September 30, 2009 -
As noted earlier this week, the Supreme Court was scheduled to look into an appeal of Entertainment Merchants Association v. Schwarzenegger yesterday, September 29.
EMA v. Schwarzenegger was not on the list of Miscellaneous Orders issued this morning by SCOTUS, which could mean that the petition was denied. When considering a petition for certiorari, SCOTUS will deny such appeals without comment, but the official outcome won’t be known for sure until Monday morning, when an Order List is issued from the Court.




Comments
Re: EMA v. Schwarzenegger: Half-way Home?
California is bleeding money, and Yee and Schwarzenegger see fit to waste tax dollars on this. I'm so glad I don't live in California.
Red Mage Gaming
http://redmage.gamerlimit.com/
Re: EMA v. Schwarzenegger: Half-way Home?
and to think, I once wanted to move to California.
Re: EMA v. Schwarzenegger: Half-way Home?
Darn! And here I was hoping to see Yee, the various psychiatric associations, the Eagle Forum, and Arnie all get multiple counts of perjury based on all the false and misleading claims they made in their documents under oath.
Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000
Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl
Re: EMA v. Schwarzenegger: Half-way Home?
Now THAT would be funny.
One does not see nearly enough penlty for lieing under oath when one is in politics.
Re: EMA v. Schwarzenegger: Half-way Home?
I think that I would prefer if SCOTUS actually did hear the case. Then this issue could be put to rest.