
MattsworknameI still hold that not having the origonal cast invovled in any way hurts this movie, and unless the 4 actresses in the lead roles can some how measure up to the comic timing of the origonal cast, i just don't see it being a success08/02/2015 - 12:46am
MattsworknameMecha: regardless of what you think of it, GB 2 was a finanical success and for it time did well with audiances ,even if it wasnt as popular as the first08/02/2015 - 12:45am
MechaTama31I think they're better off trying to do something different, than trying to be exactly the same and having every little difference held up as a shortcoming. Uncanny valley.08/01/2015 - 11:57pm
MechaTama31Having the original cast didn't do much for... that pink-slimed atrocity which we must never speak of.08/01/2015 - 11:56pm
MattsworknameAndrew: If the new ghostbusters bombs, I cant help but feel it'll be cause it removed the origonal cast and changed the formula to much08/01/2015 - 8:31pm
Andrew EisenNot the best look but that appears to be a PKE meter hanging from McCarthy's belt.08/01/2015 - 7:34pm
Matthew Wilsonwhy, let me guess it runes like crap?08/01/2015 - 7:29pm
Andrew EisenInteresting. These throwers are different than the ones we saw in the earlier Ghostbusters prop pics. https://twitter.com/feigfans/status/62754147689817702508/01/2015 - 7:28pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician